England v NZ, 1st Investec Test, Lord's, 3rd day

Southee leads late rally after Root sparkles

The Report by Andrew McGlashan at Lord's

May 18, 2013

Comments: 62 | Text size: A | A

England 232 and 180 for 6 (Root 71, Trott 56, Southee 3-34) lead New Zealand 207 (Taylor 66, Williamson 60, Anderson 5-45, Finn 4-63) by 205 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


Joe Root play some confident strokes on his way to fifty, England v New Zealand, 1st Investec Test, Lord's, 3rd day, May 18, 2013
Joe Root's innings guided England into a strong position but their fortunes swung late in the day © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links

This match refuses to reveal a favourite. Just as England appeared to have wrestled control away through a stand of 123 between Joe Root and Jonathan Trott, New Zealand surged back late in the day by taking 4 for 12, led by Tim Southee, to leave the contest tantalisingly balanced with the home side leading by 205 in conditions offering assistance to all bowlers.

Despite how the day ended, England's advantage is not inconsiderable on this surface. New Zealand will almost certainly have to score more than their first innings 207 to secure victory. Lord's pitches have, over recent years, got better for batting (or at least harder for wicket-taking) deeper into the match but this surface does not appear set to follow that trend and the ball continues to swing. Their was less movement, though, when the sun popped out so New Zealand will look skywards. Either side Root and Trott, 12 wickets fell for 100 on the third day.

Root, having played outstandingly for his 71, was the first to fall during a collapse that began in the final hour, when he inside-edged Southee into the stumps playing a shot that was not as tight as the majority he had so correctly produced. Then Southee beat Jonny Bairstow with a full delivery that clipped the pads and Matt Prior's difficult game continued when he completed a pair by pulling softly to square leg. It was the first pair at Lord's by an England player picked, in a significant part, for their batting since Mark Ramprakash against West Indies in 1995.

A compelling passage of play continued when Kane Williamson, finding considerable turn that will give Graeme Swann every chance of being a match-winner, ripped one through the gate to bowl Trott (who had earlier been dropped at slip off the same bowler on 49) and suddenly the ill Ian Bell, who had spent the majority of New Zealand's innings off the field and the morning of the third day at the team hotel, had to emerge at No. 8 behind nightwatchman Steven Finn.

Root's innings was exceptional. England were wobbling on 36 for 2 - a lead of 61 - when he arrived, after Alastair Cook's problems with Trent Boult continued by edging a drive to third slip (his fourth dismissal against him in the four Tests this year) and Nick Compton was beaten by an inswinger from Neil Wagner in the next over. The stand that followed was comfortably the highest of the match.

Until Root dragged on the only moments of unease came with running between the wickets. A better throw from Brendon McCullum at cover would have found him short on 40; in the process of collecting the ball and trying to break the stumps, BJ Watling damaged his knee and needed to leave the field, which forced McCullum to take the gloves (although not the conventional keeping pads, instead using shinguards under his trousers).

Twice on 54 Root came close to being run out again. Martin Guptill, on as sub and New Zealand's best fielder, missed the stumps then Root had to dive for his ground after another poor call. Each time, however, he managed to refocus. Perhaps the occasionally frantic running was a result of England's increased urgency. They certainly appeared more intent on not letting the bowlers settle and Root was central to this with numerous tip-and-runs.

He was strong square of the wicket, both cutting and driving elegantly off the back foot with a hint of his mentor Michael Vaughan, as he brought up his second Test fifty off 78 balls - rapid in the context of this game, if not quite Ross Taylor pace. The swiftness of footwork stood out, too, especially when he latched on to short deliveries from Bruce Martin, who did not have the same stifling effect of the first innings. Trott, meanwhile, played as he so often does and provided a reassuring presence at the other end although Root does not strike you as someone who needs calming in the middle.

The two teams continue to prove closer than the rankings would suggest. New Zealand began the day in the slightly stronger position, but they were quickly knocked back and their last six wickets fell for 52 as James Anderson received the support that had been lacking the previous day, with him and Finn sharing nine wickets.

England made the ideal start by removing McCullum in the first full over. He could have taken the game by scruff of the neck in a session but got a thin outside edge as he drove at Stuart Broad who, after being too short yesterday, immediately gained reward by pitching the ball up. McCullum thought he may have clipped his pad, not the ball, and used the DRS but there was a clear mark on Hot Spot.

With McCullum gone, England knew the risk of New Zealand racing away had diminished. Williamson, who took a painful blow in the box against the much-improved Broad and needed a few minutes to compose himself, moved to an excellent fifty from 158 balls - his back-foot play through off side continuing to stand out - before falling in the same manner to Root on Friday when he glanced down the leg side against Anderson who went on to complete his fourth five-wicket haul at Lord's when he beat Martin with a beauty to take off stump.

Finn, although remaining inconsistent, played his part in dispatching the lower order. He benefited from a disappointing lack of self-control from Southee who had clubbed three boundaries in three balls and could not resist hacking at a short delivery that was simply taken at cover. It was a waste. Finn also claimed the last two to end with somewhat flattering figures, although his strike-rate of 47.1 should not be overlooked. However, like England, there is still improvement needed.

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Mitty2 on (May 19, 2013, 12:33 GMT)

Really really disappointed New Zealand. Outplayed England for so long (including the March series) and just give away a mental advantage/dominance so easily. There had been so many positives and this really was a very easy chance to show how little rankings mean/show that you can be a force/show how overrated england are.

On the positive side for me (an Australian), however, is that broad and finn have taken wickets. And whatever happens here, any fears of English dominance with the ball in the ashes series will completely be swept away/alleviated considering the very fact that they will be the back up bowlers for anderson (or just the complete ineptitude that they possess). You see, when Anderson bowls 80-85mp/h, at least he swings the bowl (both ways), is accurate and doesn't have a terrible pitch map. Broad however, has an ishant sharma like average and finn a Mitchell Johnson like economy rate. How easy would the ashes be for england if they just replaced them with Onions and TRJ

Posted by   on (May 19, 2013, 12:26 GMT)

Extremely disappointing for a match where both sides slugged it out on an even keel for the first three innings to finish like this. It's down to quality bowling more than anything else, with Broad just seaming enough with the ball to be devastatingly effective.

Posted by cric_J on (May 19, 2013, 12:18 GMT)

Unbelievable stuff from Broady ! One just won't believe he was the same bowler who was struggling 3 days back. I mean the lad actually took 5 wickets in under 1 hour. Splendid really. He was good with the bat as well. Looks like he's all out to make this his day.

Although I won't be much surprised if he doesn't get even 1 more wicket and ends up giving another 30 runs post lunch. Because that's Stuart Broad for you.The spelling of inconsistency.

It is almost like seeing two different Broads at times.When he is good , he is unplayable (think today) and when he is poor , he is horrendous (think day 2 of this match).Good for England that it was the former Broad today.

Posted by   on (May 19, 2013, 12:07 GMT)

And this is why NZ are ranked where there are. Horrific stuff really.

Posted by kiwicricketnut on (May 19, 2013, 11:59 GMT)

Nz main problem coming to the fore again, our openers all at sea against the moving ball, i was all for fulton and rutherford getting a decent run at the top but fulton having this uncontrolable urge to follow the ball, waving the bat out at a 7th stump line is unacceptable, ya have to leave that as an international opener. Rutherfords feet don't move early on either so it is a dangerous combo and now our middle order is exposed and tumbling like flies. This game is gone as we have yet another one of our melt downs as only we can, what could of been huh. I will say this though lets get rid of the kookaburra ball and just play all test cricket with the duke, it moves more for longer evening up the competition between bat and ball which makes for more exciting cricket

Posted by spot_on on (May 19, 2013, 11:56 GMT)

Blackcaps massacred !!! End of the story !!!

Posted by brusselslion on (May 19, 2013, 8:54 GMT)

Let's hope the weather doesn't spoil the finale.

@PrasPunter (May 18, 2013, 19:14 GMT): My comment (May 18, 2013, 18:13) "This 2 innings <per team>, 5 day format is just so dull!! It will never catch on!!" was my attempt at sarcasm. Unfortunately, in my haste, I missed out the <per team> phrase.

Cricinfo: Please publish. The few friends that I had have now all deserted me following publication of my previous comment!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
England v New Zealand at The Oval - Jun 27, 2013
No result
England v New Zealand at The Oval - Jun 25, 2013
New Zealand won by 5 runs
Kent v N Zealanders at Canterbury - Jun 22, 2013
N Zealanders won by 42 runs
England v New Zealand at Cardiff - Jun 16, 2013
England won by 10 runs
Australia v New Zealand at Birmingham - Jun 12, 2013
No result
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!