Eng v NZ, 2nd Investec Test, Headingley, 5th day May 28, 2013

Boult doubtful for Champions Trophy

15

New Zealand's need to regroup after their Test defeat against England before the Champions Trophy has been made doubly difficult by the possibility that they will lose Trent Boult for the tournament because of injury.

Boult has carried the fight for New Zealand with 19 wickets at 25.47 in five Tests, home and away, against England, but his side strain is not responding to treatment and he will have a scan in London on Wednesday to assess the damage.

"He's not looking great," New Zealand's captain, Brendon McCullum, lamented. "He is still not moving that freely which is a shame because he's been a revelation for us this season."

Until a fateful Sunday at Lord's, New Zealand had pressed England all the way, but their capitulation for 68 in only 22.3 overs against Stuart Broad and James Anderson was an experience from which they never recovered.

"Right up until that point our self-belief was very high and that ripped our hearts out and just started to create some self-doubt among us, which is a horrible thing in this game," McCullum said. "That's what unfolded in this Test. We still had periods where we dominated but they didn't last long enough and the periods of England dominating seemed to last a lot longer.

"We saw in this Test match England flexing their muscles and us not being able to respond. It's incredibly disappointing. If you look back on the last five Test matches we've played some good cricket and taken some strides forward but it's fair to say this one was a step backwards."

McCullum has seen enough to favour England in the Ashes later this summer. "England are red-hot favourites at home, their ability to swing the Dukes ball is huge," he said. "Any team that plays at home is familiar with the surroundings."

There will be no overreaction to New Zealand's batting failures if McCullum gets his way. He insisted that he retained faith in the potential of the group that, until the past ten days, had begun to promise a brighter Test future.

"If you fast forward 18 months, we've got the makings of a very good cricket team," he said. "I'm a big fan of protecting the people who have performed for a period of time and that's what we've seen from this group of players. We've got the right mix and the right balance in this group and we need to keep improving as a team and smooth out some of our rough edges."

He dismissed suggestions that New Zealand, six down overnight, were caught on the hop when they did not bother with morning nets before the Test resumed under sullen Leeds skies. The forecast had left Leeds on the edge of a bank of heavy rain but it only suffered light drizzle and a delayed start and a couple of interruptions were not enough to halt England's charge to victory.

McCullum, one of the not-out batsmen overnight, fell early to a superb return catch by Stuart Broad, who dismissed him in all four innings in the series. After that, Tim Southee and Doug Bracewell chose to counterattack - Southee seems to know no other way - and then Neil Wagner and Boult sought to block. As rain was a constant threat, it seemed an idiosyncratic approach towards trying to save a Test.

New Zealand's emphasis now turns to the Champions Trophy. They have eight squad changes but the first player McCullum needs to consider when it comes to reintegration is himself. Having stepped in as wicketkeeper because of an injury to BJ Watling, he now has to decide whether to continue in the role or hand over the gloves to Luke Ronchi.

"I've always said I'd never have any regrets through my career and that doesn't change," he said. "Obviously I wasn't as fluent as I would like to be, like when I was 21, and I wasn't able to contribute with the bat as much as I wanted, but it was a decision we made and I'll stand by it. It didn't affect my batting, I'd love to say it was an excuse for why I didn't get runs but I can't claim that.

"The keeping role is something we need to talk about in the next 24 hours before we start to nail down the one-day team. It's definitely up for discussion. Luke is definitely going to play as an opener. We need to work out what's comfortable for both of us and the team."

David Hopps is the UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • StevieS on May 29, 2013, 16:57 GMT

    Cricket_is_Unpopular 42/4 , 33/3, 46/2 vs Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka isn't to shabby.

  • kiwicricketnut on May 29, 2013, 10:47 GMT

    I think McCullum might be a little crazy, in 18 months we have the making of a good cricket team, in 18 months we have the making of a good bowling line up with young quicks like milne and small to come into the mix along with an exciting spin prospect in sohdi but not a whole cricket team, not without a change in personal, you cant have a good cricket team with only one guy averaging over 40, you need 5 guys averaging that. So whos going to do that, maybe the cachopa brothers, carl and craig that is, ronchi might be able to, they don't seem to have faith in latham even though he's looked good, maybe daryl micthell at a strech, looks a good batting prospect, one things for sure they have to keep looking because averages in the 30's wont win us games. Ryder is a must.

  • on May 29, 2013, 10:39 GMT

    @Cricket_Is_Unpopular, I would suggest you look up his bowling in Sri Lanka, where he caused all sorts of trouble and he and Southee blew their batting lineup away. Or look at his bowling in India, where it was stated that he bowled very well but wasn't rewarded with figures that accurately reflect how well he bowled. In the West Indies he caused Chris Gyle all sorts of trouble. He is very good with the red ball, and his average will improve still, when he goes to Bangladesh. My question is, where is Adam Milne? If we want someone with pace, he is the fastest, even moreso than McClenaghan.

  • Captainman on May 29, 2013, 10:16 GMT

    I don't understand the fuss. The guy said he is average not terrible or something and I sort of agree. I doubt he will be at all effective is Asian wickets.

  • on May 29, 2013, 9:19 GMT

    The team needs more than self-belief to win. Consistency and character. That comes with hard practice.

  • StevieS on May 29, 2013, 9:03 GMT

    Joe Thompson there is not one English pace bowler I would pick above him. I can't be bothered looking it up but I am guessing he has a better average than Anderson, Flinn and Broad. And he has the disadvantage in that he doesn't get to improve his average by bowling against New Zealand batsmen.

  • StevieS on May 29, 2013, 8:58 GMT

    Would he have played any games anyway? He is a very good test bowler but I don't think limited overs are his thing.

  • on May 29, 2013, 5:43 GMT

    Joe Thompson your probably Aussie mate. Trent Boullt is the man.

  • venkatesh018 on May 29, 2013, 5:21 GMT

    Neil Wagner will be a very able replacement in the squad. McCleneghan, Southee, Bracewell, Kyle Mills and Wagner along with Dan Vettori will be a very formidable attack.

  • Narbavi on May 29, 2013, 3:14 GMT

    Oh how lucky are the srilankans?? In these conditions boult would have blown their batting line up away but poor guy is injured!! Recover soon!!

  • StevieS on May 29, 2013, 16:57 GMT

    Cricket_is_Unpopular 42/4 , 33/3, 46/2 vs Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka isn't to shabby.

  • kiwicricketnut on May 29, 2013, 10:47 GMT

    I think McCullum might be a little crazy, in 18 months we have the making of a good cricket team, in 18 months we have the making of a good bowling line up with young quicks like milne and small to come into the mix along with an exciting spin prospect in sohdi but not a whole cricket team, not without a change in personal, you cant have a good cricket team with only one guy averaging over 40, you need 5 guys averaging that. So whos going to do that, maybe the cachopa brothers, carl and craig that is, ronchi might be able to, they don't seem to have faith in latham even though he's looked good, maybe daryl micthell at a strech, looks a good batting prospect, one things for sure they have to keep looking because averages in the 30's wont win us games. Ryder is a must.

  • on May 29, 2013, 10:39 GMT

    @Cricket_Is_Unpopular, I would suggest you look up his bowling in Sri Lanka, where he caused all sorts of trouble and he and Southee blew their batting lineup away. Or look at his bowling in India, where it was stated that he bowled very well but wasn't rewarded with figures that accurately reflect how well he bowled. In the West Indies he caused Chris Gyle all sorts of trouble. He is very good with the red ball, and his average will improve still, when he goes to Bangladesh. My question is, where is Adam Milne? If we want someone with pace, he is the fastest, even moreso than McClenaghan.

  • Captainman on May 29, 2013, 10:16 GMT

    I don't understand the fuss. The guy said he is average not terrible or something and I sort of agree. I doubt he will be at all effective is Asian wickets.

  • on May 29, 2013, 9:19 GMT

    The team needs more than self-belief to win. Consistency and character. That comes with hard practice.

  • StevieS on May 29, 2013, 9:03 GMT

    Joe Thompson there is not one English pace bowler I would pick above him. I can't be bothered looking it up but I am guessing he has a better average than Anderson, Flinn and Broad. And he has the disadvantage in that he doesn't get to improve his average by bowling against New Zealand batsmen.

  • StevieS on May 29, 2013, 8:58 GMT

    Would he have played any games anyway? He is a very good test bowler but I don't think limited overs are his thing.

  • on May 29, 2013, 5:43 GMT

    Joe Thompson your probably Aussie mate. Trent Boullt is the man.

  • venkatesh018 on May 29, 2013, 5:21 GMT

    Neil Wagner will be a very able replacement in the squad. McCleneghan, Southee, Bracewell, Kyle Mills and Wagner along with Dan Vettori will be a very formidable attack.

  • Narbavi on May 29, 2013, 3:14 GMT

    Oh how lucky are the srilankans?? In these conditions boult would have blown their batting line up away but poor guy is injured!! Recover soon!!

  • jmcilhinney on May 29, 2013, 2:04 GMT

    That's very disappointing for both the bowler and the team as Boult performed well both in NZ and England. I don't think that his being healthy for England's second innings would have changed the result of the second Test but NZ would have been further adrift without Boult for the rest of the series. This will hurt NZ's CT campaign.

  • on May 29, 2013, 2:00 GMT

    whoever keeps i dont see both of them having success especially as ronchi has never been a specialist batsman and is coming into international cricket 4 years after his last stint, can matt henry please go for boult, best record domestically of any young bowler in 50 over matches and could push for mills place if he performs in the few goes he would be given

  • Optic on May 28, 2013, 22:54 GMT

    @Joe Thompson Rubbish, he's 23 years old, swings the ball late at mid 80's accurately & averages 29 in test cricket, you must be talking about a different player.

  • bender6 on May 28, 2013, 21:40 GMT

    to last poster- Really??? He's faster than Vernon Philander, who is an ok bowler really. There is more to bowling than pace, we would all like more pace, but Boult bowls around the same pace as Sir Richard Hadlee and he wasn't bad either. NZ does need a proper fast bowler, as we are too samey at the moment, but Mitchell McClenaghan looks a good prospect for outright pace. With Southee and Boult swinging, we then need a Spinner, oh and some batsmen to back up Ross Taylor and Kane Williamson. oh dear not again.....

  • on May 28, 2013, 18:32 GMT

    He's an average bowler, no pace.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on May 28, 2013, 18:32 GMT

    He's an average bowler, no pace.

  • bender6 on May 28, 2013, 21:40 GMT

    to last poster- Really??? He's faster than Vernon Philander, who is an ok bowler really. There is more to bowling than pace, we would all like more pace, but Boult bowls around the same pace as Sir Richard Hadlee and he wasn't bad either. NZ does need a proper fast bowler, as we are too samey at the moment, but Mitchell McClenaghan looks a good prospect for outright pace. With Southee and Boult swinging, we then need a Spinner, oh and some batsmen to back up Ross Taylor and Kane Williamson. oh dear not again.....

  • Optic on May 28, 2013, 22:54 GMT

    @Joe Thompson Rubbish, he's 23 years old, swings the ball late at mid 80's accurately & averages 29 in test cricket, you must be talking about a different player.

  • on May 29, 2013, 2:00 GMT

    whoever keeps i dont see both of them having success especially as ronchi has never been a specialist batsman and is coming into international cricket 4 years after his last stint, can matt henry please go for boult, best record domestically of any young bowler in 50 over matches and could push for mills place if he performs in the few goes he would be given

  • jmcilhinney on May 29, 2013, 2:04 GMT

    That's very disappointing for both the bowler and the team as Boult performed well both in NZ and England. I don't think that his being healthy for England's second innings would have changed the result of the second Test but NZ would have been further adrift without Boult for the rest of the series. This will hurt NZ's CT campaign.

  • Narbavi on May 29, 2013, 3:14 GMT

    Oh how lucky are the srilankans?? In these conditions boult would have blown their batting line up away but poor guy is injured!! Recover soon!!

  • venkatesh018 on May 29, 2013, 5:21 GMT

    Neil Wagner will be a very able replacement in the squad. McCleneghan, Southee, Bracewell, Kyle Mills and Wagner along with Dan Vettori will be a very formidable attack.

  • on May 29, 2013, 5:43 GMT

    Joe Thompson your probably Aussie mate. Trent Boullt is the man.

  • StevieS on May 29, 2013, 8:58 GMT

    Would he have played any games anyway? He is a very good test bowler but I don't think limited overs are his thing.

  • StevieS on May 29, 2013, 9:03 GMT

    Joe Thompson there is not one English pace bowler I would pick above him. I can't be bothered looking it up but I am guessing he has a better average than Anderson, Flinn and Broad. And he has the disadvantage in that he doesn't get to improve his average by bowling against New Zealand batsmen.