England v NZ, 3rd NatWest ODI, Trent Bridge June 4, 2013

Concerning signs for England

With their form and home advantage disappearing, Alastair Cook's side are being viewed differently ahead of the Champions Trophy
16

It is remarkable how quickly things can change. A week ago, in the eyes of many, England were favourites for the Champions Trophy. A week ago, the theory was that in home conditions and armed with two new balls, England would prevail in low-scoring matches. A week ago, England had a balanced attack, a settled team and a tried and trusted method that had brought them unprecedented success.

Suddenly, that all seems like a long time ago. Suddenly, England's top order are seen to lack urgency, the bowling to lack bite or control, and the middle-order to lack experience and form. England, in the eyes of many, have gone from favourites to no-hopers in the blink of an eye.

It is true that there have been some worrying signs in the opening two ODIs against New Zealand. On excellent batting tracks and with the ball barely swinging, England's methods have appeared obsolete. The support bowlers have been inadequate replacements for the injured Steven Finn and Stuart Broad and the batsmen, without the injured Kevin Pietersen, have lacked the firepower to mend the damage inflicted by their own bowlers conceding too many runs. In short, England's best-laid plans have been torn to shreds.

But it is worth thinking back a little further. It is worth remembering that this England side is, give or take a position here and there, the same one that rose to the top of the ODI rankings less than a year ago. This is the first time England have lost a home ODI series since 2009 and the same side that won a record 10 ODIs in succession a year ago. It is worth remembering how well New Zealand have played and it is worth remembering what happens when England abandon continuity of selection to chase results. They have been down that path. It does not have a happy ending.

That is not to say all is perfect. If England have learned anything from this series, it is how important some of their key players are to their success. The reputations of Pietersen, Finn and Broad have all been boosted by their absence. Jade Dernbach and Chris Woakes are both admirable cricketers but, in these conditions and at this stage of their careers, they have struggled to manage the role they have been given.

Recent results also suggest England have no Plan B. Not since 2006 have England suffered a whitewash in a home ODI series. On that occasion, when Sri Lanka thrashed them 5-0, just as now, England came unstuck on the flattest of pitches when scores in excess of 300 became par. England remain an excellent side in conditions when 260 is par, but there is little record of them excelling when that figure rises to 300. Indeed, while Ian Bell, speaking at Trent Bridge on Monday, reckoned England would have "knocked off 320 quite comfortably" it is worth remembering that no England side has ever done so. England's highest successful chase in an ODI is the 306 for 5 they made against Pakistan in Karachi in October 2000.

You could argue that if England require levellers such as helpful bowling conditions to allow them to compete they might simply not be a very good side. Certainly this squad would be ranked outsiders if this event was to be played in Asia or Australia.

But the disappointment for England is that it appears there may be no home advantage to them in hosting the Champions Trophy. The white Kookaburra ball seems to offer their bowlers little swing and the pitches seem to have few of the characteristics that might usually define English conditions. Even the appearance of the sun - a rare visitor to the English cricket season of late - has appeared to mock them and reduce the potency of their seasons and exacerbate the limitations of their batsmen.

Might there be other options who could have offered an alternative, more aggressive method? Of course. But for all the potential of Ben Stokes, who did himself no favours after being sent home from the Lions tour of the, Alex Hales, who didn't take his chance as a senior player on the same tour, James Taylor or James Vince, much of England's success in recent times has been built upon the solid starts provided by the current top three. It would have been extraordinary to change a winning formula after the success of 2012. Besides, it is too late to change the Champions Trophy squad now; alterations are only allowed in the event of injury. But if England are unsuccessful in the Champions Trophy, all four younger men will come into consideration ahead of the 2015 World Cup.

It may be unfair to judge England's batsmen too harshly, anyway. While many of them were chastised for making starts but then losing their wickets, the problem at the Ageas Bowl, at least, was that their target was simply too large. They have been forced to take too many risks, too early in their innings and lost their wickets as a result.

There was some encouraging news for England on Tuesday. Finn and Broad both took a full part in training and bowled with good pace, though whether they play on Wednesday remains to be seen.

With the series gone, England may well experiment a little at Trent Bridge. There is a strong case for resting James Anderson and, despite this being his home ground, Graeme Swann too. James Tredwell could come into the side and, if England decide to keep Finn and Broad on ice - in Finn's case almost literally as he nurses his sore shins - Boyd Rankin could play, too. Bell described facing him as "absolutely horrible" and, while he has rarely enjoyed the sustained fitness levels to maintain the consistency required to be a top international bowler, there is little doubt that, on his day, Rankin, with his height, pace and movement, can be a nasty proposition for any batsman. What sense it makes to now play a man not included in the Champions Trophy squad may well be asked.

Ravi Bopara will come into contention, too. While his form with the bat has receded, his worth as a bowler has increased and he could, perhaps in partnership with Jonathan Trott and Joe Root, fill a role as the fifth bowler. He also has a reputation as a skilled polisher of a cricket ball. In a game of fine margins, such factors can be crucial.

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • DCLaurie on June 5, 2013, 14:53 GMT

    I love that photo, looks like someone's put a drawing pin on Steven Finn's invisible armchair.

  • putrevus on June 5, 2013, 14:27 GMT

    "A week ago, England had a balanced attack, a settled team and a tried and trusted method that had brought them unprecedented success."

    The author must be joking, England always has been a useless ODI side and it still is a useless odi side.

    England winning some series is always due to other team not performing up to par.Of all the eight sides competing in CT England is the most boring side who cannot win their matches unless their bowlers bowl well.

    If ball does not swing their bowlers are mediocre at best Swann can be milked for singles all day.

    Unlike other teams who have stroke makers who can take the attack to bowlers England batsmen rely on grafting scores and we have seen how well they are doing during this series.

    If KP who is out and Morgan who is not in form they dont have any other player who can take attack to bowlers.

    United eleven is doing well in tests and it will come back to earth there also soon once this golden form of their captain goes away.

  • on June 5, 2013, 12:43 GMT

    Honestly, some of the reaction toward England, you'd have thought they'd been smacked for over 300 after having India four down for naff all and then bowled out for under 70...

    Coherent selection is something we've grown used to with England after all the horrors of the 80's and 90's. Woakes and Dernbach aren't ODI material. Rankin as a selection seemed more with an eye to the Ashes to my mind, given how Tremlett performed last time. The talk is of young batsmen. If there's a better one-day opener than Michael Carberry this season, I haven't seen him. His age is irrelevant: if you're good enough, you should play.

  • 200ondebut on June 5, 2013, 12:39 GMT

    Only in the Media George - only in the media. The intelligent fans knows all too well that class is permanent and form is temporary - the fans also doesn't have to sensationalize everything for a paycheck.

  • on June 5, 2013, 11:48 GMT

    PICK MICHAEL CARBERRY PLEASE! And someone like Stokes etc. Why not Clarke? so much talent, bopara as fifth bowler is absurd, tredwell+swann is great. Pick bowlers!

  • Captainman on June 5, 2013, 10:48 GMT

    The England team is not even England if you think about it :)

  • John-Price on June 5, 2013, 10:13 GMT

    It all makes a bit of a mockery of the idea of preparing four years in advance for a world cup.

  • ReluctantBlackCapsFan on June 5, 2013, 10:06 GMT

    Not sure I quite agree with the media recently that Broad & Finn are the difference between an average Eng side and a great one. Whilst stats do not provide a complete picture, the figures in the ODI's in NZ weren't flattering, especially Broad, and both seemed unworthy of the apparent praise they are receiving in the last week or so. The question for ENG is what setup can possibly be worse than playing a unreliable seamer going for 8'n'half an over, even dibbly dobbly Colly only maxed out at 67 RPI

  • jackthelad on June 5, 2013, 8:05 GMT

    Well, for England there is nothing in this ODI except to look at some options ahead of the rapidly approaching Championship. Both Woakes and Dernbach have been given enough opportunities, and have surely run out of chances; Finn shouldn't be risked at this stage, but Broad needs a turn to try and get some rhythm going again. Bopara has been given more bites at the cherry than Woakes and Dernbach combined, but for all his talent has never achieved consistency. I'd like to see Rankin given a try, though I doubt it's going to happen. The batting, actually, is ok, it's the haemorrhaging of runs from the bowlers that's caused most of the problems. Tremlett? He's tight, at least. Roll on Broad, Finn and Pietersen coming back to full fitness; this side is going to struggle mightily.

  • RocketTortoise on June 5, 2013, 7:14 GMT

    Ha, good one. "Finn has been experiencing discomfort" Photo looks like he is being impaled. Heyo!

  • DCLaurie on June 5, 2013, 14:53 GMT

    I love that photo, looks like someone's put a drawing pin on Steven Finn's invisible armchair.

  • putrevus on June 5, 2013, 14:27 GMT

    "A week ago, England had a balanced attack, a settled team and a tried and trusted method that had brought them unprecedented success."

    The author must be joking, England always has been a useless ODI side and it still is a useless odi side.

    England winning some series is always due to other team not performing up to par.Of all the eight sides competing in CT England is the most boring side who cannot win their matches unless their bowlers bowl well.

    If ball does not swing their bowlers are mediocre at best Swann can be milked for singles all day.

    Unlike other teams who have stroke makers who can take the attack to bowlers England batsmen rely on grafting scores and we have seen how well they are doing during this series.

    If KP who is out and Morgan who is not in form they dont have any other player who can take attack to bowlers.

    United eleven is doing well in tests and it will come back to earth there also soon once this golden form of their captain goes away.

  • on June 5, 2013, 12:43 GMT

    Honestly, some of the reaction toward England, you'd have thought they'd been smacked for over 300 after having India four down for naff all and then bowled out for under 70...

    Coherent selection is something we've grown used to with England after all the horrors of the 80's and 90's. Woakes and Dernbach aren't ODI material. Rankin as a selection seemed more with an eye to the Ashes to my mind, given how Tremlett performed last time. The talk is of young batsmen. If there's a better one-day opener than Michael Carberry this season, I haven't seen him. His age is irrelevant: if you're good enough, you should play.

  • 200ondebut on June 5, 2013, 12:39 GMT

    Only in the Media George - only in the media. The intelligent fans knows all too well that class is permanent and form is temporary - the fans also doesn't have to sensationalize everything for a paycheck.

  • on June 5, 2013, 11:48 GMT

    PICK MICHAEL CARBERRY PLEASE! And someone like Stokes etc. Why not Clarke? so much talent, bopara as fifth bowler is absurd, tredwell+swann is great. Pick bowlers!

  • Captainman on June 5, 2013, 10:48 GMT

    The England team is not even England if you think about it :)

  • John-Price on June 5, 2013, 10:13 GMT

    It all makes a bit of a mockery of the idea of preparing four years in advance for a world cup.

  • ReluctantBlackCapsFan on June 5, 2013, 10:06 GMT

    Not sure I quite agree with the media recently that Broad & Finn are the difference between an average Eng side and a great one. Whilst stats do not provide a complete picture, the figures in the ODI's in NZ weren't flattering, especially Broad, and both seemed unworthy of the apparent praise they are receiving in the last week or so. The question for ENG is what setup can possibly be worse than playing a unreliable seamer going for 8'n'half an over, even dibbly dobbly Colly only maxed out at 67 RPI

  • jackthelad on June 5, 2013, 8:05 GMT

    Well, for England there is nothing in this ODI except to look at some options ahead of the rapidly approaching Championship. Both Woakes and Dernbach have been given enough opportunities, and have surely run out of chances; Finn shouldn't be risked at this stage, but Broad needs a turn to try and get some rhythm going again. Bopara has been given more bites at the cherry than Woakes and Dernbach combined, but for all his talent has never achieved consistency. I'd like to see Rankin given a try, though I doubt it's going to happen. The batting, actually, is ok, it's the haemorrhaging of runs from the bowlers that's caused most of the problems. Tremlett? He's tight, at least. Roll on Broad, Finn and Pietersen coming back to full fitness; this side is going to struggle mightily.

  • RocketTortoise on June 5, 2013, 7:14 GMT

    Ha, good one. "Finn has been experiencing discomfort" Photo looks like he is being impaled. Heyo!

  • satishchandar on June 5, 2013, 7:11 GMT

    Bell is pretty good in the opening position but if you look at the top order of England, Cook and Bell at max can score at 100-110 range on their good day.. Trott knows to pace his innings but never shows the urgency until the last minute.. This puts huge pressure on Morgan as he is the ONLY proven enforcer in the team.. Buttler and Bairstow haven't done it consistently at this level.. Why not bring in Hales as opener to add some extra spice to the top order and bring back Bell to 4? Morgan at 5 followed by proven test best Prior at 6..

  • jmcilhinney on June 5, 2013, 3:19 GMT

    The picture looks like Finn has fallen back and impaled himself on something. Now that would be an injury problem for England. ;)

  • 2.14istherunrate on June 5, 2013, 0:06 GMT

    England can choose a basic ODI X! which serves them well and are well drilled but beyond that seem clueless. D'bach and Woakes have proved inadequate; Bopara even being there raises doubts about reserves and Rankin coming in? The selectors have to do better than this.

  • iceaxe on June 4, 2013, 20:09 GMT

    Bopara would have to be a leading contender for England. Surprised he wasn't included in the earlier ODI's...

  • Juiceoftheapple on June 4, 2013, 19:59 GMT

    The notional variation bowler is more suited to T20, especially where 50 overs of the white ball is concerned, especially given most international pitches are batting friendly. Secondly, bowlers who bat a bit, is a nice idea, but batsman who can score quick potentially destructive runs, and bowl a few (and see how they get on) are a better bet in my book in a 50 over format ala Patel / Bopara / Trego / Napier. But mostly I think we need at least 4 proper strike bowlers who are picked on the basis of a) difficult to score off and b) wicket takers. Dernbach does not fit this. Plus c) its a farce we dont pick a second spinner when they are proven, experienced and we are facing lesser teams against spin Tredwell is a complete no brainer. Plus Anderson, Swann, Finn. And Broad if its a spicy pitch/overhead. Ultimately we have a conservative top batting order, and we need to have a conservative bowling strategy to restrict run rates, rather than leak runs like a sieve.

  • king78787 on June 4, 2013, 19:04 GMT

    What is of concern for England: A lack of form for Compton. He need to find form or have his record in New Zealand completely erased. Flower will find any excuse to keep Compton in the team even at the expense of a class player like Bairstow. I don't think moving Root is the answer, he is doing well at 5/6. Bell is a no5 NOT a opener. He is best suited to responding to the top order:be it quick runs or a doughty defensive bore. BAIRSTOW is the right opener for England, he can attack and the opening bowlers rarely bowl short as it wastes the new ball. Once he has is eye in he can easily tackle the short ball. He made 95 against Steyn, Philander and Morkel. Bell can bat where he knows best:at 5 and Root can make runs where he is comfortable(no6). Also Compton ruins the team balance in terms of scoring rate. Currently England are: Plod,Plod/Normal,Plod,Normal,Normal and Quick. With Pietersen and Bairstow:Quick,Plod,Plod,Quick,Normal,Normal. Easy as you like.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • king78787 on June 4, 2013, 19:04 GMT

    What is of concern for England: A lack of form for Compton. He need to find form or have his record in New Zealand completely erased. Flower will find any excuse to keep Compton in the team even at the expense of a class player like Bairstow. I don't think moving Root is the answer, he is doing well at 5/6. Bell is a no5 NOT a opener. He is best suited to responding to the top order:be it quick runs or a doughty defensive bore. BAIRSTOW is the right opener for England, he can attack and the opening bowlers rarely bowl short as it wastes the new ball. Once he has is eye in he can easily tackle the short ball. He made 95 against Steyn, Philander and Morkel. Bell can bat where he knows best:at 5 and Root can make runs where he is comfortable(no6). Also Compton ruins the team balance in terms of scoring rate. Currently England are: Plod,Plod/Normal,Plod,Normal,Normal and Quick. With Pietersen and Bairstow:Quick,Plod,Plod,Quick,Normal,Normal. Easy as you like.

  • Juiceoftheapple on June 4, 2013, 19:59 GMT

    The notional variation bowler is more suited to T20, especially where 50 overs of the white ball is concerned, especially given most international pitches are batting friendly. Secondly, bowlers who bat a bit, is a nice idea, but batsman who can score quick potentially destructive runs, and bowl a few (and see how they get on) are a better bet in my book in a 50 over format ala Patel / Bopara / Trego / Napier. But mostly I think we need at least 4 proper strike bowlers who are picked on the basis of a) difficult to score off and b) wicket takers. Dernbach does not fit this. Plus c) its a farce we dont pick a second spinner when they are proven, experienced and we are facing lesser teams against spin Tredwell is a complete no brainer. Plus Anderson, Swann, Finn. And Broad if its a spicy pitch/overhead. Ultimately we have a conservative top batting order, and we need to have a conservative bowling strategy to restrict run rates, rather than leak runs like a sieve.

  • iceaxe on June 4, 2013, 20:09 GMT

    Bopara would have to be a leading contender for England. Surprised he wasn't included in the earlier ODI's...

  • 2.14istherunrate on June 5, 2013, 0:06 GMT

    England can choose a basic ODI X! which serves them well and are well drilled but beyond that seem clueless. D'bach and Woakes have proved inadequate; Bopara even being there raises doubts about reserves and Rankin coming in? The selectors have to do better than this.

  • jmcilhinney on June 5, 2013, 3:19 GMT

    The picture looks like Finn has fallen back and impaled himself on something. Now that would be an injury problem for England. ;)

  • satishchandar on June 5, 2013, 7:11 GMT

    Bell is pretty good in the opening position but if you look at the top order of England, Cook and Bell at max can score at 100-110 range on their good day.. Trott knows to pace his innings but never shows the urgency until the last minute.. This puts huge pressure on Morgan as he is the ONLY proven enforcer in the team.. Buttler and Bairstow haven't done it consistently at this level.. Why not bring in Hales as opener to add some extra spice to the top order and bring back Bell to 4? Morgan at 5 followed by proven test best Prior at 6..

  • RocketTortoise on June 5, 2013, 7:14 GMT

    Ha, good one. "Finn has been experiencing discomfort" Photo looks like he is being impaled. Heyo!

  • jackthelad on June 5, 2013, 8:05 GMT

    Well, for England there is nothing in this ODI except to look at some options ahead of the rapidly approaching Championship. Both Woakes and Dernbach have been given enough opportunities, and have surely run out of chances; Finn shouldn't be risked at this stage, but Broad needs a turn to try and get some rhythm going again. Bopara has been given more bites at the cherry than Woakes and Dernbach combined, but for all his talent has never achieved consistency. I'd like to see Rankin given a try, though I doubt it's going to happen. The batting, actually, is ok, it's the haemorrhaging of runs from the bowlers that's caused most of the problems. Tremlett? He's tight, at least. Roll on Broad, Finn and Pietersen coming back to full fitness; this side is going to struggle mightily.

  • ReluctantBlackCapsFan on June 5, 2013, 10:06 GMT

    Not sure I quite agree with the media recently that Broad & Finn are the difference between an average Eng side and a great one. Whilst stats do not provide a complete picture, the figures in the ODI's in NZ weren't flattering, especially Broad, and both seemed unworthy of the apparent praise they are receiving in the last week or so. The question for ENG is what setup can possibly be worse than playing a unreliable seamer going for 8'n'half an over, even dibbly dobbly Colly only maxed out at 67 RPI

  • John-Price on June 5, 2013, 10:13 GMT

    It all makes a bit of a mockery of the idea of preparing four years in advance for a world cup.