England v Pakistan, 1st npower Test, Trent Bridge, 2nd day

Pakistan bat with eyes wide shut

What does a Pakistan batsman think when he takes guard? Does he think at all?

Nagraj Gollapudi at Trent Bridge

July 30, 2010

Comments: 61 | Text size: A | A

James Anderson bowled Imran Farhat with a full swinging delivery, England v Pakistan, 1st Test, Trent Bridge, 2nd day, July 30, 2010
Pakistan's batsmen were clueless in the face of England's swinging onslaught © PA Photos
Enlarge
Related Links

What does a Pakistan batsman think when he takes guard? Does he fancy himself to score a fighting hundred in testing conditions? Does he think of battening down the hatches, and standing strong in the face of swing, seam, bouncers, spin and even boos from the partisan English crowd? Does he think at all?

Based on evidence from this English summer, the average Pakistani batsman retains the anxiety of a first-timer at the top of the Cresta Run, faced with the prospect of hurtling down an ice-tunnel face down and experiencing G-forces measuring up to five. The key is to keep the eyes open and not panic. As at Lord's, then Headingley, and now Trent Bridge, Pakistan's batsmen have played as if they were blindfolded.

It was clear in the morning that all the batsmen would to fight against the twin threats of the bowlers and the overcast conditions, with the latter helping the former gain incisive movement. Mohammad Asif clubbed the two together perfectly to hasten England's downfall in the morning, as six wickets fell for 23 runs in 75 minutes.

Only eight overs remained before lunch. Salman Butt should have known what to expect, which ball to leave alone, when to go on the offensive and push the opponent back. Still he allowed the new-ball pair of Stuart Broad and Jimmy Anderson to dominate him. Broad did not waste time in firing in a bouncer, barely seen in the England innings, which hit the Pakistan captain on the head and softened him up. At the Radcliffe Road End Anderson put doubts in the Pakistanis' mind by swerving the ball both ways.

The ball that eventually claimed Butt - it failed to straighten and shaped away that wee bit - was a delivery good openers never go chasing. Butt was overpowered, and like a robot opened up and nicked one. He was not the only one. His partner Imran Farhat, who hit some powerful shots including a bold hook, was set up nicely by Anderson, bowling from the round the stumps.

Farhat should have been aware of the angle. He would've known from facing his own fast men in the nets how they sell the dummy to left-handers: usually they would bowl wide off the bowling crease and angle it towards the pads. Inadvertently the batsman would play for the inswinger and open his shoulders but to his horror would find the ball moving out at the last instant before taking an edge most times. Farhat should have done what he eventually did after getting out: left the ball alone.

It was the same with the Akmal brothers - Umar and Kamar - and the newcomers Azhar Ali and Umar Amin. Each of these gents hung limp bats while the bowlers laughed their way to victory. Let us not point out their inexperience, as players new to Test cricket always dream of doing deeds their heroes did when they were young themselves. To point out a recent example, Steve Smith plucked Australia out of a dangerous position to help set a challenging target on the third day in Headingley when Pakistan's bowlers had dominated the specialist batsmen earlier in the morning. Suddenly from a winning position Pakistan had been keeping their fingers crossed by the end of the day. Smith set the hearts racing with his impulsive shotmaking, because he realised the only way to turn the screw was go aggressive.

Likewise Shoaib Malik and Mohammad Aamer realised, even for a brief period late in the afternoon, that with a little bit of patience and pluck they could score runs comfortably. Soon they understood Stuart Broad was not as potent as Anderson and Steven Finn, so they could actually take advantage of that. And even when they lost their wickets, their reactions showed something that the top-order had failed to grasp. Both men knew that those had been balls to leave alone.

Reading the bowler, anticipating something that is going to happen, waiting till the last moment before reacting, letting the ball go away rather than chase it - these are skills batsmen learn every day in the nets. Coaches stress the same during every throwdown. Ultimately it is for the batsmen to play according to the situation.

Bowlers understand it, and expect it as well. "It is very rare you roll through teams," Jimmy Anderson, England's player of the day said about Pakistan's downfall. "They played pretty well towards the end and ball got soft and the wicket's quite slow. If you stick in there you can hang around for a period of time."

Salman Butt had a different take on Pakistan's sorry state and thought Anderson & Co. took advantage of the conditions. "It is okay to say batsmen make mistakes but the runs were not coming as well," he said. "It shows how immaculate the line and lengths of the bowlers have been and the conditions have been very helpful to seam bowling. If they land the bowl in good areas then there is every kind of help for them."

It could have a very different story for Pakistan if their fielders had snatched the opportunities on the first day the way England did on Friday. Equally it could've have been another story for Pakistan if their batsmen had learnt from their past mistakes and put to use the basics they had honed for years before coming to international cricket.

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nagraj Gollapudi

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (July 31, 2010, 18:02 GMT)

There's certainly no place for batsmen like azhar ali and umar amin at all in the pakistani team. Statistics and past performances suggest that fawad alam is a much better choice, and he can also bowl slow left arms, something that was needed in this test match to compensate for Danish Kaneria. Really I think, kaneria has lost his touch already. Saeed Ajmal is far more better. Moreover, I was surprised at the exclusion of Mohammad Yousuf for the 2nd test as he has made himself available now. It really has been a heart breaking performance for us, fans.

Posted by AmmarShafique on (July 31, 2010, 17:57 GMT)

what was wrong with my comment ? :S there is no sense in not publishing it!!

Posted by israrraja on (July 31, 2010, 17:45 GMT)

I think Pakistan team should do their best in this Test and try to narrow the defeat gap as much as they can do. Remember against Australia, Pakistan lost by 150 runs in first test and won the second by 3 wickets. So this is a young and exciting team and can do any thing. As long Pakistan is playing, there is hope and same time Pakistan is producing best cricketer in the world.If you want to watch boring matches, please watch India and Sri Lanka.

Posted by anwaralam on (July 31, 2010, 14:55 GMT)

The Pakistan cricket team seems to be carried away against England following their victory against the Aussies. Their body language described everything in the field against England. They are not playing for pride. Mohammad Yousuf's prescence could have given them strength as far as batting is concerned. Yasser Hameed should replace the unpredictable Umar Akmal and I am sure he will be handy. The coach should be doing daily homeworks with them otherwise a 4-0 whitewash seems inevitable. It is pity that whatever the bowlers do good are lost due to brainless batting display. Plus they should improve their pathetic fielding at all cost. No compromise. I once saw Imran asking Inzamam to stay around the boundary area and denied him drinks during the break.

Posted by   on (July 31, 2010, 10:14 GMT)

that is the state of pakistan batting where umar gul is there best batsman.

Posted by   on (July 31, 2010, 10:04 GMT)

I think we should be patient and stick with the young guns. Losing a few tests and even a series is not a big price to pay to develop a unit that will gel together under a young Captain.

Posted by Behroz on (July 31, 2010, 9:56 GMT)

Well i think we only need to blame PCB and the selecters for putting Younis And Yousuf out and everyone knows those two are out becouse pcb wants to distroy there career and PAk cricket. I hope we will see younis and yousuf soon inshallah by the way now it is proved that australia match was won by bowlers not by those kids

Posted by dmqi on (July 31, 2010, 9:50 GMT)

Here is my team to play the 2nd test:

Ezaz Butt, Mohsin khan: opener

Salman Butt,Imran Farhat, Shoeb Malik , kamran, Umar akmal : batsmen

Wasim Bari-wicket keeper

Waker yunus, the only fast bowler

The other two from the management who can bowl. Can someone add the names. Ejaz Ahmed can not I know, so exclude him.

Posted by   on (July 31, 2010, 9:44 GMT)

Pakistan needs the service of Yousuf, I wont say Younis because he is not even performing in the County, he has lost his touch and is struggling to find his form. We need Yousuf, last time he toured England he got 2 centuries then, that makes one think, what the HeLL is PCB waiting for? come on Mr. Butt, call Yousuf back as soon as possible! Plus i am not blaming our batting attack, i would only blame the 3 seniors, Malik, Butt and Kamran Akmal, what are they doing? do they still need to learn how to leave the ball and how to play in conditions like these?

Posted by ZQ77 on (July 31, 2010, 8:50 GMT)

The writer Nargraj is spot on with his analysis of pakistan batting. If you look at the English dismissals, theywere mostly LBWs and clean bowled indicating very good inswing bowling. There is very little a batsman can do if a ball inswings at the last moment and misses his bat and hits his pad or stumps. He has to play at it. As any experiend fast bowler would tell you, an inswinger is a higher percentage ball than an outswinger in terms of taking wickets. Now if you look at pakistan dismissals they all got out caught behind the stumps. You can always leave a ball outside the offstump unlike an inswinger which you have to play at. Specially in yesterday's conditions the pakistani batsmen should have known better. That was pure atrociuos and criminal batting yet again from these imbecile pakistani batsmen.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Nagraj GollapudiClose
Tour Results
England v Pakistan at Southampton - Sep 22, 2010
England won by 121 runs
England v Pakistan at Lord's - Sep 20, 2010
Pakistan won by 38 runs
England v Pakistan at The Oval - Sep 17, 2010
Pakistan won by 23 runs
England v Pakistan at Leeds - Sep 12, 2010
England won by 4 wickets (with 3 balls remaining)
England v Pakistan at Chester-le-Street - Sep 10, 2010
England won by 24 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days