England v Pakistan, 3rd npower Test, The Oval, 4th day

One collapse too many catches England cold

After being caught cold at The Oval, England's batsmen have no option but to front up for their gross negligence

Andrew Miller at The Oval

August 21, 2010

Comments: 79 | Text size: A | A

Mohammad Asif burst through Kevin Pietersen's defences as Pakistan kept the pressure on after lunch, England v Pakistan, 1st Test, Trent Bridge, July 29, 2010
Kevin Pietersen's place is still not under realistic scrutiny, despite 25 innings without a century © AFP
Enlarge

With an inevitability that comes only with Pakistani run-chases, England came tantalisingly close to achieving the impossible on Saturday afternoon. A searing late spell of swing bowling from James Anderson gave them fresh belief after Graeme Swann's habitual trickery had contributed three wickets and a run-out to the cause, but in the end, like a pair of cheque-book-chasing lawyers, they were always trying to defend the indefensible. The fact that they failed was a triumph for justice, because it left England's batsmen with no option but to front up for their gross negligence.

In consecutive Tests at Trent Bridge, Edgbaston and now The Oval, England have suffered tail-end collapses of six for 17, seven for 46, and now seven for 28. In addition, they've managed to lose their top six for 98 in the second innings at Trent Bridge, and their top seven for 94 in the first innings at The Oval. Only in the run-chase at Edgbaston, where Andrew Strauss and Jonathan Trott added 111 unbeaten runs to secure a nine-wicket victory, have England avoided a dose of the skids, and even then they lost Alastair Cook in the third over of the innings.

It has been a bowler's series, of that there is no question. Salman Butt, in his press conference on the penultimate evening, went so far as to suggest that the conditions his team had encountered were unplayable - a provocative statement that rather slipped under the radar amid all the excitement of that day's final session. Given the choice between tracks that serve up drama such as we've seen in Pakistan's two wins at Headingley and now The Oval, and the bat-dominated stodge that passes for Test cricket in too much of the world, there is no choice. More of this sort of thing, please.

But Butt has a point, up to a point, because if a team lacks enough batsmen with the requisite experience or application to cope with bowler-friendly conditions, even collapses such as we've been witnessing all summer start to become a bit passé. Until the peerless Mohammad Yousuf arrived to provide some much-needed knowhow, Pakistan's rookie top-order simply lacked the tools for survival. But even so, despite the traumas of two double-digit totals, they've still scraped together two of the three highest totals of the series to date, with Azhar Ali providing a brilliant example of how to learn from experience with his unbeaten 92 on Thursday.

England's batsmen, on the other hand, cannot pretend they've never played under leaden skies before, and therefore - even allowing for the majesty of Pakistan's seam attack - something has clearly been amiss in their collective performances. Despite starting with some aplomb with 354 in their first outing at Trent Bridge, their totals been heading in the wrong direction ever since, with scores of 262 for 9, 251, 233 and 222 in consecutive fully-formed innings. Those last two, at The Oval, came on the most batsman-friendly track so far, and the upshot was an almighty hurry-up today.

"None of us like losing, I certainly don't, so it's a bit of a kick in the teeth every time you lose a Test match," said Strauss. "We were outplayed. We lost five wickets in the first session of the game and then yesterday afternoon we lost more than five wickets. That cost us dearly and we need to make sure it doesn't happen again, and that we learn the lessons, because if you keep doing that then you're putting yourself under pressure unnecessarily, especially when it's the top order."

The puzzlement about England's performance this summer is that they've invariably found someone in each innings to front up as a proper Test batsman should - Eoin Morgan and Paul Collingwood managed a double-century stand in the first innings at Trent Bridge; Matt Prior has bulked out the lower-order on two crucial occasions, Cook made his seminal century before everything went wrong on Friday, and if Kevin Pietersen's 80 at Edgbaston owed far too much to good luck, then Trott's twin fifties in the same game were temperamentally superb.

In between whiles, however, England have not been at the races - conceivably they've been lulled by the expectation that Pakistan will invariably fare worse when their own turn comes to bat, but the more invidious charge is that they simply don't need to push themselves right now. Yesterday was the four-year anniversary of the abandoned Test at The Oval, and no fewer than four of the top six remain from that game - and but for Ian Bell's foot injury, that would doubtless be five.

The players who needed to prove points in this series have done so - Morgan at the first time of asking, Cook at the last - and every one of the seven candidates for the top order will be on that flight to Australia. In that respect, it's job done, which in hindsight has proven to be an unfortunate state of affairs, given that the job in hand is further from being wrapped up than it might have seemed at 2-0 up with two to play.

Nobody questions that England's batsmen have the bottle to succeed when required - least of all Strauss. "If you're asking: 'Are we bad players?' then I don't think that's true," he said. "We just haven't batted well in this game." But there is plenty reason to doubt their current drive, not least that of Pietersen, whose quest for his next Test century now stretching to 25 innings and counting.

One wonders what it will take for KP's career to reach the sort of make-or-break moment that Cook experienced in this game, and that Collingwood and Strauss have themselves experienced in the past, at Edgbaston and Napier in 2008 respectively. The threat of the axe concentrates the mind like nothing else, but given that Pietersen doesn't even have a county to fall back on in a bid to regain his form, it's a tactic that the ECB would not dare countenance.

It could of course be that Pakistan's bowlers are simply too good. "It's not my business to talk up the opposition," said Strauss when asked his opinion about his opponents, and it's certainly true that Saeed Ajmal's invisible doosra burrowed deep into England's psyche in this game. But are they really that much better than the Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel combo that England thwarted so gutsily in South Africa last winter? It's a moot point. The conditions may have been tougher in this series, but the collective pressure hasn't come close. Maybe, with a series decider looming, it will click back up a notch.

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo.

RSS Feeds: Andrew Miller

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (August 24, 2010, 23:25 GMT)

Pakistan can now equal the series .. they have a very good chance!

Posted by Angel-from-Outside on (August 24, 2010, 4:44 GMT)

@Punter23: Well, ups and downs are the part of Pakistan cricket history as far as the political influence is counted but...but you shouldn't be that sort of thinking of Charity..lol...how can you grade that to charity? its even humilation to Eng...Pakistan did well in all departments, at last, and they out played England in every aspect of the game. So be broad minded and take the things as they are building up.

Posted by   on (August 23, 2010, 21:06 GMT)

Life is like an inning of Pakistani batsmen, to predict it would be next to impossible.

Posted by   on (August 23, 2010, 17:42 GMT)

Congratulation to Pakistan on a big win. Now Pakistan needs a mental coach also. Who tell the players that if a partner is near to his 100 , how can you sport him. Especially to asif, that you are not a player, whole of your life you can not make a big score, just support to your partner. Let him complete his century. Make your through proper; whole of the stadium was laughing on asif his stupid type of through. When some one drop a catch no need to laugh on it. Bring some shame on your face. Specially Kamran Akmal to shut his mouth for some time.

Posted by   on (August 23, 2010, 16:45 GMT)

Yesterday I posted a comment referring to the "cuurent" Pakistan team as "mediocre". It seems many Pakistan fans have taken exception! I still believe them to be "mediocre" andjust because they beat a side who performed very poorly - I can't see why an opinion change is in order? However, if Pakistan manage to repeat their win I'll be WRONG! (It happens....) I'm predicting a thumping win for England, but may the best team win! I can't wait for Lords.....

Posted by sonjjay on (August 23, 2010, 14:52 GMT)

Well its a good victory by Pakistan congratulations to them, their team played well and was in for some heavy criticism, Many times we fans become impatient with our team itss unreasonable and i think cook should go for englands sake. I am pretty sure with the strong domestic conditions they have a good test match opener who can replace him. Well done pakistan from an Indian fan...

Posted by   on (August 23, 2010, 13:43 GMT)

Shocking collapse from England. Lessons need to be learned!

Posted by   on (August 23, 2010, 12:48 GMT)

Pakistani team is more mercurial. England Mercury levels have been down (read pietersen) and cant match Pakistan mercury in the bowling department and that at the end was the difference.

Posted by venbas on (August 23, 2010, 11:55 GMT)

The Brit press are undoubtedly the best when it comes to hero bashing :). KP just got them the ICC T20 Worldcup with Man of Series performances. Here he had a decent series though not to his high standards(He still has a chance to correct the statistics in the last test). But if I were on a remote island for last couple of seasons and read this article, I would think that KP is the scrouge of the current English team who is there on some personal favors or such!!! KP is the sort of impact player like Sehwag or Gilchrist who can turn things upside down single handedly. Any team would be wary of such fellas who can take apart the opposition in a moment. The Aussies will only be very happy to have KP under such media scrutiny as it would make the Ashes bid easier...

Posted by 0wais on (August 23, 2010, 10:57 GMT)

Well England Staff For The First Time Focused On T20 & ODI Versions........... And Thier Batting Line Is Struggling In Test Cricket Because of That!!!! Pietersen Was In Great Form In The World T20 Which England Won But After that His Form Has Slumped...... Matt Prior Is Playing Only Test Cricket And Look He Is In The Form Of His Life......... Strauss And Cook Are Not In Good Form Either....... If It Remains Like This They Will Struggle In The Ashes!!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew MillerClose
Andrew Miller Andrew Miller was saved from a life of drudgery in the City when his car caught fire on the way to an interview. He took this as a sign and fled to Pakistan where he witnessed England's historic victory in the twilight at Karachi (or thought he did, at any rate - it was too dark to tell). He then joined Wisden Online in 2001, and soon graduated from put-upon photocopier to a writer with a penchant for comment and cricket on the subcontinent. In addition to Pakistan, he has covered England tours in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the World Cup in the Caribbean in 2007
Tour Results
England v Pakistan at Southampton - Sep 22, 2010
England won by 121 runs
England v Pakistan at Lord's - Sep 20, 2010
Pakistan won by 38 runs
England v Pakistan at The Oval - Sep 17, 2010
Pakistan won by 23 runs
England v Pakistan at Leeds - Sep 12, 2010
England won by 4 wickets (with 3 balls remaining)
England v Pakistan at Chester-le-Street - Sep 10, 2010
England won by 24 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days