England v Sri Lanka, 1st ODI, The Oval

One-day job is Cook's biggest test

England's third captain in eight days has a tough task to secure results for the team but also convince about his own one-day credentials

Andrew McGlashan at The Oval

June 27, 2011

Comments: 12 | Text size: A | A

Alastair Cook finds his groove in the nets before the first one-day international, The Oval, June 27, 2011
Alastair Cookj's form with the bat is almost as important as the results for England in the one-day series © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links

Alastair Cook has shown he is a cricketer who likes a challenge. Nine months ago his struggles in Test cricket brought his place into question, but he has since responded emphatically with six hundreds in ten matches including an Ashes series that brought 766 runs. Now he faces one of his biggest challenges; turning England into a one-day international force before the next World Cup and proving himself as a 50-over batsman.

Cook starts at The Oval, on Tuesday, against a Sri Lanka team strengthened by one-day specialists and buoyed by their Twenty20 success as he becomes England's third captain in eight days. He has, by far, the toughest job of the trio. Strauss, despite his recent lean run, is secure of his position while Stuart Broad, a left-field choice for Twenty20 captain and without any professional leadership experience, has fewer expectations on his shoulders.

If Cook achieves his twin tasks of team and personal success it will be a result to equal what he achieved in last winter's Ashes series. It will also smooth the path towards the Test captaincy but, despite being groomed as Strauss's heir apparent, if his one-day role goes seriously wrong he could yet fall down that pecking order.

"I just see myself as the one-day captain," Cook said. "I'm only concentrating on tomorrow's game and doing the best job I can. We can worry about the other stuff later. We are very separate in what we do and it's a huge honour for me to lead this one-day side forward."

Cook, however, begins his spell as full-time ODI captain having to prove himself on two fronts both as a leader and a limited-overs batsman. It is the latter which raises the most questions with a current record that reads an average of 33 and a strike-rate of 71. He is in this side because he is captain but, currently at least, there are other players in the domestic game (and even in his own squad, such as Ian Bell) who could comfortably rival him for an opening spot.

There are many who feel strongly that he isn't the right man, with one of most vocal critics the former England captain Mike Atherton who called Cook a "plodder" on a Sunday morning TV show. "Takes one to know one, I suppose," was Cook's response. "Everyone has their opinions. I have scored a one-day hundred for England and I'm excited I can score runs at the top of the order. I know I can score runs quickly, but of course I'll have my own style of doing it."

It is now Cook's job to develop into the role, and for encouragement that it can be done he need look no further than the man he has just replaced. Strauss was never one of the finest one-day players in the world - although his 158 against India, at Bangalore in March, was one of England's finest one-day innings - but he expanded his game to ensure he was never a passenger.

Strauss's return to the side in 2009 in the West Indies has echoes of Cook's current position because no one was really sure that he was the right man. Strauss was made one-day captain by default after the Kevin Pietersen-Peter Moores fall-out, but earned the Player-of-the-Series award in a 2-1 series win to show he was worth a place. What Cook would give for a similar series now.

"He can be a great example for me," Cook said. "When he first started playing one-day cricket he was striking around 65 but by the end he was around 80. So you can develop as a player and he showed that. Hopefully I can follow in his footsteps."

For doubters over Cook's pedigree as a one-day batsman, and also as a captain, there is evidence that he has it in him to become a success. Many things that happened on the Bangladesh tour in early 2010 were important for English cricket - not least the emergence of Steven Finn and Tim Bresnan's development of reverse swing - but Cook was very impressive as Strauss's stand-in.

It's easy to diminish the achievements because of the opposition, but England have since lost twice to Bangladesh in one-day internationals so Cook's unbeaten tour now looks a good achievement. And he scored runs, too, both in Tests and ODIs. In the three-match one-day series he out-paced Craig Kieswetter, with whom he will be reunited at the top of the order against Sri Lanka, as he made 156 runs at 52 with a strike-rate of 90.69. A limited sample size, admittedly, but something to build on.

"I think my one-day game has evolved since I last played. In Bangladesh I scored runs and scored them quickly so I know I have the talent and skill to do it," Cook said. "Of course I'm nowhere near the finished article, I'm 26 years old, I've got a lot of work to do and I'm prepared for that."

Cook has a lone six in one-day internationals, but that came in Bangladesh where he developed an effective slog-sweep over midwicket which proved how he is willing to move out of his comfort zone. One concern, though, is that a return to one-day cricket, where playing with an open face to third man is a regular shot, will undo all the hard work of tightening up his technique for the Test game.

But English cricket needs to find out now, with the best part of four years until the next World Cup, if Cook is the right man and he certainly couldn't want for better form. "That's part of the skills you need to have, the ability to change your mindset from one-day to Test cricket," he said. "We all need to do that and get better at it."

However, if things do begin badly in the next few matches Cook would again do well to look to Strauss who was whitewashed 5-0 by Sri Lanka in 2006, in his first full series in charge, when Michael Vaughan and Andrew Flintoff were injured. A poor start does not have to be terminal, but while the next 12 days won't define Cook's captaincy career the next 12 months will have a major say.

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by pussatina on (June 28, 2011, 20:17 GMT)

re denwarlo shame Sanath didn't get runs but really pleased it was a thrashing......

Posted by swarzi on (June 28, 2011, 14:20 GMT)

Bringing back Cook to open the innings will not necessarily solve England decades long problems. The experts need to read the history of the game a little more to see strategies that brought successful outcomes in the game; instead of just making decisions based on popular sayings of the day. Eg, I think the move to use Kevin Petersen to open the innings in the WC was a great one. But now, England management doesn't have enogh patience to wait on the outcome, so they brought back Cook. Let me explain why I think that Petersen is the better choice: Look back at the ODI history of Sachin Tendulkar, arguably the most successful ODI batsman. Scahin started his career as a middle order batsman; but he played 79 matches there but could not score a 100. At the same time Lara was opening and had scored four 100s. Sachin being wary of that started opening, at the said time Lara was sent to the middle order. The rest is history: Lara ended up not getting enough action there, scored less 100s.

Posted by big_guy_321 on (June 28, 2011, 10:34 GMT)

Cook wasnt even in the wc 15 why pick him know and make hin captain thats like sri lanka they pick kandaby as vice-captain and he is still not a permanent in the team

Posted by   on (June 28, 2011, 10:05 GMT)

Cook will be a good batsman. He has good techniques and is young. End 1st odi XI Cook Kieswetter Bell Kp Bell Morgan Bopara Swann Broad Bresnan Jimmy wat do you guys say. Lets go with one spinner as lankans are good in that dept. All the best to cook

Posted by   on (June 28, 2011, 9:14 GMT)

With Trott and Cook in the top three it would be a good afternoon nap for the spectators if England Bat first.

Posted by denwarlo70 on (June 28, 2011, 3:42 GMT)

The article is all about Cook and his capabilities as a skipper and batting prowess and so on. I am a Sri Lankan and I am pretty sure the POMS ain't gonna have no easy task like they damn well did in the 3 test series (Mind you we were depleted). ODI's are a different ball game and it is definitely a different ball game to us Lankans with slinger Malinga back in the fore at his best and Mahela+Kumar showing form in the solitary T20 and with Angelo back as well. Even thought Angy may not bowl, he is definitely a feather in the cap of team Sri Lanka. So, all in all, POMS, you've got a tough ODI series against Sri Lanka. I won't say 5-0 like 2006 but at least the series win will be ours. All the very best team Sri Lanka and last but not least, wanna see the old dog go to town in his last outing for Sri Lanka with bat or ball it doesn't matter as he is already a legend.

Posted by subbass on (June 27, 2011, 23:18 GMT)

He's a good skipper, and has the potential to become a good one day batsman, it's a fairly risky choice though in my opinion, but that been said at the moment we can't do much worse that we have in the last few months so the gamble could pay off.

Wost case scenario though is that Cook fails and Keiswetter continues to fail, putting massive pressure on the likes of Pietersen and Morgan, still I suppose we can at least rely on Trott to anchor the innings, it's up to the others to play around him. Mind you I would really like to see Bell open the innings and move Kieswetter down the order to number 7.

Posted by jackiethepen on (June 27, 2011, 23:01 GMT)

Why is Kieswetter opening with Cook? He did poorly last time and was dropped! He looked abysmal in the T20 on Saturday. Better to have KP or Bell opening with Cook. Otherwise the pressure will be on Cook to do all the work. Frankly the selection of Kiewswetter is as much a mystery as the promotion of Cook. Neither are based on merit. These players should earn their right to be in the side like everyone else. Otherwise it smacks of being favoured unfairly by the coach Flower.

Posted by   on (June 27, 2011, 21:48 GMT)

In my opinion cook is the best man for this job , he is in tremendous test form which means he is at top notch level confident about his cricket.110% he will bring laurels to english cricket.peace out

Posted by agam99 on (June 27, 2011, 19:34 GMT)

ECB following the PCB footsteps. A player who hasn't played a single ODI game for more than an year is making his comeback as the skipper. As funny as England's claim for top spot in cricket.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
Scotland v Sri Lanka at Edinburgh - Jul 13, 2011
Sri Lanka won by 183 runs
Ireland v Sri Lanka at Edinburgh - Jul 11, 2011
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
England v Sri Lanka at Manchester - Jul 9, 2011
England won by 16 runs
England v Sri Lanka at Nottingham - Jul 6, 2011
England won by 10 wickets (with 145 balls remaining) (D/L method)
England v Sri Lanka at Lord's - Jul 3, 2011
Sri Lanka won by 6 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
More results »
Video / Audio
Cup Classics: Cup Classics - Gilchrist walks in World Cup 2003 semi-final
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days