England v Sri Lanka, 1st Investec Test, Lord's, 1st day June 12, 2014

A nod to the future for Root and England

This was one day at the start of a long summer but after a long and painful winter it was a day for England to enjoy the sunshine
14

We may never really know how many nervous twitches and glances there were in the England dressing room at 22 for 2. Mitchell Johnson was thousands of miles away and although the pitch was tinged with green and the new-ball swinging there was no reason to be overly alarmed.

Yet, whatever England do at the moment their recent history looms large. So when Alastair Cook chopped into his stumps, to end an uncertain stay, they were not marching convincingly into a new season of Test cricket. But some six hours later life as an England cricketer - and there were three at Lord's for which this was their first day - was beginning to look just a little bit rosier.

Not least for Joe Root who scored his second Test hundred in consecutive Lord's innings. The punch of the fist and the roar of delight could easily have been for what has gone before as much for what had just occurred.

Closing on 344 for 5 represented England's best first innings since The Oval last August - a turgid affair which led to James Faulkner attacking how England were playing their cricket - and is just nine short of anything they made in Australia. There could be no quibbling with the intent today as they kept in touch with four-an-over. When three wickets were down before lunch it was being readied as a criticism, but the urgency during the afternoon and evening session was their most convincing batting in a long time albeit against an attack that wearied as the day went on.

It should be a concern that the innings needed lifting from another uncertain beginning, but the fact it was achieved with some conviction and style should bring a sense of optimism that the rebuilding work is underway. That the recovery was largely staged by two players who did not finish the Ashes and another completely new to the Test team should gladden the hearts of suffering supporters. They may not agree with all the selections, but there were a few ticks for James Whitaker and company today.

Apart from the 180 at Lord's, the back-to-back Ashes was a searching experience for Root, not helped by the variety of roles he was asked to fill while still trying to establish the early days of his Test career. Opening in England became No. 6 to start with in Australia, but only for one Test when he was then shunted up to No. 3 after Jonathan Trott's departure. He did not survive the series, being dropped in Sydney.

He is in his 16th Test which has involved batting in six positions and although his one innings at No. 7 came due a nightwatchman, that is hardly the stability a young player needs. He has looked most at ease in the middle order; he made his nerveless 73 on debut against India in Nagpur and scored his first Test hundred from No. 5 against New Zealand at Headingley last year.

But if you had been assessing England's batting order for this match entirely logically - and with the assumption that Ian Bell gets what he wants to bat at No. 4 - then it pointed towards Root being No. 3 rather than Gary Ballance who does not bat that high for Yorkshire. Ballance did not look out of depth but was skittish during his stay as Sri Lanka preyed on a vulnerability outside off stump that was evident in the one-day series. All this was happening while Trott was making a hundred for Warwickshire's 2nd XI. He remains a vast hole to fill.

Being an opener by trade, it is surprising that Root has not seemed more at home at, or near the top of the order - notwithstanding the hundred against Australia which provides more than half his runs as an opener. The ability to rotate the strike, drop and run, to keep the board ticking comes far more easily in the middle order than it has done facing the new ball. Those skills were on evidence here; there were just two boundaries in his half-century but it did not feel as though his innings had come to standstill as some against Australia had done so.

Before this series Root stated his desire for the middle order although, after his hundred, played down a suggestion that he had declined the No.3 job. "Batting three or five, you can come in with a very similar score on the board," he said. "Whether they had an inkling I didn't want to bat there, or had suggested the middle order, maybe that had something to do with it."

Perhaps, at international level, he is more comfortable reacting to a situation rather than setting one up (he makes his one-day home in the middle order where the mindset can be similar). There is also the fact, which cannot be escaped, that batting at No. 5 will, most of the time, mean the newness of the ball has gone: in this innings, although the top three fell relatively cheaply, the ball was nearly 20 overs old when he arrived.

Still, for the Dukes ball in England, during the first session of a Test, that can still make the job tricky. He survived until lunch, which allowed England to catch their breath after a somewhat frantic first session, then played watchfully until tea. During the final session, as the zip from Sri Lanka's seamers dissipated, he skipped along at a jaunty rate with his second fifty taking 77 balls compared to the first which required 106.

A few moments later he got solidly behind the line of Nuwan Pradeep's final ball of the day then walked off as the sun started to set over Lord's. This was one day at the start of a long summer, after a long and painful winter. Tough days will follow, which could easily revive bad memories, but this was an occasion to think of the future.

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • SoyQuearns on June 16, 2014, 2:12 GMT

    @liz1558 - not sure what comments are getting through here - but just wanted to also say that, if anything, our boys would have been more tired than yours at the end of the back-to-back ashes as we played the exact same XI for all 5 tests.

    I'm sure you can appreciate the logic there. Your side used 18 different players in the Australian campaign. You could argue that, due to the utter annihilation that your inferior side suffered, they still had to work harder and bowl longer, but that's just England's shortcomings.

    Furthermore - excuses don't change the facts. We lost 3-0 in England because England were better than us. But that 3-0 loss looked like a close series in comparison to the hiding you received. We ended the careers of 3 of your best players, and it is likely Carberry will never play Test cricket again either.

    On your point re: age - if the wickets and runs are on the board I don't care if they are 45 years old. Pick your best side. You could learn from that re: KP.

  • Roshan_P on June 13, 2014, 13:34 GMT

    I have always believed in young Rooty even though many doubted him. He has the ability and the mentality to become a great Test player. This just shows he's a good player and now needs to kick on and progress. Though this is a good innings and a great confidence boost, but it is only Sri Lanka and their bowling attack in Tests is poor. He should be given a chance at No. 5 in upcoming series against tougher opposition both home and away.

  • St.John on June 13, 2014, 10:56 GMT

    No Andrew, this is not a nod for the future. Sri Lanka has considerable batting strengths but their new ball attack is not even county standard. In reality England should have had around 450 for three on day one against a bowling attack of this standard. Test cricket is not Sri Lanka's cup of tea. They are a powerhouse in the shorter forms and maybe rightfully so, seeing that many pundits foresee the end of Test cricket in the next decade or two.

  • milepost on June 13, 2014, 10:25 GMT

    If 1 ton a year makes Root worth keeping in the side than England have pretty low standards lol.

  • liz1558 on June 13, 2014, 9:27 GMT

    @SourQuearns

    Nothing like a draught of bitter vengeance is there! Don't be surprised if England regain the Ashes at the next opportunity; your boys are verrrry old indeed. I'll be surprised if Cook is still cappie at the point; but either way, England won't be as knackered as they were down under. That's the main reason the Audries won. Had there been only one Ashes contest last year - as there usually is - home or away - England would've won.

  • rizwan1981 on June 13, 2014, 9:16 GMT

    I am a Sri Lankan and the Sri Lankan Pace attack is probably one f the worst in the world ( excluding Zimbabwe ) . Therefore , its a bit too early to claim that England has turned a corner .

    It appears , England are like Sri Lanka , Pakistan and India - Tigers at home and lambs overseas . Only South Africa and Australia have the bowlers to win in alien conditions .

  • on June 13, 2014, 5:18 GMT

    Well said SoyQuerns! Liked the look of Ali - make him captain.

  • milepost on June 13, 2014, 4:22 GMT

    I think it's early, probably ludicrous to suggest 'England are back to their attritional best'. If Australia had been 2-22 and 4-120 the usual suspects (@FFL, Ian Chappell) would be screaming "x player bailed Australia out again". Root got a ton, big deal, it doesn't change the fact he isn't world class. Cook is in all sorts of form problems at this level these days. As @R U 4 REAL NICK points out there's a lot of pressure on the debutants but also on the senior players, after all this is their first match after the last series where, well you know what happened. I think they are all playing for their careers and the bowlers were ordinary in Australia so making sweeping generalisations after a days cricket is a bit much.

  • SoyQuearns on June 13, 2014, 1:17 GMT

    I've been sticking it to England for months now after they came to Australia smug & overconfident, overstating their brilliance & understating our capabilities.

    They went home embarrassed, fractured & far more humble. And so they should have, they were absolutely & entirely dreadful.

    Since then they've fallen further, losing to Netherlands (again), having public slinging matches between overstuffed boards & enigmatic champions, cut ties with the best player they've had since Botham, & called upon a swathe of youth.

    We also saw the cowardly end of Trott & Swann's respective careers, blights on their previously good records (though Swann averaged near 30 & Trott averaged 36 for more than the last half of his career).

    We saw Carberry overlooked (despite showing ticker against Johnson).

    BUT they've played well today. At 2/22 they would have been packing it. But they scored quickly, built partnerships & came out on top.

    However, SL have no Johnson & Eng have no spinner.

  • on June 12, 2014, 20:44 GMT

    A promising day for England! Be interesting to see if Jordan can bat like an all rounder at this level. However, I wish Carberry had been given another chance!

  • SoyQuearns on June 16, 2014, 2:12 GMT

    @liz1558 - not sure what comments are getting through here - but just wanted to also say that, if anything, our boys would have been more tired than yours at the end of the back-to-back ashes as we played the exact same XI for all 5 tests.

    I'm sure you can appreciate the logic there. Your side used 18 different players in the Australian campaign. You could argue that, due to the utter annihilation that your inferior side suffered, they still had to work harder and bowl longer, but that's just England's shortcomings.

    Furthermore - excuses don't change the facts. We lost 3-0 in England because England were better than us. But that 3-0 loss looked like a close series in comparison to the hiding you received. We ended the careers of 3 of your best players, and it is likely Carberry will never play Test cricket again either.

    On your point re: age - if the wickets and runs are on the board I don't care if they are 45 years old. Pick your best side. You could learn from that re: KP.

  • Roshan_P on June 13, 2014, 13:34 GMT

    I have always believed in young Rooty even though many doubted him. He has the ability and the mentality to become a great Test player. This just shows he's a good player and now needs to kick on and progress. Though this is a good innings and a great confidence boost, but it is only Sri Lanka and their bowling attack in Tests is poor. He should be given a chance at No. 5 in upcoming series against tougher opposition both home and away.

  • St.John on June 13, 2014, 10:56 GMT

    No Andrew, this is not a nod for the future. Sri Lanka has considerable batting strengths but their new ball attack is not even county standard. In reality England should have had around 450 for three on day one against a bowling attack of this standard. Test cricket is not Sri Lanka's cup of tea. They are a powerhouse in the shorter forms and maybe rightfully so, seeing that many pundits foresee the end of Test cricket in the next decade or two.

  • milepost on June 13, 2014, 10:25 GMT

    If 1 ton a year makes Root worth keeping in the side than England have pretty low standards lol.

  • liz1558 on June 13, 2014, 9:27 GMT

    @SourQuearns

    Nothing like a draught of bitter vengeance is there! Don't be surprised if England regain the Ashes at the next opportunity; your boys are verrrry old indeed. I'll be surprised if Cook is still cappie at the point; but either way, England won't be as knackered as they were down under. That's the main reason the Audries won. Had there been only one Ashes contest last year - as there usually is - home or away - England would've won.

  • rizwan1981 on June 13, 2014, 9:16 GMT

    I am a Sri Lankan and the Sri Lankan Pace attack is probably one f the worst in the world ( excluding Zimbabwe ) . Therefore , its a bit too early to claim that England has turned a corner .

    It appears , England are like Sri Lanka , Pakistan and India - Tigers at home and lambs overseas . Only South Africa and Australia have the bowlers to win in alien conditions .

  • on June 13, 2014, 5:18 GMT

    Well said SoyQuerns! Liked the look of Ali - make him captain.

  • milepost on June 13, 2014, 4:22 GMT

    I think it's early, probably ludicrous to suggest 'England are back to their attritional best'. If Australia had been 2-22 and 4-120 the usual suspects (@FFL, Ian Chappell) would be screaming "x player bailed Australia out again". Root got a ton, big deal, it doesn't change the fact he isn't world class. Cook is in all sorts of form problems at this level these days. As @R U 4 REAL NICK points out there's a lot of pressure on the debutants but also on the senior players, after all this is their first match after the last series where, well you know what happened. I think they are all playing for their careers and the bowlers were ordinary in Australia so making sweeping generalisations after a days cricket is a bit much.

  • SoyQuearns on June 13, 2014, 1:17 GMT

    I've been sticking it to England for months now after they came to Australia smug & overconfident, overstating their brilliance & understating our capabilities.

    They went home embarrassed, fractured & far more humble. And so they should have, they were absolutely & entirely dreadful.

    Since then they've fallen further, losing to Netherlands (again), having public slinging matches between overstuffed boards & enigmatic champions, cut ties with the best player they've had since Botham, & called upon a swathe of youth.

    We also saw the cowardly end of Trott & Swann's respective careers, blights on their previously good records (though Swann averaged near 30 & Trott averaged 36 for more than the last half of his career).

    We saw Carberry overlooked (despite showing ticker against Johnson).

    BUT they've played well today. At 2/22 they would have been packing it. But they scored quickly, built partnerships & came out on top.

    However, SL have no Johnson & Eng have no spinner.

  • on June 12, 2014, 20:44 GMT

    A promising day for England! Be interesting to see if Jordan can bat like an all rounder at this level. However, I wish Carberry had been given another chance!

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on June 12, 2014, 20:18 GMT

    I can't believe I'm saying this, but thought I'd put it out there hopefully before the detractors come out in force and no doubt will: did anyone else notice that a few of the England batsmen (Bell, Root...) appeared to show more intent/attack in this test already than they did in the short formats? Bell even hit a cracking six! Root and Ali's running between the wickets was awesome - really kept the pressure on the fielders. Got it all backwards here in England.

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on June 12, 2014, 20:06 GMT

    I know Joe Root made his previous century at Lords opening, but there's no doubt in my mind he is much more comfortable and useful to the team down in the middle order. Likewise Bell has mostly blossomed in the middle, but with Trott gone and debutants coming in, I wouldn't have minded too much trying him at three.

    I know it's very early days, and I'm not going to cast judgements after just one innings, but if any position is going to be problematic I see it being three. Guys like Trott and Thorpe are gold dust and so underrated in my opinion. Whether or not Ballance, Ali or Bell can nail down that spot is a huge debate in itself, and as it looks like Bell isn't even going to be given that chance, the debutants will literally have to hit the ground running...

  • 14abhijeet on June 12, 2014, 19:59 GMT

    Now just get Compton at number 3, which might solve the puzzle.

  • Balladeer on June 12, 2014, 19:50 GMT

    So, will he be Rooted at five in the test order?

    Sorry.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Balladeer on June 12, 2014, 19:50 GMT

    So, will he be Rooted at five in the test order?

    Sorry.

  • 14abhijeet on June 12, 2014, 19:59 GMT

    Now just get Compton at number 3, which might solve the puzzle.

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on June 12, 2014, 20:06 GMT

    I know Joe Root made his previous century at Lords opening, but there's no doubt in my mind he is much more comfortable and useful to the team down in the middle order. Likewise Bell has mostly blossomed in the middle, but with Trott gone and debutants coming in, I wouldn't have minded too much trying him at three.

    I know it's very early days, and I'm not going to cast judgements after just one innings, but if any position is going to be problematic I see it being three. Guys like Trott and Thorpe are gold dust and so underrated in my opinion. Whether or not Ballance, Ali or Bell can nail down that spot is a huge debate in itself, and as it looks like Bell isn't even going to be given that chance, the debutants will literally have to hit the ground running...

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on June 12, 2014, 20:18 GMT

    I can't believe I'm saying this, but thought I'd put it out there hopefully before the detractors come out in force and no doubt will: did anyone else notice that a few of the England batsmen (Bell, Root...) appeared to show more intent/attack in this test already than they did in the short formats? Bell even hit a cracking six! Root and Ali's running between the wickets was awesome - really kept the pressure on the fielders. Got it all backwards here in England.

  • on June 12, 2014, 20:44 GMT

    A promising day for England! Be interesting to see if Jordan can bat like an all rounder at this level. However, I wish Carberry had been given another chance!

  • SoyQuearns on June 13, 2014, 1:17 GMT

    I've been sticking it to England for months now after they came to Australia smug & overconfident, overstating their brilliance & understating our capabilities.

    They went home embarrassed, fractured & far more humble. And so they should have, they were absolutely & entirely dreadful.

    Since then they've fallen further, losing to Netherlands (again), having public slinging matches between overstuffed boards & enigmatic champions, cut ties with the best player they've had since Botham, & called upon a swathe of youth.

    We also saw the cowardly end of Trott & Swann's respective careers, blights on their previously good records (though Swann averaged near 30 & Trott averaged 36 for more than the last half of his career).

    We saw Carberry overlooked (despite showing ticker against Johnson).

    BUT they've played well today. At 2/22 they would have been packing it. But they scored quickly, built partnerships & came out on top.

    However, SL have no Johnson & Eng have no spinner.

  • milepost on June 13, 2014, 4:22 GMT

    I think it's early, probably ludicrous to suggest 'England are back to their attritional best'. If Australia had been 2-22 and 4-120 the usual suspects (@FFL, Ian Chappell) would be screaming "x player bailed Australia out again". Root got a ton, big deal, it doesn't change the fact he isn't world class. Cook is in all sorts of form problems at this level these days. As @R U 4 REAL NICK points out there's a lot of pressure on the debutants but also on the senior players, after all this is their first match after the last series where, well you know what happened. I think they are all playing for their careers and the bowlers were ordinary in Australia so making sweeping generalisations after a days cricket is a bit much.

  • on June 13, 2014, 5:18 GMT

    Well said SoyQuerns! Liked the look of Ali - make him captain.

  • rizwan1981 on June 13, 2014, 9:16 GMT

    I am a Sri Lankan and the Sri Lankan Pace attack is probably one f the worst in the world ( excluding Zimbabwe ) . Therefore , its a bit too early to claim that England has turned a corner .

    It appears , England are like Sri Lanka , Pakistan and India - Tigers at home and lambs overseas . Only South Africa and Australia have the bowlers to win in alien conditions .

  • liz1558 on June 13, 2014, 9:27 GMT

    @SourQuearns

    Nothing like a draught of bitter vengeance is there! Don't be surprised if England regain the Ashes at the next opportunity; your boys are verrrry old indeed. I'll be surprised if Cook is still cappie at the point; but either way, England won't be as knackered as they were down under. That's the main reason the Audries won. Had there been only one Ashes contest last year - as there usually is - home or away - England would've won.