England v Sri Lanka, 1st Investec Test, Lord's, 1st day

A nod to the future for Root and England

This was one day at the start of a long summer but after a long and painful winter it was a day for England to enjoy the sunshine

Andrew McGlashan at Lord's

June 12, 2014

Comments: 14 | Text size: A | A
Highlights: Root leads England revival with gritty 102*


Joe Root raises his bat after reaching fifty, England v Sri Lanka, 1st Investec Test, Lord's, 1st day, June 12, 2014
Joe Root seems most at home reacting to a situation rather than making one © AFP
Enlarge

We may never really know how many nervous twitches and glances there were in the England dressing room at 22 for 2. Mitchell Johnson was thousands of miles away and although the pitch was tinged with green and the new-ball swinging there was no reason to be overly alarmed.

Yet, whatever England do at the moment their recent history looms large. So when Alastair Cook chopped into his stumps, to end an uncertain stay, they were not marching convincingly into a new season of Test cricket. But some six hours later life as an England cricketer - and there were three at Lord's for which this was their first day - was beginning to look just a little bit rosier.

Not least for Joe Root who scored his second Test hundred in consecutive Lord's innings. The punch of the fist and the roar of delight could easily have been for what has gone before as much for what had just occurred.

Closing on 344 for 5 represented England's best first innings since The Oval last August - a turgid affair which led to James Faulkner attacking how England were playing their cricket - and is just nine short of anything they made in Australia. There could be no quibbling with the intent today as they kept in touch with four-an-over. When three wickets were down before lunch it was being readied as a criticism, but the urgency during the afternoon and evening session was their most convincing batting in a long time albeit against an attack that wearied as the day went on.

It should be a concern that the innings needed lifting from another uncertain beginning, but the fact it was achieved with some conviction and style should bring a sense of optimism that the rebuilding work is underway. That the recovery was largely staged by two players who did not finish the Ashes and another completely new to the Test team should gladden the hearts of suffering supporters. They may not agree with all the selections, but there were a few ticks for James Whitaker and company today.

Root happy to take responsibility

  • Little more than 18 months ago Joe Root had not played for England, but even though his career is still evolving he is happy to play a more senior role in a remade team.
  • For much of the afternoon session he batted alongside debutant Moeen Ali in an 89-run stand which steadied England from a precarious 120 for 4 and England's side includes two further uncapped players, making Root feel a bit like an old hand.
  • "It is slightly bizarre - but that is part of being in a developing side like we are," he said. "I've got to try to take a bit more responsibility, and hope to help the guys coming into the side. If they want some advice, I'm more than ready to offer it - the little I have."
  • Although Root has slipped back down the order it did not stop him coming in with a small total on the board and lifting the team out of bother gave him great satisfaction. England are now set for a total in excess of 400 for the first time since last March against New Zealand in Wellington.
  • "It's obviously been quite a tough winter, from a team point of view and personally as well," he said. "So to come back into the side and score a hundred meant a lot to me.
  • "The position I came in at was quite a tricky one, and it's very pleasing to go on and get us in a decent position by the end of play. At times the Sri Lankans bowled really well at us, and made it very hard for us to score.
  • "But we're in a really good position now. I hope we can kick on and get somewhere near 400, if not more, tomorrow."

Apart from the 180 at Lord's, the back-to-back Ashes was a searching experience for Root, not helped by the variety of roles he was asked to fill while still trying to establish the early days of his Test career. Opening in England became No. 6 to start with in Australia, but only for one Test when he was then shunted up to No. 3 after Jonathan Trott's departure. He did not survive the series, being dropped in Sydney.

He is in his 16th Test which has involved batting in six positions and although his one innings at No. 7 came due a nightwatchman, that is hardly the stability a young player needs. He has looked most at ease in the middle order; he made his nerveless 73 on debut against India in Nagpur and scored his first Test hundred from No. 5 against New Zealand at Headingley last year.

But if you had been assessing England's batting order for this match entirely logically - and with the assumption that Ian Bell gets what he wants to bat at No. 4 - then it pointed towards Root being No. 3 rather than Gary Ballance who does not bat that high for Yorkshire. Ballance did not look out of depth but was skittish during his stay as Sri Lanka preyed on a vulnerability outside off stump that was evident in the one-day series. All this was happening while Trott was making a hundred for Warwickshire's 2nd XI. He remains a vast hole to fill.

Being an opener by trade, it is surprising that Root has not seemed more at home at, or near the top of the order - notwithstanding the hundred against Australia which provides more than half his runs as an opener. The ability to rotate the strike, drop and run, to keep the board ticking comes far more easily in the middle order than it has done facing the new ball. Those skills were on evidence here; there were just two boundaries in his half-century but it did not feel as though his innings had come to standstill as some against Australia had done so.

Before this series Root stated his desire for the middle order although, after his hundred, played down a suggestion that he had declined the No.3 job. "Batting three or five, you can come in with a very similar score on the board," he said. "Whether they had an inkling I didn't want to bat there, or had suggested the middle order, maybe that had something to do with it."

Perhaps, at international level, he is more comfortable reacting to a situation rather than setting one up (he makes his one-day home in the middle order where the mindset can be similar). There is also the fact, which cannot be escaped, that batting at No. 5 will, most of the time, mean the newness of the ball has gone: in this innings, although the top three fell relatively cheaply, the ball was nearly 20 overs old when he arrived.

Still, for the Dukes ball in England, during the first session of a Test, that can still make the job tricky. He survived until lunch, which allowed England to catch their breath after a somewhat frantic first session, then played watchfully until tea. During the final session, as the zip from Sri Lanka's seamers dissipated, he skipped along at a jaunty rate with his second fifty taking 77 balls compared to the first which required 106.

A few moments later he got solidly behind the line of Nuwan Pradeep's final ball of the day then walked off as the sun started to set over Lord's. This was one day at the start of a long summer, after a long and painful winter. Tough days will follow, which could easily revive bad memories, but this was an occasion to think of the future.

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by SoyQuearns on (June 16, 2014, 2:12 GMT)

@liz1558 - not sure what comments are getting through here - but just wanted to also say that, if anything, our boys would have been more tired than yours at the end of the back-to-back ashes as we played the exact same XI for all 5 tests.

I'm sure you can appreciate the logic there. Your side used 18 different players in the Australian campaign. You could argue that, due to the utter annihilation that your inferior side suffered, they still had to work harder and bowl longer, but that's just England's shortcomings.

Furthermore - excuses don't change the facts. We lost 3-0 in England because England were better than us. But that 3-0 loss looked like a close series in comparison to the hiding you received. We ended the careers of 3 of your best players, and it is likely Carberry will never play Test cricket again either.

On your point re: age - if the wickets and runs are on the board I don't care if they are 45 years old. Pick your best side. You could learn from that re: KP.

Posted by Roshan_P on (June 13, 2014, 13:34 GMT)

I have always believed in young Rooty even though many doubted him. He has the ability and the mentality to become a great Test player. This just shows he's a good player and now needs to kick on and progress. Though this is a good innings and a great confidence boost, but it is only Sri Lanka and their bowling attack in Tests is poor. He should be given a chance at No. 5 in upcoming series against tougher opposition both home and away.

Posted by St.John on (June 13, 2014, 10:56 GMT)

No Andrew, this is not a nod for the future. Sri Lanka has considerable batting strengths but their new ball attack is not even county standard. In reality England should have had around 450 for three on day one against a bowling attack of this standard. Test cricket is not Sri Lanka's cup of tea. They are a powerhouse in the shorter forms and maybe rightfully so, seeing that many pundits foresee the end of Test cricket in the next decade or two.

Posted by milepost on (June 13, 2014, 10:25 GMT)

If 1 ton a year makes Root worth keeping in the side than England have pretty low standards lol.

Posted by liz1558 on (June 13, 2014, 9:27 GMT)

@SourQuearns

Nothing like a draught of bitter vengeance is there! Don't be surprised if England regain the Ashes at the next opportunity; your boys are verrrry old indeed. I'll be surprised if Cook is still cappie at the point; but either way, England won't be as knackered as they were down under. That's the main reason the Audries won. Had there been only one Ashes contest last year - as there usually is - home or away - England would've won.

Posted by rizwan1981 on (June 13, 2014, 9:16 GMT)

I am a Sri Lankan and the Sri Lankan Pace attack is probably one f the worst in the world ( excluding Zimbabwe ) . Therefore , its a bit too early to claim that England has turned a corner .

It appears , England are like Sri Lanka , Pakistan and India - Tigers at home and lambs overseas . Only South Africa and Australia have the bowlers to win in alien conditions .

Posted by   on (June 13, 2014, 5:18 GMT)

Well said SoyQuerns! Liked the look of Ali - make him captain.

Posted by milepost on (June 13, 2014, 4:22 GMT)

I think it's early, probably ludicrous to suggest 'England are back to their attritional best'. If Australia had been 2-22 and 4-120 the usual suspects (@FFL, Ian Chappell) would be screaming "x player bailed Australia out again". Root got a ton, big deal, it doesn't change the fact he isn't world class. Cook is in all sorts of form problems at this level these days. As @R U 4 REAL NICK points out there's a lot of pressure on the debutants but also on the senior players, after all this is their first match after the last series where, well you know what happened. I think they are all playing for their careers and the bowlers were ordinary in Australia so making sweeping generalisations after a days cricket is a bit much.

Posted by SoyQuearns on (June 13, 2014, 1:17 GMT)

I've been sticking it to England for months now after they came to Australia smug & overconfident, overstating their brilliance & understating our capabilities.

They went home embarrassed, fractured & far more humble. And so they should have, they were absolutely & entirely dreadful.

Since then they've fallen further, losing to Netherlands (again), having public slinging matches between overstuffed boards & enigmatic champions, cut ties with the best player they've had since Botham, & called upon a swathe of youth.

We also saw the cowardly end of Trott & Swann's respective careers, blights on their previously good records (though Swann averaged near 30 & Trott averaged 36 for more than the last half of his career).

We saw Carberry overlooked (despite showing ticker against Johnson).

BUT they've played well today. At 2/22 they would have been packing it. But they scored quickly, built partnerships & came out on top.

However, SL have no Johnson & Eng have no spinner.

Posted by   on (June 12, 2014, 20:44 GMT)

A promising day for England! Be interesting to see if Jordan can bat like an all rounder at this level. However, I wish Carberry had been given another chance!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Related Links
Tour Results
England v Sri Lanka at Leeds - Jun 20-24, 2014
Sri Lanka won by 100 runs
England v Sri Lanka at Lord's - Jun 12-16, 2014
Match drawn
Northants v Sri Lankans at Northampton - Jun 5-8, 2014
Match drawn
England v Sri Lanka at Birmingham - Jun 3, 2014
Sri Lanka won by 6 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
England v Sri Lanka at Lord's - May 31, 2014
Sri Lanka won by 7 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days