Nottinghamshire v Middlesex, Trent Bridge, 4th day

Wessels blast completes stunning chase

Jon Culley at Trent Bridge

June 17, 2014

Comments: 6 | Text size: A | A

Nottinghamshire 392 (Hales 96, Murtagh 6-93) and 387 for 4 (Hales 94, Jacques 76) beat Middlesex 505 (Morgan 191, Rogers 180) and 271 for 9 dec. (Stirling 66*, Gurney 4-76) by six wickets
Scorecard


Riki Wessels ended the day unbeaten on 78, Nottinghamshire v Northamptonshire, County Championship, Division One, Trent Bridge, 3rd day, May 13, 2014
Riki Wessels smashed 74 in just 48 balls as Notts cruised home © Getty Images
Enlarge

In a Championship that remains a wide open contest, Nottinghamshire have taken over the leadership, at least temporarily. In spite of conceding more than 500 runs in the first innings and being outplayed for much of the opening three days, they pulled off a stunning victory, achieving a target of 385 with only four wickets down and with more than 11 of the available overs to spare.

Only twice in their history had they scored more in the fourth innings total to win a match and the only county to achieve a higher last-innings score to win a match are Middlesex themselves, who reached 502 for 6 in 1925 on the back of a double hundred from Patsy Hendren. Nottinghamshire's own record was made in 2001, when they knocked off 461 with only three wickets down against Worcestershire at New Road in 2001, when Greg Blewett and Darren Bicknell made centuries.

As all of those facts confirm, run chases of this magnitude rarely come off, even when the maths suggest they might. The vital component is always a good start and it was that which made the difference this time. Nottinghamshire needed to score at four-and-a-half an over; for the first 30 overs they exceeded five, and did not lose a wicket.

On a pitch which forgave few errors from the bowlers, there were enough on both sides for boundaries to be common currency and it was a pattern that continued. Nottinghamshire got off to a flying start and never looked back.

Phil Jaques and Alex Hales plundered fours at every opportunity and were not parted at the top of the order until they had put on 156 when, the 31st over, Jaques swept Patel and found Toby Roland-Jones at deep-midwicket. Hales had been lucky once or twice, dropped on 58 and 86, but from such a strong position it was Nottinghamshire's match to lose. Middlesex did not bowl well enough at any point to look like stopping them.

Hales disappointed himself by getting out in the 90s for the second time in the match, this time leg before sweeping, but he had again played impressively, appearing to be on top of the technical shortcomings that undermined him last season. Much more of this and the possibility of an England career beyond Twenty20 will beckon.

Michael Lumb passed fifty for the first time this season and though he and Samit Patel were out in the space of five balls - the only moment in which the outcome seemed even remotely in doubt - it was a short-lived scare. Patel will regret squandering his chance with a loose shot taken low down at short extra-cover, but James Taylor and Riki Wessels negotiated this mini-crisis as adeptly as could have been asked of them.

With time on their side, they took a few overs to weigh things up, which was necessary given that Ravi Patel's left-arm spin had claimed three of the four wickets, but once they felt safe to do so went back on the front foot with intent.

Wessels in particular took the initiative. His unbeaten 74 came in only 48 balls and included five sixes, the last of them pulled over midwicket as Eoin Morgan turned his arm over for the first time in seven years in a Championship match.

"It is up there with any win we've had since I've been coach," Mick Newell, Nottinghamshire's director of cricket said afterwards. "Looking at today in isolation, for six blokes to pass fifty and finish the game as convincingly as that it is a wonderful batting effort.

"But over the course of days two, three and four we have put in a performance that has dragged us back after a poor first day. I can't remember giving away the best part of 800 runs in a match and still winning.

"Alex and Phil provided a great platform. You need to make a good start because if you lose wickets early you never think you'll make the runs. You can only cock it up in the first hour. You can only win it at half past five. You can't really plan a day like today.

"The opening partnerships and the ones that followed were outstanding. They kept the rate up so that we never had to push on past four or five an over. But lots of things go into a win like this. Knocking them over for less than a hundred runs on the second morning was important and then the contribution of Luke Fletcher and Andre Adams down the bottom of our innings got us close enough."

Chris Rogers, the vanquished captain who had seen his side score 472 to beat Yorkshire at Lord's earlier in the season, insisted the declaration had been timed correctly.

"You have to be positive and be prepared to lose and that was the reason for a relatively early declaration," he said. "We probably out played them for three days and we wanted to win the game. I would have made that declaration 10 times out of 10 because if you set that kind of total and lose on a day four wicket you are going to have to bowl exceptionally badly. Unfortunately, apart from Ravi, no one stepped up.

"Notts played very well, particularly up front, but we were pretty ordinary. If you get early wickets a run chase becomes impossible but we didn't and couldn't stop them, and that was disappointing."

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by CricketingStargazer on (June 18, 2014, 10:18 GMT)

@billycricket First, I'm a neutral. Second, I was only listening-in to the commentary. There was a fair amount of bewilderment being expressed. Middlesex did not seem to have a clear idea of whether to twist or stick on the 3rd evening. Even the batsmen seemed unclear as to whether the aim was to declare, or bat to the Close.

As you say, the Notts bowlers stuck to their task, but were helped by the fact that the Middlesex batsmen were unsure of their tactics. When a player such as Paul Stirling, who is very aggressive, plays a largely defensive innings, something odd is going on. As I said, the bowlers were allowed to dictate terms and put on the shackles. There was no serious effort to lift the tempo and see what would happen.

Posted by Andy876 on (June 18, 2014, 9:38 GMT)

As a Notts fan I never expected this! Often with these chases, a good start peters out into a draw or even degenerates into a collapse, but the partnerships kept on coming. It reminded me a lot of the chase in this game from 1992 - surprisingly similar scores and partnerships at the top of the order...

http://static.espncricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/1992/ENG_LOCAL/CC/SURREY_NOTTS_CC_21-23JUL1992.html

Posted by billycricket on (June 18, 2014, 8:57 GMT)

Having seen every ball bowled of the match, I don't understand you saying Middx lost the plot??? What about some credit to the bowlers who stopped you getting away both on Monday evening and the final morning. That is where the game was set up. This was as flat a pitch as I have seen at TB for many years, getting control was always difficult, (just look at 505 first inns in rapid time.) Hats off to Notts I say in facing 505 then coming back to win chasing such a huge score on the last day. Bring on somerset...

Posted by markatnotts on (June 17, 2014, 21:54 GMT)

I was absolutely astonished by this, after work I had arranged to meet friends for drinks and couldn't make it down for the last hour. After the rollicking start my hope was that even with a mini collapse we would get the draw. However Hales for the second time in his career will be gutted to be out for 90 odd twice in a match (Lancs 2010 the other one). But the platform layed with Jaques was magnificent. Lumb is finding his form, Taylor anchored the innings and Wessels went ballistic. Still the bowling is a problem. For Middlesex Patel looks promising holding up pretty well under the onslaught.

Posted by CricketingStargazer on (June 17, 2014, 20:36 GMT)

Middlesex totally lost the plot last night. They did not seem to have a clear idea of what they wanted to do. When an hour of positive batting would have set up a declaration, they prodded and poked, lost wickets regularly and let Nottinghamshire dictate terms. Even this morning the batting was pretty aimless almost until the end. The result was that Middlesex needed to go for all out attack to win and gave away runs far too freely. With a rocket-assisted start, the chase became straightforward and Middlesex were incapable of restoring control.

In a huge chase such as this, as Sri Lanka found, you need everything to go your way. If Middlesex had been able to dry up the runs for half an hour there is no doubt that, at worst, they would have obtained the draw and, quite possibly, a few batsmen would have committed suicide trying to raise the tempo.

Middlesex are, as one fan said, consistent only in their inconsistency. They are unlikely to be serious title contenders.

Posted by Treidy on (June 17, 2014, 20:12 GMT)

I suppose the good news is that we didn't declare twice before losing.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
ESPNcricinfo staffClose
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days