|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
Full name John Wells
Born date unknown
Date Christened January 5, 1760, Wrecclesham, Surrey
Died February 15, 1835, Wrecclesham, Surrey
Major teams Hambledon, Surrey
Batting style Right-hand bat
Bowling style (unknown arm) fast (underarm)
Relation Brother-in-law - W Beldham
|First-class debut||White Conduit Club v England at Lord's (Old), Jun 20-22, 1787 scorecard|
|Last First-class||England v Surrey XI at Lord's, Jul 12-14, 1815 scorecard|
"He was a man," declared Nyren, "of a trans-parent and unflawed integrity - plain, simple, and candid; uncompromising yet courteous; civil and deferential, yet not a cringer." John Wells was born in 1759--the year of victories--and came from the village of Wrecclesham, near Farnham, like the great William Beldham whose sister he married. The distance from his home to Hambledon was 27 miles, and Wells and his brother-in-law had to ride there and back in the day. Eventually they decided to build a cart for the journey, but the dart-tax was laid on about that time, so they continued to ride.
John Wells was as upright physically as he was morally. He is described as short, thick, well-set, built like a cob-horse, and just as strong, active, and hard-working as that animal. He had a very good underarm delivery and shared with T. C. Howard the reputation of being one of the two best fast bowlers of his time. He was a steady, effective, and-dependable batsman and a good fieldsman in any position. This latter quality was aided by the deadly accuracy of his throw-in, for which he became celebrated.
Indeed it was so marked that, on one occasion in a single-wicket match, Lord Frederick Beauclerk warned the younger Tufton (afterwards the last Earl of Thanet, who was arrested in France by Napoleon's orders in 1803) to beware of Honest John's marksmanship. But the warning was not sufficiently heeded and the honourable gentleman's wicket was thrown down from the side, where only a single stump was visible to the fieldsman. His physical strength was evidently allied to phenomenal quickness in gathering the ball. Once he was so quick that Beldham saw him tear off a finger-nail against his shoe-buckle in the process.
All this solid worth as a cricketer was balanced by the sturdy character of the man himself. He was not only an accomplished all-rounder, but a sound judge of the game, and one to whom others appealed for his opinion on any doubtful point. It is seldom that Nyren goes to such trouble to stress a man's reliability.
"John Wells," he writes, "possessed all the requisites for making a thoroughly useful cricketer; and in his general deportment, he was endowed with those qualities which render a man useful to society as well as happy in himself."
Here, then, was both one of the finest cricketers in England and a rare fellow to meet, one whom success did not spoil nor adversity dismay. There is, as usual, a lack of statistical record for his name does not appear in any match till 1787, when he was 28, and he must certainly have been playing before then. Nor is there anything to show- precisely when he retired from the game but, if this is the date at which he began to assist Hambledon, it seems to suggest that much of his great reputation must have been built up elsewhere, possibly in the ranks of Surrey. He was assisting the Players XI in 1806. There was a George Wells, possibly his son, who played in first-class cricket between 1814 and 1821.
John Wells was believed to be a baker by trade, but it is highly probable that he delivered more cricket-balls than loaves. He died at his native village in 1835, at the age of 76, and was laid in the same grave as his wife, with a humble "also" preceding his name on the tombstone. But, for many years afterwards. there might be seen in Wrecclesham a tribute to the memory of Honest John Wells and his illustrious brother-in-law which is surely unique in the history of Cricket. This was a sign, outside a small public house, which bore the words: "The Rendezvous of the Celebrated Cricketers Beldham and Wells."
When Mitchell Johnson hit Virat Kohli on the helmet with a bouncer, Australian fielders came from everywhere. Mental disintegration had gone, replaced by the cricket unity. Two teams, one family.
From the bouncer that struck him on the badge of his helmet to the bouncer that dismissed him, Virat Kohli's century, and his duel with Mitchell Johnson, made for compelling human drama
After the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death, this match showed that cricket and life will continue to go on. This time Test cricket dug in and got through to tea.
Virat Kohli's innings on the final day transcended the conditions, the bowlers and his batting partners, and when it was all in vain, he displayed remarkable grace in defeat
The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game
Turning your back on a system that the whole cricketing world wants a discussion on, refusing to discuss it because it is not 100%, is not good enough
The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be
After a long time we have seen an Indian team and captain enjoy the challenge of trying to overcome stronger opposition in an overseas Test