| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cricinfo staff
January 8, 2009
![]()
| |||
Andrew Strauss was formally unveiled as England's Test captain at a packed press conference at Lord's, after a tumultuous 24 hours for English cricket surrounding the double departure of Kevin Pietersen and the coach Peter Moores. He was not, however, named England's one-day captain, a decision that Strauss admitted was still in "a state of flux".
Strauss, 31, was thrust into the hot seat yesterday and spoke of his determination to draw a line under the fractious events of the past few days, while confirming that he "has no problem" working with Pietersen, a "world-class player" whom he firmly believes will support him during his tenure.
"I would like to thank Kevin Pietersen for his efforts as England captain. He is one of the greatest players in the world and I am delighted that he has confirmed that he is available to play in all our forthcoming fixtures.
"KP has been very supportive of me so far. It's a tough situation for him and I'm sure he has his own side of the story. I believe he did what was in the best interests of the England team and I have no problems with him as a player. It's vital we get the best out of Pietersen and I believe I can work with him very closely."
Strauss added that he didn't believe the dressing-room rifts were nearly so wide as the media have made out.
"Clearly from the point of view of the players and some of the management we need to chat and get it sorted out. But I've said before we are about playing and winning cricket matches and I'm sure that will unite us. I have some conversations I need to have with some of the players and will happily do that over the coming days."
"In situations like this people get pushed into corners sometimes, but my experience of the England dressing-room is that we have always got on well, I don't think anything has changed that.," said Strauss. "We have some strong characters in that dressing-room which is what you want, you want characters who believe strongly in what they about.
"My job is to manage them and make sure we are all going in the right direction and with the characters in the team I believe firmly that we can do that. The reality is that it is going to take some effort on everyone's behalves and that's the reality. You're not just going to walk in and everything's going to be hunky dory."
This is Strauss's second stint as England captain after impressing during a stand-in spell in 2006 when he led them to a 2-0 series-win over Pakistan. At the time, many felt Strauss should have been named the permanent skipper, not a locum. England instead opted for Andrew Flintoff during the 5-0 Ashes defeat of 2006-07, and Strauss's form subsequently tailed away until he was dropped for the following winter's tour of Sri Lanka. His back-to-back centuries in Chennai in December marked a fine return to form however and, ultimately, his was the only name in the hat to replace Pietersen.
Though he was understandably keen to present fresh, forward-looking views on his and England's future, he did make mention of the relationship between Moores and Pietersen which broke down so irrevocably. "Towards the back end of the India tour there were signs that Kevin and Peter probably weren't getting on as well as they could do," he said. "You've got to remember that the cricketers themselves were concentrating on trying to play two Tests and getting back after the terror attacks. There were certainly weren't signs that his [Pietersen's relationship with Moores] was as estranged as it turned out."
Asked whether the team felt sympathy with Moores for the manner in which the situation had played out, Strauss said: "Yes and rightly so. Peter Moores put in a huge amount of effort, enthusiasm and determination in taking the England team forward. I don't think anyone likes to see things end up in this manner. He has shown a lot of integrity and I don't think he deserves to go out in this fashion. But that's the way it's happened. There have been issues that have had to be dealt with and now they have been dealt with."
Strauss takes the helm without a first-team coach - Andy Flower is expected to get the role for the West Indies tour - but said he would leave the selection process of the long-term choice to the ECB. "To be honest with you there are only a few coaches I've worked with. Anyone else I'd have no idea who they were and what they were about as people," he said. "Coaches have reputations I suppose but the ECB have people in charge to make those decisions and I back myself to be able to work with most people."
When Pietersen was appointed in August last year, Geoff Miller, the national selector, made clear England's intention to have one captain for both roles. With Strauss not part of the one-day side, the possibility of dual-captaincy is again on the cards. "To be honest with you that's in a state of flux at the moment," Strauss said. "I have a meeting with the selectors tomorrow to discuss the one-day situation. Clearly there are issues with that. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to work out I haven't been playing in the one-day team for 12-18 months. We need to discuss what is best for the team."
Inevitably, thoughts turned to his predecessor Pietersen, who arrived back in London today to a police escort and an army of photographers and later said he would be spending a few days with his family before making any public comment.
"KP is a very strong-willed person and that was one of his great strengths as England captain. He had a vision of where he felt English cricket need to go and backed himself to deliver that," Strauss said. "He wasn't worried about upsetting a few people along the way. In a way that's a very positive trait to have, but in another it is going to create confrontation and that's the way it has worked out.
"All I know, knowing him as a person and a cricketer, you need people who aren't going to take a backward step. That's how he tried to run his captaincy and things were difficult, there's no other way to describe it."
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
|
Is Strauss the man to unite England?
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.
ICICI Bank Money2India brings " locked exchange rate" and a free gift
on registering and transfer of USD 250 and above.
FREE copy of Playfair with Wisden pre-order
At Cricshop.com
Cricket is no longer the game it once was, rather than being sportsmen the players are now entertainers who need to maintain a good media image.
Posted by jokerbala on (January 09 2009, 16:49 PM GMT)Pietersen though among the best bats today, was too authoritative as a captain.He exercised too much of his power too soon.It takes a while before the team mates come to respect or even fear a captain and it does not happen over night.I think these events that have happened are a blessing in disguise for the England as it gives them a chance to start afresh.
Posted by gavbergin on (January 09 2009, 12:07 PM GMT)It may be two years late, but at last Andrew Strauss has received the job which he should have been appointed to in 2006 and last year. This is one South African-born England Cricketer who appears to be a class act, as well as a reliable, level-headed character. Anyone who doubts his steel should consider the gritty way Strauss has remodlled his batting style-clawing his way back into form in the most demanding position in the game:opening batsman. Hats off to the high heidyins at Lord's for not bowing to the arrogance of the typically modern Kevin Pietersen. Let him go and earn millions playing the abominated imitation of cricket that also sums up the modern age of instant gratification.
Posted by NOTTVENKAT on (January 09 2009, 11:32 AM GMT)It is a sad day for English cricket. English cricket needed flamboyance and aggression to move out of their current sluggish ranking. Kevin in many ways Kevin was similar to how Kapil Dev started his captaincy. Lots of aggression, some naivety but a massive push forward. Blaming his tactics for loss against India is a joke. India was a much superior side notwithstanding the strong position England were in the first test. But England were not ready for Kevin. It is sad to see that Freddie was behind the mutiny along with Andrew. With this kind of factions, it is safe to say England will remain where they are, a occasional success to remind the world that they are indeed good and slowly go to the bottom of the table. Australians are damn lucky. I was hoping to see a English win in the Ashes. Now we can bet on the scoreline . Will it be 3-0 or 4-0 or a whitewash. Good luck Andrew. Looks like you even get a few one dayers to play...
Posted by ssm2407 on (January 09 2009, 09:59 AM GMT)I find it crass & just typical of Pietersen to announce to via a statement that he "intends to spend some time out of the spotlight" before giving his version of events in due course. As ever he seems to be more concerned with his media image than anything else - was it too much to say he wishes his successor well ? Its all me myself & I with Pietersen & I really believe English cricket will be well rid of him. No doubt he is a great player, but quite simply he has burned too many bridges to fit in successfully as a team man. In Strauss England have got an ideal experienced level headed mature man as leader. His predesssor might not have said it but one can only wish him all the best.
Posted by man_mani on (January 09 2009, 08:00 AM GMT)English Cricket is in the dark phase before and after 2007 world cup, as it is seeing too many captain changes, which I feel is not good for English team, which may affect their team performances. If a captain change occurs, there will be changes in the team(either in order of playing Eleven or some members itself). ECB have to look for a captain who can be around the team for quite a long time. Instead of riding on the experience, they should look at cricket knowledge of that player to be a captain, as rightly done by South Africa, and now India. Flintoff should be the last option for the captaincy, as his careen is prone to injuries. Kevin is a good cricketer but not a good captain, as hez begging people to be part of his team(Treshcothick, Harmison and now warne for Coaching job..:) ). ECB should look for a new face, which should make them smile when England plays.....
Posted by humbiddiramba on (January 09 2009, 07:51 AM GMT)Bring back Michael Vaughan! He's has the cool head of Strauss, and his occasional off-spin is far superior to that of Peitersen's
Posted by madmike360 on (January 09 2009, 04:22 AM GMT)At last a worthy player got the captaincy. Although I prefer to give Flintoff another chance I feel Andrew is a better team player than KP. But ECB is now facing the problem of fitting Strauss in their ODI unit. Finally ECB please try to hang on to a captain for a reasonable time !!!!!!!!
Posted by Lizzyp on (January 09 2009, 02:51 AM GMT)To anyone who has doubts about Strauss, and I have seen comments that he is "too mild" to lead England, then may I suggest you read the above properly. Strauss has been open and forthright and did not pussy-foot around what some might consider dodgy ground. I have to agree with Dan on the Ashes and also remind people that his batting also generally seems to improve on the occasions when he has captained England.
Posted by sammykent on (January 09 2009, 01:23 AM GMT)Strauss is adequate but KP is the better choice and the ECB need to re-instate him. When looking to become a force in Test cricket it is essential to have a captain that has conviction in his decisions and a competitive spirit. KP is the firebrand that fits the mould and relishes the challenge of going after teams like Australia and South Africa (despite what some people would say about his lack of allegiance). I fear that Strauss will be too timid in his captaincy and too nice to be an effective leader. Who would accuse Ponting, Dhoni or Smith of having small egos? The most successful captains are driven and passionate, KP exudes this and Strauss does not.