| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 10, 2009
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Players/Officials:
Owais Shah
Series/Tournaments:
England tour of South Africa
|
|||
As England's one-day team triumphed 2-1 over South Africa, Owais Shah was left marooned in London. He had been dropped two games after a sensational 98 from 89 balls against South Africa in the Champions Trophy, and on the back of two years in which he has scored more one-day runs, hit more fifties and struck more sixes than anyone else in the country.
Shah thinks it's an injustice that can't be explained by the reasons given to him by the selectors. "I was told I'm not consistent enough," he said during an npower event at Lord's. "But I've scored more runs than anyone else so that can't be right. There's got to be more which I haven't been told about."
Given England's recent success and the fact that Shah, now 31, has played 71 times for his country in 50-over cricket over the best part of a decade, it will surely be difficult for him to force his way back into the side.
Since the Champions Trophy, Jonathan Trott and Alastair Cook have come into the squad while Kevin Pietersen has returned from injury as well. Though Trott has started solidly, opening with Andrew Strauss, Shah thinks the top order lacks match-winning quality, and is adamant that his ability to clear the ropes brings a dynamism missing from the current set-up. In that Centurion tour de force, he struck five sixes in the space of 13 balls.
"I'm a lot more destructive than the guys who have come in at my expense," he said. "I'm a six-hitter, as you saw in the Champions Trophy. And sure, there are players in England who can get runs but it's all about how you get runs. I don't believe there are enough players in that line-up who can change the game. They can get runs, but it's all about changing the game, scoring against tough opposition. I believe I can offer that compared to the other players."
The lack of decisiveness is something Shah says hampers England's Test team as well, compared with sides such as India. "If you look at the best teams in the world, they have players who score really big runs, destructive runs and really nail the opposition.
"Pietersen apart, we don't have those sorts of players. If you look at India, you have players like Yuvraj [Singh] batting at six, he's one of the most destructive players in the world. It's a question of how we want to play our cricket. It's how those guys play their cricket and they're the No.1 team in the world."
Shah has been asked to play in a variety of positions during his career for England - batting as low as seven and as high as three. He cites this lack of stability as a reason why he has not scored as many runs as people might have expected.
"Every player just wants some consistency and I just find if it's constantly changing you don't have a role. I flirted with No. 3 but it was never set in stone - one series I was batting here and another there. It's just like, leave me in one position and let me deliver a role."
It's something Shah hopes his Middlesex team-mate Eoin Morgan can avoid as he tries to establish himself in England's team. "I just hope they don't mess him around like other players have been messed around, saying go there, go here. I hope he gets left alone at six to deliver his role."
While Shah has been a victim of England's muddled approach to one-day cricket, he has not helped himself by being involved in a series of run outs. His critics suggest it points to a wider problem with his temperament.
Yet Shah has no qualms with his running and feels the issue has been blown out of proportion. "I am comfortable with my running, but saying that, I am human, I do make mistakes and I will get run out," he said. "There are nine ways to get out; one of them is run out."
One of the most striking aspects of England's recent revival has been their fielding, and by leaving out Shah, alongside cumbersome movers like Ryan Sidebottom, the management have sent a clear message that poor fielders will not feature in England's one-day outfits.
While Shah accepts he is not the sharpest mover, he does not see his fielding as a big problem. "Of course I am not the quickest, I'm no Paul Collingwood, but there are places you can field where it's not difficult. I'll happily hold my own in the field. And let me tell you, Virender Sehwag is not the best fielder in the world."
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Assistant editor Sahil Dutta grew up supporting England during the 90s. Despite this, he still enjoys the game. His unrequited passions for Graeme Hick and, in latter years, Vikram Solanki gave him a stoicism that guided him through an Economics degree and a stint working at the European Parliament. He maintains the purest love for Tests and the whims of legspin bowling and still harbours hope that he could be the answer to England's long search for a mystery spinner. As it is, his most exciting cricketing experience was planning a trip to Australia for the 2006-07 Ashes with two utterly indifferent friends. Unfortunately his lung collapsed shortly before his planned departure and the pair were left to wander around from Test to Test, unprepared and clueless. Any comparisons with England are far too obvious to make. That cancelled holiday inspired an Ashes blog which led, via some tea-making at the Wisden Cricketer, to the ESPNcricinfo towers.
Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.
ICICI Bank Money2India brings " locked exchange rate" and a free gift
on registering and transfer of USD 250 and above.
FREE copy of Playfair with Wisden pre-order
At Cricshop.com
Shah is a joke - Morgan hits many more sixes than him and if you look at Collingwoods stats his six hit ratio is very similar to Shah's. Trott and KP will win more matches than Shah and he doesn't deserve a place in the One day team. He has played 71 times and maybe won one game for England - I wonder though how many times his drops or runs outs have cost England a game!
Posted by HusseyFan on (December 11 2009, 06:08 AM GMT)Shah is absolutely correct. With Shah in the line up, England become a much stronger team. He is one player who can match up to the Indian power hitters. The selectors have not explained to him or to us why they have dropped him. What an English line up - Trott, Shah, Pietersen, Collingwood, Morgan. Not including Strauss as I dont think he deserves a place in the one day team. Another couple of power hitters at the end and England could even win the next World Cup.
Posted by justint1995 on (December 10 2009, 21:21 PM GMT)Poor Owais, you've got to have some sympathy for him after some decent scores in the ICC Champions Trophy, but the fact is KP is back and England's batting order looks as secure as it has ever been in ODI Cricket, he's got to be the poorest runner in between the wickets and fielder out of all the players in the frame at the moment, he's 31 years old and needs to accept the fact he's gone.
Posted by Jojy.John.Alphonso on (December 10 2009, 17:13 PM GMT)Dear Owais, There's no doubt about your potential as a batsman but you always seemed a nervous wreck while running between wickets or fielding. You also have this habit of putting your foot in the mouth. I don't see you returning to International cricket, especially after this outburst against fellow teammates. I would suggest helping Middlesex return to former glory and waiting on a chance to be recalled to the National team. You had the potential to be a Sehwag
Posted by Chase_HQ on (December 10 2009, 13:28 PM GMT)It's fair enough actually. He's been England's best ODI batsman for a while now, holding the fort while others are failing around him. It's been tough and it's a shame that he can't be involved in a winning team now. The trouble is that England see the ODI game as a means of grooming potential test players, and as he's out of the frame for Test matches, he's a bit of a luxury for the ODI team. For example, they'd rather play Denly in the ODI side than Shah, even though Shah would be a better bet, because Denly has greater long term prospects as a Test play. It's a shame but that's the way it seems to work out.
Posted by Ghal on (December 10 2009, 11:56 AM GMT)Time to wake up and smell the flowers Owais you are no Viru and a coloured guy is only tolerated by the England selectors as long as he is better than the white guy. As soon as your form drops you are out of there. Its just the nature of the setup - get used to it.
Posted by Tigg on (December 10 2009, 11:17 AM GMT)Poor runner, bad temperament, terrible fielder. Lets hope he never makes it back in the England side. As for a six hitter, you don't want a mindless slogger batting at the top of the order. You want someone who can hit the ball along the ground where you can't get out by miss-hitting.
Posted by jackiethepen on (December 10 2009, 10:51 AM GMT)I do have some sympathy for Shah. He was fighting for his place with his wonderful knock of 98. Unfortunately he was out in the next game almost straight away. But it is his fielding which is the nail in the coffin. I saw the look on Strauss's face when he fumbled a catch. It said enough! That was after a series of terrible run-outs. And Shah did put pressure on other batsmen with his running - Strauss included during Shah's stint in the Windies in the Tests. He almost ran his captain out twice. Then ran himself out etc. It is a shame. But one day cricket and Twenty-20 depends on good fielding. It can be the difference between victory and defeat by saving 30 or so runs as well as taking wickets and creating pressure. It is all part of the strategy, Shah, not just hitting sixes. A pity because I think he added something down the order. He was messed about. What's new? Bell pushed up and down the order. Prior likewise.
Posted by Test-Over-T20 on (December 10 2009, 10:08 AM GMT)My god this is pathetic, how can he say stuff liket hat about England batsman, Colly can hit sixes, Pietersen can, Morgan can, Trott can when he really wants to, I can't believe he thinks he deserves his place in the team just to get out of a duck or make a quick 70-80..
Posted by Nipun on (December 10 2009, 06:15 AM GMT)Shah is probably a strong candidate as the world's worst fielder & runner.& one fluke-slogged 98 doesn't make you a six-hitter.I often onder how he got to play 71 matches after all !