England news April 2, 2013

Newell backs Taylor after England setback

20

Nottinghamshire's coach, Mick Newell, has come to the defence of his struggling England batsman James Taylor after he was the surprise omission in the 30-strong England Performance Squad announced by the ECB.

Taylor's England ambitions have faltered since he was given a Test debut against South Africa at Headingley last summer - a debut which became overshadowed by Kevin Pietersen's public admission of problems within the dressing room.

While Pietersen's England stand-off clouded the summer, Taylor's issues passed almost unnoticed. He was dropped after only two Tests, failed to make the cut for England's winter tour squads in India and New Zealand and led England Lions on a disastrous one-day tour of Australia, although he did top the Lions averages with 331 runs at 55.16.

Newell, who raided Leicestershire for Taylor at the end of the 2011 season, remains confident that he can rebuild his reputation by playing a central role in Nottinghamshire's Championship challenge.

"I don't think he was quite ready to play Test cricket," Newell said. "If Ravi Bopara had not pulled out for personal reasons he would not have played. He just needs a bit longer to develop his game. But I'm very confident he is going to be a high run-scorer for the next two or three years."

Newell's signing of Taylor was based on the belief that he would have several seasons developing his game at Trent Bridge before any England honours came along. Even the move to Notts was a challenge for Taylor. His upbringing at Leicestershire came on flatter pitches against Division Two attacks. At Trent Bridge, he had to adjust to Division One bowlers in arguably the most bowler-friendly conditions in the country.

In time, it can prove to be an appropriate move which will benefit his career. But Trent Bridge is a tough learning ground for batsmen. His progress could be more thorough, but slower. This is no quickie degree.

His batting statistics declined markedly as a result - a career first-class batting average of more than 50 falling to 47.03 as he made only 608 Championship runs at an average of 32.00. His Notts career was up and down from the start. He was dismissed first ball on his first-class debut - against Loughborough MCCU at Trent Bridge - but struck a hundred second time around, so becoming the tenth Notts batsman to make a century on debut.

"In terms of number it was a poorer return than I would have liked, but I would expect him to average less in Division One than Two," Newell said. "If not, then what is the point of two divisions?"

Taylor shared a century-stand with Pietersen at Headingley and, if he was very much the junior partner, he was not the first to be overshadowed by Pietersen's batting genius. But it was a highly unfavourable time to join an England dressing room as the personality clashes became evident. He then failed twice at Lord's, where he was unlucky to be run out in the second innings.

Taylor is part of a strong top six at Nottinghamshire that will feature three England one-day batsmen - all part of the EPS - in Alex Hales, Michael Lumb and Samit Patel, and which will be further strengthened by two Australian batsmen, Ed Cowan at the start of the season and David Hussey once the Ashes series begins.

As for the England Lions who fared so badly in Australia, they are conspicuous by their absence. Stuart Meaker, James Harris and Danny Briggs make it, but there is no Varun Chopra as a potential Test opener, no Rikki Clarke, which presumably scuppers his Champions Trophy chances, and no Simon Kerrigan as understudy to Monty Panesar. Ben Stokes, strikingly, and Matt Coles, both of whom were banished early from the tour for disciplinary reasons are overlooked.

But there was encouragement for Chris Tremlett, Surrey's strapping seam bowler, who has not played a Test match since January 2012 due to a long-standing back problem and last featured in a first-class match for Surrey in July last year. An Ashes return could yet be the biggest turn-up of the summer.

The EPS was introduced in 2006 as a list of 30 players who could potentially come under England's direct control as part of an attempt to ease their integration into the senior teams. It is an indicator of those held in highest regard by the management and includes players on a mix of England central contracts, incremental contracts and county contracts.

England Performance Squad 2013: Alastair Cook (Test and ODI capt), Stuart Broad (T20 capt), James Anderson, Jonny Bairstow, Ian Bell, Ravi Bopara, Tim Bresnan, Danny Briggs, Jos Buttler, Nick Compton, Jade Dernbach, Steven Finn, Alex Hales, James Harris, Craig Kieswetter, Michael Lumb, Stuart Meaker, Eoin Morgan, Graham Onions, Monty Panesar, Samit Patel, Kevin Pietersen, Matt Prior, Joe Root, Graeme Swann, James Tredwell, Chris Tremlett, Jonathan Trott, Chris Woakes, Luke Wright

David Hopps is the UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on April 2, 2013, 17:28 GMT

    Most of the squad looks good, but there's 4 names who I definitely wouldn't have. Ravi Bopara, Samit Patel, Craig Kieswetter and Jade Dernbach have all been tried, tested and failed. Especially Bopara who has had more than enough chances. With promising young players coming through, we shouldn't be going back to them. Instead, we should be showing more faith in the young guns who haven't played much. Persist with them. We should have picked James Taylor, James Vince, Liam Dawson and Reece Topley instead. 3 of those 4 haven't yet played for England, but all have lots of promise and potential.

    James Harris, Alex Hales and Danny Briggs are great inclusions to the performance squad. Hopefully it's a sign of things to come. All deserve a chance sooner than later in the ODI side.

    Lastly, it'd be great if we get Chris Tremlett back to full fitness. When he is, he's a great asset to our seam attack and will always pose a big threat, especially to the current Australian batting line-up.

  • jmcilhinney on April 2, 2013, 13:11 GMT

    I guess that it's not that big a deal when you consider that Ravi Bopara is the only specialist batsman in the squad who is not currently in one of the England teams. If there were other batsmen included who one would have considered to be behind Taylor in the pecking order then it might have been more of a concern. While I'm not convinced that Bopara, although obviously talented, is ever going to really make it as an Test cricketer, England have invested a lot in him and keeping him around the national setup to pounce if he does look like getting over the hump is not necessarily a bad idea. He has looked a bit more like fulfilling his potential in the limited-overs formats and his bowling is pretty handy there too.

  • SirViv1973 on April 3, 2013, 12:46 GMT

    @Samuel H, I too would agree that ltd overs cricket espically T20 isn't Meaker's forte. I would also add that if you look at the current crop of bowling reserves available to Eng ie SM, Woakes, Roland Jones, Topley & Harris he is the only one who has that bit of extra pace. Should god forbid anything happen to more than 1 of our first choice options during the ashes I think, although far from the finished product he would have to be considered as he would be the one most likley to be able to 'ruff up' the ozzie batsman.

  • SDHM on April 3, 2013, 9:25 GMT

    @OhhhhhhhMattyMatty - suggest you compare Meaker's first class record to his limited overs ones, then try making that assumption again. He's definitely a Test prospect, although I expect Harris, Wright or Roland-Jones might be in with more of a shout of playing in the home NZ series if they have a good start to the season & Finn continues to struggle with his new run-up.

  • Lmaotsetung on April 2, 2013, 21:53 GMT

    I think the reason the likes of Bopara, Dernbach, Patel are included is because they are already under contract by the ECB. They may not had a central contract at the start but they fulfilled the criteria needed to earn a partial contract from the ECB hence their inclusions. I guess the ECB don't want to have too many players under their control as this would be chaotic to the counties involved.

  • A_Vacant_Slip on April 2, 2013, 21:47 GMT

    Good to see the big fellow Chris Tremlett in this squad. For pure fear factor alone Vs the Australian Tremlett is worth his place. Hope he is fit to play. Love to see him play!

  • JG2704 on April 2, 2013, 20:15 GMT

    Does anyone actually know what the point is in this squad?

    To me it looks like a mishmash of capped test/T20/ODI playesr plus Harris so surely JT's chances of playing test cricket in the near future are no more or no less likely because he's in/not in the squad. I mean surely if Prior or any of the batsmen get injured JT would be above Jos and Craig to get in the test side and surely there would be spinners who would get in the test side ahead of Briggs

  • SirViv1973 on April 2, 2013, 17:44 GMT

    @Roger_Dodger, I would be surprised if Bopara gets another chance in the test side but I wouldn't rule him out in the shorter formats. Given that the players who play Tests are usually rotated in & out of ODi & T20 series to give them rest, there are often places up for grabs. Bopara was actually playing well in the early to mid part of last season but his form really fell apart towards the end of the summer. His medium pacers have also proved useful at times in the shorter formats.

  • AKS286 on April 2, 2013, 17:27 GMT

    No role for including Patel & Bopara. Taylor is a promising player. really not fair.

  • OhhhhhMattyMatty on April 2, 2013, 17:10 GMT

    Astonished there is no Toby Roland-Jones. He is the next cab off the rank in terms of seam bowling in Test cricket. Far rather see him in there than Stuart Meaker or Jade Dernbach, who are at best T20 specialists. I'd hope to see Australia face a Lions XI of: Chopra, Taylor, Bopara, Hildreth(c), Morgan, Patel, Bairstow(wk), Woakes, Tredwell, Tremlett, Roland-Jones.

  • on April 2, 2013, 17:28 GMT

    Most of the squad looks good, but there's 4 names who I definitely wouldn't have. Ravi Bopara, Samit Patel, Craig Kieswetter and Jade Dernbach have all been tried, tested and failed. Especially Bopara who has had more than enough chances. With promising young players coming through, we shouldn't be going back to them. Instead, we should be showing more faith in the young guns who haven't played much. Persist with them. We should have picked James Taylor, James Vince, Liam Dawson and Reece Topley instead. 3 of those 4 haven't yet played for England, but all have lots of promise and potential.

    James Harris, Alex Hales and Danny Briggs are great inclusions to the performance squad. Hopefully it's a sign of things to come. All deserve a chance sooner than later in the ODI side.

    Lastly, it'd be great if we get Chris Tremlett back to full fitness. When he is, he's a great asset to our seam attack and will always pose a big threat, especially to the current Australian batting line-up.

  • jmcilhinney on April 2, 2013, 13:11 GMT

    I guess that it's not that big a deal when you consider that Ravi Bopara is the only specialist batsman in the squad who is not currently in one of the England teams. If there were other batsmen included who one would have considered to be behind Taylor in the pecking order then it might have been more of a concern. While I'm not convinced that Bopara, although obviously talented, is ever going to really make it as an Test cricketer, England have invested a lot in him and keeping him around the national setup to pounce if he does look like getting over the hump is not necessarily a bad idea. He has looked a bit more like fulfilling his potential in the limited-overs formats and his bowling is pretty handy there too.

  • SirViv1973 on April 3, 2013, 12:46 GMT

    @Samuel H, I too would agree that ltd overs cricket espically T20 isn't Meaker's forte. I would also add that if you look at the current crop of bowling reserves available to Eng ie SM, Woakes, Roland Jones, Topley & Harris he is the only one who has that bit of extra pace. Should god forbid anything happen to more than 1 of our first choice options during the ashes I think, although far from the finished product he would have to be considered as he would be the one most likley to be able to 'ruff up' the ozzie batsman.

  • SDHM on April 3, 2013, 9:25 GMT

    @OhhhhhhhMattyMatty - suggest you compare Meaker's first class record to his limited overs ones, then try making that assumption again. He's definitely a Test prospect, although I expect Harris, Wright or Roland-Jones might be in with more of a shout of playing in the home NZ series if they have a good start to the season & Finn continues to struggle with his new run-up.

  • Lmaotsetung on April 2, 2013, 21:53 GMT

    I think the reason the likes of Bopara, Dernbach, Patel are included is because they are already under contract by the ECB. They may not had a central contract at the start but they fulfilled the criteria needed to earn a partial contract from the ECB hence their inclusions. I guess the ECB don't want to have too many players under their control as this would be chaotic to the counties involved.

  • A_Vacant_Slip on April 2, 2013, 21:47 GMT

    Good to see the big fellow Chris Tremlett in this squad. For pure fear factor alone Vs the Australian Tremlett is worth his place. Hope he is fit to play. Love to see him play!

  • JG2704 on April 2, 2013, 20:15 GMT

    Does anyone actually know what the point is in this squad?

    To me it looks like a mishmash of capped test/T20/ODI playesr plus Harris so surely JT's chances of playing test cricket in the near future are no more or no less likely because he's in/not in the squad. I mean surely if Prior or any of the batsmen get injured JT would be above Jos and Craig to get in the test side and surely there would be spinners who would get in the test side ahead of Briggs

  • SirViv1973 on April 2, 2013, 17:44 GMT

    @Roger_Dodger, I would be surprised if Bopara gets another chance in the test side but I wouldn't rule him out in the shorter formats. Given that the players who play Tests are usually rotated in & out of ODi & T20 series to give them rest, there are often places up for grabs. Bopara was actually playing well in the early to mid part of last season but his form really fell apart towards the end of the summer. His medium pacers have also proved useful at times in the shorter formats.

  • AKS286 on April 2, 2013, 17:27 GMT

    No role for including Patel & Bopara. Taylor is a promising player. really not fair.

  • OhhhhhMattyMatty on April 2, 2013, 17:10 GMT

    Astonished there is no Toby Roland-Jones. He is the next cab off the rank in terms of seam bowling in Test cricket. Far rather see him in there than Stuart Meaker or Jade Dernbach, who are at best T20 specialists. I'd hope to see Australia face a Lions XI of: Chopra, Taylor, Bopara, Hildreth(c), Morgan, Patel, Bairstow(wk), Woakes, Tredwell, Tremlett, Roland-Jones.

  • Jakespin on April 2, 2013, 16:35 GMT

    Extraordinary decision to overlook Taylor, made doubly so by the inclusion of Bopara. How many more chances should he be given?

  • on April 2, 2013, 16:21 GMT

    Oh. Dernbach. Never mind, eh?

  • Roger_Dodge on April 2, 2013, 16:08 GMT

    Are we really still persisting with Bopara? It seems that every pro rates him as a tremendous talent, but he has failed at the highest level over and over again.

  • SirViv1973 on April 2, 2013, 15:37 GMT

    Although the list dosen't mean too much, it's good to see Tremlett's name in there. Hopefully he will be fit enough to get a few early season CC games under his belt. If we are going to do well in both ashes series you feel we will need more options than just Anderson, Broad & Finn, with this in mind a fit Tremlett bowling quickly would be a huge asset. Also with the ashes in mind I wouldn't mind seeing someone like Harris get a game against NZL. I don't think there would be any harm in Broad or Finn going back to their counties to sharpen up and it would be good to see how Harris might fair given the chance.

  • on April 2, 2013, 13:06 GMT

    Disappointed to see Taylor not there, but looking at the list, I struggle to see who he could replace (perhaps Bopara) in the 30.

  • 2.14istherunrate on April 2, 2013, 12:31 GMT

    He was left out last year too,but he got the first try in Tests. I think these lists are fairly meaningless and one or two names are never going to be more than t20 players,if that. It's odd that he always does well for Lions. Given that Bopara may not get another Test he is possibly 3rd behind Root and Bairstow,who has hardly been recipient of the most logical tyreatment.

  • on April 2, 2013, 11:59 GMT

    Glad to see Ravi Bopara included, prior to the personal problems he looked like he was on the verge of greater consistency in an England shirt. I hope he draws confidence from this and starts the season strongly.

  • GeoffreysMother on April 2, 2013, 11:53 GMT

    SamuelH - I think it is about a Performance Squad ( the 30 best players) rather than a Development Squad (the most promising players). I assume it is so they can be watched carefully and have their workload and fitness monitored. I imagine that the counties providing these players get some dosh because they are part of the England set up. It doesn't stop a player having a good season from getting selected (like Compton) but does prevent a return to the teams in the past when someone who has a good couple of weeks gets picked in desperation.

  • on April 2, 2013, 11:39 GMT

    James Harris is an interesting inclusion.

  • SDHM on April 2, 2013, 11:37 GMT

    Really don't get the point of the EPS. If it's a development squad, then why aren't the likes of Taylor, Roland-Jones & Kerrigan involved, and the likes of Cook & Pietersen are? Why do Bopara & Kieswetter, despite falling out of England sides, get included while the previous mentioned and many others, aren't? Why do Tremlett & Bresnan waltz straight back in after injury without proving they're fit & firing? Baffling.

  • SDHM on April 2, 2013, 11:37 GMT

    Really don't get the point of the EPS. If it's a development squad, then why aren't the likes of Taylor, Roland-Jones & Kerrigan involved, and the likes of Cook & Pietersen are? Why do Bopara & Kieswetter, despite falling out of England sides, get included while the previous mentioned and many others, aren't? Why do Tremlett & Bresnan waltz straight back in after injury without proving they're fit & firing? Baffling.

  • on April 2, 2013, 11:39 GMT

    James Harris is an interesting inclusion.

  • GeoffreysMother on April 2, 2013, 11:53 GMT

    SamuelH - I think it is about a Performance Squad ( the 30 best players) rather than a Development Squad (the most promising players). I assume it is so they can be watched carefully and have their workload and fitness monitored. I imagine that the counties providing these players get some dosh because they are part of the England set up. It doesn't stop a player having a good season from getting selected (like Compton) but does prevent a return to the teams in the past when someone who has a good couple of weeks gets picked in desperation.

  • on April 2, 2013, 11:59 GMT

    Glad to see Ravi Bopara included, prior to the personal problems he looked like he was on the verge of greater consistency in an England shirt. I hope he draws confidence from this and starts the season strongly.

  • 2.14istherunrate on April 2, 2013, 12:31 GMT

    He was left out last year too,but he got the first try in Tests. I think these lists are fairly meaningless and one or two names are never going to be more than t20 players,if that. It's odd that he always does well for Lions. Given that Bopara may not get another Test he is possibly 3rd behind Root and Bairstow,who has hardly been recipient of the most logical tyreatment.

  • on April 2, 2013, 13:06 GMT

    Disappointed to see Taylor not there, but looking at the list, I struggle to see who he could replace (perhaps Bopara) in the 30.

  • SirViv1973 on April 2, 2013, 15:37 GMT

    Although the list dosen't mean too much, it's good to see Tremlett's name in there. Hopefully he will be fit enough to get a few early season CC games under his belt. If we are going to do well in both ashes series you feel we will need more options than just Anderson, Broad & Finn, with this in mind a fit Tremlett bowling quickly would be a huge asset. Also with the ashes in mind I wouldn't mind seeing someone like Harris get a game against NZL. I don't think there would be any harm in Broad or Finn going back to their counties to sharpen up and it would be good to see how Harris might fair given the chance.

  • Roger_Dodge on April 2, 2013, 16:08 GMT

    Are we really still persisting with Bopara? It seems that every pro rates him as a tremendous talent, but he has failed at the highest level over and over again.

  • on April 2, 2013, 16:21 GMT

    Oh. Dernbach. Never mind, eh?

  • Jakespin on April 2, 2013, 16:35 GMT

    Extraordinary decision to overlook Taylor, made doubly so by the inclusion of Bopara. How many more chances should he be given?