England news September 13, 2013

Strauss the perfect fit for ECB

With a complicated web to weave, the ECB may have identified the ultimate company man in charming, soothing Andrew Strauss
  shares 14

Ever since he became captain of the England cricket team, there has been a sense of entitlement about Andrew Strauss. Suggestions he would be fast-tracked as a Conservative MP have so far proved unfounded, but whether it be as a summariser on Sky Sports, a motivational speaker, or, the role in sharpest focus, the next managing director of England cricket, he has no shortage of admirers.

Bright, diplomatic and persuasive, you could also envisage him as a British High Commissioner in one of the nicer, trouble-free parts of the world, discussing trade deals and educational opportunities and slipping into the conversation at an appropriate time how something really must be done about this immigration problem. That Strauss will charm and soothe in whatever he commits the next phase of his life to is rather taken for granted.

There will be other candidates, naturally, when the deadline for applications closes on September 25: Nasser Hussain, another former England captain, would keep the role focused and demanding; Clare Connor, former captain of the England women's team and head of England women's cricket, is mulling over whether to apply; and Angus Fraser, managing director of cricket at Middlesex and a former England stalwart, would also be an obvious fit if he moved offices across Lord's.

To further complicate matters, Andy Flower's future as England team director remains uncertain, perhaps even to him. England split the coaching role to accommodate Flower's wish to spend more time with his family, putting Ashley Giles in charge of the one-day set-up, but ESPNcricinfo first indicated last month that Flower's appetite to remain as coach of the Test side might not extend beyond this winter's Ashes series in Australia.

In the middle of it all, Strauss had the luxury this summer of shadowing the former managing director of the England team, Hugh Morris, as he goes about his job. It has been quite a privilege, an invitation into the inner sanctum if ever there was one. There is no doubt who is seducing whom. It would be no surprise to find that the ECB quietly slipped a few of Strauss's favourite wines into the office.

The ECB has a complicated web to weave and, not for the first time, there is the danger of adding to an ever-growing bureaucracy. The more Flower retreats from day-to-day coaching, the more his role begins to overlap with that of MD of England cricket. A structure that has done much to improve the performance of the England cricket team is in danger of becoming bloated and confused to satisfy the individual aspirations of talented individuals.

Senior officials have been known to disappear for years within the offices of the ECB - and that includes Morris, whose role became increasingly hard to define and who certainly distanced himself from media responsibilities as Flower asserted his own, highly-disciplined and protective approach. Quite what does the MD of England cricket do? This is a chance to re-examine demarcation lines.

Strauss has been suitably discreet about his potential job application. "I'm looking into it," he said. "But they're decisions that need to be made over the next couple of weeks and I'll think quite long and hard about whether it's the right time and the right job for me. I haven't decided one way or another but I'm certainly looking at it, as will a lot of other people be.

"I'm very passionate about the game of cricket and want to contribute to it. In exactly what way that is, that kind of remains to be seen."

It is impossible to avoid the conclusion that when it comes to the ECB, Strauss is the ultimate company man. He does not as much tick the boxes as employ others to tick them for him.

Not to be too distasteful, because Strauss would have politer sensibilities, but there is also the issue of money. Morris's salary is thought to have been around £150,000, which for most of us would be nice if you can get it, but so soon after retirement Strauss can command considerably higher figures in other areas. Since retirement, he has also been in demand as a "brand ambassador", and although anybody with a real desire to achieve can surely not feel satisfied with such a superficial existence for long, he has felt the attraction of easy money. Perhaps at the moment he is simply not affordable?

It was intriguing to Strauss's approach to his role for Sky Sports during the Ashes series. "I really enjoyed doing the Sky stuff," he said, but at times he seemed cautious in the role - uneasy even - as his fellow commentators gently tried to tease out opinions about a dressing room of which he had so recently been such a dominant part.

Every former England captain faces a difficult transition in moving to the commentary box. As a captain, the protection of team unity is essential. A successful captain builds a strong sense of loyalty and mutual support. Then comes the switch to the commentary box where tactics are debated, techniques are dismantled and strong opinions demanded.

Time soon makes that transition more comfortable. Dressing rooms evolve, ties weaken, loyalties are no longer as strong. But some make the shift more quickly than others. For Michael Atherton, it was merely part of the intellectual process; his move from captain to analyst, whether on TV or in the written word, has been hugely successful. Hussain, driven by a wish to express strong, honest opinions, also benefited from an independent spirit.

But there were times, when Strauss's discomfort seemed to have a deeper source; the discomfort of a man born not to debate but to lead. Insights were hard to find, presumably because he did not always wish to offer them. His belief in the England project seemed absolute, his unwillingness to undermine it apparent. To some extent, he was still acting as a brand ambassador - for English cricket.

His autobiography comes out next month and it is hoped that it is more deep and meaningful than many, but if it reads more like a job application than a dismantling of the system, nobody will be overly surprised.

If Strauss and the ECB demur, what then? While the job specification requires "international playing experience", David Collier, the chief executive of the ECB, has indicated that such experience need not necessarily be in cricket. Collier also went on to suggest that while "playing at international level is strongly preferred, consideration could be given to someone who has outstanding international cricket management experience with the senior national team."

That encourages all manner of names to be conjured up: Sir Clive Woodward, the former England rugby coach or Peter Moores, Lancashire and former England coach, would both qualify for consideration. According to the most informed sports gossip column around, Darren Gough and Nick Knight are also expected to be among the applicants.

But it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that when it comes to the ECB, Strauss is the ultimate company man. He does not as much tick the boxes as employ others to tick them for him. One senior official has even been known to refer to him at times as "Dear Andrew". Flower's future massively complicates the issue. But we may be about to find out whether Dear Andrew is ready to answer the call.

David Hopps is the UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on September 13, 2013, 12:22 GMT

    Strauss would be an ideal candidate for this role. He commands respect and would ensure tours will be arranged with a sense of context, with appropriate rest periods. I cannot imagine Strauss allowing an Ashes series to finish on February 3, and a World Cup campaign starting on February 7, as it happened in 2011.

    I think Knight would be good too, level headed, and insightful. Hussain I think is too volatile but would be an excellent advisor to Strauss.

  • on September 15, 2013, 16:03 GMT

    I think Nassir is the perfect choice for the position

  • Yunzi on September 14, 2013, 11:29 GMT

    Nassar Hussain would be the perfect fit for the job

  • Capricorn60 on September 14, 2013, 7:00 GMT

    It appears that it is not only me who thinks Strauss is a crap commentator - so wishes he gets this job in order that we are no longer subject to his awful commentating anymore. I wish other jobs could be found for some other retired players who have started commentating like Russell Arnold & V.V.S. Laxman who are equally rubbish too!

  • on September 13, 2013, 18:49 GMT

    Give it To KP............

  • Front-Foot-Lunge on September 13, 2013, 18:03 GMT

    scottyg: LOL, comment of the day. Strauss may be a legend of the English game but his commentating is too awful for words. This sounds like just the job he's looking for.

  • Cpt.Meanster on September 13, 2013, 17:47 GMT

    I don' think he will succeed in the job no matter how well he knows some of the players in the England team. I think Strauss is a soft spoken person, somebody who would do well in coaching per se, remaining in the background, far away from cameras, limelight, and most importantly, the devil which is the British press. But a high profile job in the ECB, that too this soon after his retirement is not a good thing. Andy Flower would be the best candidate for the role because he has achieved a lot of good things for England in test cricket, taking them to no.1 and helping them in remaining a potent force in the format. If Strauss wants some kind of job other than commentary, he should sign up as the batting coach.

  • MB40 on September 13, 2013, 16:40 GMT

    I'm unclear what the managing director will do that can't be done by the existing chief executive, and vice versa. Perhaps abolish the position, or simply merge it with CE or Andy Flower's current job.

    Coincidentally, it would be hard to argue that Ashley Giles had brought much to the one day manager's job that you wouldn't have got if you just left the players to their own devices. A bit of a rethink needed at the ECB all round.

  • Gevelsis on September 13, 2013, 16:15 GMT

    Well good luck to him. As a commentator he left a lot to be desired.

  • Selassie-I on September 13, 2013, 12:46 GMT

    Clearly the best person for the job. I don't know if flower would bring the right kind of personality to the job.

  • on September 13, 2013, 12:22 GMT

    Strauss would be an ideal candidate for this role. He commands respect and would ensure tours will be arranged with a sense of context, with appropriate rest periods. I cannot imagine Strauss allowing an Ashes series to finish on February 3, and a World Cup campaign starting on February 7, as it happened in 2011.

    I think Knight would be good too, level headed, and insightful. Hussain I think is too volatile but would be an excellent advisor to Strauss.

  • on September 15, 2013, 16:03 GMT

    I think Nassir is the perfect choice for the position

  • Yunzi on September 14, 2013, 11:29 GMT

    Nassar Hussain would be the perfect fit for the job

  • Capricorn60 on September 14, 2013, 7:00 GMT

    It appears that it is not only me who thinks Strauss is a crap commentator - so wishes he gets this job in order that we are no longer subject to his awful commentating anymore. I wish other jobs could be found for some other retired players who have started commentating like Russell Arnold & V.V.S. Laxman who are equally rubbish too!

  • on September 13, 2013, 18:49 GMT

    Give it To KP............

  • Front-Foot-Lunge on September 13, 2013, 18:03 GMT

    scottyg: LOL, comment of the day. Strauss may be a legend of the English game but his commentating is too awful for words. This sounds like just the job he's looking for.

  • Cpt.Meanster on September 13, 2013, 17:47 GMT

    I don' think he will succeed in the job no matter how well he knows some of the players in the England team. I think Strauss is a soft spoken person, somebody who would do well in coaching per se, remaining in the background, far away from cameras, limelight, and most importantly, the devil which is the British press. But a high profile job in the ECB, that too this soon after his retirement is not a good thing. Andy Flower would be the best candidate for the role because he has achieved a lot of good things for England in test cricket, taking them to no.1 and helping them in remaining a potent force in the format. If Strauss wants some kind of job other than commentary, he should sign up as the batting coach.

  • MB40 on September 13, 2013, 16:40 GMT

    I'm unclear what the managing director will do that can't be done by the existing chief executive, and vice versa. Perhaps abolish the position, or simply merge it with CE or Andy Flower's current job.

    Coincidentally, it would be hard to argue that Ashley Giles had brought much to the one day manager's job that you wouldn't have got if you just left the players to their own devices. A bit of a rethink needed at the ECB all round.

  • Gevelsis on September 13, 2013, 16:15 GMT

    Well good luck to him. As a commentator he left a lot to be desired.

  • Selassie-I on September 13, 2013, 12:46 GMT

    Clearly the best person for the job. I don't know if flower would bring the right kind of personality to the job.

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on September 13, 2013, 12:46 GMT

    I liked Strauss as a batsman, but as a captain... so so. Outside of playing cricket I don't know enough about him to comment, but I'm just thinking/saying: if his captaincy bears any relation to his personality, then I think he may be too negative and 'careful', and as we've seen in these current ODI's against Australia the ECB needs a good shake-up and some enthusiastic, much more imaginative individuals injected in as soon as possible.

  • Nutcutlet on September 13, 2013, 12:44 GMT

    One of the criticisms that is often levelled against politicians, especially the younger ones, is that they have had no life experience outside the party machine. Likewise, teachers are often accused of knowing little or nothing of the real world beyond education if they begin their teaching careers straight after their degree & PGCE. In both cases the criticism seems to hold a great deal of water for me. So, although Strauss is a good communicator, doesn't (as far as I know) raise any hackles, is fair-minded & highly thought of across the world, I wonder whether he's not been gone from the England side long enough. In ten years' time, say, the situation will be different. By then he will not be able to identify with anyone in the changing room & he will bring a more varied, non-cricket experience to the position of MD of the English cricket & be all the better for it. Nonetheless, the field is very strong and the appointment will be sound.

  • scottyg on September 13, 2013, 12:22 GMT

    If this means he's not commentating, I'm all for it.

  • demigoat on September 13, 2013, 12:19 GMT

    How suitable Strauss is for the job rather depends on what the job entails. If it needs little more than diplomacy skills and a safe pair of hands then I'm sure he'd be fine. I have my doubts though if, or in so far as, the job involves strategy; taking things forward rather than simply keeping things going. I don't think anyone would seriously contend that Strauss was much of a tactician or that his comments, whether as player or commentator, are marked by their insightfulness.

    Again, this is not to say there isn't value in having a strong and dependable figurehead. But I'd hope that, if the job does require more than being diplomatic and presentable, we could do rather better.

  • demigoat on September 13, 2013, 12:19 GMT

    How suitable Strauss is for the job rather depends on what the job entails. If it needs little more than diplomacy skills and a safe pair of hands then I'm sure he'd be fine. I have my doubts though if, or in so far as, the job involves strategy; taking things forward rather than simply keeping things going. I don't think anyone would seriously contend that Strauss was much of a tactician or that his comments, whether as player or commentator, are marked by their insightfulness.

    Again, this is not to say there isn't value in having a strong and dependable figurehead. But I'd hope that, if the job does require more than being diplomatic and presentable, we could do rather better.

  • scottyg on September 13, 2013, 12:22 GMT

    If this means he's not commentating, I'm all for it.

  • Nutcutlet on September 13, 2013, 12:44 GMT

    One of the criticisms that is often levelled against politicians, especially the younger ones, is that they have had no life experience outside the party machine. Likewise, teachers are often accused of knowing little or nothing of the real world beyond education if they begin their teaching careers straight after their degree & PGCE. In both cases the criticism seems to hold a great deal of water for me. So, although Strauss is a good communicator, doesn't (as far as I know) raise any hackles, is fair-minded & highly thought of across the world, I wonder whether he's not been gone from the England side long enough. In ten years' time, say, the situation will be different. By then he will not be able to identify with anyone in the changing room & he will bring a more varied, non-cricket experience to the position of MD of the English cricket & be all the better for it. Nonetheless, the field is very strong and the appointment will be sound.

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on September 13, 2013, 12:46 GMT

    I liked Strauss as a batsman, but as a captain... so so. Outside of playing cricket I don't know enough about him to comment, but I'm just thinking/saying: if his captaincy bears any relation to his personality, then I think he may be too negative and 'careful', and as we've seen in these current ODI's against Australia the ECB needs a good shake-up and some enthusiastic, much more imaginative individuals injected in as soon as possible.

  • Selassie-I on September 13, 2013, 12:46 GMT

    Clearly the best person for the job. I don't know if flower would bring the right kind of personality to the job.

  • Gevelsis on September 13, 2013, 16:15 GMT

    Well good luck to him. As a commentator he left a lot to be desired.

  • MB40 on September 13, 2013, 16:40 GMT

    I'm unclear what the managing director will do that can't be done by the existing chief executive, and vice versa. Perhaps abolish the position, or simply merge it with CE or Andy Flower's current job.

    Coincidentally, it would be hard to argue that Ashley Giles had brought much to the one day manager's job that you wouldn't have got if you just left the players to their own devices. A bit of a rethink needed at the ECB all round.

  • Cpt.Meanster on September 13, 2013, 17:47 GMT

    I don' think he will succeed in the job no matter how well he knows some of the players in the England team. I think Strauss is a soft spoken person, somebody who would do well in coaching per se, remaining in the background, far away from cameras, limelight, and most importantly, the devil which is the British press. But a high profile job in the ECB, that too this soon after his retirement is not a good thing. Andy Flower would be the best candidate for the role because he has achieved a lot of good things for England in test cricket, taking them to no.1 and helping them in remaining a potent force in the format. If Strauss wants some kind of job other than commentary, he should sign up as the batting coach.

  • Front-Foot-Lunge on September 13, 2013, 18:03 GMT

    scottyg: LOL, comment of the day. Strauss may be a legend of the English game but his commentating is too awful for words. This sounds like just the job he's looking for.

  • on September 13, 2013, 18:49 GMT

    Give it To KP............