England news April 23, 2014

Farbrace named England assistant

ESPNcricinfo staff
21

The appointment of Paul Farbrace as England's assistant coach has been confirmed by the ECB. Farbrace had been identified as the leading candidate to become Peter Moores' No. 2 and his resignation as Sri Lanka coach on Tuesday cleared the way for him to join England's new set-up.

The ECB has not specified what compensation, if any, was paid but said "an agreement" had been reached with SLC. Farbrace was only in the Sri Lanka role for three months and Sanath Jayasuriya, the chief selector, said SLC had been left "helpless" after losing their coach weeks before they travel to England for Test, ODI and T20 series.

"We are grateful to SLC for their understanding and co-operation in releasing Paul from his contract in order to achieve his desire to return to England and to allow him to work with Peter Moores," David Collier, the ECB's chief executive, said. "Paul developed his coaching through the ECB's Level Four programme and brings substantial international experience to the new England management."

Farbrace's brief spell in charge of Sri Lanka was a successful one, their only defeat in 18 matches coming against England at the World T20. They went on to lift that trophy, having won the Asia Cup a few weeks beforehand, and the ECB sought out Farbrace to offer him the role when he was back in England on holiday after the World T20.

Moores was appointed as England's head coach for the second time at the weekend, after five years with Lancashire, and he said Farbrace's "recent international experience" was of particular value. As well as the visit of Sri Lanka, about whom Farbrace knows plenty, India will tour England during the summer. The first fixture for the new regime will come against Scotland in Abderdeen on May 9.

"It's fantastic to be given the opportunity to work with your own country's national team and this was an offer that I could not turn down - much as I have enjoyed working with the Sri Lankan players and sharing in their recent success," Farbrace said.

"I am particularly relishing the chance to work more closely with Peter as we undertook the Level Four Coaching programme together and have known each other since we were both young wicketkeepers on the county circuit together. It will also be great to renew acquaintances with Alastair Cook and other senior players whom I worked with earlier in my coaching career with England's age-group teams."

In addition to two stints with Sri Lanka, the first as Trevor Bayliss' assistant, Farbrace has coached with Yorkshire and Kent, as well as England women and England U-19s. Paul Downton, England's managing director who led the recruitment process, said Farbrace had enjoyed "unprecedented success" with Sri Lanka. Having resigned during his six-month probationary period, he is able to start in the England job straight away.

"I am really excited about the way the England management structure is taking shape and I know that Paul and Peter Moores are looking forward to working closely together," Downton said. "I would like to echo David Collier's thanks to SLC for reaching an agreement which allowed Paul to join us."

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • SLMaster on April 25, 2014, 15:01 GMT

    If ENG have high regards for Farbrace why wasn't he in the picture few months ago. Sure Farbrace helped SL (may be to 10%), however, his ability is overrated with the three months stint with SL. Everyone is forgetting that SL players had a major/substantial part in recent success.

  • CKfrombrisbane on April 25, 2014, 4:24 GMT

    SL won because of their skills not because of Farbarce involvement . Farbarce was a lucky coach. Now time to show the skills for Farbarce.

    With struggling English team Farbarce will regret about his decision.

  • on April 24, 2014, 20:56 GMT

    This move will surely back fire him in his career...he will live to regret.

  • cloudmess on April 24, 2014, 14:30 GMT

    If Paul Downton really did consult globally with coaches all across the world (as he grandly claims in the press conference), then judging by the 5-man shortlist he drew up with the cricketing world at his feet, the feed-back he had from the likes of Kirsten, Fleming etc must have been along the lines of: "English county coaches are the best in the word, Paul. And not least the English county coaches who've already been tried and failed in the England job". As he diligently took notes, he must have wondered what all the giggling was.

  • on April 24, 2014, 14:27 GMT

    Sri Lanka had a fantastic period under him. But unfortunately we will miss him in the future. Its time to Atapattu to show his talent and become permanent head coach of the national side.

  • Mutukisna on April 24, 2014, 11:41 GMT

    When England were looking for a coach long before Sri Lanka won the World T20, I suggested that there is a coach and an Englishman at that, who is doing a pretty good job with Sri Lanka Cricket and that the ECB would do well to consider him. I don't think for a moment that the ECB acted on my advice, as I would have preferred PF to be appointed as the Head Coach rather than as Assistant. I am now convinced that Farbrace will eventually take over as Head Coach and many suspect that his appointment will only serve to undermine Moores in his job in the long run. Makes me wonder whether Mr Downton has appointed Farbrace as a fallback. Otherwise, why do you need two high profile coaches? I am responding to this article as it originates from ESPN Sports Media not an individual writer.

  • Redmakka on April 24, 2014, 9:16 GMT

    I find it quite amusing that alistair cook has now come out and said that the players found the dual coach situation hard. Why did he not mention this before? He is nothing but a yes man. His captaincy skills are quite inferior to the othet captains in the world. As for farbrace, I would use the example of the former man utd manager, David Moyes. He left Everton to become Man Ut and look at what has happened to him. The grass is not always greener on the other side. The Enfland team play a boring brand of cricket, and it seems that the KP Saga has shown that you must agree with everything and not ask questions and express your opinions to reach that higher level. KP should be in that team and Captain.

  • on April 24, 2014, 9:02 GMT

    ECB and Cook, getting all wrong, I'm afraid. Farbrace hiring is a negative tactic which clearly shows the fear of another white-wash within the England camp. Everyone is seriously worried and afraid about how this English team (without their only match-winner, KP) is even going to win a game.

  • Flash_hard27 on April 24, 2014, 7:48 GMT

    Lots of sour grapes from Sri Lanka fans at the loss of a coach but clearly SLC were fantastically naive in the contract negotiations to get Farbrace in the first place. Your ire should be aimed at them for letting you down not the ECB for targeting someone that they believe will make England stronger.

    and remember Farbrace is English, of course he would prefer to be involved with his home team over one from another country. Wouldn't you?

  • Herath-UK on April 24, 2014, 6:58 GMT

    Both ECB & Farbrace have lost face from this whole saga & England have not started well with the 'new team culture'. England stood on principles to sack KP but broke all ethics in an unprofessional manner to reach & appoint Farbrace. England have to offer a lot to Sri Lanka as damage limitation to its reputation & show some sort of leadership after all. Otherwise this is going to boomerang on them one way or other.

  • SLMaster on April 25, 2014, 15:01 GMT

    If ENG have high regards for Farbrace why wasn't he in the picture few months ago. Sure Farbrace helped SL (may be to 10%), however, his ability is overrated with the three months stint with SL. Everyone is forgetting that SL players had a major/substantial part in recent success.

  • CKfrombrisbane on April 25, 2014, 4:24 GMT

    SL won because of their skills not because of Farbarce involvement . Farbarce was a lucky coach. Now time to show the skills for Farbarce.

    With struggling English team Farbarce will regret about his decision.

  • on April 24, 2014, 20:56 GMT

    This move will surely back fire him in his career...he will live to regret.

  • cloudmess on April 24, 2014, 14:30 GMT

    If Paul Downton really did consult globally with coaches all across the world (as he grandly claims in the press conference), then judging by the 5-man shortlist he drew up with the cricketing world at his feet, the feed-back he had from the likes of Kirsten, Fleming etc must have been along the lines of: "English county coaches are the best in the word, Paul. And not least the English county coaches who've already been tried and failed in the England job". As he diligently took notes, he must have wondered what all the giggling was.

  • on April 24, 2014, 14:27 GMT

    Sri Lanka had a fantastic period under him. But unfortunately we will miss him in the future. Its time to Atapattu to show his talent and become permanent head coach of the national side.

  • Mutukisna on April 24, 2014, 11:41 GMT

    When England were looking for a coach long before Sri Lanka won the World T20, I suggested that there is a coach and an Englishman at that, who is doing a pretty good job with Sri Lanka Cricket and that the ECB would do well to consider him. I don't think for a moment that the ECB acted on my advice, as I would have preferred PF to be appointed as the Head Coach rather than as Assistant. I am now convinced that Farbrace will eventually take over as Head Coach and many suspect that his appointment will only serve to undermine Moores in his job in the long run. Makes me wonder whether Mr Downton has appointed Farbrace as a fallback. Otherwise, why do you need two high profile coaches? I am responding to this article as it originates from ESPN Sports Media not an individual writer.

  • Redmakka on April 24, 2014, 9:16 GMT

    I find it quite amusing that alistair cook has now come out and said that the players found the dual coach situation hard. Why did he not mention this before? He is nothing but a yes man. His captaincy skills are quite inferior to the othet captains in the world. As for farbrace, I would use the example of the former man utd manager, David Moyes. He left Everton to become Man Ut and look at what has happened to him. The grass is not always greener on the other side. The Enfland team play a boring brand of cricket, and it seems that the KP Saga has shown that you must agree with everything and not ask questions and express your opinions to reach that higher level. KP should be in that team and Captain.

  • on April 24, 2014, 9:02 GMT

    ECB and Cook, getting all wrong, I'm afraid. Farbrace hiring is a negative tactic which clearly shows the fear of another white-wash within the England camp. Everyone is seriously worried and afraid about how this English team (without their only match-winner, KP) is even going to win a game.

  • Flash_hard27 on April 24, 2014, 7:48 GMT

    Lots of sour grapes from Sri Lanka fans at the loss of a coach but clearly SLC were fantastically naive in the contract negotiations to get Farbrace in the first place. Your ire should be aimed at them for letting you down not the ECB for targeting someone that they believe will make England stronger.

    and remember Farbrace is English, of course he would prefer to be involved with his home team over one from another country. Wouldn't you?

  • Herath-UK on April 24, 2014, 6:58 GMT

    Both ECB & Farbrace have lost face from this whole saga & England have not started well with the 'new team culture'. England stood on principles to sack KP but broke all ethics in an unprofessional manner to reach & appoint Farbrace. England have to offer a lot to Sri Lanka as damage limitation to its reputation & show some sort of leadership after all. Otherwise this is going to boomerang on them one way or other.

  • YsaKaru on April 24, 2014, 6:57 GMT

    poor cricket by ECB.... Hopefully our lankan lions will hammered them...

  • ksquared on April 24, 2014, 5:57 GMT

    If the ECB thinks that poaching the opponents coach is going to make their side a winning team then they are in for a rude shock. Unless ECB goes on to the extent of giving rank green tops to the two touring sides both SL and IND are far superior sides to ENG

  • Udendra on April 24, 2014, 4:00 GMT

    Is this the new trend? Stealing well performing coaches from other countries? shame.

  • on April 24, 2014, 2:58 GMT

    "the team culture" Cook is referring to is the extremely boring brand of cricket cook and Co. wants play and get repeatedly hammered by virtually every team. mark my words they are gonna be hammered by SL and india this summer.

  • on April 24, 2014, 2:28 GMT

    All the more reason England should be careful now. Sri Lankans come with a vengeance & you know what an angry Sri Lankan team can do. Frankly, Sri Lanka's best strategists are Mahela & Sanga. If Fabrace disclose their strengths & weaknesses, the latter will come up with a different game plan. Believe me, i know how capable they are.

  • on April 24, 2014, 1:48 GMT

    This move clearly confirm that touring Sri Lanka will be a huge challenge to England. Further it's confirm that England badly need to know strengths and weakness of Sri Lanka. Well this will be a more towords tactical decision rather than strategic decision. England team in worst situation which force them to discard ethics and values. England need to bounce back Ethically or unethically that's the mind set of ECB.

  • S305 on April 23, 2014, 23:04 GMT

    Paul Farbrace, man, with the England tour in the horizon, you've left us in a blue funk. Nevertheless, we understand this opportunity for your to coach your own country........, thank you very much for bringing us the World Cup: it it gratefuly appreciated. Thanks for bringing our boys together as one. Wish you the best in your coaching career.

  • cloudmess on April 23, 2014, 21:58 GMT

    Just read this article, and Alistair Cook's words. English cricket seems swamped in euphemisms and sound-bites again, as it always was in the bad old days. It's now more important to have good men on board and to create the right culture, rather than to have the best men on board and to create a winning team.

  • TripleCenturian on April 23, 2014, 19:37 GMT

    What relevance does Colliers comment about where Farbrace took his coaching badges have? Were Flower and Fletcher and Cooley and Saker all trained to coach via the ECB Level 4 programme? I doubt it but it did not stop them being appointed.

    Collier infers that we can pull rank over Sri Lanka just because we taught Farbrace hoe to coach which is very condescending to smaller countries and arrogant in the extreme

  • Lakpj on April 23, 2014, 18:32 GMT

    I don't think Paul did a lot to win SL a World cup in just over 10 weeks, the team had already to been to 4 finals earlier and only had failed to cross that final hurdle. But the real damaging aspect would be to loose the coach just weeks before a tour and that too to the team you are going to face next.

  • Htc-Android on April 23, 2014, 18:28 GMT

    It was really an unprofessional behaviour from ECB to approach a coach who has been employed by another cricket board.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Htc-Android on April 23, 2014, 18:28 GMT

    It was really an unprofessional behaviour from ECB to approach a coach who has been employed by another cricket board.

  • Lakpj on April 23, 2014, 18:32 GMT

    I don't think Paul did a lot to win SL a World cup in just over 10 weeks, the team had already to been to 4 finals earlier and only had failed to cross that final hurdle. But the real damaging aspect would be to loose the coach just weeks before a tour and that too to the team you are going to face next.

  • TripleCenturian on April 23, 2014, 19:37 GMT

    What relevance does Colliers comment about where Farbrace took his coaching badges have? Were Flower and Fletcher and Cooley and Saker all trained to coach via the ECB Level 4 programme? I doubt it but it did not stop them being appointed.

    Collier infers that we can pull rank over Sri Lanka just because we taught Farbrace hoe to coach which is very condescending to smaller countries and arrogant in the extreme

  • cloudmess on April 23, 2014, 21:58 GMT

    Just read this article, and Alistair Cook's words. English cricket seems swamped in euphemisms and sound-bites again, as it always was in the bad old days. It's now more important to have good men on board and to create the right culture, rather than to have the best men on board and to create a winning team.

  • S305 on April 23, 2014, 23:04 GMT

    Paul Farbrace, man, with the England tour in the horizon, you've left us in a blue funk. Nevertheless, we understand this opportunity for your to coach your own country........, thank you very much for bringing us the World Cup: it it gratefuly appreciated. Thanks for bringing our boys together as one. Wish you the best in your coaching career.

  • on April 24, 2014, 1:48 GMT

    This move clearly confirm that touring Sri Lanka will be a huge challenge to England. Further it's confirm that England badly need to know strengths and weakness of Sri Lanka. Well this will be a more towords tactical decision rather than strategic decision. England team in worst situation which force them to discard ethics and values. England need to bounce back Ethically or unethically that's the mind set of ECB.

  • on April 24, 2014, 2:28 GMT

    All the more reason England should be careful now. Sri Lankans come with a vengeance & you know what an angry Sri Lankan team can do. Frankly, Sri Lanka's best strategists are Mahela & Sanga. If Fabrace disclose their strengths & weaknesses, the latter will come up with a different game plan. Believe me, i know how capable they are.

  • on April 24, 2014, 2:58 GMT

    "the team culture" Cook is referring to is the extremely boring brand of cricket cook and Co. wants play and get repeatedly hammered by virtually every team. mark my words they are gonna be hammered by SL and india this summer.

  • Udendra on April 24, 2014, 4:00 GMT

    Is this the new trend? Stealing well performing coaches from other countries? shame.

  • ksquared on April 24, 2014, 5:57 GMT

    If the ECB thinks that poaching the opponents coach is going to make their side a winning team then they are in for a rude shock. Unless ECB goes on to the extent of giving rank green tops to the two touring sides both SL and IND are far superior sides to ENG