Old Trafford's abandoned international

Lancashire exonerated in cancellation enquiry

Cricinfo staff

September 11, 2009

Comments: 2 | Text size: A | A

Disappointed fans begin to disperse after the match was abandoned, England v Australia, 2nd Twenty20 international, Old Trafford, September 1, 2009
The abandoned Old Trafford match led to an ECB enquiry © Getty Images
Enlarge

Following an extensive enquiry into the events that led to the abandonment of the second Twenty20 between England and Australia, the ECB has recommended that a reserve playing surface should be prepared for all future international fixtures, and that - in the event of the sort of exceptional circumstances that forced the cancellation of the September 1 contest - an amendment to the playing conditions should be sought to ensure that the match goes ahead regardless - which, in the case of that particular Twenty20 fixture, might have involved bowling all overs from one end.

The ECB launched their enquiry after the on-field umpires, Peter Hartley and Nigel Llong, were forced to abandon the match primarily because of what they considered to be a 'dangerous' and 'unstable' area on the bowlers' run up at the Brian Statham End of the ground. It was also deemed that there were other areas of the ground that were 'marginal' in terms of their suitability for international cricket.

The enquiry determined that the cause of the problem was the fact that the new drainage system, installed at Old Trafford in the winter of 2008-09, did not include parts of what is to become the new square in 2011, when the surface is relayed to face North-South, as opposed to East-West as it does currently. To do so, the ECB said, would have resulted in further extensive works having to take place in 2010.

The safety of the players was deemed to have been paramount in making the decision, and although Lancashire were able to start their County Championship match against Sussex the following day, the umpire for that match, Neil Mallender, stated that he would not have declared the ground fit for international cricket. Nevertheless, the ECB report exonerated Lancashire for their part in the abandonment, praising their ground covers as "excellent", and pointing out that there had been an unusual volume of rain in the days leading up to the match, exposing those parts of the ground without the new drainage.

The report made six recommendations in all:

  • That as soon as the square at Old Trafford is relocated in Autumn 2010 the drainage is further reviewed to ensure all areas outside the square benefit from the enhanced drainage system.
  • To recommend to ICC that the abandonment of matches whilst remaining in the sole control of the umpires is only made after consultation with the ground authority.
  • The safety of players must remain an overriding criteria if there is a substantive risk of serious injury.
  • To recommend to ICC that conditions must be safe to preserve the integrity of the match and due care for the players but in marginal conditions play should be maximised. In the case of abandoned T20 matches the Home Board should have the right to reschedule the fixture if a venue be available and is feasible within 24 - 48 hours .
  • All Category A and B venues be required to prepare two playing surfaces which shall be a minimum of 5 metres apart for major matches.
  • That in consultation with the Home Board the ICC Match Referee and the captains should have the power to amend the playing regulations to seek to provide play .
  • David Collier, the ECB chief executive, said: "We thank Gordon Hollins, the ECB's head of venue partnerships, for his thorough investigation of the events surrounding this abandonment. We are bitterly disappointed for the 17,000 spectators who had spent time and money attending the match and aim to do everything in our powers to ensure play whenever possible.

    "The Board have received a series of recommendations which they will now progress - including the suggestion that drainage facilities and permanent floodlights for matches awarded from 2011 become a significant part of the balanced scorecard used when the Major Match Group award such matches."

    The ECB will also recommend a new match protocol for International Twenty20 to the ICC as a matter of urgency.

    © ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

    Posted by ARad on (September 11, 2009, 15:00 GMT)

    "but in marginal conditions play should be maximised."

    This is too vague and puts too much pressure on the umpires. The umpires should always err on the side of the safety. An abandoned match (especially a T20I) is nothing compared to a major injury to a quality player.

    Posted by D.V.C. on (September 11, 2009, 13:15 GMT)

    By and large these suggestions seem excellent. There is one thing that concerns me though: the 1st Class Umpire's statement that he would not have passed the ground fit for international cricket. Why do professional 1st Class players not warrant the same protection as International players? And more fundamentally, is not the game of cricket the same at all levels of play? If a player makes a name for themself adapting to unusual conditions at a domestic level do they not deserve the opportunity to display that adaptability on the world stage?

    Comments have now been closed for this article

    TopTop
    Email Feedback Print
    Share
    E-mail
    Feedback
    Print
    ESPNcricinfo staffClose
    Tour Results
    England v Australia at Chester-le-Street - Sep 20, 2009
    England won by 4 wickets (with 60 balls remaining)
    England v Australia at Nottingham - Sep 17, 2009
    Australia won by 111 runs
    England v Australia at Nottingham - Sep 15, 2009
    Australia won by 4 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
    England v Australia at Lord's - Sep 12, 2009
    Australia won by 7 wickets (with 38 balls remaining)
    England v Australia at Southampton - Sep 9, 2009
    Australia won by 6 wickets (with 9 balls remaining)
    More results »
    News | Features Last 3 days
    News | Features Last 3 days