Cricinfo Extracover / Features

Tendulkar right to decline the captaincy

Sachin Tendulkar just may have saved the selectors the blushes by turning down the captaincy

Ian Chappell

November 8, 2007

Comments: 9 | Text size: A | A



Tendulkar tried to micro-manage his bowlers during his second captaincy stint, with poor results © AFP
Enlarge

Sachin Tendulkar was right to decline the Indian captaincy. It may well be the case with marriage that it's better the second time, but not necessarily cricket captaincy.

If you go purely by record, Tendulkar's second stint as Indian captain was a disaster: one win in eight attempts. However, as bad as those stats are, they don't reveal the full story.

Tendulkar tried to micro-manage in his second stint at captaincy. He would often talk to bowlers a couple of times an over - and not just a few words of encouragement either, more like a coaching lesson. It would be the equivalent of his batting partner giving Tendulkar advice two or three times each over.

Now this has the same effect on bowlers that constant chatting between balls would presumably have on Tendulkar's own concentration and his rhythm as a batsman. It also hints at a lack of faith in the bowler's ability. He's been selected, he's attended the team meeting, so let him bowl. An occasional suggestion or a quick natter about field placings before an over is acceptable, but not a coaching lesson every third ball.

Imran Khan was one of the better international leaders and he believes a good captain should "understand bowling". Tendulkar definitely comprehends bowling when he's facing it, but from his actions as a captain he doesn't appear to understand bowlers.

The Indian selectors wouldn't have done Tendulkar any favours by appointing him Test captain a third time. His first assignment would have been in the toughest environment: Australia have lost just six Tests at home since the start of the 1995-96 season. In addition, during his first two stints as Indian captain he was at his peak as a player. Now he's no longer a dominant batsman.

Tendulkar has saved the selectors from what could've been not only an embarrassing decision but also a costly mistake. If he had accepted the captaincy and India went on to lose the series badly to Australia, it could have hastened his retirement.

RSS Feeds: Ian Chappell

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 9 
Posted by sushain.pandit on (November 08 2007, 07:03 AM GMT)

Well, I won't quite agree with what has been said/implied here. What the author calls here 'micro-managing' is in fact called 'creating a sense of expectation' and 'an unrelenting predilection for being never at rest'; these qualities being primal to create world champions. What is less obvious is that only a champion would know these and all he was trying was to pass them on. "Understanding Bowling" would obviously help Imran Khan as a captin, mainly because he's a bowler and thus in ctrl of things and was at all times supported by world-class performers like Wasim, Waqar and other genuine seamers. It doesn't always help if you "understand bowling" and your bowlers keep getting away for runs; then you need to approach the bowler and talk. It's a known fact that Tendulkar hasn't done well in his stints as a captain, but saying that his approach wasn't right would be a bit gross and again, let us stop linking every single issue with his retirement and take his decision in good spirit.

Posted by chaitanya_lakkapragada on (November 08 2007, 07:02 AM GMT)

I think what Ian Chappell said with regard to the bowlers and how sachin handled them was absolutely right.I think during his two stints as captain, he never realized that every player has certain limitations, beyond which he cannot perform.Sachin expected his players to perform at his level and the players at his disposal had limited talent.He also did not have a proper support structure to assist him, which is the case even now, what with the team without a coach.Even the board dosen't know who the "Cricket Manager" for the Australian tour is going to be.You never know with the BCCI.They may even call Mr.Bob Simpson to assist the team in Aus.

Posted by jk16 on (November 08 2007, 06:45 AM GMT)

completely agree. sachin is a great batsman but a poor leader and appears to be a very impatient and 'know-all' kind of captain. another stint at the job would have exposed his inabilities further.

Posted by diloo on (November 08 2007, 06:30 AM GMT)

Yeah Ian is right. Tendulkar wanted the same intensity form players as he played the game. Continuous advice,suggestions to bowlers may have an adverse effect on them.Stats also do not favour tendulakar as a captain.He is also not the same force as he used to be. Better leave him concentrate on his batting.

Posted by satyadas on (November 08 2007, 05:55 AM GMT)

Absolutely spot on Mr. Chappell. I had noticed Sachin's constant talking with the bowlers during the overs. It will certainly affect the bowler's thinking. One can not put any simpler than that a bowler has also been selected, participated in the team meeting, so knows the plan. Suggestions once in a while are fine but not continuous interference.

Posted by NitinS on (November 08 2007, 05:07 AM GMT)

Dear Mr. Chappell, I have not found much to agree with in your recent opinions on Tendulkar - but that is on Sachin the cricketer and batsman. However, I do fully agree with you on this occasion - Sachin was way overboard in his discourses to bowlers during his stint as captain. I often watched live tele casts with my father and both of us (avid Sachin fans) wished he would shut up and let the bowler do his stuff! After all, he wouldn't (and doesn't) appreciate receive batting advice from a bowling or batting captain. It would have been nice to see if he had changed and improved as a man manager over time - but perhaps not. He seems to be doing well in his current role as mentor to the likes of Yuvie and Bhajji (who have now passed out!) and perhaps the younger ones as well.

Posted by Manish.J on (November 08 2007, 05:05 AM GMT)

I think when Sachin was captaining Indian side, he didin't had support of many quality bowlers as they are now in Indian team. That made his job difficult with not much options left. Today we have 5 pacers in line up and that make a huge difference.

Posted by omarhanif on (November 08 2007, 04:58 AM GMT)

I totally agree with Ian, but the question is still needs to be answered. Who will be the India Test Captain? If you ask me, I will definatly go for Dhoni keeping in mind the future and his abilities of what he has achieve in his tenure as a captain. Kumble is great but for how long, we are already started talking about his retirement and if that is the case, no point of having a captain for only 6 months or a year. A good example to follow here is of Grame Smith or of Stephen Flemming. He can be the third one.

Posted by GuRuPaarth on (November 08 2007, 04:57 AM GMT)

I agree with Ian that Sachin wouldn't have made the best captain. There are certainly others within the team who are more capable of leading. However, I adamantly disagree that it would have been an embarrassing mistake. This bowling and batting line-up of the current team has more than potential. They are performing. I don't believe that Tendulkar would have came to give advise to someone like Zaheer. This current team is much better than the ones he had lead in the past. Nonetheless, it was the best decision keeping in mind of the future. I also think he was wary of the success that Dhoni might have in the ODIs. Dhoni is a special captian and Sachin rightly decided not to be compared against him. It is also much likely for someone like Dhoni to succeed since Tendulkar is put under far too much pressure by the media. His actions are constantly watched, judged, and more often scrutinized. Tendulkar has never been short of good ideas and they are better noted as a senior member or VC.

Do you agree with Ian Chappell?
Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Ian ChappellClose
Ian Chappell Widely regarded as the best Australian captain of the last 50 years, Ian Chappell moulded a team in his image: tough, positive, and fearless. Even though Chappell sometimes risked defeat playing for a win, Australia did not lose a Test series under him between 1971 and 1975. He was an aggressive batsman himself, always ready to hook a bouncer and unafraid to use his feet against the spinners. In 1977 he played a lead role in the defection of a number of Australian players to Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, which did not endear him to the administrators, who he regarded with contempt in any case. After retirement, he made an easy switch to television, where he has come to be known as a trenchant and fiercely independent voice.
Related Links
News : Tendulkar declines Test captaincy
Players/Officials: Sachin Tendulkar
Teams: India
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
  • Cricinfo Widgets
Sponsored Links

Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.

on registering and transfer of USD 250 and above.

At Cricshop.com