South Africa v West Indies, Champions Trophy, Group B, Cardiff June 12, 2013

South Africa face knockout pressure before the knockouts

South Africa have a poor record in knockout games in ICC tournaments, and their last group game against West Indies is an elimination match
19

Remember when the Champions Trophy used to be really harsh? When it had no room for error? Remember 1998 - it was called the ICC Knockout then - when teams had only one chance to advance? South Africa made it through three such matches. They won a quarter-final, a semi-final and a final in what remains their most successful streak in elimination encounters.

These days, say they word knockout to them and their eyes widen, their voices crack and the panic in their demeanour is obvious. They know they are not good at sudden-death situations.

South Africa have lost seven out of 12 knockout games in 50-over ICC tournaments and tied one. Their four wins came more than a decade ago, which means nobody in the current squad has tasted success in an elimination.

With that record, they enter a must-win game against West Indies in Cardiff on Friday. The match is as good as a quarter-final but South Africa are being careful not to think of it that way. Russell Domingo, their assistant coach who will take over from Gary Kirsten as head coach at the end of this tournament, resolutely referred to it by as many other terms as he could think of, and said the real pressure will kick in only once South Africa reach the real knock-out stage.

"This is a knockout game but not a knockout game, if you know what I mean. It's not a semi-final or a final," he said. "We can't look too far ahead but if we can get over the semi-final, then we'll be there and thereabouts, but it's this game first. The semi-final will be seen as a massive step for us, that's the monkey on the back."

Domingo's disguise of the final group match as simply a big game is not too far off the mark. If South Africa lose and return home on Saturday, there will be disappointment but not disgust. But if they make it to the final four they will have enormous pressure to go all the way. For now, all they can do is narrow the focus and aim to beat West Indies, a side they have had the better of in recent years.

South Africa have won 18 of their last 20 ODIs against West Indies, a record Domingo declared "very good." He will be alarmed to learn that the only two matches they lost, in 2004 and 2006, were in a Champions Trophy and both results put South Africa out of the competition.

That statistic sums up the difference between the two teams. West Indies have been lacking overall but can rise to the big occasion, while South Africa are otherwise consistent but fold under pressure. Domingo knows that means their dominance over West Indies could count for little on Friday. "They've got 11 game-breakers," he said. "We know that we are going to have our hands full."

The most dangerous of those marquee men is Chris Gayle. His century led to South Africa's exit in Jaipur seven years ago but he has been lying low in this competition so far. Gayle's two innings have yielded 60 runs and he has been kept mostly quiet. South Africa will want to ensure he doesn't wake up against them, something they were successful at during the 2011 World Cup.

In a surprise move in Delhi, Johan Botha opened the bowling and had Gayle caught at first slip. South Africa's only right-arm offspinner on this tour is JP Duminy and they may turn to him to work early magic against Gayle. "A lot will depend on the conditions. If it's overcast, maybe opening with a spinner will not be necessary but if it's dry, then we might," Domingo said. "We know if we can get him out early, it's a big blot for the West Indies morale."

Rain is forecast for Friday so there's every chance South Africa will adopt a more conventional approach to the match. Whatever they decide, Domingo said the emphasis will be on small things rather than major tactical innovations. "It is really important to do your basic disciplines well: limiting extra balls, someone batting through to the 44th over, those are crucially important."

South Africa also hope for a more welcoming reception than they had at their previous two matches. In front of highly partisan subcontinental crowds, Domingo said he could count "about nine South Africans," but the lack of noise around the team has not been too much of a bad thing.

"We know crowd support can go two ways. It can be a massive source of inspiration or it can be a massive source of pressure, so we are very much under the radar," he said. Not anymore. Whether they want to acknowledge it or not, South Africa will play a knockout match on Friday. The pressure is on.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Rahul_78 on June 13, 2013, 9:59 GMT

    The first step to solve the problem is to accept it. Gary kirsten and AB have been quite open about it and have acknowledge that SAF has a history which affects the current players mindset in ICC events. I guess after Hansie SAF never had a leader who was fearless and could adversity into an advantage. Smith has been amazing for them but in his long reign he has been unable to break the voodoo completely. It is a pity that Kirsten is quitting from top job for SAF. I anybody it was him who could have guided them to success in these events. AB is fantastic player but his captaincy seems to be quite flaky at the moment. SAF need to find characters like Imran or Border who can guide them through difficult periods and shed the mental blocks. Unfortunately AB doesnt yet ignite that confidence with his leadership.

  • Samudro2106 on June 13, 2013, 5:32 GMT

    Really hope that SA will do well to erase their past records from their mind and be the champions this time. Steyn coming back will be a huge boost and I think, Alviro should come in place of Ingram. And Miller should bat freely as he did in the IPL. My line up : Amla, Alviro, Faf, AB, JP, Miller, Mclaren, Peterson, Morris, Steyn, Tsotsobe.

  • gretfan on June 14, 2013, 10:50 GMT

    Great thing about this years trophy is 3 out of 4 games are knockouts and still all eyes would be on the fourth one... :)

  • neiljturner on June 14, 2013, 9:16 GMT

    7 out of 12 knockout games? Slightly misleading as an indicator, since the whole point of this article is to highlight a situation where it's win-or-be-eliminated but *technically* not a knockout; South Africa have been in similar situations a few times before.

    South Africa's last game vs Pakistan was one - and they won that no problem. Should it be 7 out of 13, then? Can somebody do the research on what the actual figure is?

  • Greatest_Game on June 14, 2013, 5:19 GMT

    @ Cricfan_99 wrote "Choke Alert !!! A BIG Choke on its way!!!"

    It is disrespectful of the West Indies to presume that they are going to choke. They are a fine team, and I'm sure that they will give a good account of themselves. Perhaps you could consider the positive contributions you could make concerning this great cricket team?

  • Retour on June 13, 2013, 21:50 GMT

    The result could be decided on which WI shows up for the game. The one where its dangerous hitters are on fire or where some sloppy cricket causes its downfall

  • on June 13, 2013, 20:04 GMT

    SA's performance so far shows how much they rely on the great Jacques Kallis. And who wouldn't: two players in one (and a good catcher).

  • on June 13, 2013, 19:58 GMT

    The great thing about this tournament is that 3 of the 4 final group games is a quarter final (the other is the small matter of India v Pakistan!). South Africa v West Indies should be a cracker (and you can choke on crackers!).

  • on June 13, 2013, 17:35 GMT

    In order for the West Indies(WI) to win the team will have to make 300 + runs, Gayle when playing for the WI most times ever give of his best. He should now be brought down in the middle and let Sarwan open the inning. Our batters call themselves world class but they have not shown it in the last two innings; and the bowlers had a bad day also. WI pick yourself up and do justice for the people of the West Indies by winning this match on Friday. YOU CAN DO BETTER.

  • Electric_L0ser_Wacko on June 13, 2013, 12:57 GMT

    Choke Alert !!! A BIG Choke on its way!!! Not that it surprises any of us... But lets see if they prove us pessimists wrong.

  • Rahul_78 on June 13, 2013, 9:59 GMT

    The first step to solve the problem is to accept it. Gary kirsten and AB have been quite open about it and have acknowledge that SAF has a history which affects the current players mindset in ICC events. I guess after Hansie SAF never had a leader who was fearless and could adversity into an advantage. Smith has been amazing for them but in his long reign he has been unable to break the voodoo completely. It is a pity that Kirsten is quitting from top job for SAF. I anybody it was him who could have guided them to success in these events. AB is fantastic player but his captaincy seems to be quite flaky at the moment. SAF need to find characters like Imran or Border who can guide them through difficult periods and shed the mental blocks. Unfortunately AB doesnt yet ignite that confidence with his leadership.

  • Samudro2106 on June 13, 2013, 5:32 GMT

    Really hope that SA will do well to erase their past records from their mind and be the champions this time. Steyn coming back will be a huge boost and I think, Alviro should come in place of Ingram. And Miller should bat freely as he did in the IPL. My line up : Amla, Alviro, Faf, AB, JP, Miller, Mclaren, Peterson, Morris, Steyn, Tsotsobe.

  • gretfan on June 14, 2013, 10:50 GMT

    Great thing about this years trophy is 3 out of 4 games are knockouts and still all eyes would be on the fourth one... :)

  • neiljturner on June 14, 2013, 9:16 GMT

    7 out of 12 knockout games? Slightly misleading as an indicator, since the whole point of this article is to highlight a situation where it's win-or-be-eliminated but *technically* not a knockout; South Africa have been in similar situations a few times before.

    South Africa's last game vs Pakistan was one - and they won that no problem. Should it be 7 out of 13, then? Can somebody do the research on what the actual figure is?

  • Greatest_Game on June 14, 2013, 5:19 GMT

    @ Cricfan_99 wrote "Choke Alert !!! A BIG Choke on its way!!!"

    It is disrespectful of the West Indies to presume that they are going to choke. They are a fine team, and I'm sure that they will give a good account of themselves. Perhaps you could consider the positive contributions you could make concerning this great cricket team?

  • Retour on June 13, 2013, 21:50 GMT

    The result could be decided on which WI shows up for the game. The one where its dangerous hitters are on fire or where some sloppy cricket causes its downfall

  • on June 13, 2013, 20:04 GMT

    SA's performance so far shows how much they rely on the great Jacques Kallis. And who wouldn't: two players in one (and a good catcher).

  • on June 13, 2013, 19:58 GMT

    The great thing about this tournament is that 3 of the 4 final group games is a quarter final (the other is the small matter of India v Pakistan!). South Africa v West Indies should be a cracker (and you can choke on crackers!).

  • on June 13, 2013, 17:35 GMT

    In order for the West Indies(WI) to win the team will have to make 300 + runs, Gayle when playing for the WI most times ever give of his best. He should now be brought down in the middle and let Sarwan open the inning. Our batters call themselves world class but they have not shown it in the last two innings; and the bowlers had a bad day also. WI pick yourself up and do justice for the people of the West Indies by winning this match on Friday. YOU CAN DO BETTER.

  • Electric_L0ser_Wacko on June 13, 2013, 12:57 GMT

    Choke Alert !!! A BIG Choke on its way!!! Not that it surprises any of us... But lets see if they prove us pessimists wrong.

  • on June 13, 2013, 12:26 GMT

    WI will Win, Gayle, Samuels, Pollard and Sammy will fire (batting wise) Roach, Ramphal, Narine and Samuels will fire bowling wise.... it will be close but WI will prevail.

  • DeckChairand6pack on June 13, 2013, 11:49 GMT

    South Africa took over 100 years to beat Australia in Australia. And since 2008 they have done it twice. My point is, past performance is not an indicator of future success (or failure in our case..!). We will come good..., eventually..., and hopefully not after 100 years!

  • FredElliot on June 13, 2013, 11:00 GMT

    If you want to go down the previous history path, SA have been in this situation before. In the 2007 Super 8 stage their last game was against England when a win for either side would have put them in the semi finals at the expense of their opponents. SA won easily.

  • on June 13, 2013, 6:27 GMT

    I also want S.A to win this match, they have players to do it and want India Vs S.A final

  • Shongololo on June 13, 2013, 2:08 GMT

    SurlyCynic is right. If South Africa keeps Kleinveldt far from the starting line-up, we will have taken a significant step towards victory. Next, let's get rid of ordinary Ingram (bring in Alviro) and our chances will be further boosted. Given the quality of the two sides, I'd have to disagree with LeftBrain and say it would be a surprise were SA to lose.

  • LeftBrain on June 12, 2013, 18:54 GMT

    With their history, I wont consider SA favourite for this game. WI is due for a good perofrmance after their effort against India. It will be a surprise if SA wins.

  • Kapil_Choudhary on June 12, 2013, 18:34 GMT

    "If South Africa lose and return home on Saturday, there will be disappointment but not disgust. But if they make it to the final four they will have enormous pressure to go all the way".

    This statement perfectly encapsulates the defeatist attitude that has seeped not only into the fans but even into the SA players' minds. They would rather not even reach the knock-out stages than reach there and lose - probably a huge reason why SA lost all its matches in the previous World T20.

    Even SL has suffered major losses in recent ICC tournament finals - however ask any SL player or fan as to whether they prefer losing in the final or not reaching there at all and everyone will undoubtedly choose the former - but not so with SA.

    The result of this match seems so obvious that Cricinfo needs to put up a poll - Why will SA lose to WI?? Options - (a) A Gayle Blitz (b) The Great SA choke (c) Both

  • SurlyCynic on June 12, 2013, 17:59 GMT

    As long as Kleinveldt gets nowhere near the field they have a chance.

  • cricktexpert on June 12, 2013, 17:43 GMT

    what pressure man......if a team plays well they will win....if you play bad you will loose......just a game........it aint end of the world........just enjoy the game...

  • cricktexpert on June 12, 2013, 17:43 GMT

    what pressure man......if a team plays well they will win....if you play bad you will loose......just a game........it aint end of the world........just enjoy the game...

  • SurlyCynic on June 12, 2013, 17:59 GMT

    As long as Kleinveldt gets nowhere near the field they have a chance.

  • Kapil_Choudhary on June 12, 2013, 18:34 GMT

    "If South Africa lose and return home on Saturday, there will be disappointment but not disgust. But if they make it to the final four they will have enormous pressure to go all the way".

    This statement perfectly encapsulates the defeatist attitude that has seeped not only into the fans but even into the SA players' minds. They would rather not even reach the knock-out stages than reach there and lose - probably a huge reason why SA lost all its matches in the previous World T20.

    Even SL has suffered major losses in recent ICC tournament finals - however ask any SL player or fan as to whether they prefer losing in the final or not reaching there at all and everyone will undoubtedly choose the former - but not so with SA.

    The result of this match seems so obvious that Cricinfo needs to put up a poll - Why will SA lose to WI?? Options - (a) A Gayle Blitz (b) The Great SA choke (c) Both

  • LeftBrain on June 12, 2013, 18:54 GMT

    With their history, I wont consider SA favourite for this game. WI is due for a good perofrmance after their effort against India. It will be a surprise if SA wins.

  • Shongololo on June 13, 2013, 2:08 GMT

    SurlyCynic is right. If South Africa keeps Kleinveldt far from the starting line-up, we will have taken a significant step towards victory. Next, let's get rid of ordinary Ingram (bring in Alviro) and our chances will be further boosted. Given the quality of the two sides, I'd have to disagree with LeftBrain and say it would be a surprise were SA to lose.

  • on June 13, 2013, 6:27 GMT

    I also want S.A to win this match, they have players to do it and want India Vs S.A final

  • FredElliot on June 13, 2013, 11:00 GMT

    If you want to go down the previous history path, SA have been in this situation before. In the 2007 Super 8 stage their last game was against England when a win for either side would have put them in the semi finals at the expense of their opponents. SA won easily.

  • DeckChairand6pack on June 13, 2013, 11:49 GMT

    South Africa took over 100 years to beat Australia in Australia. And since 2008 they have done it twice. My point is, past performance is not an indicator of future success (or failure in our case..!). We will come good..., eventually..., and hopefully not after 100 years!

  • on June 13, 2013, 12:26 GMT

    WI will Win, Gayle, Samuels, Pollard and Sammy will fire (batting wise) Roach, Ramphal, Narine and Samuels will fire bowling wise.... it will be close but WI will prevail.

  • Electric_L0ser_Wacko on June 13, 2013, 12:57 GMT

    Choke Alert !!! A BIG Choke on its way!!! Not that it surprises any of us... But lets see if they prove us pessimists wrong.