Champions Trophy 2013

Ingram quietly confident in opener's role

Colin Ingram looked comfortable at the top of the order in South Africa's last match against West Indies after a couple of nervous outings; South Africa will hope he stays comfortable there for a long time

Firdose Moonda

June 17, 2013

Comments: 20 | Text size: A | A

Colin Ingram hits a six over long-off, South Africa v West Indies, Champions Trophy, Group B, Cardiff, June 14, 2013
Colin Ingram's aggression bodes well at the top of the order for South Africa © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Colin Ingram
Series/Tournaments: ICC Champions Trophy

Colin Ingram does not immediately appear a man to go to war with. He is too polite to say anything offensive, too mild-mannered to raise anyone's ire and too gentle to be afraid of. His innings against West Indies may start to change that impression.

Ingram was the only batsmen to raise his bat to a half-century in a carefully crafted knock that displayed temperament others lacked. He saw off the new balls patiently and dealt with the spin threat by taking it on.

It was a display which showed the cut and the sweep as his two main weapons. They transform him from a baby-faced rookie into a man with gravitas.

In actual fact, Ingram is both those things. He has been playing professionally for eight seasons and made his international debut three years ago but has been performing a new task in this competition: partnering Hashim Amla at the top of the line-up. A tough ask of anyone.

Ingram said it was "not a new role" because he has done it before but that was a long time ago and at a lower level. He opened the batting in 21 of his first 26 List A matches at the start of his career. But he only did it once between November 2009 and now, despite which Gary Kirsten promoted him ahead of Alviro Petersen, the specialist opener who was included in the squad as Graeme Smith's replacement.

Petersen, a regular in the Test squad, was picked on the strength of his form on the county circuit despite not playing an ODI for over a year at the time. Although the national selectors indicated he would play alongside Amla, Kirsten decided to gamble on Ingram because it "would not be too different" to playing him at No. 3 and would allow them to fit David Miller into the middle order.

Kirsten's Midas touch worked again. After two innings where Ingram seemed uncertain and vulnerable outside the off stump, he found his feet against West Indies and formed a good foil to Amla.

They put on 80 runs in 12.1 overs, the highest opening stand of South Africa's campaign so far. What stood out above the numbers was the understanding they seemed to have of each other's game plans.

A small example was their running between the wickets, which was more confident and better communicated than it had been previously. The pair also appeared to have adjusted to conditions which have proved to be trickier than expected. "The two new balls have probably posed more of a challenge than we thought," Ingram said.

Slow starts have been a trend in the tournament and Ingram is happy to adopt a more conservative approach. "It's been important to stick together with Hashim and look after the new ball," he said. "We're looking to assess conditions up front, and just try and build the partnership. The first few overs it nips around. We have to stick in there and try to look for bad balls."

The home side, England, have been the prototype for that. Other teams have tried to do the same with South Africa succeeding in their most recent game. Ingram and Amla's base allowed the middle order to bat with some freedom.

It has also meant South Africa can continue to use the No. 3 position as their swivel spot. If they want a pinch-hitter who can lengthen the line-up, Robin Peterson is on hand. If they want someone to capitalise on a good start, AB de Villiers steps up and if they feel the innings is going according to plan, Faf du Plessis can step into the role.

The floating batting line-up did not work for South Africa in the past but they seem to like the idea enough to try it again. Key to its success is having a strong opening pair and with Smith injured, South Africa had to search for a new one.

Smith and Amla were the top two in 46 ODIs and averaged 42.77, and their left-right combination was thought to be one of the reasons for their success. Ingram is also a left-hand batsman but does not have a heavy bottom hand or a penchant for swiping towards the leg-side, like Smith. He is a more delicate player who handles spin well.

He has only been in the job for three matches, so it is too early to start making comparisons but he has had a promising and quietly confident start. If the soft-spoken Ingram can keep it going, he may be able to nail down the place for long enough to become the man South Africa can entrust with many of their biggest battles with the bat.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

RSS Feeds: Firdose Moonda

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by 2nd_Slip on (June 18, 2013, 15:04 GMT)

Yes Ingram has done well opening the batting so far, but, my concern is that to me it seems with this ploy, AB,Gary and co. effectively are acknowledging the fact that they made a mistake by selecting Alviro Peterson instead of someone like Henry Davids, Quinton De Cock or even Stephen Cook, who play as openers on a regular basis and have done well this past summer in limited overs cricket?

Posted by   on (June 18, 2013, 11:06 GMT)

@ SoulForReal the true indicator of a players caliber is their performance plus how they react when put under pressure. Tsotsobe might have done well on helpful tracks in the past but you can just see how helpless his face is when he is being smacked around and pitch is not helping, compare that to steyn's attitude and what he brings in the same situation. you can see fire in his eyes

Posted by Rhygwyn on (June 18, 2013, 8:57 GMT)

As a Saffer our whole batting line up looks soft other than for Amla and AB. I hope they prove me wrong. In fact considering this is the first time we are going into a trophy competition without a strong looking team our odds are probably better than ever. If we win the comp I will just shake my head in disbelief and realize once again that the world is upside down.

Posted by OutCast on (June 18, 2013, 2:06 GMT)

England is too far from playing effective ODI games... they play it in test style... they need to adapt to ODI bowling in the death overs and the batsman should learn to slog in the PP overs coz Eng can afford to throw wickets....

Posted by Javed_17 on (June 17, 2013, 23:19 GMT)

@SoulForReal i am confused by your post which sort of contradicts the article on a wrong basis. Ingram is being tested here as an opener and has not failed. As for tsotsobe, stats never lie. This tournament has not been his best. i am not saying drop him but his performances have not commanded a place on the side

Posted by   on (June 17, 2013, 19:42 GMT)

@SoulForReal if you are using the stats don't lie argument why on earth are you picking Behardien? Ingram with 3 ODI tons and an average of nearly 40 does the trick for me! Lopsy has a good record for sure, although these past two years have seen his average and economy rate worsen. One does also need to find the balance between batting depth and bowling strength and sometimes an all rounder might have to come into the reckoning. No need to pick a single XI, consider the conditions and opposition for each match and try to develop a complete squad. I like the look of this SA squad, some world ranking top 10 batsmen and bowlers, some improving and contributing all rounders and some young exciting talent coming through like Miller and De Kock.

Posted by SoulForReal on (June 17, 2013, 18:37 GMT)

Ingram is no opener. Alviro should. Farhaan Behardien. To Ujjawal Agarwal, you clearly used emotions to choose your team. Tsotsobe is the highest ranked SA ODI player for three years running. Why is he not in your team. Surely you should have your best players in the team. Stats don't lie. Tsotsobe has a better ODI average than Steyn and Morkel. My ODI team: Amla, Alviro/Smith, AB, JP, Farhaan, Faf, Mclaren/Philander, Pieterson, Steyn, Morkel Tsotsobe. Kallis must only play test matches. He is too slow for the ODI game.

Posted by mahjut on (June 17, 2013, 18:01 GMT)

There was certainly no clamour to drop him ... or i'm going deaf! But people questioning the wisdom of persisting with essentially a makeshift experiment (after losing Smith) after two games in what could effectively be a three game tourney, seems perfectly understandable!

averages always say something i suppose - I often look at cumulative averages - and added to Colin's plunge since the first 7/8 games he really is untravelled in a cricketing sense playing almost exclusively at home (and I'm always trying desperately hard to forget the series in the Emirates as it was the first time watching both cricket ... and more than that ... SA, that i have actually turned off in boredom). in any case he'd used up his big warm up score against Netherlands in the first two games of this tournament.

Long term - bring him in! i'm no die-hard fan of Alviro in the short forms and Ingram may have taken a few massive steps here. It's all good going forward one hopes... Gary was right again!

Posted by mahjut on (June 17, 2013, 12:10 GMT)

after the first two games it would've been a pretty one-eyed Ingram fan to be 'demanding' he keeps his spot - and if he'd failed in the last one and SA had departed the tourney his selection would've been a real talking point. having said that, Kirsten does seem to have the midas touch and on the whole makes the right calls at the right time (one can even understand his desire to blood de Kock, almost as easily as it was to support GK's eventual decision to allow QdK the chance to go back to domestic cricket and really nurture his abilities). So, well done again Gary and well done to Colin for justifying the trust!

Posted by SurlyCynic on (June 17, 2013, 10:19 GMT)

The last article mentioning Ingram said he shouldn't be in the team so it's nice to see the change in tone, especially as he has a decent record for SA.

Posted by   on (June 17, 2013, 8:23 GMT)

@gibbs.175: This is a perfect example of a comment by people who doesnt really watch cricket. Amla is slow? He has strike rate of 91, this is comparable with all explosive openers like jayasuria, shewag, gibbs etc. And amla has far better better average than anyone of those. But i must say gibbs played some of the greatest innings of odi cricket, amla is yet to do that.

Posted by mehulmatrix on (June 17, 2013, 8:05 GMT)

Nice to nice Ingram do well. Does look a cool and relaxed lad with good temperament. Great idea by Kirsten, i think combination of Left & Right was important. From what i saw in match against WI, Ingram wasn't going on front foot too often and seemed rooted at times, missing or getting edge on full length balls. Possibly he didn't want to commit and also WI didn't bowl many of them. His six off Narine was pretty good! Guess he should be more careful in semis. Was nice to see Peterson at No 3 v/s Ind, but where have the pinch hitters gone? Good surprise at times to disturb the bowlers. Even some unorthodox batsmen can be a good surprise!

Posted by   on (June 17, 2013, 7:46 GMT)

My selection for one day team of SA: Amla, Smith/Ingram, Kallis, Faf Du, Duminy, ABD, Miller, Mclaren, Steyn, Morkel, Philander.

7 genuine batsmen with Mclaren at 8 and 4 genuine wicket taking bowlers with kallis, Amla, FafDu to provide the 5th bowler's ten overs.

Posted by LourensGrobbelaar on (June 17, 2013, 7:24 GMT)

@gibbs.175 Clearly your adoration of Gibbs has clouded your judgement. Amla has a higher strike rate in ODI's than Gibbs, and far better average. He has also passed the 3000 career run mark in about 9 games faster than the great Viv Richards, at a high strike rate. It is only conditions that's making him more cautious.

Posted by satishchandar on (June 17, 2013, 7:09 GMT)

It was actually a risky option to play Ingram as opener at first.. They picked Alviro and they would have been tempted to play Alviro as he is playing in England for Somerset and had good scores there too.. Ingram didn' set thing on fire yet but he is adequate.. He had managed to hold on place well in two games after initial failure and each game followed by a step up.. Failure, struggle for slow 20 and then a MOM innings.. Had Ingram failed again like in first game, it would have sparked a debate on why he was tried there actually when they got ready replacement in Alviro but that is how things turn up master stroke - you try something unusual and it gives you something what you expect..

Posted by Gregg22 on (June 17, 2013, 7:00 GMT)

@ gibbs Amla is slow??? Do you even watch cricket? Doesn't seem like you do. Please take a look at his stats paying close attention to his strike rate. Amla has been so impressive over the last 3 seasons because he understands his game more. Even his test strike rate has improved, largely due to his experience as an opener in ODI's. As for Ingram, i wasn't convinced. Still isn't. Time will tell, but it looks promising. Dave Miller is just what SA needed because we've struggled to find that power hitter low down the order. Hopefully he provides that.

Posted by koushik2412 on (June 17, 2013, 6:52 GMT)

ingram has to go to no 3 once smith comes in. there is doubt over the future of the legendary kallis in the south african ODI scheme of things.

Posted by gibbs.175 on (June 17, 2013, 5:41 GMT)

Amla is a slow and good opnner ...so other hand we should have a firing ,attacking openner like GIBBS....Q,D kock...INGRAM is a very good batsman to fill a middle order spot ....Randle was also a attacking openner in 1998 champion trophy

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Firdose MoondaClose
Tournament Results
England v India at Birmingham - Jun 23, 2013
India won by 5 runs
India v Sri Lanka at Cardiff - Jun 20, 2013
India won by 8 wickets (with 90 balls remaining)
England v South Africa at The Oval - Jun 19, 2013
England won by 7 wickets (with 75 balls remaining)
Australia v Sri Lanka at The Oval - Jun 17, 2013
Sri Lanka won by 20 runs
England v New Zealand at Cardiff - Jun 16, 2013
England won by 10 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days