Australia v Sri Lanka, Champions Trophy, Group A, Cardiff June 17, 2013

Sri Lanka hold their nerve to reach semi-final


Sri Lanka 253 for 8 (Jayawardene 84*, Thirimanne 57, Johnson 3-48) beat Australia 233 (Voges 49, Kulasekara 3-42) by 20 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

A victorious Sri Lanka will play in Cardiff on Thursday. A humbled Australia will start pondering the Ashes, and the state of disrepair their cricket has fallen into. Led by Mahela Jayawardene's silken unbeaten 84, Sri Lanka stuttered into a Champions Trophy semi-final against India by defeating a collective whose captain Michael Clarke watched disconsolately from The Oval balcony.

Their slim chances of qualifying long since expired, Australia offered a last gasp via Clint McKay and Xavier Doherty, who added 41 for the final wicket. They were only separated by a blinding return catch from Tillakaratne Dilshan, whose exultant celebrations underlined the anxiety that had crept into a team who looked comfortable winners for most of the journey.

Once Jayawardene had lifted Sri Lanka to 253 for 8 after an uncertain beginning, passing 11,000 ODI runs on the way, Australia's chances of qualifying became largely theoretical. India in their pomp might have been a chance to reach 254 in 29.1 overs, but not a team that had failed to top 250 in two previous matches and been distracted by all manner of off field woes, from Clarke's fragile back to David Warner's choices of drinking spots and punching bags.

This left Angelo Mathews' team to ride out a brief spell of hitting from Glenn Maxwell, a doughty rearguard from Adam Voges, and a pesky last stand by the final wicket pair of McKay and Doherty, who conjured the second best partnership of the innings. As in India earlier this year, this served mainly to expose the appalling lack of application shown by many of the batsmen.

Australia's troubles were best summed up by their stand-in leader George Bailey, who dozed off at the wrong moment and found himself run out, helping to end a Champions Trophy defence that never really began. Apart from the emergence of James Faulkner they have precious little to show for the past two weeks.

Sri Lanka's innings had flirted with mediocrity in the face of some diligent bowling until Jayawardene's delayed arrival, which signalled a late innings surge. Lahiru Thirimanne had been promoted ahead of Jayawardene at an uncertain 20 for 2, and the switch allowed the senior man to make merry in the later overs against the older ball after Thirimanne composed an important, steadying 57.

Given the scenario confronting them, Australia's batsmen were forced to play on instinct, and Shane Watson's cover drive from the first ball of the innings made for a promising portent. But as has become the norm Watson flattered to deceive, bowled in the second over when making a hare-brained attempt to cut Nuwan Kulasekara off the stumps.

Phillip Hughes showed himself adept at edging past the bails, twice gaining boundaries in those fortuitous circumstances. But the use of only half the bat did not suggest permanence, and it was no great surprise when he glided Kulasekara into Kumar Sangakkara's gloves.

Having come in at No. 3, Maxwell offered entertainment, cracking five boundaries and one six in the manner that earned him his exorbitant IPL contract. But Sri Lanka always had Lasith Malinga to use in case of emergencies, and he duly yorked Maxwell in his first over after the Victorian had swung once too often.

Bailey has been a middle order resuscitator of sorts in the two previous games, but the team has not responded fruitfully enough to his leadership. He was to slip up badly here, dawdling in mid-pitch when trying to pinch a leg bye and finding himself run out at the non-striker's end by Kulasekara's direct hit.

The innings then petered out in a manner sadly familiar to those who have watched Australia away from home in recent months. Only Doherty and McKay gave the impression they genuinely cared to win the contest, something not so surprising when observing the recent record: they have not won overseas in an international match in any format this year. Quite apart from the problems unearthed by Warner's Birmingham misadventures, this is no trend to take into an Ashes series.

Overcast skies and a desire to know his eventual target had encouraged Bailey to send Sri Lanka in. Mitchell Johnson's first two deliveries of the match were poor; the first clattered to the backward point boundary, the second scuttling to fine leg off the pads. But his third was straight and too quick for Kusal Perera, who was clearly lbw.

Sangakkara hinted at the genius that had guided Sri Lanka to a stirring chase against England on this ground last week, but found himself tied down by McKay's persistent line and subtle movement. Having already chanced a desperate single, Sangakkara was offered a fraction of extra width and lashed out, but managed only to slice a drive to Maxwell.

At that moment Australia could envision a slim target, but Thirimanne was sent in to steady the innings in Dilshan's company, leaving Jayawardene in reserve. A serviceable job was done, gaps found every now and then the Australian bowlers were not gifted any wickets. It took Doherty to split them with a ball that straightened just enough to take an edge, Watson diving alertly to his right at slip.

Mathews played a halting innings in Jayawardene's company before losing his off bail to a nicely pitched delivery from Faulkner, but Dinesh Chandimal was busier and more effective in a fifth-wicket stand of 65 in 56 balls. The Australians did not bowl too much that was loose, but were left to marvel at Jayawardene's knack for manipulating the field as the score mounted.

In what is becoming a pattern as familiar as Australian defeat, the wicketkeeper and agitator Wade became embroiled in a profane joust with Jayawardene. Ninety-nine Sri Lankan runs from the final 13 overs meant the Australians could start thinking less about niggle and more about the Test matches to come.

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on June 19, 2013, 16:38 GMT

    Sri lanka will win,if not washout the match

  • John on June 19, 2013, 9:15 GMT

    @CricketingStargazer on (June 18, 2013, 10:36 GMT) How would it have been a travesty if Aus advanced ahead of SL? To have done that , they'd have to have beaten them in which case Aus would have lost once and SL would have lost twice. So which team would have been more deserving - one which loses one of 3 or one which loses 2 of 3? Also if the NZ game had lasted another 5 overs or so Aus would almost certainly have won that game on DL. I'm also not AS confident as you re the Ashes.

  • $$ milind on June 19, 2013, 3:31 GMT

    So, its Sri Lanka vs India again. Sri Lanka at the moment have problems with their bowling although they have done well to restrict Australia. We know that MALINGA may be a threat to all teams, but not vs India. We've seen in the past how Dhoni,Kohli have smashed him earlier in ODIs. While Dhawan and Raina have taken on him this year in IPL. Surely, Sri Lanka have to do something special to restrict this heay Indian batting.

  • John on June 18, 2013, 20:58 GMT

    please publish this time-you published the follow up and nothing of offence

    @brittop - Yes but if a (potential) spectator looks at the weather forecast and knows there's little chance of a result would they not be put off anyway? And you're surely not going to be any happier going to a washed out game without a reserve day Surely cricket isn't helping itself by having so many washed out days over here. As a fan - I'd have to travel to watch any quality cricket. If I travelled to Cardiff for example for a 1 dayer and it was washed out with no reserve day , I'd feel really peeved. If there was a reserve day (and the weather was set fair for that day) I'd probably stay over another night - and yes it would cost a little more but if I'd rather pay that extra and see a game than go home having spent all that time/money and not having seen a game. Obviously there are times when you'd get the reserve day rained off which is sods law , but surely we want to maximise the playing time

  • associate cricket fan on June 18, 2013, 20:14 GMT

    @Aayush Kataria. I never said Indian pacers arent good. But they are not as good as Johnson/ Anderson. It was Jadeja Who took wickets against WI and we all know they are a horrible side against spin.( They even struggled against BD spinners) Regarding PAK, their batting was poor throughout the tour. So i think their batsman are not in good form. If you look at SL we faced better pace attacks like Aus and ENG. So we will find your pace attack easier. Also Kusals technique will most likely work against medium Pacers. So I think its going to be a close contest between both teams. Cant really tell who is going to win this game.

  • Dummy4 on June 18, 2013, 18:16 GMT

    India is definitely gonna beat against SL in the semi-final. yes India have a poor bowling attack but as a team India always had upper hand on Sri Lanka in the recent past. In the last 5 years, India beat Sri Lanka in 5 bi-lateral series (4 held in SL), one triangular series and Asia Cup (both on Sri Lankan soil). In the previous 8 matches, India played against SL in Australia, India won 5, SL won ONLY 2 with 1 tied. Sri Lanka's so called powerful bowling attack has always looked miserable against India, Malinga's economy rate against India is 6, Kulasekara's 5.39 & Perera's 5.79.

  • Sarah on June 18, 2013, 15:23 GMT

    Sri Lanka batsmen now know the Indian bowlers n their tactics like back of their hands. Inability of Indian bowlers to get SL opening pair in the warm up game showed it very well. It will be next to impossible for bowlers like Ishant, Jadeja , Kuma n Ashwin to get players like Dilshan, Sanga, Mahela or even Kusal out. I can't wait to see our legendary batsmen feasting on Indian bowler. All the best for Semi final. G'luck !!!!!

  • Rob on June 18, 2013, 14:15 GMT

    As I posted earlier (not published) unlucky Aussie- rain stopped likely win against NZ and if they had 50 overs to get that total they would have. I cannot understand why reference to IPL is so prominent- it has no relevance at all in a different format, like this has no relevance to how Australia will get on in the Ashes.

  • Kepili on June 18, 2013, 12:10 GMT

    Here is a question, are we sufficiently using the technology for the benefit of the game? A solitary review/side/match in a world tournament? The Group A match SL lost is a prime example of how a match result can be changed at the last stage, due to an astonishingly poor umpiring decision! This type of single decision can cost a team not only the winning points but the Championship! The players are heavily penalized for wrong doing & even jailed! On the other hand Umpires considered to be supremely honest & never get penalized for any decision.. no matter how naked or grave their decision can be! "Genuine-blunders" & "Obvious-benders" are 2 different things! Do we have to let them kill the sport that we love so easily? ICC please save the sport we love!!! How many times umpires waste time on unnecessary reviewing of clearly made runs? Cut down this and make room for at least 3 DRS reviews per side, which would be much more meaningful! Otherwise CRICKET would become another circus!!

  • achint on June 18, 2013, 12:09 GMT

    @baseball sucks R u joking?ind vs sl means dat sl will go to finals!! As lankan pride 07 agrees,ind has dominated sl in past 4-5 years. Ind has won all their 5 matches while sl has got only 2 wins. It is 70-30 in india favourand they have also deafeted sl in warm up match! Even the writer says that india's batting is so strong that they have a chance to chase 250 in 29 overs!!!