India v Sri Lanka, Champions Trophy, semi-final, Cardiff June 20, 2013

India enter final with crushing win

512

India 182 for 2 (Dhawan 68, Kohli 58*) beat Sri Lanka 181 for 8 (Mathews 51, Ishant 3-33, Ashwin 3-48) by 8 wickets
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

The only glitches in India's march into the final were two sets of pitch invaders running on to the field on two separate occasions. On a Cardiff surface with a lot of moisture, the ball seamed, bounced steeply and turned appreciably, and the Indian bowlers were all over Sri Lanka after winning the toss. In the afternoon, the Indian openers continued their run of impressive stands, adding 77 through some luck and some attractive shots, and India cruised home with 15 overs to spare.

It would have reminded India of their first day of international cricket in South Africa on the 2010-11 tour, when they were inserted on a pitch that had absorbed a lot of rain and were bowled out for 136. Watching the first innings of this match, it seemed Sri Lanka had done well to not be rolled over for 136 themselves. The conditions were so juicy India's three frontline quicks bowled the first 22 overs - even MS Dhoni had a bowl later - and India either beat the bat or hit edge on 68 occasions.

The Sri Lankan batsmen couldn't be blamed much, except for probably Kusal Perera. They had to dig in hard just to survive. They strived to - Kumar Sangakkara had left alone 12 out of his first 32 balls - but eventually the ball with your name arrived. However, what really foiled Sri Lanka's plans was the assistance the pitch provided to spin, which they hadn't budgeted for when they were batting out the quicks like it was a Test. The quicks went for 98 for four wickets in their 30 overs; the spinners took four wickets for 81 in their 20.

The pitch might have been great help, but India exploited the toss advantage with impressive accuracy. The first extra came in the 20th over. Angelo Mathews, among others, fought the conditions, but like others he too fell the moment he became adventurous.

It didn't help that Sri Lanka had lost Dinesh Chandimal to injury before the match began and Tillakaratne Dilshan retired hurt in the fifth over. Kusal showed again that his game is not suited for these conditions as he followed a full and wide delivery to edge it for Suresh Raina to take one of his three catches at second slip. It was the seventh time in 12 matches that Buvneshwar Kumar had taken a wicket in his first spell, including five openers dismissed in single figures.

Then Dilshan seemed to have pulled his calf while trying to keep out a sharply swinging delivery. He tried to bat on, but with the new no-runner regulations he had to leave the field. Sangakkara and Lahiru Thirimanne began to play it like the first morning of a Test, and justifiably so.

India kept the pressure up with Bhuvneshwar bowling a nine-over spell, and Umesh Yadav and Ishant Sharma getting appreciable movement every time they landed the ball on the seam. Ishant got the ball to stick into the pitch and steep tennis-ball bounce too.

Sangakkara began to take the odd risk at the end of the 13th over, but when he charged at Bhuvneshwar and square-drove him for the first boundary since the fourth over, the score had reached only 32. Around this time, Ishant was beginning to get balls to misbehave a lot. The batsmen had to start playing at balls sooner or later, and when they did it didn't bring good news.

The combination of that bounce and seam movement finally accounted for Thirimanne, who followed a short-of-a-length delivery and fended in front of his chest. Sangakkara provided a replay in case you had missed it. Raina had taken all three, and the score now was 41 for 3 after 18 overs. It was so inviting that when Dhoni finally took off a seamer after 22 overs, he gave up the pads and began to bowl the 24th over.

During their 78-run stand in 18.1 overs, Mahela Jayawardene and Mathews successfully reviewed an lbw call each, and seemed to have put Sri Lanka back on track. With the ball turning thanks to the moisture, their plans unravelled. Jayawardene was bowled by a Jadeja skidder, and the batting Powerplay's analysis read 5-2-12-1.

Everyone who tried big hits in the remaining overs fell to the tricks of the pitch. Dilshan came back to bat for the last two overs. Sri Lanka, though, could manage just the 54 in the last 10. About an hour later, by when the Indian openers had seen off the Nuwan Kulasekara threat, it almost seemed the pitch had lost all its moisture. Shikhar Dhawan continued to drive and cut fearlessly, Rohit Sharma continued to provide the starts, and Virat Kohli added a fifty to four centuries in his last seven matches against Sri Lanka.

Sri Lanka didn't help themselves. They used Lasith Malinga - their best hope despite his poor record against India - only for three overs at the top and then when India had chugged along to 93 for 1. They dropped Dhawan thrice, first when he was on 18. India were not complaining, though.

Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Harmony111 on June 22, 2013, 17:46 GMT

    @recycle-bin-is-empty: Thanks bro. It is possible that Eng get to bowl in good conditions and then Ind are 60/4 after 15 overs. Finn & Anderson can do that. What will happen then? And it is also possible that Dhawan/Sharma give another strong start to India and it is also possible that India bowl first in good conditions and reduce Eng to 60/4 in 15. Each of these scenarios is highly likely (although 2 of them are mutually exclusive but let's not go that deep). It is good to be confident but not so good to be over-confident. India might play so well that they win by 150 runs or by 7 wickets but that would be the best case scenario. A more real scenario would mean a much closer, hard fought match. In fact after two boring wins vs Pak & SL I'd want this match to be as exciting as the Natwest Trophy Final. That would this last ever Champions Trophy match a truly memorable one with hopefully India alone getting the trophy.

  • dummy4fb on June 22, 2013, 15:37 GMT

    Finally i am agree with result since sri lanka want to give enough scores to beat india.but i have doubt regarding batting line up of sri lanka after retired dilshan.they should promote right hand batsman after retired dilshan since sangakkara in other side.

    another concern is whu they doesn't promote thisara perera in power play sessions.anyway i would like to see that sri lankan team comeup with good stragies in triangular series of west indies & beat india with removing their porbia.

  • mahecric on June 22, 2013, 11:45 GMT

    The kind of unassailable form Team India is going through, I am afraid the final would also be a one sided affair. If that happens it would not be good to see that a teams majority batsman did not had to bat to win a prestigious tournament like Champions Trophy. If the conditions are overcast and india wins the toss it should be repeat of the semis vs Srilanka. If India had to bat first the contest of the england fast bowlers will be interesting... I hope it an exiting match and not a one sided.

  • BDforever on June 22, 2013, 11:35 GMT

    Most probably England will choke India tomorrow.

  • Solid_Snake on June 22, 2013, 9:37 GMT

    @Indian_Snake->The runs Dhawan scored,That's not meaningless.I admire his batting & the runs he scored so far.But dont reach on a conclusion so early.He neutralized Morkel in a match,based on that we will rank him.Is it okay? I just said that i want to watch him go in batting first facing England bowlers.If he succeeds or Fails there,he will still be the same Dhawan.I am not here to judge him in a single match only.G

  • recycle-bin-is-empty on June 22, 2013, 9:29 GMT

    @sandy7823 "Current ENG side is a world 11 more than ENG side." why ?? I am an Indian but if a player who is born in India but has been brought up in some other country and is playing for that country, I am not going to boast that an Indian player is playing for that country. What matters is where that person resides, where he has been brought up and nurtured and given training, if some other country is valuing his talent and nurturing him then that country has every right to consider that person as her own and utilize his talent.

    @Harmony111 "My basic point is that while India should win against Eng if it comes to our best vs their best but it won't be as easy as we had defeated WI or Pak or SL." Absolutely spot on mate, especially if the conditions are favourable to swing then it would be one hell of a contest. I would absolutely love to see if Dhawan dominates Eng's swing bowling (hoping ;-), kindof like he did against Pak and at the same time how B. Kumar utilise those conditions

  • dummy4fb on June 22, 2013, 9:28 GMT

    @ Front-Foot-Lunge..'''If SL hadn't folded in seaming conditions to some pretty average seam bowling they would have won he for sure''' Too many if's and but's in your statement,in the same way if Aus batting had not folded during Ashes they would have won it last time,if aus batsman would'nt have folded against England during Champions Trophy they would have won the game,If NZ batsman had scored 10 more runs Eng would not have been in the semi-final...see i can use the same stupid excuses....try to give credit where its due rather than moaning on fantasies

  • Harmony111 on June 22, 2013, 8:18 GMT

    @sandy7823: Dear I am being practical enough. Cricket is a phunny game and Eng are not all that weak that India's win can be taken for granted. Even if Butler scores a 10 ball 30, it can still give Eng's total a boost in the end. My basic point is that while India should win against Eng if it comes to our best vs their best but it won't be as easy as we had defeated WI or Pak or SL.

    @McGorium: Sanga indeed said it. I base my comments on facts and can back them up if needed to. Here is a cricinfo article that shows exactly what Sanga said. The article is ------"Pace and bounce hold no fear - Sangakkara"------. Just google it and read the first line of the 3rd para which says ------""I think out of all the subcontinent sides we play bounce a lot better than most sides,""------.

  • CricketFirstLove on June 22, 2013, 7:47 GMT

    The T20 aggressiveness is manifesting in tests and ODIs. India's batting and Dhoni's bold captaincy will see through any cricket team in the present now. Good God Indian cricket has come of age. I give full credit to Dravid and Dada for moving out earlier and making room for budding players. Tendulkar is still blocking one slot though in tests. He must immediately retire so that others are groomed. Congrats Shikhar and Dhoni for the splendid performance.

  • true_point on June 22, 2013, 7:29 GMT

    The current young Indian Team has done exceptionally well in this tournament. The selectors have to be congratulated for taking bold decisions to give chance to youngsters like Dhawan, Bhuvaneshwar, Karthik etc. etc. The main reason why we have been successful is that our opening partnership has been good. Once the foundation is laid, then our middle order takes up. Previously also if our opening batsmen shine, especially if Shewag scores, then we would win. Hope Rohit can be consistent and cut his impetuosity. Media should play a responsible part in allowing these youngsters to mature. Right now, there is are articles urging Ishant to be the leader as the senior Pro. Let him take his time to grow up and let us not put pressure on his shoulders. May he does not want to be a spearhead. Our media and public should give them space for them to express themselves. Now it is like regressing if we bring back Shewag and Gambhir.