| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amol Karhadkar
February 6, 2013
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
|
|||
Anjum Chopra, the former India captain, believes women's cricket hasn't developed as much as it should since being taken over by the BCCI in 2005. However, unlike her predecessor Diana Edulji, who squarely blamed the BCCI, Chopra said it was a reflection of reality and of market forces in sport.
India failed to qualify for the Super Six stage of the World Cup after their defeat to Sri Lanka on Tuesday.
"I don't blame the BCCI for it. I don't blame them completely. I know it's a big statement but there are reasons," Chopra, currently a technical advisor to the South African women's team, told ESPNcricinfo. "Ideally, I would have liked to be in the same boat as men cricketers. But I come from a managerial background and I understand finance. So if I say it has to be on the same pedestal, it would be unfair."
Chopra, the first woman cricketer to earn 100 ODI caps, felt it was too much for Indian women's cricket to ask for the same monetary benefits as their male counterparts. "I can ask for the same adulation but I can't ask for the same remuneration. It will take myself and my game some time to reach that level," Chopra said.
"I look at it from this perspective: if somebody is getting ten rupees and I am getting two, at least I know that somebody is getting ten rupees and I can also get ten at the end of the day. Let's work hard and bridge that gap. If I don't get [that money] after performing, I can come back and complain. But at least I know somebody is getting, so the world is wide open.
"I had a chat with the sponsors of the men's team and asked them why they didn't sponsor the women's team. They said, 'The Board never forced us to do it, so we took the easier way out.' Again, it's their decision. I am just an onlooker and commenting on it. But I am sure they would have sat down and discussed it before making that decision. Again, I would say the world is far wide open, it's not closed."
Chopra said the issue of remuneration worked differently for different people. "I had a job so I was getting paid even before the BCCI came in. The remuneration has increased and, though it's not gone from zero to hundred, a lot of players were not getting paid at all [earlier]. As I say, when you are in a bigger structure and you are small fry, you have to learn to swim as well. If you learn to swim in a pond, you can learn to swim in an ocean later."
The other point of concern for India's women cricketers is the drastic reduction in their international commitments over the past eight years. India played just 26 ODIs between the 2009 and 2013 World Cups, much less than the top three teams in women's cricket. Australia, England and New Zealand have featured in 36, 39 and 34 ODIs during the same period. Even West Indies, ranked lower than India, have played 38 ODIs during the same period. The lack of game practice was perhaps one of the major reasons for India bowing out of title race in the preliminary round.
This is in stark contrast to their schedule when the sport was under the Women's Cricket Association of India. "That's a drawback," Chopra admitted. "We could have played more international cricket. Again I say, I don't know why the BCCI has reduced our international commitments. But looking at it from their perspective, I know that they say that if you are the fourth-ranked team in the world, you should play against the top three teams; not the ones who are below us, which is fair. But the difference right know is so great that we are not able to climb higher. So, I would rather get the best results out consistently as a player or as a team member and then knock on the doors for opportunities."
Despite having joined the South African set-up, Chopra stressed that she is "still an active player" and the thoughts of hanging up her boots have never crossed her mind. In fact, she is relishing being a part of the dressing room of an international team, that too for a World Cup. "First of all, I am getting an opportunity to be with an international team, which is a huge honour for me. The best part is, I am still around the dressing room that has some of the players who I have played against.
"Besides, there are a few talented cricketers coming about. Working for Cricket South Africa, especially to talk about the South African culture and the great sporting culture over there, I get to know what's happening on the other side of the world. So it's been brilliant. Especially, their men's is doing so well, so you get to know a lot about how they prepare, how they interact and what all are the things they do while preparing for a big series."
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
I have not followed Women cricket extensively but for this World Cup. The matches that India lost was when we were chasing. Chasing is a different beast altogether unlike setting a target. Middle Order needs to learn the order of building an innings and the lower middle order should be able to hit out at the closing stages - more so in chasing. It really took several decades for the men team to learn the magic of finishing the games. Remember india of 90s when Jadeja / robin singh would take the match close but would fail - that is even with the stalwarts in the lineup. So give the Eves plenty of time and they will learn over experience.I hope one does not correlate Pay and Performance at his stage. That would be little too premature. It is more lack of skill / experience at this stage.
The number of games played by women, not just India but all the teams mentioned here is a joke. It's similar to the problem of Ireland or Afghanistan men's team. Around 30 games in a span of 4 years show the semi-professional or amateurish character of the game. More so as women hardly play any Test cricket whatsoever. There is an immediate need to increase the number of games. Each team should play at least 20 ODIs a year alongside few Test matches. May be ICC can consider a yearly championship (in lines of Test championship in Men's cricket) & crown a champion at the end of the year. Just by playing during the World Cups & in between playing once in a blue moon can't develop the game, for sure. I guess Anjum is right in saying the time to demand equal pay has not yet come. But it certainly is time to demand a greater attention towards the game & make it more intense.
Having watched the games in ongoing WWC, one area Indian team is lacking is in having one or two big hitters. West Indies have Dottin and Sri Lanka have Kaushaliya for example but India has no one. In the end, a team can only hope to improve and progress if they play regularly and BCCI needs to pay attention to it. One thing however is clear that standard of cricket itself has improved so much in women's game over the years that I think right promotion and scheduling can surely make women's game lot more popular.
Well written. I think they counted the chickens before they hatched. Sri lankans showed mettle but the indians just fizzled out without a fight. They need lot more games than just a few more. The fielding was not great, athleticism much to be desired as has to be expected because of the culture. we need some great athletes as a whole not just for cricketers. where are the good women athletes ?. I believe there are good Indian athletes just not proud enough. The bickering between states and agencies and to top it all corruption. Show your game because when you start talking you should have the game to counter the opponent who will be all riled up at the comments. Bravado works only to an extent and we see that all the time. Go India ( Men or Women).
Yet another India win over Pakistan in a world cup. Such easy win to reach the target with six overs to spare .The score now in India v Pakistan in world cups 1s 9-0 whitewash!
Posted by dineshdbest on (February 7, 2013, 10:50 GMT)Women cricket players need exposure. I think adding a slot for 1 women player in IPL can gain a lot. If we can have a composition of 4 foreign players 5 Indian players and 2 un capped, then we can also add 1 women player in the slot anywhere.
Posted by kc69 on (February 7, 2013, 8:14 GMT)A team that scored 84,104 and 81 all out in last 3 matches this score of 192 for 7 is not bad at all but i still hope Indian women win this to salvage some pride.
Posted by pauliangenius on (February 7, 2013, 7:29 GMT)GO GO team INDIA and get whipped by Pakistan also. If Srilanka, can thrash India, Pakistan can hammer the final nail in Indian women cricket.
Posted by KURUWITA on (February 7, 2013, 6:55 GMT)PAk scored 192 which is too much for India I think. Ms Raj learnt from Aussies to make a lot of talks and to critisize opponents before matches. Before Eng game she said English got only one good bowler. Ms Raj, stop critisize opponents to media. Discuss your own team problems.
Posted by crkt4evr on (February 7, 2013, 3:48 GMT)really india women team needs lots more support and they DESERVE it....people just watch a few WC matches n start complaining but tend to forget how much they have helped/supported on their journey till there...i really dont know the reason for our team doing so well in spite of lots of hurdles...we r PROUD OF U n wil always b so!