England v New Zealand, Women's World Cup 2013, Mumbai

England hold nerve to overcome NZ

The Report by Abhishek Purohit in Mumbai

February 13, 2013

Comments: 3 | Text size: A | A

England 266 for 6 (Taylor 88, Edwards 54) beat New Zealand 251 for 9 (Satterthwaite 103, Bates 79, Colvin 3-48) by 15 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


Amy Satterthwaite and Suzie Bates put on 134 runs for the second wicket, England v New Zealand, Women's World Cup 2013, Super Six, Mumbai, February 13, 2013
A 134-run stand between Amy Satterthwaite looked to be taking New Zealand to an easy win, but they lost seven wickets for 42 runs to fall short © Getty Images
Enlarge

In a day-night match rendered inconsequential as soon as West Indies surprised Australia in a morning start, England overcame a 134-run stand between Amy Satterthwaite and Suzie Bates to keep New Zealand comfortably short in a big chase. New Zealand needed 122 at a run a ball with eight wickets remaining when Bates fell, but England's bowlers, led byJenny Gunn, kept striking even as the asking rate kept mounting. Sarah Taylor earlier rode on some let-offs to finally make some runs in the tournament after three successive ducks, and Charlotte Edwards made a half-century at the top of the order. The match held little meaning, though, as both sides went out of contention for a place in the final against Australia following West Indies' victory.

The match followed the same pattern as that in the previous two day-night games at Brabourne Stadium - the side batting first scored big runs and won. Unlike those two matches, though, New Zealand gave England more than a scare when Bates and Satterthwaite were going after the bowling. With the game dead, the tournament's leading wicket-taker, England's Anya Shrubsole, didn't take the field during New Zealand's chase despite being in the XI.

England began with the slow-mediums of Arran Brindle from one end and despite her having Lucy Doolan stumped down the leg side, Bates and Satterthwaite were barely troubled in motoring along at above five runs an over. Both were prolific in the region of midwicket and extra cover, with Satterthwaite hitting as many as 16 fours. Gaps were picked with ease as Bates, the tournament's leading run-getter, found support from Satterthwaite.

With lead fast bowler Katherine Brunt proving expensive, it was down to Jenny Gunn to bowl a tight spell of 10-1-26-2. Gunn also broke the partnership, having Bates bowled after the batsman moved too far across in the 30th over. Satterthwaite kept New Zealand going as she put on 51 with Sophie Devine in 11 overs. The asking-rate was just over seven at this stage when Devine heaved at left-arm spinner Holly Colvin and the wicketkeeper Taylor took the top edge.

A tiring Satterthwaite struck two more boundaries to get to her century but in the 44th over, lofted the offspin of Danielle Wyatt straight to extra cover. England now closed in. Colvin, coming from over the stumps, bowled Nicola Browne round her legs on an attempted sweep. Katie Perkins heaved at Wyatt and was bowled too. The fight went out of New Zealand as they subsided to end 15 runs short.

The context had gone for the players in the middle when they learnt of Australia's defeat, which meant West Indies had entered the final. Edwards, who had added 59 upfront with Wyatt, recovered from her initial disappointment to pull authoritatively as she and Taylor added another 68.

Taylor, one of the foremost talents in the game, would have made her fourth successive duck had she been taken at deep midwicket in the 18th over off Browne. She was to be caught on 69 at midwicket off a Bates no-ball. Taylor did hit some superb strokes on way to 88 off 79, showing once again why she's highly rated. Her front-foot driving down the ground was effortless as well as commanding. Her front-foot defence was precise and assured. She stepped it up in the batting Powerplay with powerful swings over midwicket, before lofting Bates to mid-off in the 40th over.

Even as England lost a few wickets, Gunn and Heather Knight propelled them well past 250 as they took 38 off the last three overs, a charge that was to push the game out of New Zealand's reach.

Abhishek Purohit is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Abhishek Purohit

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by JG2704 on (February 14, 2013, 19:08 GMT)

@jmcilhinney on (February 14, 2013, 2:27 GMT) I'm gutted we're not there but I feel on hindsight the damage was probably done by not beating SL in the 1st game. But there has been some shocking umpiring in this tournament. Often when Eng have gone out of tournaments I feel Eng have badly underperformed. On this occasion we lost 2 matches (same as WI) , both by the narrowest margins possible , have the best net RR in the Super 6 and we're out of the tournament. TBH , I don't like the format at all. I feel that the top 2 from each group should have gone through and then you have a semi and then a final. If we have to do a S6 then have all the teams play each other in the group and not just teams from the opposite group. And if you have to carry points forward , you carry all your group stage points over and not just the ones against S6 qualifiers.

PLEASE PUBLISH THIS TIME

Posted by jmcilhinney on (February 14, 2013, 2:27 GMT)

I have to admit that I don't know who else was on the wrong end of umpiring mistakes and when but, as an England fan, I feel a little aggrieved that better umpiring in England's game against Australia or NZ's game against WI probably would have seen England in the final. If England had that extra win or WI one less then England's superior NRR would have seen them through. That said, WI did play well and England should have won both the games they lost. SL are obviously a much-improved team and maybe England weren't really prepared for them and they should have chased down Australia's total even with the umpiring mistakes. Good to see Taylor make some runs here but they really needed her in that loss to Australia. Did Australia throw the game against WI? I doubt it but their intensity may have been down a bit, even subconsciously.

Posted by JG2704 on (February 13, 2013, 19:28 GMT)

Well done to both sides for showing passion for the game in hand when there was little to play for after poor scheduling meant that final games in the super 6s and the group stages were not played at the same time. Was good to see Taylor show some form and well played Bates and Satterthwaite for NZ. Some poor umpiring decs once more but nothing which affected the result which in effect is just a warm up game for the 3rd place play off which is just a small consolation in itself

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Abhishek PurohitClose
Tournament Results
Aus Women v WI Women at Mumbai (BS) - Feb 17, 2013
Aus Women won by 114 runs
Eng Women v NZ Women at Mumbai (BS) - Feb 15, 2013
Eng Women won by 4 wickets (with 18 balls remaining)
SA Women v SL Women at Cuttack - Feb 15, 2013
SL Women won by 88 runs
Eng Women v NZ Women at Mumbai (BS) - Feb 13, 2013
Eng Women won by 15 runs
Aus Women v WI Women at Mumbai - Feb 13, 2013
WI Women won by 8 runs
SA Women v SL Women at Cuttack - Feb 13, 2013
SA Women won by 110 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days