Women's World Cup 2013 February 18, 2013

India lack BCCI support - Connor

ESPNcricinfo staff

Clare Connor, the ICC women's committee chairman and former England Women's captain, has blamed the BCCI for India's poor showing at the Women's World Cup.

India finished in seventh place after failing to qualify for the Super Six stage with just one victory from the group phase. Connor has said the team did not receive the support they deserved from their board.

Connor is now head of women's cricket at the ECB who have made the England Women's team the best-resourced in the world but says standards have slipped in India and the BCCI are at fault.

"Generally India have been strong but other teams, Sri Lanka and West Indies who have accelerated so much in the past four years, are overtaking them," Connor said in an interview. "The Indian players and the support staff will look to the BCCI for more support."

"There is such passion for cricket in this country. It probably asks the question whether the women have had the support they deserve because their standards have slipped. While that is partly the responsibility of the players I don't think they had as much support going into this tournament as they would need. That is a shame because they were the hosts and we wanted to bring the World Cup to India because of the passion for the game. It is a shame they didn't make it further in the tournament.

"If there is more support from the BCCI, then standards will rise. The passion is there for the game, people just need to know more about women's cricket probably, and hopefully that support will grow."

Connor said the world cup was a "huge achievement" for the women's game but it was disappointing that the BCCI didn't put as much weight into the tournament as it has done for men's competitions. The Wankhede Stadium was dropped at a late hour to host the final of the Ranji Trophy.

"For me personally the disappointment is that the BCCI has not pulled its way as much as it could have done for the Indian women's team and to support the profile and exposure of this tournament.

"The market for women's cricket in India is massive. It is why we wanted a successful tournament here. We wanted to engage this cricket-mad nation and we wanted people to support the Indian women's team more. We want to grow the game. We want there to be role models and the aspiration to play towards the highest level. Hopefully on television that message would have got across a little bit.

"India is really important for the women's cricket. It has so much passion for the game that has not necessarily flowed into the women's game. Over time I hope that will happen with more high-quality cricket being played. It has huge finance in terms of backing the game. I hope this tournament has gone towards opening up some minds that were closed towards women's cricket in the past."

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • anupriya91 on February 21, 2013, 4:03 GMT

    personally i feel like financial incentives will take at least a good 10 years to be properly introduced or even decided upon. but for players who paid for their own travel fair to go play state matches..2500 is at least something. but the number of matches in a season? without adequate match practice, how can we hone talent? matches need to be increased DRASTICALLY. that is hurting us the most. and what possible reason can the bcci have for not increasing the number of matches? we have screamed ourselves hoarse for the return of u-16 and u-22..they reject it every time. why? does it make sense? it doesn't to me. not one bit.

  • anupriya91 on February 21, 2013, 3:58 GMT

    @mr_anonymous: i understand your point completely. and i agree with it to quite and extent. but please take and moment and re-read whatever i have said and understand my point. we are waiting. what else can we do? i firmly do believe that we have to be in the system to change the system. but the impatience (read-panic) is setting in from the fact that before coming under the bcci, we were a good team. we never lost to sri lanka, pakistan, any other team except nz, aus and eng and on our days we could beat them too. we never exited a world cup before the semis. but now we're losing to west indies, sri lanka and we recently lost in the world t20 to pakistan. if matches are decreasing, how can we attract any viewers? test matches are completely done away with. during the last asian games in china, women's cricket was included...it was an easy gold for india...the bcci refused to send a team. and by charity i meant matches too.

  • Mr_Anonymous on February 20, 2013, 19:44 GMT

    > still hoping..waiting..patiently. but after a point we're powerless

    I sense a lot of impatience although I don't think you should consider yourself powerless. I'll give you an example of how Aakash Chopra uses his blog to make suggestions and recommendations for improving Indian cricket and has a discussion with other cricket lovers. Maybe some Indian women cricketers need to start doing the same and providing a vision for what they think needs to be done and how we can get there. If there is a vision, then educating the Indian cricket lovers and getting adequate support from the BCCI in small steps is possible. It won't happen by being frustrated, it won't happen overnight and while I hope that it can happen in the next couple or few years, you have to be mentally prepared to face the possibility that it might not even happen during your entire playing career. As long as you enjoy your cricket and are motivated to keep improving and happy playing it, it should be fine.

  • Mr_Anonymous on February 20, 2013, 19:44 GMT


    > how? they dont want us. they never did..bcci was one of the last boards to adopt women's cricket.

    First of all let's stay positive. BCCI was probably the last board to embrace T20 also. However, when the Indian viewers embraced the format, BCCI embraced it in a big manner. That has not happened yet for women's cricket. The BCCI cannot force Indian viewers to embrace women's cricket. It has to happen organically for it to be sustainable.

    > we're the beggars who should be happy with whatever "charity" we are getting from the bcci.

    Getting compensated adequately should be a goal although if financial rewards are the main goal or only goal then I think you can and will get very frustrated. The best batsman in the world (Amla, in Tests and ODIs) probably makes less money than so many other people on the list(s). That has not discouraged him or diluted his run making appetite or his ability to keep improving. Is that fair? Is it Cricket SA's fault?


  • anupriya91 on February 20, 2013, 18:16 GMT

    @mr_anonymous: dont you think that we're forgetting a very central point in our discussion? the "unique" nature of the problem. you gave nehwal's example and anand's..besides being individual sports were a lot can be achieved through individual commitment and effort, most sports associations of india(if not all) come under the ambit of the government...the republic of india. the bcci is accountable to no one. it certainly believes so. you cannot organise a cricket league in india outside the ambit of the bcci without being pariahs. the bcci rejects the claim that it comes under the ambit of even the RTI. it is a "private" organisation with its own rules. so if the will is lacking and there is no clear mechanism to force a "creation of will"..what do we do? we extend a hand but the other party snubs us. all we can do is sit and wait..for it to acknowledge us. but should that mean we cannot complain about the snub?

  • anupriya91 on February 20, 2013, 17:59 GMT

    also. one particular factor that makes me really depressed about the situation. bcci's monopoly over cricket and the politician-businessman-cricket board nexus. if we get a raw deal by the bcci, who do we go to? the icc? does the icc have any power of the richest cricket board? do we go to the govt? apparently cricket is the sole jurisdiction of the bcci and the govt is run by a few politicians with very high stakes in the business of cricket. it all makes me feel powerless and hopeless. maybe by a miracle we will win a world cup in the near future...but given the current attitude and demeanor of the board, i dont think it guarantees anything. its a matter of WILL. there is no real will from the board to improve things. we beg for things, they throw us a penny or the promise of change and then forget us. change cant be overnight, it shouldn't be. but the sport needs SAVING..not improvement. what if there is no women's cricket in the next 50 yrs to bring about change in?

  • anupriya91 on February 20, 2013, 17:45 GMT

    @mr_anonymous: i dont think i'm expressing myself correctly. the key word here is "cooperate". how? they dont want us. they never did..bcci was one of the last boards to adopt women's cricket...it did so when it absolutely had to. you can take a horse to the water but you cant make him drink. there is a sense of arrogance...we're the beggars who should be happy with whatever "charity" we are getting from the bcci. you really need to hear a few of the top level bcci members talk to really understand what i'm saying. we are still living on hope that maybe someday we will triumph and it will be enough to end this apathy. abhishek purohit's article "a tournament that had to be gotten out of the way" says it all. that's exactly how they approach things. there are glimmers of hope..some positive steps..some demands met..but every time it feels like things might be going in a the right direction, 2 steps are taken back. still hoping..waiting..patiently. but after a point we're powerless.

  • Nampally on February 20, 2013, 17:15 GMT

    @YS-USA: I was going by numbers announced in 2011 where players had identical numbers as you quoted. But I noted that the numbers from 2010 to 2011 tripled. So I extrapolated the numbers on the same scale from 2011 to 2013.Obviously BCCI were less charitable with their increases - Zero!.I am also not sure of the current exchange rate. in 2011 quotes, 1 crore was listed as equal to $220,000.To cut the long story short, You are absolutely right in your numbers. My apologies for wrong numbers. However the fact remains of huge disparity- How many women Cricketers playing for India have a contract apart from the Match fee. Men were paid in addition Rs. 7 lakhs/Test, Rs. 4 lakhs/ODI & Rs. 2 lakhs/T20. Goswami, Raj, Kamini, Kaur are all good players at the international level. Recognition of their talent is called for & should be done sooner than later.

  • anupriya91 on February 20, 2013, 5:15 GMT

    @Mr_Anonymous...i thought so too. that we needed a success story to capture the imagination of the masses and spur on change. but we had that moment in 2009 when we reached the finals. we reached the finals DESPITE the system. what happened? instead of going forward..we're 10 steps back. when the men's team saw an early exit from the world t20, we reached the semis...thought people would notice then. what happened? nothing. my point is that the situation is such that it is becoming increasingly difficult for the national side to perform despite the system. it is always difficult to perform against all odds..the indian team could do that before on sheer talent..but the truth is..now other teams are equally talented if not more..and they have their board's backing..or some attention, hence they're racing ahead. it is not so much a case of the decline of the indian team as it is about the other teams over taking us.