|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
Points table for matches completed by 26 Sep 2012
|West Indies Women||1||1||0||0||0||2||+0.706||118/18.0||117/20.0|
|South Africa Women||1||1||0||0||0||2||+0.665||80/17.2||79/20.0|
|Sri Lanka Women||1||0||1||0||0||0||-0.665||79/20.0||80/17.2|
|New Zealand Women||1||0||1||0||0||0||-0.706||117/20.0||118/18.0|
Points by match: Group B
|26 Sep 2012||SA Women||2||SL Women||0||Table | Match|
|WI Women||2||NZ Women||0||Match|
The following points system will apply:
Tie or no result 1
In the event of teams finishing on equal points in their Group, the right to play in the semi-finals will be decided in the following order of priority:
If a rankings match is tied, the teams shall compete in a one over per side eliminator to determine the winner. Details for OOPSE. If weather conditions prevent the one over per side eliminator from being completed, or if the match is a no result, the teams will be ranked according to their final position in the Group stage.
If a semi-final is tied, the teams shall compete in a one over per side eliminator to determine which team progresses to the Final. Details for OOPSE.
If following a tie, weather conditions prevent the one over per side eliminator from being completed, or if the match is a no result, then the Group winners will progress to the Final.
In the event of a tied Final, the teams shall compete in a one over per side eliminator to determine which team is the winner. Details for OOPSE. If weather conditions prevent the one over per side eliminator from being completed, or if the match is a no result, the teams shall be declared joint winners.
Net Run Rate
A team's net run rate is calculated by deducting from the average runs per over scored by that team throughout the relevant portion of the competition, the average runs per over scored against that team throughout the relevant portion of the competition.
In the event of a team being all out in less than its full quota of overs, the calculation of the net run rate of both teams shall be based on the full quota of overs to which the batting team would have been entitled and not on the number of overs in which the team was dismissed.
Only those matches where results are achieved will count for the purpose of net run rate calculations. Where a match is abandoned, but a result is achieved under Duckworth/Lewis, for net run rate purposes Team 1 will be accredited with Team 2's Par Score on abandonment off the same number of overs faced by Team 2. Where a match is concluded but with Duckworth/Lewis having been applied at an earlier point in the match, Team 1 will be accredited with 1 run less than the final Target Score for Team 2 off the total number of overs allocated to Team 2 to reach the target.
In circumstances where a match (and the points for such match) is awarded to a team as a result of the other team's refusal to play, either by the match referee in accordance with Law 21.3 (a)(ii) as read with playing condition 21.3 or in accordance with the provisions of the relevant event agreements signed by the participating teams, the net run rate of the defaulting team shall be affected in that the full 20 overs of the defaulting team's innings in such forfeited match shall be taken into account in calculating the average runs per over of the defaulting team over the course of the relevant portion of the competition. For the avoidance of doubt the runs scored and overs bowled in such forfeited match will not be taken into account when calculating the net run rate of the team to whom the match was awarded.
As a six-year-old, he watched Wasim Akram at the 1992 World Cup and decided that he would be a left-arm fast bowler. As a man, he put on a show very nearly as memorable as Wasim's 23 years before
The SCG might be India's preferred semi-final venue at this World Cup, but persistent rain in the lead-up has left them worried their spinners may not get the help they are widely expected to
This contest brings together a belligerent bunch of brats and braggers from two countries that are so different, yet share rampant egotism and a high opinion of themselves
Over the last few months, he has slowly moved from a flashy finisher, to a more measured risk manager
It was Grant Elliott and New Zealand's time in Auckland. Not South Africa's. But the Proteas will leave this tournament wondering when that will ever change. Maybe next time.
India's Plan A in this World Cup had worked flawlessly over seven matches. When they came up against the toughest opponents in the World Cup, however, they were left scrambling for a back-up plan