ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / News

England v Netherlands, Group B, World Cup 2011, Nagpur

No room for lemons in City of Oranges

Andrew Miller

February 21, 2011

Comments: 23 | Text size: A | A

Match Facts

February 22, Nagpur
Start time 14:30 local time (09:00 GMT)


Ryan ten Doeschate during a training session at the SSC, Colombo, February 11, 2011
The outfield is awash with orange as Ryan ten Doeschate warms up for the World Cup © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

Big Picture

Whisper it, but England owe the Netherlands a significant debt of favour. The last time these two teams met was at Lord's in June 2009 on a soggy opening night of the World Twenty20, when Ryan ten Doeschate, Tom de Grooth, Edgar Schiferli and Co. inflicted a sensational humiliation on an England team who were still resettling after their Moores/Pietersen upheaval, and had yet to recognise the need to front up in all formats.

It was a notable nadir, and a result that still ranks as one of the most abject moments in England's often chequered history in ICC competitions. And yet, it was arguably the hurry-up that they needed. Since that night, England have gone on to win and retain the Ashes, they triumphed at the subsequent World Twenty20 in the Caribbean, and until last month's ODI debagging in Australia, they had not lost a series in any format of the game since September 2009.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the memories of that evening have been surpressed by both teams in the build-up to this rematch. On the one hand, the Dutch have no wish to relinquish their comforting status as underdogs, but on the other, there is a widespread acceptance that England in 2011 are a very different proposition. They are not among the outright favourites for the World Cup by any stretch of the imagination, but neither should they be the makeweights who have disgraced every edition of the tournament since 1996.

Netherlands could hardly wish for a more portentous venue than Nagpur, India's so-called city of Oranges, although in a contest stretched over 100 overs rather than 40, England's experience ought to tell in the end - just as it did against Canada in their inauspicious warm-up in Fatullah last week, and indeed in Peshawar 15 years ago, when the teenaged Bas Zuiderent stole the plaudits for his maiden fifty, if not the result. England were as bad as they've ever been in that campaign. They've come a long way since then.

Form guide

(Most recent first)

England: LLLWL
Netherlands: LLWLL

Pitch and conditions

There has been a distinct English feel to the weather in Nagpur in recent days with cloud cover and drizzle in the air. Similar is forecast for the match which will suit both sides who are more used to cooler conditions. The nets have been a little spicy, but don't expect the surface to offer the same life.

Watch out for…

The big talking point is Kevin Pietersen's promotion to the top of the England order. It's not a role he has attempted too often in the past, although his 131 from 122 balls against India A in Bangalore seven years ago provides some evidence of what he might be able to achieve. Besides, so far in the tournament, No. 1 has been the place to bat, with Sehwag, Tamim, Dilshan and Watson all cashing in on their opportunities. KP's never better than when he has a point to prove.

Ryan ten Doeschate is the Netherlands' outstanding performer. A big-hitting and technically correct batsman, and a tricksy seamer with a good change-up in pace and a range of subtle variations, he has honed his skills as a stalwart at Essex, and is the one Dutch player who would press for a place in the England middle-order. A lot will rest on his shoulders if they are to come close to matching their shock result two years ago.

Team news

Graeme Swann is back with England's squad after an eventful month which began with a back injury in Australia, and culminated in the birth of his first son, Wilfred, only days after his successful quashing of a drink-driving charge at Nottingham Magistrates' Court. Assuming he has regained his fitness and focus after all that, he'll be straight back into the side, and may be joined by the late squad addition Ravi Bopara, whose powerful strokeplay could be vital in the absence of Eoin Morgan.

England (probable) 1 Kevin Pietersen, 2 Andrew Strauss (capt), 3 Jonathan Trott, 4 Ian Bell, 5 Paul Collingwood, 6 Matt Prior (wk), 7 Ravi Bopara, 8 Tim Bresnan, 9 Graeme Swann, 10 Stuart Broad, 11 James Anderson.

The Dutch captain Peter Borren is expected to play but will not bowl after suffering an abdominal strain. There could be a new look at the top of the order with the young wicketkeeper, Wesley Barresi, touted as a possible opening partner for the Worcestershire starlet, Alexei Kervezee. "I think [Barresi] can handle this level of cricket: not only handle it, but also do very, very well," said Borren.

Netherlands (possible) 1 Alexei Kervezee, 2 Wesley Barresi (wk), 3 Eric Szwarczynski, 4 Tom Cooper, 5 Ryan ten Doeschate, 6 Peter Borren (capt), 7 Bas Zuiderent, 8 Tom de Grooth, 9 Mudassar Bukhari, 10 Adeel Raja, 11 Bradley Kruger.

Try picking the XIs for tomorrow's game by playing Team Selector.

Stats and trivia

  • The first meeting between these two teams came in Peshawar exactly 15 years ago, when Graeme Hick's century proved the difference between two improbably well-matched teams. Bas Zuiderent was playing in his and his country's second full ODI, and made 54 as an 18-year-old.

  • The second, and most recent, 50-over meeting occurred in East London in the 2003 World Cup, and was a much more one-sided affair. James Anderson, blazing a trail in his maiden international season, claimed 4 for 25 as the Dutch crashed to 142 all out.

  • Paul Collingwood has played two matches in his career against the Dutch … and lost them both. The most recent was of course the Lord's Twenty20, but he first tasted defeat while playing for Durham at Amstelveen in the third round of the NatWest Trophy in 1999. He made 7 from 39 balls in a five-wicket defeat.

    Quotes

    "[Losing intensity] was an accusation that could have been levelled during the one-day series in Australia. But not the World Cup. We're up for it. There's a good vibe and buzz about everything out here at the moment."
    Andrew Strauss promises there will be no post-Ashes hangover in England's performances on the subcontinent

    "Certainly half the squad were there on that evening and they are fully aware of what is possible on any given day. I know it was a shorter version but they are going to take quite a bit of confidence out of that victory into this."
    The Dutch coach Peter Drinnen knows his team will remember that winning feeling after their heroics at Lord's two years ago

Andrew Miller is UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew Miller

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 23 
Posted by NALINWIJ on (February 22, 2011, 10:53 GMT)

In two days we have almost confirmed the prior notion of who will qualify for the quarters from this group A despite a month of matches to go.On the other hand eliminating associates mean that expansion of world cricket may be limited. Canada and SL are the associates from WC 1979 and SL have won WC 1996. I believe at least 2 associates should qualify.12 teams mean 2 groups of 6. Each play 5 games anf if each round is done in 4 days that would be 20 days and if QFs are done on the weekend and SFs are done midweek and final on saturday the tournament could be over in 31 days.

Posted by   on (February 22, 2011, 9:00 GMT)

A Dutch win today against England will be very welcome to arrest the clamor for restricting the WC to test playing nations.

Posted by ia76 on (February 22, 2011, 8:33 GMT)

To say that England 'disgraced' the 2003 World Cup in South Africa is more than a little harsh. As i recall, England comfortable dealt with the Dutch and Namibia, thrashed Pakistan (thanks to the floodlights) and were similarly beaten by India (also largely due to the lights), before losing a thriller against Australia by 2 wickets thanks to Andy Bichel having the match of his career. All this against the farcical Zimabawe situation, where England were forced to forfeit the match for political and safety reasons. A victory against either Australia or Zimbabwe would have left England only needing to beat Kenya to earn a semi-final spot. As this was under lights, they would potentially have been a toss of a coin away from the final. In no way did England bring any 'disgrace' upon that competition and nor were they makeweights. Couldn't argue too much about many of the others though...

Posted by Rakesh_Sharma on (February 22, 2011, 7:31 GMT)

If you take opinion of sports loving real cricket fans than no doubt they will vote overwhemingly for atleast 2 Associates in world cup. This criticism of minnows being a mismartched is exposed basically due to wrong scheduling. First of all the cricket wc must be finished at the most within three weeks (21 days) It is not that just matches must be interesting and meaningful but each day must be enriching. Four games per day. I know around boxing days even 3 Test matches go simultaneously. So is the case with upto 3 or 4 onedayers in diff countries. Why and Why such ridiculously one match per day. Minnows can be no problem if 4 matches are played in a day as they would be well covered by more intense matches. Classic example is 1983 wc in England there used to be 4 matches in a single day. So each day will throw some interesting probabilities and WC will be able to keep its tempo all around till the climax(Final). I fully support atleast 2 Associates for cup to be called WC

Posted by Avanlarys on (February 22, 2011, 7:03 GMT)

@indiazen - Cuz a football match ends in 90 Minutes and an ODI needs about 500 minutes or plainly speaking ONE DAY. Hope the zen got his wisdom

Posted by Jibbapoo on (February 22, 2011, 6:29 GMT)

Go Nederlands. They may be minnows but they are the most splendidly dressed minnows in the cup. There is some class in their team, especially Ryan ten Doeschate. I hope they pump England. Having teams like the Netherlands, Ireland etc is goog for cricket and good for these teams. They get to play against great teams and can only benefit from the experience.

Posted by indianzen on (February 22, 2011, 5:02 GMT)

If even a football 35 team world cup ends in 20 days, why are these guys just dragging the time?

Posted by blodha on (February 22, 2011, 1:12 GMT)

i hope orange city makes it a day for oranges

Posted by   on (February 21, 2011, 23:57 GMT)

I agree with Arya. This world cup is four days old and there hasn't been a proper game yet. Dragging it out for six weeks is just the ICC giving themselves a financial pat on the back. There should be two games a day and the whole thing should be wrapped up in three weeks, as befits a "World" Cup with only eight decent teams.

Posted by CricSamraat on (February 21, 2011, 23:41 GMT)

Netherlands should try to make a match out of it. Two associates have provided sub-par performance in this World Cup. Is it too much to wish a respectable performance from the Dutch?

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew MillerClose
Andrew Miller Andrew Miller was saved from a life of drudgery in the City when his car caught fire on the way to an interview. He took this as a sign and fled to Pakistan where he witnessed England's historic victory in the twilight at Karachi (or thought he did, at any rate - it was too dark to tell). He then joined Wisden Online in 2001, and soon graduated from put-upon photocopier to a writer with a penchant for comment and cricket on the subcontinent. In addition to Pakistan, he has covered England tours in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the World Cup in the Caribbean in 2007
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
  • ESPN Cricinfo

World Cup Videos

Dhoni takes India home

Dhoni takes India home
03:52 | Nov 4, 2014
Yuvi steers India clear

Yuvi steers India clear
03:58 | Nov 4, 2014
Dhoni takes India home

Dhoni takes India home
04:48 | Nov 4, 2014
... and that's that

... and that's that
13:40 | Apr 11, 2011