ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / Features

Australia v NZ, Group A, World Cup 2011, Nagpur

New Zealand's top seven woes

Of all the full-member teams, New Zealand's top seven batsmen have the poorest average in the last two years

Nagraj Gollapudi in Nagpur

February 25, 2011

Comments: 11 | Text size: A | A

Brendon McCullum, having hit two boundaries against a wayward Shaun Tait in his first over, slashed hard at a wide delivery in the bowler's next over only to be pouched easily at third man; Martin Guptill failed to go forward to a length ball, which kept low and hit his off stump; Jesse Ryder, feet static, chased and nicked a Mitchell Johnson delivery that moved away a wee bit after pitching on a length; Ross Taylor moved in trying to play across to an inswinging yorker that re-arranged his furniture; James Franklin and Scott Styris played shots they will never even attempt in the nets.

None of those deliveries were really unplayable. Few could have been actually left alone. On paper most of these names are a top cast and evoke a strong appeal, but come audition day they tend to fail miserably, and often. Firsthand it is difficult to know if the hurdles are more mental than technical. The one certainty is New Zealand's top order has had more troughs than peaks in the recent past.

In the last two years, New Zealand's top-order batsmen (Nos. 1 to 7) average the least among all full-member teams. In 25 matches since January 2009, New Zealand's top seven average 27.49. That is less than even Zimbabwe, whose batsmen score at 28.48 runs. The best teams like India and South Africa peak above the 40-run mark. Another damning number in the same period is the New Zealanders have registered 36 ducks, a record for any team. On a per match basis New Zealand have less than one fifty-plus score, which is lower than all other teams.

On the back of the disaster back home, it was pretty evident that New Zealand's players were a little bit distracted. But Daniel Vettori, a man who is stoic at the best of times, said later that they were professionals and the remorse felt back home could not be compared or used as an excuse for the dip in the performance today. So is it then the mental approach of players that is vulnerable? Considering the match had been designated for the Chappell-Hadlee Trophy, it was natural for the players to stay pumped up. Sadly, on Friday, there was only team which was high on adrenaline and it was not New Zealand.

Never once during their act did New Zealand look fluent and solid. They started slowly and grew more timid every over. In the first 15 overs, when the first two Powerplays were on, New Zealand had 78 dot balls and lost their top five batters. Australia had come out with a plan and Ricky Ponting deployed his pace arsenal of four quicks for the first 19 overs to combat the opponent. It worked wonders. "The pressure that Australia put on us in a number of different aspects really hurt us but in the end it was about wickets. It is more about psyching up the pressure and being able to repel that," Vettori said. He felt the batsmen could have hit back through coming back in the batting Powerplay but that never happened because there was no man left standing.

To begin with, McCullum was frenetically chasing everything Tait threw at him and trying to hit it hard. Considering he was facing the fastest bowler in the game, a better ploy could have been to just use the pace to his advantage. McCullum is New Zealand's senior-most top-order batsman, and the team looks to him to provide the ballistic starts he is famous for. But it is not mandatory that he needs to go guns blazing each time. He can study a like-minded batsman in Virender Sehwag, who is showing the determination to bat out as long as possible, which effectively helps India reach bigger totals. It is not necessary that McCullum has to go bashing in the first fifteen. If he can last longer he can always convert the final 15 overs into a Powerplay and use the long handle. His team will have no complaints.

It is just not McCullum who has cobwebs to clear. It is difficult to understand the reason a batsman like Ryder, who scored a brilliant 107 in the final match of the one-day series at home against Pakistan earlier in the month, cannot thread together two big scores on a trot. After the early fall of McCullum, New Zealand depended on Ryder to provide the thrust. He gladly licked Johnson when he failed to get enough height on some short-pitched deliveries aimed at Ryder's hips. A few words were exchanged and Ryder was not shy to open his mouth. But then when Johnson pitched it a little fuller Ryder grew circumspect.

"The two balls in the over before [which Ryder pulled for fours] I did not get them right. I obviously fed him on his hips where he likes them," Johnson said. But Johnson improvised his length immediately. "I actually said to Ricky that I just felt I would nick him off from that good length. Fortunately he nicked it for me. Not sure the plan of bowling short and not getting it up worked but just bowling that good length worked."

That was the case with most other batsmen. Australia had many plans today. New Zealand had barely any answers. Vettori was concerned. "We have got very good players in the top 5. We just need to be stand up and be counted particularly in these big games. They have got the skills, but we have to look it as a unit. We got to find a way to find a result."

New Zealand's top five can learn a lot from the grit of Nathan McCullum, who has hit three half-centuries in his last four innings. If he can dig in deep, why not the rest.

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nagraj Gollapudi


Comments: 11 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by dummy4fb on (February 26, 2011, 10:23 GMT)

Vetori is a great sport and his comments post match reflect this. The fact is the team had their minds elsewhere for the Aussie match. They played like they were distracted, and uptight. Dont worry Kiwi fans, these guys will come back. Taylor, McCullum, Ryder and co just need to relax, and focus on the cricket ball. Semi final birth coming up...

Posted by cricfan80720437 on (February 26, 2011, 8:44 GMT)

Infuriating performance from the top order. NZ have the talent but the application is all over the place. I'm really disappointed in the performance. I know Australia are better, but it seems like the NZ top order just never learn from their mistakes.

Posted by boris6491 on (February 26, 2011, 7:30 GMT)

The argument that they were distracted by the happenings back home is credible, but it doesn't hide how mediocre they were, and have been in the past while. That batting looks so brittle and it is becoming a joke how much they are relying on players like Nathan McCullum, Vettori, and Franklin to do the batting for them. All three are essentially bowlers who have been forced to improve their batting due to constant top order collapses. On paper, the batting looks quite decent with McCullum, Taylor and Ryder providing the firepower and Guptill and Styris carrying the batting through. The main problem is that none of these players are reliable and consistent. The bowling as well relies heavily on Vettori, Bennett may frighten an associate team with his unique bowling action but is too inaccurate whilst Southee's pace won't bother anyone if the ball doesn't swing as much. Vettori has been forced in recent years to employ a containing approach, something not optimal for NZ cricket.

Posted by kanagsrat on (February 26, 2011, 7:27 GMT)

@ rohanbala, just quickly i think you're being quite unfair in your judgement, just cause taylor and mccullum failed in this match, does not take away from the fact they are 2 of the best batsman in the side.

Posted by rohanbala on (February 26, 2011, 1:19 GMT)

Tell players like Ross Taylor and Brendon Macullum that it is a IPL match that they are playing and only then they will start making a contribution. It was absurd that some commentators were saying that Ross Taylor will be the next best candidate to lead the Kiwis once Daniel Vettori decides to quit playing 50 over matches. How could a player who fails to even reach double digit scores ever dream of holding a place in the playing eleven, let alone lead the side? The Kiwi selectors need to think a lot after this World Cup and decide about the composition of their team and it is most likely that a majority of the current players will find themselves out of the list.

Posted by dummy4fb on (February 25, 2011, 22:35 GMT)

Same story, different day

Posted by h_kap on (February 25, 2011, 22:16 GMT)

With ICC adamant about dropping Associate teams in WC 2015, i see a 9 team WC. LOL

Posted by dummy4fb on (February 25, 2011, 21:12 GMT)

I feel so sad for NZ cricketers, I don't think so that they were good mode for playing cricket because of devastating earth quake that hit NZ. I would say that NZ cricketers did brave job here because they couldn't play normally because the earth quake horror was in their mind. My all pray for those NZ victims and who lost the loves one. I hope that NZ will overcome this horror soon and their Cricketers bring joy and smile for Great NZ. As a Bangladeshi cricket fan, I always like the D.Vettory because I found himself, the gentle Cricket Captain in Modern Cricket History. Good Luck Danny boy(Vettory) and NZ.

Posted by dummy4fb on (February 25, 2011, 21:07 GMT)

the last point pretty much summed up the performance. why not do a '92 and send Nathan up the order to open?

Posted by dummy4fb on (February 25, 2011, 18:43 GMT)

NZ needs to probably look to change their skipper. As admirable as Dan Vettori is, he is unable to get this bunch of skilled cricketers to perform to their potential. John Wright was a step in the right direction, now they should think in this direction as well.

Email Feedback Print
Nagraj GollapudiClose

How about specialists at short leg?

Sam Perry: The importance of the position is at odds with the fact that it is seen as a punishment to be posted there

    The champion of women's cricket liberation

Rachael Heyhoe-Flint was a larger-than-life personality who was never afraid to take on cricket's male establishment. By Raf Nicholson

    Peter Roebuck's Somerset agony

David Hopps on newly published material that reveals Roebuck's despair at being made a scapegoat for the decision to release the club's West Indian stars

    Jozi v CPT: let the fur fly

What do Capetonians think of Johannesburg? Andrew Fernando is privy to some heavy-duty inter-city rivalry

News | Features Last 3 days

'Why don't you admit you're an alien?'

Some of the reactions on Twitter to Virat Kohli's record-equalling hundred during India's chase in Pune

Another record chase, another Kohli special

Stats highlights from the first ODI between India and England in Pune

The agony and ecstasy of Kedar Jadhav

Kedar Jadhav battled physical exertion and pain as he played the innings of his life, but there could not have been a better balm to soothe those pains than watching his team go the distance

Who is Hashim Amla, really?

As Hashim Amla prepares to play his 100th Test, his former and current team-mates offer insight into the making of a great batsman

The Kohli-Dhoni duet

Transitions in leadership are very much a talking point at the moment. India's ODI handover had hallmarks of the old and new ways

News | Features Last 3 days

World Cup Videos