ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / Features

India v England, World Cup 2011, Group B, Bangalore

Shahzad's six and Munaf's palm

ESPNcricinfo presents the plays of the day from an enthralling match in Bangalore

Sharda Ugra at the Chinnaswamy Stadium

February 27, 2011

Comments: 26 | Text size: A | A

Munaf Patel took a clever return catch to dismiss Kevin Pietersen, World Cup, Group B, Bangalore, February 27, 2011
Sitting down on the job: Munaf Patel somehow managed to collect the rebound from Kevin Pietersen's drive © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

The Six
Never mind what Sachin Tendulkar did or Andrew Strauss did. Or how Ajmal Shazad had bowled. When he faced the third ball of the last over, England needed 11 off the last four balls of the match. Munaf Patel bowled length, Shahzad squared his shoulders and swung. The ball landed into disbelieving specators at the mid-off boundary near the KSCA club house. It was the shot that helped England get out of their Powerplay prison and tie the game. Well, at least the shot showed them they could actually survive the jitters.

The Double Whammy
Just when things were coasting for England - 59 needed off 48 - there arrived on England's path, the bogeyman in disguise. Also known as the batting Powerplay that makes teams, and the batsmen that must take them, go loopy. When it must be faced against the most highly-skilled bowler in the team, the portents are ominous. Ian Bell who had just been treated for cramps was trying to rush over the finish line, eyeing perhaps heave-ho corner but ballooning one to the fielder at mid-off. Off the next ball, Zaheer Khan found the captain's toes with a yorker and for England, the plot began to sicken.

The Catch
Surely the most unathletic of India's fielders can't take the catch that looked like being match changing? Oh yes he can, if he is under threat of having his skull fractured. With England racing to 68 in the 10th over and Kevin Pietersen's strokeplay swallowing up all the noise of the Chinnaswamy Stadium, Patel found fortune favouring his reflexes. A straight drive with full blood written on it headed for Patel's cranium and naturally the man fended it off with his hands as far away as he could. The shot had thrown him off his feet and the ball bobbed up over him at a reasonable pace. On its way down, it met Patel's outstretched palm. On ya bike, Mr Pietersen. Not that it meant anything in the context of the game eventually.

The Missing Single
How does one describe this without embarrassment spreading through the Indian dressing room? With wickets falling, 4-11 off the last 11 balls of the Indian innings, Zaheer Khan had madly scrambled for a second on the very last ball. Unable to be the Usain Bolt of 22m, Zaheer was run out but then discovered, as did the entire ground, that the first run didn't even count. Munaf Patel had not put his bat inside the crease after the first run before gambolling over for the second. So one less on the total. One run less for England to make. As punishment, the fates decreed that it would be Patel who would bowl the final over which would tie the game. Which gave India one point less than what a victory would have. Which would have happened had the missing single not been missed. No doubt by a single inch or so.

The Opportunity
The first one, the first ball, the first strike. Bowler Jimmy Anderson on whom rested England's quick bowling hopes. Batsman Virender Sehwag who decided that, today, he wanted to leave the business of building platforms to the ministry of railways. In his mind he wanted to have one racing over the Chinnaswamy grass past the boundary, but in reality he sent an edge towards second slip. Had Graeme Swann held on it would have been a show-off snatch but, sadly for England, it didn't. Two balls later, one went off Sehwag's leading edge past a diving Ian Bell in the covers. A third edge followed in the over and even though Sehwag didn't last much longer, the rest of Anderson's day was ruined.


Zaheer Khan leaps for joy after dismissing Andrew Strauss, India v England, World Cup, Group B, Bangalore, February 27, 2011
Zaheer Khan gets two in two: 'batting' Powerplay? Really? © AFP
Enlarge

The Fly Swatter
What happens when a ball is short, widish, sits up and begs to be hit? With several options before him, Sehwag took a look at Anderson's offering and thought about his shots. Not the pull, no. Surely the cut. Enough. Sehwag whacked it, cross-batted, in the air over mid-on, bringing in a new dimension to the word, 'groundstroke'. It's called the Fly Swatter. Since all these fizzy drinks wallahs are posing as inventors of trendy, new cricketing terminology, ESPNcricinfo is going to patent this one. So there.

Oops of the Day
On an afternoon when they fielded far, far better than they had gone against Netherlands, England's Keystone Kops moment came from the most unexpected sources. Yuvraj Singh glided one from Michael Yardy, where a respectable single would have been fair all-round. Graeme Swann, one of the better fielders in the team, was in line at short third-man, had it covered, sorted. Nope. A bungled collection and it was past him to the boundary rope. Could India possibly beat that? (Err, shall we count the ways?)

Munaf's Other Moment
The small anthem ceremony begins with a bunch of kids, carrying the flags of competing nations and the ICC to a piece of Vangelis music called 'Conquest of Paradise'. Once they are in place, the players walk out with children, who are winners of a sponsor's contest. It is the only time in the match the players keep their game faces off holding the kids' hands, patting their heads, some chatting to them and putting their arms around small shoulders. Munaf Patel went one step further. He decided to spare the child next to him the trouble of trying to keep step. Patel picked the tyke up and put him under his arm, carrying him to the spot where they were to stand. When the child was on his feet again, both Patel's and his smiles were bigger than the ground.

People Power
Cricket spectators in India are used to being taken for granted. Sometimes they can feel lucky just about not getting roughed up. But in the Chinnaswamy Stadium this afternoon they could gloat about earning a small, but important, victory. A jib camera, ones that are mounted on a crane and used to get close-up shots of crowds in the stands, was positioned just in front of the one of hospitality stands at the ground level. To start with, as the camera swung in on them, the fans responded enthusiastically as they always do. But as soon as the game started it became clear that the crane was at the eyeline of those in the front rows. Soon a chorus began to move it and grew louder and more intense by the minute. But even the most optimistic of the lot wouldn't have bargained for what came next. The crew started dismantling the unit and in a matter of minutes it had disappeared from sight.

Sharda Ugra is senior editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sharda Ugra

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 26 
Posted by   on (March 2, 2011, 4:00 GMT)

diri u said it!!!!!!! we dont have any decent bowlers apart from Zaheer and even then hes not fast enuff!!!!!!

Posted by SridharKalyan on (February 28, 2011, 15:57 GMT)

With Ashish Nehra and Sreesanth as the back-up in the pace attack, we really have little hope against S Africa and West Indies. The spinners aren't kicking up a huge storm either - the much touted 'surprise package' called Piyush Chawla went for 71 runs yesterday against a team that is not the best of spin-players. Wonder what these guys will do against a Pakistani or a Sri Lankan batting line-up!! To cap it all, we have people like Tendulkar, Sehwag, Zaheer, etc who feel it is below their dignity to bend and pick a ball in the field. It is sad that the media still keeps hyping the indian team just for their own ends. It will be a great day if we reach the Semis.

Posted by Crass on (February 28, 2011, 7:10 GMT)

@CricSamraat - I like your sense of humour. Inia could not defend 338 and their bowling contngent is 3rd rate while England gave away 338 runs and they have a balanced squad.

Posted by diri on (February 28, 2011, 5:44 GMT)

I said it before and i will say it again, India have the weakest bowling attack from all the test playing nations and will never win this world cup. mark my words. Its shocking that they cant defend a huge score like yesterdays.....batting does not win you matches alone you need good bowlers and im sorry to say India have rubbish bowlers. This world cup belongs to SA who have good batsmen and GOOD BOWLERS

Posted by ChWaQaS on (February 28, 2011, 5:41 GMT)

Spell of Day by Zaheer khan is missing

Posted by FaheemAhmed on (February 28, 2011, 5:33 GMT)

So much so for India's supremacy. Their middle order & the tail too was exposed on a flat batting pitch. If a team gets first 2 Indian wickets early, thats the end of India

Posted by veeracho on (February 28, 2011, 3:57 GMT)

@CricSamraat: You say that India's bowling is 3rd rated and that England is a balanced side... Did you forget Netherlands scored 290+ against England and India scored 338??? England's bowling spearhead Jimmy Anderson went for 91 runs in his 10 overs... Does England have a balanced side? Please know the numbers, before you comment...

Posted by jasonpete on (February 28, 2011, 2:25 GMT)

to cricsamraat! india lost due to poor bowling and fielding but keep in mind india also made 338 against england one of the best bowling attack currently, where as the same pakistan team kept 206 allout against the same england attack in the warm match and england scored 274 against ur best bowling team pakistan ,lol everyone knows yesterday pitch was incrediblly flat where its difficult to contain the scores,thats why both team made more scores against each other.

Posted by   on (February 28, 2011, 1:37 GMT)

India lost due to senseless batting in last 5 overs. After a massive platform set by Sachin they failed to build a massive total. England's bowling was not wicket taking but our batsman gifted them in attempt to overtrying of slog shots. Last man run out was damn foolishness. And there was still 1 ball to go when we bowled out.

Posted by salmankhan1234 on (February 28, 2011, 0:33 GMT)

How can some one blame munaf Patel for 1 run short where you have 338 runs to defend. Shame on people who thinks like that. Sehwag could have gone for 1st ball duck. Harbajan dropping strauss. Kohli dropping Ian bell. And yea if ghambir didn't have hold the ball for too long at the boundry then strauss and Bell had only made a single instead of 2 runs. And one more if tailenders didn't have stole a single from Dhoni, that Bye run could have save India. Come on people, what's wrong with you. 338 runs chased by an average batting line up. Is it that hard to get 1 wkt of Bell and Strauss who are an average batsman. DHoni should change his tactic on rotating bowlers. At one point 4 consecutive overs were bowled by different bowlers.this is a world cup where captain has to do everything.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sharda UgraClose

'The man who had a winning impact'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss VVS Laxman's match-winning skills

    'If I were a fruit, I'd be an orange'

Jonny Bairstow talks red hair, team-mates to avoid while batting, and what to see in Yorkshire

Once a rat in blue, now the Kohinoor

The Cricket Monthly: Kamran Abbasi hates to love Virat Kohli
Download the app for: iPad | for Android tablet

    A touch of Bradman

Hundred in a session? Easy peasy for Doug Walters. Ashley Mallett on his old team-mate's way with a stroke

Rear-ended in Hambantota

Tour diary: Another eventful stint in the province

News | Features Last 3 days

Youngest double-centurions, and the oldest living Test players

Also, the closest ODI team match-ups, most catches in a T20, and expensive Test debut five-fors

From Constantine to Chanderpaul

As West Indies play their 500th Test, here's an interactive journey through their Test history

Soaring in the 1980s, slumping in the 2000s

In their pomp, West Indies had a 53-13 win-loss record; in their last 99, it is 16-53. That, in a nutshell, shows how steep the decline has been

The contenders to replace Ajmal

Following the bowling ban on Saeed Ajmal, ESPNcricinfo picks five bowlers Pakistan may replace him with for the time being

I got more than I expected - Shastri

ESPNcricinfo spoke to Ravi Shastri, India's new team director, after the conclusion of the tour of England, where MS Dhoni's team lost the Tests, won the ODIs and then lost the only Twenty20 international

News | Features Last 3 days
  • ESPN Cricinfo

World Cup Videos

... and that's that

... and that's that
13:40 | Apr 11, 2011
Inside ESPNcricinfo

Inside ESPNcricinfo
12:49 | Apr 10, 2011
 World Cup review

World Cup review
05:26 | Apr 8, 2011
Frozen Out

Frozen Out
46:34 | Apr 5, 2011