ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / News

Netherlands v South Africa, World Cup 2011, Group B, Mohali

All-round South Africa wallop Netherlands

The Report by Nitin Sundar

March 3, 2011

Comments: 38 | Text size: A | A

South Africa 351 for 5 (de Villiers 134, Amla 113) beat Netherlands 120 (Tahir 3-19, Kallis 2-19) by 231 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


AB de Villiers and Hashim Amla take a run during their 221-run partnership, Netherlands v South Africa, World Cup 2011, Mohali, March 3, 2011
Hashim Amla's obduracy combined with AB de Villiers' aggression to leave Netherlands floundering © AFP
Enlarge

A day after Ireland's heroics in Bangalore gave the Associates a major fillip, normal service resumed in Mohali where AB de Villiers and Hashim Amla reeled off contrasting hundreds to set up a hammering of Netherlands. Peter Borren elected to field under overcast skies, but things unraveled at an alarming rate after a disciplined show in the first quarter of the match. Amla overcame a sluggish start and focused on accumulation, while de Villiers shredded the attack in a blaze of big hits that was reminiscent of Herschelle Gibbs' assault in the last World Cup encounter between these two teams. South Africa's bowlers then backed up the batting with a near-perfect display to set up the fourth-biggest win in World Cup history.

Smart Stats

  • AB de Villiers has now scored two consecutive centuries in the 2011 World Cup. He becomes the first South African to score two centuries in a single World Cup and the fifth batsman after Mark Waugh, Saeed Anwar, Rahul Dravid and Matthew Hayden to score two consecutive centuries in a single World Cup tournament.
  • de Villiers also became the 16th batsman to score two or more centuries in one World Cup tournament. The record is three centuries in one tournament, jointly held by Mark Waugh (1996), Sourav Ganguly (2003) and Matthew Hayden (2007).
  • de Villiers' strike rate of 136.73 is the highest among South African batsmen who have scored centuries in World Cup matches.
  • Hashim Amla reached his first century in World Cups off 121 balls. Overall, he has scored over 2200 runs at an average of 60.07 with eight centuries and 12 fifties.
  • The 69 runs scored in South Africa's batting powerplay is second only to Pakistan's aggregate of 70 runs in their batting powerplay against Kenya.
  • The 221-run stand between de Villiers and Amla is the highest third-wicket partnership for South Africa in World Cups and the third highest for any team in the World Cup. It is also the highest partnership for the third wicket for South Africa in all ODIs.
  • South Africa's 351 is their third-highest World Cup score and the 12th highest score for any team in World Cups. South Africa's highest World Cup score is the 356 against West Indies in the 2007 World Cup.
  • From a decent position of 81 for 2, Netherlands lost their last eight wickets for just 39 runs to be bowled out for 120.
  • The 231-run win is the fourth largest margin of victory for any team in World Cups and the largest for South Africa in World Cups. It is also the second largest margin of victory for South Africa in ODIs.
  • With his third player of the match award in World Cups, de Villiers is joint second with Jacques Kallis on the list of South African players with most match awards in World Cups. Lance Klusener heads the list with five awards.

Chasing 352, Netherlands' best chance of getting anywhere depended on the top order's ability to see off Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel. The openers played out six overs from South Africa's fastest bowlers, but Jacques Kallis ruined their efforts by snaring two quick wickets after coming in first-change. With the run-rate under control, Graeme Smith deployed his spinners on the lower order, and Netherlands sank without a trace, losing their last seven wickets for 39 runs against Imran Tahir and Robin Peterson.

The margin of victory completely eclipsed Netherlands' spirited efforts with the new ball. Their steady army of seamers stuck to tight lengths, and their accuracy left Smith prodding uncertainly from the outset, unsure of his footwork and indecisive in his outlook. After 31 balls of struggle, Smith had seen enough, and lost his leg stump while trying to shovel Bernard Loots across the line. Ryan ten Doeschate then won the first round in the battle of the prolific allrounders, strangling Kallis into glancing one down the leg side through to the wicketkeeper Wesley Barresi. At 58 for 2 in the 16th over, South Africa were in some strife. Thankfully for them, their two best batsmen in recent times were on hand to revive the innings. Even their most optimistic fans, though, would not have envisaged the emphatic manner in which the tide was turned.

Restless to put the failure against West Indies behind him, Amla tried to kick off his World Cup career by disregarding the lengths, and punching on the up. He nearly paid the price in Berend Westdijk's third over, when his drive fell just short of the man at short cover. In Mudassar Bukhari's next, he mishit another forcing shot through the off side, getting an inside edge that was pouched by Barresi on the bounce. Amla tightened his approach following the two reprieves, resorting to deflections behind square, and compact drives down the ground. His first eight balls yielded three fours, but he got only one more - a fortuitous inside edge to fine leg off ten Doeschate - on his way to a vital half-century.

As he had done against West Indies, de Villiers checked in with a surge of immaculate boundaries, flicking and cutting ten Doeschate for fours in the 18th over. They were shots of intent that changed the complexion of the game, ending a period of nearly ten overs in which South Africa's only boundary was Amla's edge to fine leg. de Villiers then went on to expose Netherlands' limitations, leaving the accumulation to Amla and throwing punches in all directions. He looted boundaries in all but two of the overs between 27 and 35, pinging boundaries in a comprehensive arc from third man to midwicket, with shots ranging from the revers- sweep to the slapped flick. While his improvisation was top class, the hallmark of his innings remained the trademark crunched cover-drives whenever the bowlers over-pitched.

Netherlands enjoyed a boundary-drought between overs 36 and 41, but it was clearly a case of the batsmen calibrating their guns for a final assault. Amla strolled to one of his quieter hundreds in the 40th over, and South Africa took the batting Powerplay soon after. de Villiers began the carnage by lapping Pieter Seelar for the first six of the innings, before reaching his century off 88 balls. His next ten deliveries brought him 34 runs, as he smashed Loots for three successive sixes and then ten Doeschate for a hat-trick of fours. Netherlands managed to dismiss both batsmen in quick succession, but it was scarce solace as the Powerplay went for 69. The fields fell back for the last four overs, but that did not seem to affect Duminy, who kept getting under length deliveries to swing four gleeful sixes. Netherlands must have known they were out of the game once South Africa finished with 351. Unfortunately, they did not have Kevin O'Brien in their ranks.

Match Timeline

Nitin Sundar is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nitin Sundar

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 38 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by JohnnoFigjam on (March 6, 2011, 8:21 GMT)

Hi there :)

Australia M-6 I-6 N.O-1 R-206 H.S-97 AVE.-41.20 S.R.-74.90 England M-7 I-6 N.O-1 R-237 H.S-86 AVE.-47.40 S.R.-84.04 India M-7 I-7 N.O-1 R-371 H.S-116*AVE.-61.83 S.R.-95.37 Pakistan M-5 I-5 N.O-1 R-291 H.S-119*AVE.-72.75 S.R.-105.43 West Indies M-6 I-6 N.O-0 R-416 H.S-129 AVE.-69.33 S.R.-100.97 OVERALL M-45 I-44 N.O-6 R-2288 H.S-140 AVE.-60.21 S.R.-93.08

End of discussion... thanks for playing.

Posted by justk on (March 5, 2011, 12:45 GMT)

@johnno:Dream land n nothing else..amla scoring quick runs..in one day..biggest joke of the millienium or the new millenium..and all the arguments in the favor clearly suggests tht me n viv gilchrist were right..i mean, u say anything to tendulkar or gilchrsit or sehwag, we wont be defending like this..and 'Why not just respect the fact that a guy who was clearly battling out there, still managed to dig in and score a hundred', this points makes me laugh..i mean, against holland, he has been diggin in there..then imagine against england or india or rsa or aus for tht matter, as rsa still take aus as their bench mark even though they may not be....' i'd rather a player do that for the team than get out to a stupid stroke early trying to increase the run rate.'..i dont know on whom this has been directed, but if u r saying amla plays slow for the team, then god bless his team mates, but if he cannot play fast enough, then against, god bless them..

Posted by JohnnoFigjam on (March 5, 2011, 8:13 GMT)

Justk and Gilly, honestly. why you changing the subject, where does "..people always try to make this rsa team big.." come from. we were discussing amla being a selfish batsman. You guys change subjucts when you loosing an argument faster than my girlfriend. Anyone that has seen amla bat knows that when on song he scores pretty quickly. Why not just respect the fact that a guy who was clearly battling out there, still managed to dig in and score a hundred. i'd rather a player do that for the team than get out to a stupid stroke early trying to increase the run rate.

Posted by justk on (March 5, 2011, 6:37 GMT)

@shao;@dona:LOL, tahir ripping indian batting line up..even the legendary shane warne did not do it..and remember, how he used to take wickets against eng and rsa, same is graemme swann now..he has ripped rsa in their own backyard..it is u guys who are living in a fantasy world..and as far as i know, african death bowling attack is not upto the mark..now only the matches against better teams will prove this..and england has a more balanced side if africa n england are compared..someone said tht they leaked 340 runs, the indian bowling..go n check the match again. strauss twice nicked,bell was out anyways..they could not even have got closed to this target..and dale steyn is only good with a new ball..we know tht the old ball bowling is perfected by pakistan, and now zaheer khan is master of tht...and also, africa are missing big hitters..even england has bresnan there..u wait n watch sunday's encounter and see rsa choking..even peter kirsten has said tht they dont stand any chance

Posted by Shao_Kahn on (March 4, 2011, 16:44 GMT)

@justk - Tahir will rip through the famed Indian line up...as for england...they are the worst fielding side

Posted by donndaman on (March 4, 2011, 13:36 GMT)

Wouldn't all of you guys just love it if that happens. On form at the moment the two teams to play the final is South Africa v Pakistan. I dont see India making the final with a weak bowling attack. To let England get almost 340. Never. @ justk. Please man, stop playing fantasy cricket. According to your lot, South Africa had to be such a great team, in order for them to lose, they have to choke.Are u serious????. Ever heard that the other team was better.

Posted by LALITHKURUWITA on (March 4, 2011, 11:52 GMT)

SA is always doing best in the first part of World Cups and and reserving the worst for the final rounds and collapse. It could repeat this time too.

Posted by diri on (March 4, 2011, 10:43 GMT)

@ BudhaWillSmile why does it remind you of the 1996 sa team????

Posted by justk on (March 4, 2011, 8:10 GMT)

@vivgilchrist:well said mate..ur absolutely right..people always try to make this rsa team big..we all know that they do choke in all the important tournaments..and this time it will be no different..and also, they are saying that they have best bowling attack..people dont realise tht this is not south africa where extra bounce will come..this is completely different conditions..south african bowling attack does not have the ability to bowl in the death overs..and spinners, well until n unless imran tahir will not bowl against india, he will enjoy..and also, they do not have depth in their batting..if i compare india,england and south africa, then south africa is a week team even though they may have a better bowling line up and are a good fielding unit

Posted by Cricinfouser on (March 4, 2011, 5:50 GMT)

This team reminds me of Hansie Cronje team of 1996 WC ;)

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Nitin SundarClose
Nitin Sundar Social media manager Nitin spent his formative years perfecting the art of landing the googly, before blossoming into a book-cricket specialist. More excellence followed in the underarm version of the game before, like the majority of India's misguided youth, he started taking studies seriously. After four forgettable years of electrical engineering, followed by a rigorous MBA and 16 months in the strategy consulting industry, he began to ponder life's more profound issues. Such as the angle made by Brian Lara's bat with the horizontal at the peak of his back-lift. A move to ESPNcricinfo followed and Nitin is now a prolific nurdler in office cricket, with a questionable technique against the short ball.
News | Features Last 3 days
  • No stories yet
News | Features Last 3 days

World Cup Videos