ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / News
Netherlands v South Africa, Group B, World Cup 2011, Mohali
Smith fine with 2.5m rule
Firdose Moonda at the PCA Stadium
March 3, 2011
Report : All-round South Africa wallop Netherlands
Sambit Bal : Grey is the colour of the DRS
News : ICC criticism of Dhoni out of line - India
News : ICC bats for its 2.5-metre rule
News : Dhoni angered by UDRS ruling
In Focus: Technology in cricket
Audio/Video: Graeme Smith: Pretty relaxed as a team
Players/Officials: Graeme Smith
Matches: Netherlands v South Africa at Mohali
Series/Tournaments: ICC Cricket World Cup
Teams: South Africa
Graeme Smith has joined the growing debate over the 2.5m clause in the UDRS by saying he was aware of the rule and understood it. Smith has not yet had to deal with the practical implications of the clause, although there were two instances in the match between South Africa and Netherlands in Mohali where it could have come into play.
Bas Zuiderent was given out lbw to Robin Peterson in the 22nd over of Netherlands' innings. Zuiderent was struck low on the front foot and was given his marching orders by Asoka da Silva. He did not review the decision but replays showed the impact was 2.5 meters from the stumps. The second incident was when Imran Tahir dismissed Berend Westdijk, who was the last wicket to fall. The on-field umpire ruled that Westdijk was out but the batsman called for a review. Replays showed that the point of impact on Westdijk's pad was 2.5 metres from the stumps as well.
Zuiderent's decision was not reviewed and Westdijk's decision was not changed because the on-field umpire had initially ruled that he was out.
According to the ICC's manual for the review system, if an "out" decision is reviewed, in order to prove that "the ball is missing the stumps, the evidence of the technology should show that no part of the ball would have made contact with any part of the stumps or bails." In the South Africa v Netherlands match, the 2.5m rule would have helped both batsmen had they been ruled not out and the fielding side had reviewed the decision, as was the case with Ian Bell against India.
While it sounds tricky, Smith said that had he been faced with the incident, he would have known what to do. "I am fine with it because it was communicated to us. I understood the rule so whether you agree or disagree with it, that's the way we were told it was going to be in this tournament. It's pretty simple I guess, you know what to expect."
Smith spoke with the kind of confidence in the law that his Indian counterpart does not have. MS Dhoni criticised the rule, calling it an "adulteration" of technology with human judgement, after the Ian Bell incident. Dhoni and India have never been in favour of the UDRS system and only used it in one Test series, its inaugural one against Sri Lanka in 2008, rejecting it for all others, before being forced to use it at this World Cup.
The ICC, through general manager Dave Richardson, had asked for Dhoni to read through the rules, as Smith claims he has done. The BCCI reacted in a strongly worded letter to the ICC, accusing them of putting unnecessary pressure on the Indian team.
The 2.5m rule exists because that is the distance that experts have identified at which the accuracy of Hawkeye begins to falter, leaving room for the on-field umpire's discretion to be used.
India's 3-0 series win over Sri Lanka was their first ever clean sweep away from home in a series of three or more Tests
Never in their history have Sri Lanka been so comprehensively rolled over. There was no Duleep Mendis-style counterattack, or a Muttiah Muralitharan-esque bamboozling. There was only misery
Stats highlights from the third day of the Pallekele Test between Sri Lanka and India
Stats highlights from a banner day for Shikhar Dhawan and KL Rahul in Pallekele
On this day in 2016, India's highest court mandated the Lodha Committee's recommendations. Six months past its deadline, the Indian board continues to stall. How is this so?
Also, how many times has a wicket fallen off the first ball of a Test?