ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / News

Canada v Pakistan, Group A, World Cup 2011, Colombo

Bagai says Canada's plans failed

Osman Samiuddin at the Premadasa Stadium

March 3, 2011

Comments: 19 | Text size: A | A

The status of Wayne Gretzky as the most famous Canadian sportsman of all time would not really have been threatened by Ashish Bagai and his men had they pulled off an Irish - to use the current slang - but dear Lord it would have made them famous. For 83 overs, they threatened a result that would have surpassed even Kevin O'Brien's heroics on Wednesday night in Bangalore for shock value; one that would not have been dissimilar to Ireland's other big World Cup win, three years and 50 weeks ago.

The instant Shahid Afridi won the toss and chose to bat, under dirty grey skies on a dirty brown surface, Jamaica '07 entered the room. It was a good toss to lose, Bagai said later, the groundsman having told him it was a bowl-first wicket. And Canada were tremendous, more so given they lost a frontline bowler in Khurram Chohan early. The spirit of Ireland and Bangalore was still floating around in the morning, Bagai said. "It gave us all a little belief in the morning."

At the centre was a quite outstanding spell of precisely the kind of right-arm medium dibbly-dobblers that so often trumps a top side in these conditions. Harvir Baidwan has a reputation for taking wickets and you can kind of see why; his pace is seductively friendly and the lengths are generally full so that batsmen will take chances. Ahmed Shehzad fell for it, and Younis Khan was duped by a lovely curving ball. Two overs to Umar Akmal and Misbah-ul-Haq deserved much more than just one maiden.

Harvir Baidwan celebrates the dismissal of Ahmed Shehzad, Canada v Pakistan, Group A, World Cup 2011, Colombo, March 3, 2011
Harvir Baidwan's dibbly-dobblers posed serious problems for Pakistan's batsmen in the conditions © AFP

There was support as well: a lovely hand from the podgy Balaji Rao, who put in a pleasing, unhurried spell of legspin; Rizwan Cheema and Jimmy Hansra more than chipped in as well, leaving their captain satisfied with the overall effort in the field. "Keeping them to 184 on that wicket was a tremendous effort especially after losing one of our key bowlers in the first couple of overs. The six bowlers did a fantastic job and it was a decent fielding effort."

Canada's problems lie most squarely with their batting. They've now scored 122, 123 and 132 in three games. And it's been fragile enough to sense that even when they were sneaking along at 104 for 3 in the 34th, one wicket could change the game. Until then Zubin Surkari and Jimmy Hansra had been just the men for the job, chancing it and milking it. When Ireland took off in pursuit of 133 in Jamaica, though, and even on Wednsesay night, despite losing wickets, there remained a robustness and calm about them that, to the disappointment of Bagai, was absent in Canada's performance in Colombo.

"The wicket was getting better and better which is very unusual for this wicket. The game plan was to just be positive and because the batting has been a worry, we said we would just play our natural games. A couple of youngsters opened the batting and we said play your natural games and the same for the rest of us. We had a decent partnership in the middle, a couple of good ones, but Shahid [Afridi] came on and he was the difference between the two teams. Our batting worries continue. It's very disappointing because I thought we had a good chance of putting in a shock performance and getting back on track but that wasn't to be."

Afridi, especially, looked as if he might pose fatal problems; his bowling is, these days, a handful against most sides but against the Associates he is an entire truckload of trouble. There was a plan in place, Bagai said; the kind sides put out against Muttiah Muralitharan, but plans look best on paper. "We're very disappointed one guy ran through the batting order. We started off with the approach of trying to milk him for 30 to 35 runs, but once he gets wickets he gets right on top of you and he gets very confident. He gets his variations going and then it gets harder and harder and we were just not good enough today."

They weren't, but only just. "That's sport, that's cricket, you've got to pick yourself up. At the end of the day it is sport," Bagai said. It can be a cruel one.

Osman Samiuddin is Pakistan editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Osman Samiuddin


Comments: 19 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Dev on (March 4, 2011, 6:07 GMT)

Well done @IndnCrktfan. Ind should not be blamed every time.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 4, 2011, 4:46 GMT)

I was a tough one for the Canada. They should be very proud of their bowling and fielding accomplishments. It was always going to be trouble with the bat. A tough ask to expect much from a 19 and 16 year old in the opening spot, but there was probably a hope that on of them could get a 20 or 30. Putting either one into the tough middle order spot would have been to much pressure for them. Then, all they had were Hansra, Baghai, Zubin and Cheema. The biggest pressure was on Cheema and the foundation was somewhat laid for him to be a big hero. Unfortunately he fell to Afridi early and that was the game. At 104 for 3 after the 6 by Hansra, the game was on for sure. Canada did have a real moment there.

Posted by Aravindhan on (March 4, 2011, 4:15 GMT)

Any day, I wouldn't dream of putting my money on Canada against Pakistan. If they had gotten Pakistan all out for say 130 or 140, may be they had a chance. But anything above 160 is out of their reach for they're still not good enough to play quality bowlers like Gul and Afridi.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 4, 2011, 4:07 GMT)

@Vishal_D_CricketFreak: There are basically 2 reviews for each inning. 2 Unsuccessful Reviews can make it to 0, but as far as you can review successfully you can keep on going. That makes is perfect in a way that players on ground has to be upto the task for grabbing it otherwise it ll be missed opportunity. Im totally in favor of UDRS otherwise Pak game against Canada would have been total mess up. 'Harper' O Gosh, he is no good to game!!! He already has cost lots of games to Pakistan and bieng Pakistan supporter he is undigestable.

Run-Outs/stumpings are excluded from'UDRS" its as it was previously.

Posted by Subash on (March 4, 2011, 2:20 GMT)

@Aamir: Thanks for your post. . Rizwan Cheema and Khurram Chohan are playing in the Canadian side and I believe they are of Pakistani origin. It's 3 players and not 5 players like @Ahsan mentioned who had problems with VISA. 2 of them are playing in the Canadian side. http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/content/story/498527.html

Further they did play against Zimbabwe in Nagpur, India. I guess we all need to do our homeworks before playing the blame game.

Posted by Satyanarayana on (March 4, 2011, 1:19 GMT)

Wake up guys.All Canadian players got visas from India.check this http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/content/story/499335.html Don't blame India for everything

Posted by Navneet on (March 4, 2011, 0:54 GMT)

@Vishal_D_CricketFreak : Max 2 unsuccessful reviews per inning

Posted by shahid on (March 4, 2011, 0:20 GMT)

India, go bring Harvir Baidwan home. He is a much better ODI bowler than Patels, Parveens etc

Posted by K on (March 3, 2011, 23:31 GMT)

folks, please read this article: http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/content/story/499335.html

where it states clearly that "canada players visa problems" to India has been resolved. Cheema was one of the players who was waiting for visa- and if I am not mistaken, I saw him play against Pakistan :-) So, folks, get your facts straight.

Posted by manju on (March 3, 2011, 22:46 GMT)

If all the documentation required for Indian visa, no reason for refusal. I see some Pak born Canadians playing in the tournament. How were they sent to the tournament??? wierd..

Posted by miraj on (March 3, 2011, 22:28 GMT)

@ahsan uz zaman and @ aamirabbas..just to clarify guys, india did grant visa to all pakistan born players in canadian team. lets get the facts right, i want canada to do well as many of you do. it was a fantastic bowling performance but batting is not upto par. they already played a match in india againts ZIM. india bashing does go far , people like to take shots whenever they can. also great bowling performance by afridi..pak is the most dangerous team in the world cup..

Posted by Aamir on (March 3, 2011, 21:50 GMT)

@IndnCrktfan: FYI, the process of sending a team in a major tournament is to get all the required documentation (Visas etc) before announcing the team. Now, as India has not given visa to couple of good Canadian players (coz they born in Pakistan), no matter whether they would get Visas from Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, Canadian cricket board was unable to send them for this tournament. If they kept those players in team how would they play their matches in India (remember, they have their four matches in India). So, be realistic and look at the facts before posting illogical comments.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 3, 2011, 21:30 GMT)

@ andy ahh those were the good old days of 90's music:), and yes pakistan owes it to mr.boom boom. however, nothing should be taken away from canada for putting a brave face and giving pakistan a tough time.

Posted by hameed on (March 3, 2011, 21:16 GMT)

Skippers need to lead from the front. Afridi did it the ball and Bagai has to do it with the bat.

Posted by VISHAL on (March 3, 2011, 21:09 GMT)

how many comments can one team use ???? in 2nd inning pakistan used 4 reviews????? plzz tell me someone !!!!!

Posted by Subash on (March 3, 2011, 20:58 GMT)

@ Ahsan: VoW! Canada loses and still India gets blamed. I hope u realiise this match was not played in Inda but in Sri Lanka. 5 players not getting visa to travel to India should not be an issue, as they could have easily travelled to Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. I don;t know if Bangladesh and Sri lanks also refused visas. Obviously India has no right to issue visas to SriLanka and bangladesh. What is your problem. No matter what happens in the world of cricket, India is the one to be blamed. I am seeing this trend in this WC. India as a nation is on the rise, and this to many is not acceptable.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 3, 2011, 20:29 GMT)

I would personally like Canada to do well in this World Cup. But it was a disgrace, and should be brought up in media alot that India delayed visas to 5 of their key players who were Pakistan born even though applications went in 4 months in advance. They would not be performing so badly if their full strength team was allowed to visit.

Posted by Hassan on (March 3, 2011, 19:49 GMT)

Eat your heart our Lorgat

Posted by Ryo on (March 3, 2011, 19:25 GMT)

Between them and victory lay "Mr Boombastic, terrifying-tastic, touch him in the back and he says I'm Boom Boom.... -bastic, rated as the best...."

Email Feedback Print
Osman SamiuddinClose
Osman Samiuddin Osman spent the first half of his life pretending he discovered reverse swing with a tennis ball half-covered with electrical tape. The second half of his life was spent trying, and failing, to find spiritual fulfillment in the world of Pakistani advertising and marketing. The third half of his life will be devoted to convincing people that he did discover reverse swing. And occasionally writing about cricket. And learning mathematics.
News | Features Last 3 days
  • No stories yet
News | Features Last 3 days
  • No stories yet

World Cup Videos