ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / Features

Bangladesh v West Indies, Group B, World Cup 2011, Mirpur

Nothing short of a rout

Bangladesh broke a few dubious records during the course of their mauling at the hands of West Indies in Mirpur, one of the most one-sided games so far in the World Cup

Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan

March 4, 2011

Comments: 29 | Text size: A | A

Chris Gayle and Sulieman Benn celebrate the wicket of Jacques Kallis, West Indies v South Africa, 3rd ODI, Dominica, May 28, 2010
Sulieman Benn: picked up his best ODI figures © Associated Press
Enlarge
Related Links

The match between West Indies and Bangladesh was expected to be a close contest, and one that would provide a huge boost to the winning team's chances of making the quarter-finals. Instead, West Indies made sure that the match was a completely one-sided affair. Bangladesh's inept batting performance coupled with a disciplined bowling display by West Indies meant that the hosts' score in the end was one of the lowest in World Cups. Quite a few records were set during the course of the low-scoring first innings. Here is a look at a few of them.

Fourth-lowest total in World Cups
Bangladesh's 58 is the second total below 100 in the 2011 World Cup after Kenya's 69 against New Zealand. Overall, it is the fourth-lowest in World Cups and Bangladesh's lowest ever in ODIs.

Lowest total against West Indies in World Cups
Bangladesh's 58 is the lowest total by any team against West Indies in World Cups. The previous lowest was Scotland's 68 in the 1999 World Cup. The lowest total in all ODIs against West Indies is Pakistan's 43 in Cape Town in 1993.

Fewest overs played
The entire Bangladesh innings lasted just 18.5 overs making it the fourth-lowest on the list of least overs faced in a team innings in World Cups. The least number of overs faced by any team is 14 by Namibia against Australia in the 2003 World Cup. The total of 31.1 overs played in the match is the second-lowest aggregate number of overs in a World Cup match. The record is 140 balls in the match between Canada and Sri Lanka in the 2003 World Cup.

Most deliveries remaining after the chase
West Indies won by nine wickets with 226 balls to spare. This is in eighth position on the list of matches won with most deliveries to spare. The record is 277 balls, when England beat Canada in the 1979 World Cup.

Victory margin
The nine-wicket win is the fifth time West Indies have won by a margin of nine wickets or more in World Cups. Their two ten-wicket wins have come against Zimbabwe and Pakistan. It is also the second-largest margin of victory in chases for West Indies in matches against Bangladesh.

Benn's best bowling
Sulieman Benn's 4 for 18 is his second four-wicket haul and his best bowling figures in ODIs. He has 25 wickets at an average of 31.32 from 22 ODIs.

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 29 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Manesh on (March 7, 2011, 12:24 GMT)

@r0ketman. I am not a in that group. But I have few things to say. First, BD got test status after 1 or 2 wins over test playing nations. In that case, Ireland is ready for it. BD did clean sweep against NZ. But that's not because of high standards of BD cricket, just because NZs standards are went down for the last few years! If BD were playing good cricket, they could beat India in the opening match. And a commanding win over Ireland too was possible. Also, there was no fight against WI too. BD fans forgot that they beat an ' A team' of WI earlier!

Posted by roket on (March 7, 2011, 1:27 GMT)

While this is a horrible loss for BD, fans claiming that BD's test status should be taken away should first answer these questions: 1. India was bowled out for 42 by England in a TEST match in 1974 after playing test cricket for over 42 years, why did ICC not take away India's test status in 1974? 2. BD has won more than 50% of their ODI matches in last 12 months, including a sweep of NZ, something that Ireland can not claim. 3. Pakistan was bowled out for far less by WI in 1993, the year they won the WC, why did ICC not take away their test status? India started competing only in the last 8 or 10 years, and they have been playing Cricket as a test playing nation since 1932. Please please read history first before talking trash. I am positive this will not get posted after the biased moderators review my post.

Posted by Manesh on (March 5, 2011, 10:27 GMT)

@udca. what happened to India? they lost all the games??? dude, India won the first one and second one was a draw. Comment once India lose(if you get a chance to do so) :P

Posted by Cric on (March 5, 2011, 5:26 GMT)

Azilur: it looks like BD has bad days a bit too often for their own liking, considering their success record since WC 2007.

Posted by charith on (March 4, 2011, 15:16 GMT)

half empty pots make da largest noise...... India, England and Bangladesh have proved that

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 4, 2011, 15:15 GMT)

Wake up call for ICC. Ireland is better side ,very compact compared to bangladesh.. Atleast now Icc need to do favour to ireland ,instead of giving useless test status like bangladesh team.. It has become the habit for top teams to score Maximum runs and increasing their average against minnows like bangladesh ..It will be better If icc dismiss the test status for bangladesh.

Posted by Zohaib on (March 4, 2011, 15:15 GMT)

Can someone plz take test status back from them???

Posted by Aamir on (March 4, 2011, 15:13 GMT)

Bangladesh is a team of 11 very very excitedly curious players. Always try to find ways to get out.... rather than staying in. Teams playing against them in any format usually don't carryout catching practices before the game...... because they know BD players will provide them enough practice during the game. This (BD) is one team which has not changed (batting approach) since day 1.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 4, 2011, 14:56 GMT)

Great show by WI against BAN

Posted by Mradul on (March 4, 2011, 14:18 GMT)

@Ska.: Too late BD fans, its too late for you. Its already all over in 31.1 overs...

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print

    How Bangladesh is finding and developing its talent

Mustafizur, Mosaddek, Mehidy, Nazmul - where did they all come from? By Mohammad Isam

    It's time to rediscover Test-match batting

Mark Nicholas: England's recklessness in the name of positivity is a sign that the art of batting in the longest format is no longer given due attention

Is it possible for a Pakistani to be a fan of Ian Botham?

Imran Yusuf ponders an age-old question
The Cricket Monthly

    Nottingham's the charm

On tour in the UK, Firdose Moonda witnesses a fine comeback, visits the country's oldest pub, and squeezes in some yoga lessons

News | Features Last 3 days

An outsider's inside view of Sri Lankan cricket

The memoirs of a fan who has seen the excellence and the excesses of the country's cricket

Of Crane, Stokes and other things

England's selectors have delivered a couple of surprises with their Ashes picks

Two legends make their entrance

1992 An impressive debut ton from India's Pravin Amre could not stop South Africa's first home Test for 22 years ending in a bore-draw at Durban

Batting through the pain barrier

Eleven batsmen who overcame injury to make their mark on a game

Eleven bizarre dismissals ... and one that got away

Over the years, batsmen have lost their wickets in strange ways. Here's a collection of those dismissals

News | Features Last 3 days

    No stories yet

World Cup Videos