ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / Features

England v South Africa, Group B, World Cup 2011, Chennai

A pitch of which a Test match would be proud

The Chennai pitch was dry, crusty and rough, as unwelcoming for batsmen as a cold, sniping wind on a frosty day

Firdose Moonda at Chennai

March 6, 2011

Comments: 29 | Text size: A | A

With three men around the bat, Graeme Swann turning it square on a crumbling pitch and two lower-middle order batsmen fighting to survive, it could have been the final, deciding session of a Test match. A sight so pleasing to a cricket connoisseur's eye is not often on show in one-day cricket. It's the format for flat pitches and high run-chases, where the batsmen's fluency and the bowler's accuracy are usually the two elements of competition.

It's rare that there is, in the space and time that a one-day match allows, an innings can be built from the ground up as a batsman is tested against bowlers baying for blood on a pitch that is offering something for them to bait with. It's rare that those who use spin, not merely slower bowling on helpful tracks, and reverse swing to trap their prey are able to show the beauty of their trade in those 100 overs that make up the ODI. Rare things are always valuable, but just how valuable is only apparent when they are on display.

The Chennai pitch was the stage for such a performance. It was dry, crusty and rough, as unwelcoming for batsmen as a cold, sniping wind on a frosty day. There would be turn - that was evident from ball one when Robin Peterson, whose ability to spin the ball is often laughed at in his home country - did just that. There would be reverse swing, as James Anderson, searching for redemption after the totals England conceded in their first three matches, showed with such aplomb. What there wouldn't be were easy runs and that meant a low-scoring tussle, which produced a set of skills that don't often have to be on display in this format.

"There was a lot on offer for bowlers: reverse swing, spin, bounce. It was a bowler's day," Graeme Smith said. Andrew Strauss and the two batsmen who followed him back to the changeroom, Kevin Pietersen and Ian Bell, were walking illustrations of that. Strauss fell trying to play a glory shot, having faced just three balls before that. Had he waited a little before doing that he would have seen that, in this case, the best form of attack was defence.

Pietersen's problems against left-arm spin stem from things beyond the pitch, but Bell went the same route. Peterson's catch off his own bowling was the work of an adrenaline-fuelled man at the peak of his confidence, but Bell's mistimed attempt at a drive was not the kind of shot that would enable success on this surface. Ravi Bopara and Jonathan Trott's innings were better examples of how to craft a knock on a tricky surface.


 Hashim Amla looks back at his broken stumps after being bowled by Stuart Broad, England v South Africa, Group B, World Cup, Chennai, March 6, 2011
Hashim Amla showed the necessary patience for a tough surface, but his dismissal left too much for the tail to cope with © Getty Images
Enlarge

Timing and placement were the building blocks of their strokes. Both of them scored slightly more on the leg side, with deft flicks and guides around the corner, and although they unleashed a few cuts and Bopara had one, glorious cover-drive, most of their runs came from nudges, pushes and playing with soft hands. Patience was their stand-out characteristic, as runs had to be worked for and did not just present themselves. "On a flat pitch we would have looked to score a run a ball, but that would have been really difficult on this pitch and you have to realise that early doors," Bopara said.

Once the pair had left, the rest of the England batsman were incapable of transcending the conditions. Inconsistent bounce, which made Morne Morkel dangerous, and turn, which Imran Tahir manipulated like putty in his hands to bowl googly after googly, saw England exit for a score that was, despite evidence to the contrary from South Africa, chaseable. Not easily chaseable, but with more of the Bopara-like approach, patiently chaseable.

The first 15 overs of South Africa's reply may even have vindicated that statement, when the sheer numbers are taken into account. A third of the target had been ticked off, at 68 for 1, and with time on their side, South Africa should have, from a purely statistical perspective, cantered home. The action spun a different tale, however. Graeme Swann, who was spinning as incessantly as a nauseating ride at an amusement park, had Smith feeling like he was on one. The South Africa captain was unsettled and scratchy and it was only a matter of time before he gave way.

He opened a crack, the size of which Stuart Broad, who was bowling tight lines, wicket to wicket, could widen, as he did with the dismissal of Hashim Amla and Jacques Kallis. Swann was the architect and Yardy and Pietersen the apprentices but it was Anderson who was the master. He broke the back of the South African middle-order by twisting it out of joint as it couldn't cope with his swing. "They bowled really well with the reverse swing," Smith said. "There are many batters who have mastered the art of playing that."

Having batted on the pitch first and seeing the runs dry up, Strauss knew that that would be the way to go. "There was a lot of turn and bounce there. You need to ask questions of the batsmen and all credit to the bowlers for being able to do that for us. It's tough for the tailenders to come in when the ball is reversing or spinning." It was so tough that South Africa lost 7 for 41, compared to England's 6 for 58.

Although Strauss said the pitch, "broke up a bit too much," he stopped short of criticising it, because there probably wasn't much to fault it for. It didn't ask the same questions as one-day surfaces usually do, but difference should not be scorned at. It kept the intrigue of captaincy alive as bowlers were rotated quickly and it produced a thriller which tested areas of the game that are not usually up for scrutiny in such a match. As Strauss put it, these kind of pitches, "sometimes make for good, entertaining cricket."

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

RSS Feeds: Firdose Moonda

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 29 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by joel on (March 7, 2011, 17:23 GMT)

It was a shame that graeme swanns bowling wasnt rewarded more ! , he mesmorised SA top order batsmen . I have never seen smith bat so poorly against spin , his figures did not do justice to a terrific display of spin .

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 7, 2011, 12:57 GMT)

Yes Even a low scoring match also exciting one Pitches in these days were often batsman friendly and bowlers envy.Majority these pictches brings exciting result.Were as in Bating Piches 270 are easily chaseable in thiese wickets even 160-190 are easily defendable

Posted by Gurpreet on (March 7, 2011, 9:51 GMT)

Hi Amu123, Actually it's group B that's keeping the 1st round alive :-)

Posted by Anil on (March 7, 2011, 9:08 GMT)

Well done England.. you guys did good slap on the "unbeatables" faces. In Cricket, I believe 50:50 importance in bowl and bat. In bowling, spin and swing are equal and important, more often whoever is on top of that with bat is only consider as a perfect champion. Or else, can bark but no one (having playing knowledge) care about it.

Posted by Marthinus on (March 7, 2011, 8:26 GMT)

Question is.... Was it a case of the team batting first having a really big advantage? Had the rolls been reversed and SA batting first, SA would probably have won by at least 100 runs. Thought SA missed a trick though not making use of a pinch hitter or even a second pinch hitter... They should have opened with Peterson and van Wyk upfront, both open the batting for their franchises, with a licence to get quick runs and be like 100/2or3 in the 20th over. Amla, Kallis and co could then have knocked the remaining runs without having to take to many risks...

Posted by Sri on (March 7, 2011, 7:30 GMT)

Hmmm.. England, hats off. I was chiding Strauss for his not-so-classy statement, "We are good at bouncing back" before the RSA game, but the Poms were equal to the task. Their WC summary reads : Thumping win, unlikely tie, unlikelier loss, unlikeliest win.. The English are keeping the "charm of ODI" alive in a tepid Group B.

Posted by Phani on (March 7, 2011, 6:57 GMT)

Both the matches in this Sunday went very similar. Both low scoring games, more turn, good bowling & fielding in the 2nd inngs. etc. Only difference why India could chase the target easily is that SA lower middle order is weaker than that of India.

Posted by poornimaa on (March 7, 2011, 6:30 GMT)

I was at Chepauk to watch this and boyyy am I proud!! The brilliant cricket and the wonderful support for both teams made up for the fact that we sat 8 hours in the blistering heat.. Was probably the most absorbing game of the tournament so far.. With Ireland looking earnest and spirited the second half of the group stages promises to be interesting..

Posted by James on (March 7, 2011, 5:55 GMT)

England have dropped one of the few matchwinners (in one dayers) that they have. They have dropped collingwood, and unfortunately for them, Bopara has done well, which should encourage them to continue with Bopara. A win against SA hardly matters- only the topper from the group has any real advantage- the toppers get to play team no. 4 from group A which is likely to be New Zealand- currently a weak team. Numbers 2, 3 and 4 from group B will face Pakistan, SriLanka and Australia- all of who are equally unpredictable and tough to beat on their day. By removing Collingwood, they have removed their best player of spin, their best fielder, and a useful containing bowler. Swan and Anderson, their other matchwinners may not win them every match.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 7, 2011, 5:13 GMT)

this is what we need in a WORLD CUP to promote cricket globally,a nail biter finish which rearly happens in this world cup.i hope icc will schedule proper format next time arround

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Firdose MoondaClose

    How Bangladesh is finding and developing its talent

Mustafizur, Mosaddek, Mehidy, Nazmul - where did they all come from? By Mohammad Isam

    It's time to rediscover Test-match batting

Mark Nicholas: England's recklessness in the name of positivity is a sign that the art of batting in the longest format is no longer given due attention

Is it possible for a Pakistani to be a fan of Ian Botham?

Imran Yusuf ponders an age-old question
The Cricket Monthly

    Nottingham's the charm

On tour in the UK, Firdose Moonda witnesses a fine comeback, visits the country's oldest pub, and squeezes in some yoga lessons

News | Features Last 3 days

An outsider's inside view of Sri Lankan cricket

The memoirs of a fan who has seen the excellence and the excesses of the country's cricket

Of Crane, Stokes and other things

England's selectors have delivered a couple of surprises with their Ashes picks

Two legends make their entrance

1992 An impressive debut ton from India's Pravin Amre could not stop South Africa's first home Test for 22 years ending in a bore-draw at Durban

Batting through the pain barrier

Eleven batsmen who overcame injury to make their mark on a game

The king of swing

1971 Birth of the Burewala Bombshell

News | Features Last 3 days

    No stories yet

World Cup Videos