ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / Features

India v South Africa, Group B, World Cup 2011, Nagpur

Batting costs India on day of about-turns

India failed where they were expected to succeed, and impressed where they'd struggled in the past. In the end, that failure cost them

Sharda Ugra in Nagpur

March 12, 2011

Comments: 254 | Text size: A | A

Morne Morkel had Sachin Tendulkar caught at point, India v South Africa, Group B, World Cup, Nagpur, March 12, 2011
Nine for 29: India will remember that for the rest of their campaign © Getty Images

Imagine that India's World Cup campaign is an upside-down cake. What else could you say about their cricket in Nagpur on Saturday, other than it overturned?

All that had seemed to work so far in their previous four group games - solidity in the middle order, the ability to calculate risks and plan innings - fell apart.

All that had regularly fallen apart or just imploded - the threat of the bowlers, the zest of the fielders - was suddenly looking the real deal.

Any respectable baker knows that if the recipe of the upside-down cake is not followed to utter precision, if the temperature is not absolutely spot on, that cake will not respond like normal ones and become stodgy, or just not rise and turn into porridge. That cake and its best parts will end up burnt and bitter. In Nagpur on Saturday, India failed to be precise, they heated themselves at the wrong time and were well and truly burnt. Defeat at the hands of South Africa by three wickets in Nagpur. Their dinner will taste of ashes.

The match was what it was meant to be: a contest between the World Cup's two strongest contenders who had just spent the better part of the southern hemisphere summer banging heads. When they met again in Nagpur, in India's biggest game of this World Cup so far, the head-banging continued. It was a riveting contest, filled with incident, individuals falling and rising within the space of a few overs, teams rising and falling and rising within hours.

Beaten by England when they should have won, triumphant in Nagpur when they could have lost, South Africa have risen. India, who have talked about raising their tempo, finding their rhythm, gaining momentum, have fallen. They were tripped not by the familiar frailties that had come up against the weaker teams, but against a newer, more threatening anxiety. That when India are up against one of the best and most varied bowling attacks in the World Cup, their strongest suit could suddenly go shabby.

Nine for 29 are not numbers that the Indians will be allowed to forget for the rest of this campaign. Captain MS Dhoni, frozen and furious on the other end for more than half an hour of his 12 not out, will never want to remember it. Nine for 29 is a coded message sent out by the Indian batsmen to all other frontline teams in the World Cup to take a close look at India's flaws. That the fortress could be breached.

The real irony is that India's batsmen were not bombed out by the short ball; Morne Morkel had to be taken off after seven overs, Dale Steyn's first spell went for 24 off three. After his seventh over he had conceded 46. Yet it is how he finished his overs - 5 for 50 that counted. His wicket-taking spell - 16 balls, four runs, five wickets - reads so implausible that the only time Steyn could possibly repeat it is if he was asked to bowl to Canada Under-19s. Steyn on the scent can in any case be a menace on two legs. Steyn in that mood, bowling to batsmen whose calculation and planning has melted into mush, becomes what Nagpur was. The theatre of the absurd. Those lovely idioms about well begun being half done have never been more untrue at the hands of the Indian batting, which began exceptionally well but ended up in a heap.

The aftershock of the nine for 29 will erase the memory of few aspects of India's game that were actually good today. The impact of one repeatedly annihilated the memory of the other. The two century stands between Tendulkar (whose 99th international 100 is already buried under the rubble) and Sehwag and then Tendulkar and Gambhir had the audience and the team dreaming of 370. After being indistinct in the first few games, the top three had batted like top three must and did what they were meant to do. They had gobbled up the overs and sent the run-rate into orbit. What they had done, unintentionally of course, was make those that followed them assume that the rest was going to be easy.

The South African bowlers, led in the middle overs by the parsimonious Johan Botha, started to take the pace off the ball, the pitch began to slow down further and the batsmen who followed the top three were struggling with timing.

Both Gambhir and Tendulkar were out when trying to push the pace, the batsmen who followed them believed that in the Power Plays demanded mayhem. They wanted to inflict it on the bowlers but ended up dispensing it on their team. A methodical response to the situation rather than flailing at full tosses or trying to hit the ball out of the ground would at least have seen India through the 50 overs. Eight more balls, maybe eight more runs. Small steps, significant meanings.

Dhoni's shuffling of the batting order - Yusuf Pathan before Yuvraj Singh, Virat Kohli at No. 7 - had been greeted with many a raised eyebrow, but the captain was backed by evidence from previous games, that his batsmen could independently work out the calculations of setting a total. The nine for 29 that will sting Indians even harder in the week before their last group match, because when South Africa came in to bat, the Indian bowlers and fielders laid siege to the target of 297 with an energy and a spirit not found in previous games. When up against qualify opposition, Harbhajan lifted his game. Zaheer Khan conceded four off the penultimate over. Off the last over, the South Africans were left with 13 to get. India in the field had pushed as hard as they could. India with the bat tried to push too much. Everything turned upside down.

Sharda Ugra is senior editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sharda Ugra


Comments: 254 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 15, 2011, 15:33 GMT)

Why do our cricket admins always expect batsmen to win games for India. What are bowlers doing? What have been they doing since the beginning of the world cup? Except Zaheer, I dont see any bowler showing an ability to win a match. 290 odd is still a very good score to win a match. If our bowlers can't defecd that kind of score, then they cant defend even a score of 390. Bowlers also get paid as much as batsmen so they have equal and same responsibility. I am myself a bowler for my club and think bowlers win more matches than batsmen do. Australia and Pakistan are good examples.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 15, 2011, 8:18 GMT)

Yes Sehwag and Kohli and the rest make match winning 100s against minnows or when targets are easy. whereas Tendulkar makes 100s against big oppositions when opposition is playing well & therefore found as sole warrior bcz the rest of Indian batting barring Sehwag doesnt have it in them to perform at big stage against hard target.. People forget to see that it is the big stage, tough targets, hard oppositions that brings the best out of champions but unfortunately on all such occasions he is the sole warrior bcz Team India has only 1 champion and the rest are opportunists. He targetted 350 run chase (a hard target),... He targetted England and SA (tough oppositions) He targetted SA (series decider) and scored 200 He targetted SL & AUS in tournament finals (big stage) but found himself as sole warrior but in last 3 cases mentioned above he stayed till the end and didn't leave anything to others and made sure India wins. in other cases he left little to others and they made a mess of it.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 15, 2011, 6:45 GMT)

India was going out off world cup

Posted by Amol on (March 15, 2011, 2:32 GMT)

Alexk400: ("Sachin is making runs that do not count. Other team make runs that count to win.") ??? You mean to say whatever runs Sachin scores, do NOT add to the grrand Total ??? But whatever the rest of team India scores does add ?? Is that what you are implying ?

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 14, 2011, 23:59 GMT)

I think Indian players needs to take IPl out of there mind, and start playing One day cricket,and it was a good lesson to learn from.my choice would have been 49th over by harbhajan amd 50th for khan.Job done.

Posted by Herman on (March 14, 2011, 21:13 GMT)

I could not believe my eyes when I saw that Dhoni gave the ball to Nehra instead of to Harbajhan. BIG mistake! I knew right then that SA Proteas would win. Harbajhan's slow spinners were containing the runrate, and would have stifled the last over. Nehra is exactly what the SA batsmen would have chosen for the last over if they had any say in the matter.

Posted by Alex on (March 14, 2011, 20:21 GMT)

There are many things to be blamed.

1. Indians needs to understand World cup is different animal, you can't blast off like in normal ODI. Every team play out of the skin.So what we need is intelligent batting. Blast off slogging failed twice. Indians need to understand you can not slog blindly as opposition have quality bowlers to bowl death overs.

2. Yuvi should bat in powerplay , yusuf pathan do not need powerplay , he need slow bowlers and spinner to bowl. He and Dhoni fail against extreme fast bowling.

3. Sachin is main reason for pathetic fielding display , Team rules are like this...except sachin every one field well. He do not inspire because he is making runs that do not count. Other team make runs that count to win. Sachin prefer century than Win a game.That say everything about sachin and india.

4. Dhoni and Sehwag do not want to win this world cup for sachin. Period.

Posted by Amol on (March 14, 2011, 19:23 GMT)

It's NOT 9-for-29. It's 8-for-29. Calling it 9-for-29 makes it appear like Sachin did not score at all and went for just a duck. Remember when Sachin went back he had added a superb Nelson to the score which was a huge 267 at the time. But that unlucky guy did not possibly been have thought what disaster was going to follow.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 14, 2011, 19:20 GMT)

Backing the wrong players

Dhoni hasn't helped matters by backing the wrong players. Although the squad consists of 15 members, the India captain gives the impression that he has only 13 players to choose from. He doesn't seem to have faith in the last two. The only bowler with some pace, S Sreesanth, has been binned after just one game against Bangladesh in Dhaka.

The temperamental pacer was overawed by the situation and perhaps a game against the minnows would have given him some confidence. But Dhoni has opted to give other mentally fragile players more opportunities than Sreesanth. R Aswhin, too, has got a raw deal. It is no secret that the team think-tank wasn't too keen on including the spinner in the World Cup squad and instead wanted an extra batsman. Ashwin was only picked after the selectors put their foot down. It wouldn't be a bad idea for the selectors to nudge Dhoni on the two players. But will he listen?

Posted by Amol on (March 14, 2011, 19:15 GMT)

I see an IND(B2)-PAK(A3) and SA(B1)-NZL(A4) quarter-finals. But who AUS(A1) and SRL(A2) will face is still subject to discussions.

Email Feedback Print
Sharda UgraClose

    How Bangladesh is finding and developing its talent

Mustafizur, Mosaddek, Mehidy, Nazmul - where did they all come from? By Mohammad Isam

    It's time to rediscover Test-match batting

Mark Nicholas: England's recklessness in the name of positivity is a sign that the art of batting in the longest format is no longer given due attention

Is it possible for a Pakistani to be a fan of Ian Botham?

Imran Yusuf ponders an age-old question
The Cricket Monthly

    Nottingham's the charm

On tour in the UK, Firdose Moonda witnesses a fine comeback, visits the country's oldest pub, and squeezes in some yoga lessons

News | Features Last 3 days

No stories yet

World Cup Videos