ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / News

Batting Powerplay in numbers

South Africa flourish, England struggle

S Rajesh

March 15, 2011

Comments: 13 | Text size: A | A

Ab de Villiers winds up to smash the ball, Netherlands v South Africa, World Cup 2011, Mohali, March 3, 2011
AB de Villiers: 78 runs off 32 deliveries in the batting Powerplays © Getty Images
Enlarge

The batting Powerplay was designed to offer further assistance to the already pampered batsmen in ODIs, but so far in the World Cup it hasn't always worked out that way. Captains have sometimes struggled to figure out the best time to use them, and when it's been taken, batsmen have taken the meaning of the term too literally, trying the belt every ball out of the ground. It has disrupted the rhythm of batsmen who've been used to taking singles in the middle overs, and on occasions it's ended up being a curse for the batting team rather than a blessing.

A couple of games involving India offered good examples of what could go wrong for a dominant team in these five overs. Against England, the batting Powerplay turned around what seemed to be a lost cause for India, as they took four England wickets and conceded only 25 runs, which is the worst performance in the batting Powerplay in this World Cup by one of the big teams. India were themselves at the receiving end against South Africa in what's the second-worst batting Powerplay performance so far, losing 4 for 30 and completely messing up an innings which seemed to be soaring towards great heights.

The overall stats for the Powerplays in this World Cup show that while the overall run-rates are fairly low for the mandatory and bowling Powerplays, it goes up to almost eight runs per over in the batting one. The overall average, though, drops from the mid-30s in the other two Powerplays to the mid-20s, with the average batting Powerplay score being about 40 for 2.

All these numbers, though, get skewed because of the presence of the smaller teams. The top nine teams average 8.37 runs per over and 24.51 runs per wicket in the batting Powerplays; in the mandatory one, they average 5.29 per over and 49.95 per wicket, which is significantly better than the overall tournament stats.

World Cup Powerplay stats
Powerplay type Runs Wickets Average Run rate
Mandatory 3051 87 35.06 4.72
Bowling 1362 42 32.42 4.41
Batting 1609 70 22.98 7.96

The timing of the batting Powerplay has been one of the big points of debate in this World Cup. There's an argument in favour of taking it early if a team has got off to a good start, but captains have preferred to wait till at least the 35th over, when the mandatory ball change happens. Most often - 33 times out of 49 so far - the batting Powerplay has been taken from the 40th over onwards.

Twice, the batting Powerplay has been taken before 30 overs, but on both occasions, the result of the match was a foregone conclusion by then: Canada took it in the 28th against Sri Lanka when they were 75 for 7 chasing 333, while Sri Lanka took it in the 16th against Kenya when they were 110 for 1 chasing 143. In neither case was it a tactical move by a captain who wanted to wrest the initiative.

There have been 14 instances of the batting Powerplay being taken between overs 30 and 39. Ireland timed it superbly in that fantastic run-chase against England when they took it in the 32nd over and creamed 62 without losing any wicket. New Zealand did it well too, against Canada, taking it in the 37th over when they were only two down, and scoring an incredible 74 runs for the loss of two wickets, which is the highest by any team in the batting Powerplay in this World Cup. West Indies used it to recover from a slow start against Ireland, scoring 55 without losing a wicket after taking it in the 36th over.

In most of these cases, teams have taken the batting Powerplay when they've had wickets in hand and two batsmen have been pretty well set. That's allowed the teams to make good use of the fielding restrictions. The other benefit, which can't always be shown in terms of Powerplay numbers, is that taking it forces the opposition to bowl out their best bowler(s) early, which means lesser bowlers have to bowl at the end of the innings: in their match against New Zealand, Pakistan were forced to bowl Umar Gul during the Powerplay, and Ross Taylor and Co then attacked Shoaib Akhtar and Abdul Razzaq quite mercilessly in the last four overs.

On the 13 occasions when teams have taken the batting Powerplay between 30 and 39, they've averaged more than nine runs per over; when taken after 39, the run-rate drops to 7.47, though that's also because of cases when teams have already lost lots of wickets and can't fully exploit the field restrictions. The lack of specialist batsmen also means teams tend to lose more wickets in these Powerplays, which explains the low average.

When the batting Powerplay has been taken
When taken Innings Runs Balls Wickets Average Run rate
before 30 overs 2 65 52 1 62.00 7.50
30-39 overs 14 564 373 13 43.38 9.07
40 overs onwards 33 980 787 56 17.50 7.47

Thanks largely to that blitz against Canada, New Zealand's batting run-rate in Powerplay overs is the best among all teams in this World Cup so far. South Africa and West Indies, though, are the only two teams to score more than 50 twice during the batting Powerplays. Among the top teams, England have struggled the most during these five overs, losing 12 wickets - easily the most by any team - and averaging only 6.40 runs per over.

In terms of bowling performances, South Africa lead the way by quite a margin: they've taken nine wickets at an average of less than seven, and an economy rate of less than five runs per over. Coupled with their batting run-rate, it can safely be said that South Africa have been the best team, overall, in the batting Powerplays. West Indies have good numbers too with the ball, but the only team which took a batting Powerplay against them was Ireland. India have taken the most wickets - 13 - and have a respectable economy rate too.

Teams with bat and ball in batting Powerplay
Team Bat average Run rate Bowl average Econ rate
New Zealand 21.50 10.60 30.00 7.94
South Africa 21.50 10.18 6.67 4.93
Pakistan 52.33 9.81 15.20 6.60
West Indies 40.00 9.60 14.00 5.60
Sri Lanka 33.20 8.89 28.33 5.66
Netherlands 22.20 8.53 32.80 9.93
Ireland 28.25 8.16 45.67 8.93
Australia 38.50 7.70 23.33 8.23
India 25.20 7.20 13.23 7.31
Kenya 34.00 6.80 43.25 10.07
Bangladesh 18.00 6.75 33.33 7.50
Canada 15.50 6.48 18.20 8.67
England 13.16 6.40 37.20 8.58
Zimbabwe 12.00 5.40 43.00 8.60

The stars of the batting Powerplays

The pressure is often on the fielding team in these Powerplays, but the onus is also on the batsmen to lift the tempo and utilise the fielding restrictions. Some batsmen have handled this better than the others, reveals the table below. AB de Villiers has scored 78 in 32 balls, taking 51 off 18 against Netherlands, and 27 off 14 against India. The record for most runs in a batting Powerplay in this World Cup, though, belongs to Ross Taylor - against Canada, he scored 54 off 20. A couple of performances by associate batsmen against England deserve honourable mention too - Kevin O'Brien hammered 45 off 16, while Ryan ten Doeschate managed 35 from 16.

There are other batsmen, though, who haven't enjoyed these Powerplays as much: Ian Bell is one of only two batsmen to be dismissed thrice, scoring 27 in 28 balls, while Jonathan Trott has scored 19 in 20 balls and fallen twice. Sachin Tendulkar has been dismissed twice in ten balls in the batting Powerplays, scoring 11 runs.

Batsmen who've done well in the batting Powerplays
Batsman Runs Balls Dismissals Average Run rate
AB de Villiers 78 32 1 78.00 14.62
Ross Taylor 67 34 1 67.00 11.82
Kieron Pollard 65 31 0 - 12.58
Upul Tharanga 61 35 1 61.00 10.45
Ryan ten Doeschate 53 31 0 - 10.25
Umar Akmal 48 26 1 48.00 11.07
Kevin O'Brien 45 16 0 - 16.87

Not surprisingly, Dale Steyn has the best numbers among bowlers, with four wickets for 18 runs at an economy rate of less than 3.50. Against India he took 2 for 7 off 12 balls, while against West Indies he had 2 for 3 off nine deliveries. Zaheer Khan is the highest wicket-taker, though, with seven, including a haul of 3 for 11 from 18 balls against England, a spell which turned the match around. His only poor game during the batting Powerplay came against South Africa, when he conceded 22 in two overs.

The best bowlers in the batting Powerplays
Bowler Balls Runs Wickets Average Econ rate
Dale Steyn 33 18 4 4.50 3.27
Muttiah Muralitharan 42 32 3 10.67 4.57
Zaheer Khan 64 53 7 7.57 4.96
Umar Gul 34 31 3 10.33 5.47
Ryan ten Doeschate 36 38 4 9.50 6.33

Steyn, Zaheer and Gul are among the strike bowlers who've handled the challenge of the batting Powerplay well, but one fast bowler who hasn't done as well is James Anderson. He has been a disappointment in the tournament as a whole, taking four wickets at 70.50 runs per wicket and 6.55 runs per over, and in the batting Powerplays too he has been far too loose, conceding 26 in 12 balls against Ireland, 16 in 12 against Bangladesh when they were eight down, and 14 from six against Netherlands. Given these numbers, it's a doubt if he'll be entrusted with bowling duties in the batting Powerplay in England's must-win game against West Indies.

Bowlers who've struggled in the batting Powerplays
Bowler Balls Runs Wickets Average Econ rate
Mudassar Bukhari 30 50 0 - 10.00
James Anderson 42 68 1 68.00 9.71

All stats updated till the match between Pakistan and Zimbabwe on March 14.

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 13 
Posted by   on (March 16, 2011, 18:43 GMT)

On the same basis, seeing that the batting powerplay is supposed to be a weapon in the batting Captain's locker, to be used to favour the batting side, why is it "compulsory" ? I can see plenty of situations, particularly in games going "down to the wire", when the team batting second might not want to use a powerplay at all. Needing (say) six an over through the last twenty overs to win the game, might prefer to confront the fielding captain with the dilemma of protecting the boundaries (thus allowing a skilful batsman a single of nearly every ball) or saving the singles and leaving the boundary exposed.

Posted by kichy on (March 16, 2011, 15:11 GMT)

i think they should experiment with the bowling powerplay. like take in the 22-26th overs

Posted by da3za on (March 16, 2011, 8:37 GMT)

Good article, very interesting. @ Zaheer07 and Sulent_intruder: It says in the article Ross Taylor scored 54 runs off 20 balls against Canada.

Posted by ranga_s on (March 16, 2011, 8:27 GMT)

@cooljack_143: totally agreed dude....smartness is the name....I assume SL will win over NZ provided the inform top order and the class of the bowling attack...but not counting NZ out though...but NZ has a realistical chance of beating SL in Mumbai if only half the SL side has an off day which seems unlikely...I'd go with 90%-10% SL favour..Pakistan serious challange but hasn't pumped that much confidence to think that they'll over come Aus..So Group A seems AUS, SL, NZ, PAK...SA should win over BAN. WI can win over IND and ENG..If they do thats it for ENG..But assume Indian batting will score over 300 and Zaheer and Harbhajan attack while others keep a lid..Group B, SA, IND, WI, BAN..QF's, AUS V BAN, IND V NZ, SL V WI, PAK V SA...Expect AUS V SL, IND V SA semis...but boy those are tough territories...wonder world cup...best WC by far.....

Posted by   on (March 16, 2011, 8:23 GMT)

I suggest that the fact that the batting powerplay with its enforced bringing-up of the field more often results in benefit to the FIELDING side, should teach the players a crucial lesson; that "four in the circle and five men out" is NOT the optimal field for restricting runs. More emphasis on saving the single and bowling to the field would, overall, be better; in particular fielders "in the circle" would generally do far better to come in closer and aggressively "save one" - giving the batsman the temptation to try to hit over the top with attendant risk - than to hang back on the edge of the circle, saving neither one nor four. I am therefore surprised that fielding teams don't learn from this and impose - perhaps "suddenly" - patches of play in which they defend the single aggressively and leave the boundaries less well-protected, encouraging the batsman to take risks. There is no regulation which states you can ONLY have four men "in the circle" in the non power-play overs.

Posted by Dave1957 on (March 16, 2011, 6:09 GMT)

Teams should plan for the batting powerplay (BP3) as meticulously as for any other part of the match. The batting team should use it not only as an opportunity to get quick runs with big shots, but also to get back into a game if the bowling team has the upper hand. If the bowlers are drying up the runs, the batting team can force them to revise their strategy by taking BP3 earlier (preferably after over 35), especially in India, where spinners usually slow down the scoring rate in the middle overs. This forces the bowling team to bring back their strike bowlers, who has to bowl with a harder ball and use up some of their 'death' overs. BP3 is an opportunity for batsmen to play the ball into gaps; as the field is up, it could turn ones into twos or threes. They should select shots wisely - chips over the infield could go to the boundary. BP3 is a science, and the batting team should use it wisely for maximum benefit. Maybe not 15 per over, but easily 9 to 12, without any risks.

Posted by diri on (March 16, 2011, 5:37 GMT)

SA dominating the stats.....AS USUAL

Posted by brighton82 on (March 15, 2011, 22:02 GMT)

i think it should be Ross Taylor scored 54 off 20 against Canada.

Posted by Avery_Mann on (March 15, 2011, 22:01 GMT)

"Among the top teams, England have struggled..." I'm not sure we can count England among the top teams in ODI cricket any more! (They're still a great test team though)

Posted by   on (March 15, 2011, 21:14 GMT)

This is one of the finest articles. Indian batsmen and thinktank should read this and follow them. their attidude in the batting play is pretty worse and they want to hit every ball for a sixer like shewag.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
  • ESPN Cricinfo

World Cup Videos

... and that's that

... and that's that
13:40 | Apr 11, 2011
Inside ESPNcricinfo

Inside ESPNcricinfo
12:49 | Apr 10, 2011
 World Cup review

World Cup review
05:26 | Apr 8, 2011
Frozen Out

Frozen Out
46:34 | Apr 5, 2011