ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / News

West Indies v England, World Cup 2011, Group B, Chennai

England stay alive in another thriller

The Report by Andrew Miller

March 17, 2011

Comments: 219 | Text size: A | A

England 243 (Trott 47, Russell 4-49) beat West Indies 225 (Russell 49, Tredwell 4-48) by 18 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


Ramnaresh Sarwan's calm innings ended when he popped a catch to Ian Bell, England v West Indies, World Cup, Group B, March 17, 2011
Staying alive: England's crazy campaigners live to fight another day © Getty Images
Enlarge

In a campaign of ludicrously slender margins, England gave themselves a fighting chance of reaching the World Cup quarter-finals after emerging victorious by 18 runs in a monstrous battle of wills against West Indies at Chennai. In a contest that fully lived up to the "arse-nipper" billing that Graeme Swann had given it beforehand, England once again teetered on the brink of oblivion before the spin of Swann and James Tredwell hauled them back into contention in a sensational denouement. Needing 244 for victory, West Indies were coasting on 222 for 6, before losing their last four wickets for three runs in 21 deliveries.

It was a finale that would have been remarkable in any other context, but coming from a team that has managed to turn each of its six qualifying fixtures into horror-shows best viewed from behind the sofa through cracks in the fingers, it was a conclusion that teetered towards self-parody. Following a schizophrenic batting performance, in which Jonathan Trott shed his demure image to crash six fours from his first nine balls, England themselves crashed from 121 for 2 to 151 for 6, before Luke Wright justified his first call-up of the campaign with a vital 44. Their eventual total was at least 30 runs below par, but not for the first time, the team's fighting spirit made up for it lacked in planning and application.

West Indies' reply was a tale of three cameos. Between them, Chris Gayle and Darren Sammy slammed 84 runs from 50 balls, while Andre Russell launched his own innings with 45 from 30 before going into his shell after a hugely controversial reprieve on the long-on boundary. While those three were cutting loose, aided and abetted by a string of silent partners, not least the obstinate Ramnaresh Sarwan, it was clear that England had no option but to take all ten wickets to progress.

Cue the spinners - one whose last dew-sodden performance had resulted in an ICC fine for an audible display of petulance; the other whose solitary appearance of the winter came in a forgotten ODI at Hobart back in January. Between them Swann and Tredwell scalped seven of the first nine wickets, including three in the last 11 balls of their allocation, before a sharp throw from fine leg sealed the victory with Sulieman Benn well short.

That it was Trott who delivered the decisive throw was fitting, because it was his superb catch running round at cow corner that looked to have removed Russell for 39 and turned the contest in England's favour at 204 for 7. However, as he landed Trott's momentum slid him agonisingly close to the boundary rope, and though the fielder insisted he had taken the ball cleanly, the third umpire overturned the decision and Russell came back to the crease with six more runs to his name.

It was a moment that might have knocked the stuffing out of lesser sides, but England's bottle is the one aspect of their cricket that cannot be questioned after the events of the past month. Chastised by his let-off, Russell added a further four runs from 16 deliveries before Tredwell, whose three top-order breakthroughs had given England a glimmer, nailed him lbw as he attempted to work a single to leg. One ball later, Benn survived a referral by the skin of his bails as he padded up to a straight one, but England had the bit between their teeth and the desperation to make their opportunity count.

Smart Stats

  • This was England's fifth win over West Indies in World Cups and their sixth in global tournaments. They have lost only two matches to West Indies in major tournaments.
  • While England scored 92 runs in boundaries, West Indies were far more attacking, scoring 126 runs in fours and sixes.
  • Graeme Swann and James Tredwell picked up seven wickets for 84 runs in 20 overs. Tim Bresnan and Chris Tremlett, on the other hand, did not pick up a single wicket and conceded 93 runs in 12 overs. The 4 for 48 is Tredwell's best bowling performance in ODIs.
  • West Indies had their best performance in the first ten overs of the innings in the 2011 World Cup scoring 78 for 2.
  • Andre Russell followed up his 4 for 49 with 49 off 46 balls. He missed out on becoming only the eighth player to score a fifty and pick up four wickets in a World Cup game.

Though Strauss might have been tempted to wait for the tailender Benn to come onto strike, he decided there was no time to wait and unleashed Swann's final over on the well-set Sarwan, who had been in the toilet at the fall of the first wicket but whose belated appearance at No. 6 looked set to seal the game. He had eased along to 31 from 67 balls with scarcely a shot in anger, but Swann's first delivery turned sharply into the gloves, and looped tastily to Ian Bell at a commendably attacking short leg. Two balls later Kemar Roach slogged to Chris Tremlett at mid-off, whose extra height proved invaluable in reaching a low chance, and Bopara's subsequent over delivered the decisive run-out.

The start of the West Indies innings had been scarcely any less breathtaking. With his abdominal strain still appearing to cause him some discomfort, Gayle decided that boundaries, not singles, were the order of the day. He smashed the usually reliable Tim Bresnan for four fours in his second over of the match, before welcoming Tremlett to World Cup cricket in no-less-devastating fashion, with three fours and a dismissive six over wide long-on.

After five overs, West Indies already had 50 on the board, but in a portent of thrills to come, the spinners signalled a change of tempo. Swann's first over went for a tidy three runs, before Tredwell struck with his fourth ball of the tournament, one delivery after Gayle had swatted him for his eighth boundary in 20 balls. Leaning onto the front foot, he was rapped on the pad in front of middle, and a full four years after his maiden England tour, Tredwell finally had his first ODI wicket.

One over later, he had his second, when Devon Smith got in a muddle against a yorker, and allowed Matt Prior to pull off a sharp stumping as he scooped the rolling ball in his right glove. And Tredwell made it three wickets in four overs when Darren Bravo was caught in two minds as he pushed outside off, for Strauss at slip to cling onto a sharp low catch.

Sammy continued to attack the off-colour Bresnan, who switched ends to no avail, before another big six off Tredwell took him to 36 from 21 balls. However, after a relative period of calm, Bopara nailed him via an inside-edge onto the off stump, and the same mode of dismissal then accounted for Devon Thomas, who had been playing the anchor role in his 10 from 20 balls. Though Kieron Pollard played responsibly for his 27-ball 24, Swann eventually got the better of his block-it-or-slog-it approach, and at 150 for 6, the balance of power had veered towards England once again.

It was a scoreline that England themselves would have recognised, for the nadir of their own innings had been 151 for 6, after a calamitous collapse of 4 for 30 in 10.2 overs. All told, it was a batting performance that epitomised England's extraordinary campaign. While Trott was at the crease, caressing boundary after boundary in a 38-ball 47, there seemed no reason to doubt that, at the sixth time of asking, his team would finally produce the command performance that has been so glaringly absent from their efforts to date. But then, when he fell in the 22nd over to a feeble clip to short midwicket, the middle order lost all semblance of direction before Wright's run-a-ball stand of 41 with Tredwell prompted a vital revival.

Devendra Bishoo, the Guyanese legspinner, bowled supremely on debut to claim 3 for 34 in his ten overs, including 2 for 23 in a massively composed first spell of eight off the reel, while the bustling Russell was a constant threat as he mixed boundary balls with wicket-taking deliveries to finish with a career-best 4 for 49. But as they face up to yet another head-scratching post-mortem, both sides may wonder how on earth it came to this. With Bangladesh taking on South Africa on Saturday, and West Indies still to face a daunting finale against India, the tussle for qualification is far from over, even if England have taken their own fight as far as it will stretch.

Match Timeline

Andrew Miller is UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew Miller

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 219 
Posted by BigFriendlyGiant on (March 20, 2011, 10:03 GMT)

Against the other three 'big' teams in the group, England won two and bludgeoned India to a tie (albeit with wickets in hand at the end). The slips came against the less potent sides. With all the post-Ashes emotion, and players falling apart bodily or mentally (hopefully Anderson will recover his zest soon), to have done so well and beat SA and WI is a mighty achievement. There are a few days to rest, time to judge how to use the 'fringe' players like Treadwell, Wright and Dernbach going forward. Now we're at the 'sharp end' of the tournament, all other teams know they will have to scrap to beat England, scrap hard, right to the end!

Posted by harshthakor on (March 19, 2011, 8:08 GMT)

England displayed great resilience in the closing stages with the essential will to win which the West Indies simply lacked.England has proved that they can stick to a game plan and hold their nerves at the death.Their spin attack is their forte which can conquer strong oppostion .Sad to see the West Indies fold after coming so close at 220-6.Russels's performace was outstanding.If they correct their mistakes West Indies can still be a dark horse with their oustanding stroke players.Like England they have to devise a strategy.

Posted by vinu1984 on (March 19, 2011, 7:02 GMT)

Bangla cant dream of entering Quarter They dont deserve to b there Ireland is better team in League matches THROW BANGLA OUT OF WORLD CUP THE WILL NEVER COME TO QU+TR FINALS FOR NEXT 20 YRS

JAI ENGLAND

GOOD LUCK ANDY INDIA IS THERE FOR U TO REACH QTR FNLS

BANGAL GET READY TO PACK UR BAGS

BYE BYE BYE BANGLA

Posted by   on (March 19, 2011, 4:45 GMT)

hard 2 take but i wish u guys good luck 4 the match againts india, some one need 2 stay long @ the wicket, gayle should slow down a bit and try 2 make even 20 more runs, that way westindies will have a chance, sad, we playing a wicket keeper who can't bat, shame, shame he shouldn't have get pick over ram...r flec...

Posted by   on (March 19, 2011, 2:04 GMT)

West Indies are a disgrace .Their world ranking is justified. I think the win over Bangladesh was an upset . Sarwan played like he was on debut . He was disgusting to watch. I hope Bangladesh beat South Africa and West Indies lose to India cause they are just minnow beaters. Chanderpaul should also hang up his one day bat and he and Sarwan concentrate on test cricket alone.

Posted by aclarity on (March 19, 2011, 0:37 GMT)

WI Selectors will make the biggest mistake to go back to Shiv. Take a careful look at the experience players. They are failures - Shiv, Sarwan, Smith and Miller. Play Edwards! Give the youngster a chance. Only one of the four above could play. You can put them in a hat and raffle the selection - it would not make a difference. Go Young WI, Go Young - not the experience losers please.

Posted by hardess699 on (March 18, 2011, 22:27 GMT)

@Ambrose Alexander I totally agree with u.....smith must give way 4 shiv.........sammy n thomas hav got to be consistent though

Posted by caasija on (March 18, 2011, 18:27 GMT)

Poor game management lost this for WI. How on earth you are at 215 for5 and Russell well set and NO BATTING POWER PLAY called for? Russell would not even have been in that reversal decision had the power play been taken. What was the caoch and captain thinking about? Incredible brainlock that was as the game would have been over in two more overs. many fans in the WI are thinking WI management wanted England in as a Test nation to save them and the ICC some embarassment. No Batting powerplay - what the hey??

Posted by Farhad-Shamsi on (March 18, 2011, 17:24 GMT)

ENG do not deserve to be in the QF. They lost to minnows BAN and IRE and tied with IND. They had unconvincing wins against SA and WI.

Posted by 2.14istherunrate on (March 18, 2011, 17:08 GMT)

Another roilercoaster ride. i thought Gayle was going to win it inside 20 overs, but the spin tactic saw to that and almost all else. I don't see the point in not playing a third spinner in the next game or Colly as well. Bopara looked the only threatening seamer at all. looks like a gig in Colombo is likely for us which at least means avoiding those B'desh tracks (-yuigh!!!). It was good to see Sarwan back- gives authenticity to the Windies.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew MillerClose
Andrew Miller Andrew Miller was saved from a life of drudgery in the City when his car caught fire on the way to an interview. He took this as a sign and fled to Pakistan where he witnessed England's historic victory in the twilight at Karachi (or thought he did, at any rate - it was too dark to tell). He then joined Wisden Online in 2001, and soon graduated from put-upon photocopier to a writer with a penchant for comment and cricket on the subcontinent. In addition to Pakistan, he has covered England tours in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the World Cup in the Caribbean in 2007
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
  • ESPN Cricinfo

World Cup Videos

... and that's that

... and that's that
13:40 | Apr 11, 2011
Inside ESPNcricinfo

Inside ESPNcricinfo
12:49 | Apr 10, 2011
 World Cup review

World Cup review
05:26 | Apr 8, 2011
Frozen Out

Frozen Out
46:34 | Apr 5, 2011