ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / Features

New Zealand v Sri Lanka, Group A, World Cup 2011, Mumbai

Sangakkara takes command

At the Wankhede, Kumar Sangakkara scored his first one-day century since 2008, but more importantly, it was an innings of control, one under pressure; one that shows he is ready to take responsibility for his team's fortunes

Nagraj Gollapudi at the Wankhede Stadium

March 18, 2011

Comments: 14 | Text size: A | A

Hamish Bennett cools off on a hot day, New Zealand v Sri Lanka, Group A, World Cup 2011, Mumbai, March 18, 2011
Kumar Sangakkara found the perfect balance between defence and attack en route to his first one-day century since June 2008 © Getty Images
Enlarge

It was a simple punch. He did not finish the shot, just left the bat hanging mid-air briefly. The power behind the stroke was enough to carry the ball past the ropes on the straight boundary. Hamish Bennett had not done much wrong, except pitching on a length with a straighter delivery on the offstump. But Kumar Sangakkara had moved in quickly to time the ball sweetly. He did not need to add the flourish by finishing the follow-through. It was a stroke of authority.

Sangakkara played many such elegant strokes on Friday at the Wankhede Stadium, both along the ground and lofted drives, but with every stroke he strengthened his and Sri Lanka's grip over the match. On Friday, he played an innings as much of belief as of desire.

Sri Lanka had a disastrous start, losing both openers inside the first half hour. The onus was on Sangakkara and Mahela Jayawardene to remain solid considering the fact that the rest of the middle-order batsmen had not clocked enough time in the middle in the previous matches. Sri Lanka had to win this match in order to strengthen their chances of playing the quarter-finals and the semi-finals in front of a home crowd.

Twenty-three thousand fans turned up at the Wankhede, which has a capacity of about 33,000, and most cheers were reserved for the Sri Lankans. Still New Zealand's bowlers did not make the job easier for the Lankan duo. Backed by supremely athletic fielding, New Zealand cramped their opponents. After 10 overs, Sri Lanka were 43 for 2. Five overs later, at the end of the bowling Powerplay, only 17 had been added. With 20 overs left, Sri Lanka were 124 for 2.

Even Jayawardene, a fluent player on any surface, was finding it hard to dominate. It was the most vital phase in the match. If Sri Lanka threw caution to the wind but failed in the gamble, then New Zealand would take the upperhand. But if Sangakkara and Jaywardene continued steadfastly, there would come a time when they could break free with the knowledge that the likes of Angelo Mathews was yet to come. Unfortunately Jayawardene was defeated by a Waqar Younis (reverse-swinging toe crusher) from Tim Southee on the very first ball of the batting Powerplay.

Days like these bring a different set of challenges to even a batsman like Sangakkara, who became the fourth Sri Lanka batsman to breach the 9000-run mark in one-dayers. It is on days like these that a batsman analyses his game completely, works out every stroke he is going to play in his mind before playing it, understands the field inside out, calculates the best bowler(s) to target, does a quick reconnaissance of the field before each over to identify gaps he could take advantage of. It is not that these measures are not taken by a batsman in every match, but most times there is a larger freedom for the batsman to take liberties, which was not readily available on Friday.

A good example of Sangakkara's improvisation came two overs into the batting Powerplay. Tim Southee had pitched it short and wide outside off stump and had been duly slapped for a four and six. To escape further punishment, Southee ran in to bowl the next delivery from around the stumps. The idea was to bowl from wide off the crease, keep it short and bowl into the body of Sangakkara. Southee had covered his bases cleverly by keeping the third man and the fine leg on the boundary, just as insurance. So what does Sangakkara do to counter the challenge? He moves outside the leg stump, lines up parallel to the delivery, before cutting it in front of square and over point for a handsome six.

The amazing thing about the stroke was Sangakkara did not upper cut it. He used the pace of the ball to place it perfectly. In the first two overs of the batting Powerplay only eight runs came; in the following two 32 runs were smacked. Like he had said on the eve of the match, Sangakkara was not going to lose his head when the field was up. The idea was to play the field to his advantage. Importantly, the platform had been laid for the lower order to bolster the innings further.

This is the third World Cup for Sangakkara and this was his maiden century in the event, and also his first one-day hundred in three years. In the 63 innings between the last hundred and Friday's century, Sangakkara has got 19 fifties. It is not that he does not like getting hundreds. He is a tenacious character. It is just that he read the match situation perfectly on Friday.

"Understanding when to accelerate and when to consolidate in your innings is the key," he said after the match. "When that kind of self-realisation comes through it makes it easier to score runs. I have got close a few times and probably I concentrated less on getting a hundred, and probably more on doing what was needed to be done at that moment."

In the ICC's Test batsmen rankings, Sangakkara is just one point behind Sachin Tendulkar and Jacques Kallis. In the longer versions he has shower more grit than in the one-dayers. It might be a mental thing. He is seventh on the ODI rankings. Ahead of him are men like Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers, Michael Hussey and MS Dhoni - men who have created more impact on their team's results more consistently. If Sangakkara wants an example of how to influence one's team, he need look no further than fellow Sri Lankan Aravinda de Silva, another batsman who played according to the situation during Sri Lanka's victorious campaign in 1996. de Silva's contrasting knocks in the semi-finals and the final are part of cricket's folklore.

So far this tournament, Sangakkara has stressed on the fact that the real test lies in the knockout stages. Whatever has happened so far will, and does, not matter. The do-or-die match is where the heroes will be remembered. He could do well to listen to those words.

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nagraj Gollapudi

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 14 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 21, 2011, 6:52 GMT)

He's the leading run getter of this WC...he's argubaly the most consistent batsman in all formats of the game...sachin can go for his strokes regardless of the match situation because he knows that india batting line-up has the likes of sehwag, gambhir, yuvraj ad dhoni behind him whereas for SL, sanga has only mahela as a star class batsman to recover any collapse in the team batting apart of him...so he cannot go for all the shots as soon as he comes to the wicket like sachin but he's without any doubt is a match winner unlike sachin...

Posted by Vishal on (March 19, 2011, 9:29 GMT)

It was a Masterclass...The 39th & 40th overs in the Batting Powerplay was a Treat to Watch,especially the Way he manipulated the Fields to take on Southee & Oram..THe Off-side shots giving him 16 runs of 3 Balls was truly one of the Highlights of the Match!

Posted by Kyle on (March 19, 2011, 8:47 GMT)

How can we fix the middle order? There is a very easy solution. One that is both logical and simple. Ranatunga knows the answer, I only wish the others would listen to him...

We have already seen that every game where samaraweera has played he has gotten out or not provided much use, except for one. What was that game?

The game that he was required to come in, take his time, and BUILD an ininngs, not get quick runs.

It is just his nature, how he plays, just like how mahela is capable of being innovative and getting quick runs.

I think the key to solve this is to simple move sama to number 4 position and mahela to fifth.

That way Sanga and Sama can build, and later on mahela and mathews can combine to get the quick powerplay runs.

Posted by Dru on (March 19, 2011, 7:03 GMT)

All class was Sanga and played an intelligent and telling innings but he must be thinkinig just how much he has to do on his own after the middle order failed to capitolise on the platform he laid. The great thing about Sanga is he is a treat on the eye to watch and all proper cricket shots. He plays pace and spin equally well as the keeper of the team is probably the most valuable player in the team. What a player - what class.

Posted by mulitha on (March 19, 2011, 6:05 GMT)

Lankans are best nd WelDone Sanga!!

Posted by Tharindu on (March 19, 2011, 6:04 GMT)

Why didn't you mention Dilshans' name in the list of batsmen who are ahed of Sangakkara?

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 19, 2011, 3:29 GMT)

" The do-or-die match is where the heroes will be remembered" Thats y no matter what, Aravinda is a class apart. His knock in the 1996 semi final was such a superb knock under pressure...

Posted by Shan on (March 19, 2011, 3:11 GMT)

It has been a great knock from Sanga. Amazing the way he built the innings with his buddy Mahela. A slow but steady construction of the innings which was needed after loosing openers when your middle order wasn't in touch. Some pundits said its old fashion, I disagree though. Mahela and Sanga didn't play for the crowd, they played intelligent cricket.

Posted by Vishwanath on (March 19, 2011, 3:10 GMT)

very good article. his innings was of some pedigree.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 19, 2011, 3:00 GMT)

Sangakkara is a great batsman who can change his game according to the form of the match. In 20s he is such an explosive batsman and in Test he is solid as a rock. He will guide SL to the world cup...

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Nagraj GollapudiClose

    How Bangladesh is finding and developing its talent

Mustafizur, Mosaddek, Mehidy, Nazmul - where did they all come from? By Mohammad Isam

    It's time to rediscover Test-match batting

Mark Nicholas: England's recklessness in the name of positivity is a sign that the art of batting in the longest format is no longer given due attention

Is it possible for a Pakistani to be a fan of Ian Botham?

Imran Yusuf ponders an age-old question
The Cricket Monthly

    Nottingham's the charm

On tour in the UK, Firdose Moonda witnesses a fine comeback, visits the country's oldest pub, and squeezes in some yoga lessons

News | Features Last 3 days

An outsider's inside view of Sri Lankan cricket

The memoirs of a fan who has seen the excellence and the excesses of the country's cricket

The saviour, the protecter, the butthead and the bully

The month of November was all about the stars of yet another glorious Ashes series

The lowest defences, and tortoises beating hares

Since 2000, only on six occasions has a team defended a target of 175 or below and only Zimbabwe and West Indies have been unable to chase targets below 150. This week, we look at the lowest totals that have been successfully defended in ODIs

The truth about 'unlucky' Ishant

He is known to work hard on the field but not get the wickets he seemingly deserves. Harsh but true: it's because he doesn't bowl enough wicket-taking balls

Kapil bedevils Zimbabwe

With the 175 that announced India's arrival on the one-day stage

World Cup Videos