ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / Features

ICC World Cup 2011

Tenacious England ready to scale twin peak

The euphoria at the fall of the final wicket against West Indies answered all lingering doubts about England's hunger

Andrew Miller

March 19, 2011

Comments: 8 | Text size: A | A

England celebrate wildly after Graeme Swann removed Ramnaresh Sarwan, England v West Indies, World Cup, Group B, March 17, 2011
England's fightback against West Indies was thrilling, but now, having hauled themselves into the knock-outs, can they sharpen their focus to match their resolve? © AFP

Leading into their do-or-die encounter in Chennai, there was a school of thought that England simply did not want to be in the World Cup anymore. Subconsciously, there was perhaps an element of truth at play, as a long, hard and emotional winter chugged towards its first realistic end-point. The plane was on the tarmac, fully fuelled-up and ready to go, and if anyone in the squad truly believed they were ready to duck the challenge, they could be back home in England right at this minute, like the blissfully indifferent Kevin Pietersen, freed from international duty for the first time since October.

If that seems a ridiculous notion in such a high-stakes tournament, then consider the logic - or lack thereof - that has governed England's campaign in recent days. When the team was on its knees, crying out for one last dose of heroism to spare them from the humiliation of a first-round exit, the management decreed that enough was already enough. Nothing more could be expected of such obvious go-to men such as James Anderson, whose mastery of swing and seam had delivered the Ashes on a plate in the first half of the winter, or Paul Collingwood, whose tank finally ran dry around the time of the Perth Test in December, and whose career has been gliding to a standstill on the hard shoulder ever since.

Instead England put their faith in fresh legs and clear minds, and turned the stage over to the likes of James Tredwell, Luke Wright, Chris Tremlett and Ravi Bopara - two of whom had not originally been selected in the World Cup squad, and two who had, but must have doubted if they'd ever be trusted to feature. And now, with Ajmal Shahzad's hamstring strain demanding a fourth change of personnel in the 15-man party, Andy Flower has followed a similar policy in opting for the inexperience of Jade Dernbach over older, wiser and, dare one say it, more cynical heads. If England string together three victories in their next three matches, they will have won the World Cup. Unless they get as excited about the coming days as Dernbach is sure to be, there will have been little point in pulling out all those stops in Chennai on Thursday night.

The gamble that they took against West Indies had the makings of a quiz question in years to come - ("who were the bowlers when England bombed out...") - but it was one that paid off handsomely in the crunch moments of the contest. Tremlett admittedly proved too hittable on a sit-up-and-beg surface, but his stooping catch at mid-off to dismiss Kemar Roach epitomised the difference in England's mindset when the game was on the line. Anderson in Ashes form would have gobbled that opportunity, no question, but what about the man who stopped and stared at Pietersen in Nagpur back in February, when Ryan ten Doeschate unleashed the skier that first exposed the frailties in a previously faultless fielding unit?

When the contest had been on a similar knife-edge against Bangladesh in Chittagong, the question had been put to the hollow-eyed Anderson: "How much do you really want this?" and the answer that echoed back was "not enough", as he served up a glut of leg-side wides to tear chunks out of the tail-end requirement. When Tredwell and the admirably combative Swann turned the West Indies match on its head, however, the euphoria at the fall of the final wicket answered all lingering doubts about England's hunger. They've done what they had to do to get out of a group that had been designed to guard against upsets, and having spent the past 48 hours sitting in Delhi wondering which flight they'd be boarding next, a trip to Colombo now looks the likeliest scenario.

It would be wrong to pin the blame for England's failings on fatigue and nothing else, not least because many other teams have had itineraries of similar ferocity. The Aussies, as England well know, haven't exactly had an easy time of it this winter, while India and South Africa spent the festive season hammering several bells out of one other in a memorable Test and ODI campaign, and none of those teams have made anything like as much of a meal of their qualification bids.

But in fairness to England, no-one else has had to process quite such a range of emotions to reach this point in time. For the first time in a long time, it's not ineptitude that has exposed their shortcomings, but disorientation. In short, England aren't used to being contenders - in any form of the game, let alone all three at once - and they are still working out what it takes to keep their standards topped up.

When the legendary Australian side of the 2000s was faced with the regular challenge of the Ashes and the World Cup in the same winter, they overcame the problem by winning absolutely everything in sight - except, lest it be forgotten, the CB Series in 2006-07, when England punctuated a winter of whitewashes and pedalos with the most third-rate bauble on offer. It was and remains an inexplicable heist from a team in free-fall whose captain had turned to the bottle, but it provided proof, however fleeting, that even the all-time greats end up lowering their standards once in a while - let alone teams such as this current England side who have yet to master the basics of consistency.

England got everything spot-on in the Ashes, but then, in their attempt to traverse between the two biggest peaks in their game, they lost their footing on the downward slope and went tumbling. The standards they set for themselves in that series, both on the field and in their David Saker-honed bowling strategies, were nowhere to be seen during a slack-witted one-day campaign in Australia, and they could not be rescued in time for the start of the World Cup. In hindsight, it is understandable how a team that had been performing at fever pitch for three months found it hard to replicate the same intensity against the likes of Netherlands, Ireland and Bangladesh, even if the full extent of their struggles still beggar belief.

England have been in this position before, itinerary-wise, and they do not intend going through it all again. By 2015, the Ashes and the World Cup will have been split into separate winters, and for the first time since 1992 - when, coincidentally, Graham Gooch's men performed as well as any side can without claiming the spoils - the game's most prestigious one-day trophy will not be contested on the back of a bone-jarring five-Test series against a Southern Hemisphere giant.

Three jet-lagged days at home and a ridiculous photo-call against the backdrop of Heathrow's perimeter fence was all the chance that Andrew Strauss and his team were given to process the magnitude of their triumph in Australia. But give it two more weeks, and they could have the chance for the homecoming to end all homecomings. After the tenacity they've shown just to stay alive, who would dare to discount them?

Andrew Miller is UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew Miller


Comments: 8 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Siddhant on (March 21, 2011, 4:52 GMT)

I acquiesce with your foremost statement Miller : " Leading into their do-or-die encounter in Chennai, there was a school of thought that England simply did not want to be in the World Cup anymore". Watching that game, it was very much obvious. After losing to Ireland and Bangla tigers, English are reeling in terms of confidence at the moment, plus, since they came back strongly against Proteas and Indians, they know they can do it, but are seeking faulty initiatives from others. Precarious situation, missing the encouraging assistance of Broad n KP. At moments, appear to be losing self belief even...... However, not to forget, most enchanting side of tournament. Will not be a surprise !!!! If they move on to win this World Cup from here... OZ in 1999 followed almost similar trends in group stage.

Posted by James on (March 21, 2011, 4:29 GMT)

@Freedom_of_Preston: I am sure the great Imran Khan would not have even predicted when his team won the world cup. Even now, England has the mettle to beat Srilanka in the QF. A bit of luck with the toss, would ensure a good battle. A big innings from Morgan is due, and also from Bell. If England get Sangakkara and Mahela early, SL could be in for a tough time. On turning tracks, Swann and Tredwell would be tough to handle; also tough would be the reverse swing of Anderson.

Posted by Nadeem on (March 21, 2011, 1:08 GMT)

Why dont just england go home after long long winter and take rest. they already won a WC in 2010 and then Ashes, what else more they want. Definately Srilanka is going to crush and blast them at home in QF, therefore its better for them to take a chill pill and go home as Ashes winners.

Over acheiving cause lots of injuries and disbelief in the team if you dont win. England is trying to over acheive now and it will hurt them. Let other teams also win dont act like Australians and let others win and enjoy their glory. Cricket should be played with each team has its turn and this time england has Ashes, they cannot win every thing.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 20, 2011, 14:30 GMT)

On the BBC coverage of the World Cup, Ian Chappel compared England to the 92 Pakistan side, they don't have an Imran Khan or a Wasim Akram, but they have the shaky start, the dodgy performances, but they seem to have the will to fight against the best, which is a bizarre but entertaining way to go about winning anything

Posted by joel on (March 20, 2011, 12:01 GMT)

The trouble with England is , when were good we can beat anyone . But when were not even doing the basics right , everyone can beat us . The bowling has been truely terrible at times in this world cup ! . Jimmy anderson has on some occasions completely lost the plot .When your going for 90 runs in 1 game , what chance do England have . It is a real shame about stuart broads injury , because he would of been a star in this campaign . Still with the likes of strauss swann , bresnan , morgan we have a good chance to make it to the final

Posted by Jackie on (March 19, 2011, 19:42 GMT)

Andrew Miller seems to forget that England's best bowler is injured, the other leading bowler is shot. They were a dynamic pair to frighten any opposition in full power. Swann has been showing signs of nervous strain. Bresnan and Tremlett are still work in progress. We have lost our leading batsman through injury. Strauss and Bell are exhausted whatever they may say. Will alone keeps them fighting. Trott soldiers on alone. Collingwood is over the hill and the rest are reserves. We are a raggle-taggle army. Prior has just struggled. Is this seriously the team to win the World Cup? They deserve praise for tenacity and just sheer grit. It is a shame. With fit personnel England are in great shape. But confusion is not England's downfall but sheer greed of the marketing men.

Posted by Michael on (March 19, 2011, 18:18 GMT)

A very good exposition on the psychology of winning. Amongst fans the headiness of success seems almost too much-well we are not used to it. Four bad performances for one good one is more usual. The ashes is enormous and really a two break before India should have been mandatory to change mindset and have time with families. But it still seems dispiriiting that Anderson bowled such dross v bangladesh, and indicative of a temperamental flaw. I think the aussies had an almost childish obsession about winning which our players may find hard to replicate.

Posted by Durga on (March 19, 2011, 13:55 GMT)

It will be interesting to know what the great Imran Khan would have had to say about who would win the World Cup. I bet he would predict England to win it.

Email Feedback Print
Andrew MillerClose
Andrew Miller Andrew Miller was saved from a life of drudgery in the City when his car caught fire on the way to an interview. He took this as a sign and fled to Pakistan where he witnessed England's historic victory in the twilight at Karachi (or thought he did, at any rate - it was too dark to tell). He then joined Wisden Online in 2001, and soon graduated from put-upon photocopier to a writer with a penchant for comment and cricket on the subcontinent. In addition to Pakistan, he has covered England tours in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the World Cup in the Caribbean in 2007

    How Bangladesh is finding and developing its talent

Mustafizur, Mosaddek, Mehidy, Nazmul - where did they all come from? By Mohammad Isam

    It's time to rediscover Test-match batting

Mark Nicholas: England's recklessness in the name of positivity is a sign that the art of batting in the longest format is no longer given due attention

Is it possible for a Pakistani to be a fan of Ian Botham?

Imran Yusuf ponders an age-old question
The Cricket Monthly

    Nottingham's the charm

On tour in the UK, Firdose Moonda witnesses a fine comeback, visits the country's oldest pub, and squeezes in some yoga lessons

News | Features Last 3 days

No stories yet

News | Features Last 3 days

    No stories yet

World Cup Videos