ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / Features

India v Australia, 2nd quarter-final, World Cup 2011, Ahmedabad

Time for India's batting to 'bring it'

Going by the numbers alone, India's batting line-up looks in great form; but three late-order collapses tell the story of a side who need their batsmen to fire as a unit if they are to progress to the semi-finals

Sharda Ugra in Ahmedabad

March 23, 2011

Comments: 23 | Text size: A | A

MS Dhoni inspects the pitch, Ahmedabad, March 23, 2011
MS Dhoni admitted India had struggled in the slog overs and the batting Powerplay through the tournament © AFP

On the sandy outskirts of Ahmedabad this Thursday, all will be revealed. If things go according to the home team's plan, a month of uncertainty about the kind of cricket they have played in this World Cup will suddenly cease.

Victory will return to India the status of being popular, irresistible favourites of their home World Cup. It will mark the decisive announcement of the end of Australian ownership of cricket's biggest prize. It will mean that for the first time in 19 years, there will be a World Cup final without the Australians.

The quarter-final between the world's two top-ranked one-day teams may be a World Cup contest arrived at two rounds too early. Its result will, however, emphatically establish which of the two teams' plans have worked: Australia's unrelenting dependence on pace in the subcontinent or India's slow-drip progress from group to knockout stages.

After the defeat to South Africa in Nagpur, the news that floated - much like one of Harbhajan Singh's more deceptive offerings - out of the Indian camp, sought to pour water over the heated debate around the team's stuttering World Cup. Citing fairly reliable "team sources", journalists were told that the Indians had decided to handle the Cup in two phases: in the group stages, players would be kept relaxed, fresh and pressure-free, intensity upped in the tournament's shoot-out section. This meant easy-does-it training sessions in the last month as well as the final tinkering around with team composition. The reasons behind it were irrefutable: the end of a long season, a slew of injuries to a cast of seasoned, if ageing, performers and the hot-house environment at home. Easy does it would be the only way to do it in the first month.

What the Indians then put out against West Indies in Chennai certainly appears to be their general bowling plan for the knockout: R Ashwin to open the bowling, a few early overs for Zaheer Khan with the new ball and the heavy dependence on spin all the way through till the seamers could come on towards the end in reverse gear.

At his media session, Ricky Ponting spelt it out carefully in case no one had noticed. "We have an idea that they will probably open with Zaheer with the new ball and one of their spinners, get their spinners on early and their part-timers on early. Then bring their quicker bowlers on around the ball-change time and then probably close the innings out with their quicks." He then graciously explained to his audience what could be anticipated at Motera on Thursday. "We are going to face at least 30 overs of spin and they can probably be assured that they will be facing at least 30 overs of fast bowling."

So there. The bowling tactics have been laid out for all to salivate over, like one might over one of the region's famous set meals, the Gujarati thaali. On Thursday, the other half of India's game plan will have to come to fruition. The batsmen must, to borrow from American slang, "bring it."; be that their A-game, their best form, or their long-distance runner's kick that will take them past the finish line.

To be honest, so far India's batsmen have not quite brought it as a unit. Going by numbers alone, all of the batsmen appear to be in that intangible called form. There are two Indian batsmen in the top five run-scorers of this World Cup. So far, no team has produced as many centuries [five] as India has. No other team has dazzled with as many fours and sixes as India either. Yet, after their earliest performance in Mirpur, the Indian batting line-up has not been collectively fluent. There have been stomach-churning late-order collapses in three of their six matches and the top four have been out within a 100 in seemingly easy chases against the two Associates in the group. India captain MS Dhoni admitted India had not tackled the slog overs or the batting Power play as well as they should have.

One of the key features of the Dhoni-Gary Kirsten regime has been the sense of "personal responsibility" given and taken by individuals, which has led to exceptional results, particularly in Test cricket. Translating that into combined batting consistency in the World Cup group stages has been India's primary glitch; this despite winning the toss (and so being able to dictate the early course of play) against England, Ireland, South Africa and West Indies.

India will expect more from its batting unit, and Dhoni didn't think it would be much of a burden on the hot bats. In any case he said, it was the bowlers who faced the rougher side of the stick. "If you are batting first you look to put 300-310 on the board and it's the bowlers who are supposed to defend it," Dhoni said. "If you are chasing 310 runs, normally you don't see a couple of batsmen chasing the score. Normally, you have one of the batsmen with the No. 8, 9 or 10 at the other end. Ultimately the pressure is on them [the bowlers] whether they are bowling or batting." To be fair, it is the already under-strain Indian bowling attack, full and part-timers put together, that has kept the team's results effective in the competition.

Against Australia, it is only fair that India's batsmen take on a Dhoniism: call it the "the responsibility of pressure" or "the pressure of responsibility". Or call it executing the plan methodically put into place for the most critical phase of India's World Cup, which will either be proved dead right or dead wrong.

It was Ponting who explained how this plan business really worked even when a team was having a far from smooth passage through a World Cup, like Australia had in the past or India were having now. "It's the self-belief, that's the biggest thing," Ponting said. "You have to keep believing that what you are doing is right. The longer you stick at it ... things tend to change for you."

If there is anything the Indian batting possesses, it is a conviction about its skills, particularly in conditions like Ahmedabad. It is what could primarily take them through tomorrow, rather than the meaningless mind games that seem to be taken more seriously by those outside the team camps than folks in them. The Indian batting's susceptibility against short balls, of which there can be a few expected from Australia is, Dhoni said, an old and somewhat battered hat. "The best batsmen in the world don't like facing the short-pitched deliveries. This is not something new to us. It follows us. Wherever we are, the shadows of short-pitched deliveries can be seen. I don't think it's a new strategy."

A famous 19th century Prussian general called Carl von Clausewitz had made a wise observation about military campaigns when he said: "No plan survives first contact with the enemy." It could be applied, minus the shooting, to cricket as well, particularly to the one-day game. Ponting, now a troubled, but insightful short-game sage, said that ODIs between two teams like Thursday's quarter-finalists, were often ruled by a single, emphatic event. "It can just be one good shot, it could be one good ball, it could be a freakish piece of fielding that goes your way and all of a sudden, you've got some momentum back."

India needs precisely this single emphatic event to spark some momentum in the batting to put its knockout plan into something approaching execution; of the kind that it seeks; not of the variety cricketers avoid mentioning on a World Cup quarter-final morning.

Sharda Ugra is senior editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sharda Ugra


Comments: 23 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Hassan.Farooqi on (March 24, 2011, 15:53 GMT)

Interesting "Two Phase Strategy" of India, and may work for them as they are a solid team. On the contrary, Pakistan's strategy, as explained by Afridi, is to give everything in every match played, not looking towards the next match. Then after the match, won or lost, forgetting all about it and focusing on the next match. Maybe because Pakistan team was written-off before the tournament began and they wanted to win whatever match they could win.

Posted by dummy4fb on (March 24, 2011, 13:17 GMT)

Man I really want India to win this one so we can have PAK vs IND in the Semi's. Exciting!!

Posted by Happy_AusBang on (March 24, 2011, 13:05 GMT)

Ever since the WC started I felt India's bowling is not potent enough. They were a bit lucky in the first game against BD and then against ENG. A slightly better bowling and fielding could have seen them restrict AUS to not more than 220.

Having said that, how lucky Ponting is? Once again the umpire lets him off on what should have been a plumb lbw decision and IND had foolishly used by their reviews. Ponting was given not out when he clearly nicked one against PAK. Fortunately, PAK went for the review straight away and got him out.

Posted by CricketChat on (March 24, 2011, 13:02 GMT)

Would be nice if Sachin clicks in this crunch match against a mentally and physically tough opponents. If Ind batting doesn't click this could be the last WC match for most of Ind team anyway.

Posted by Bigwonder on (March 24, 2011, 12:49 GMT)

Today's Australia batting (specifically Pointing) shows how weak India's bowling attack is. Pointing who has been unable to score much against associate teams was able to and was allowed to score a century. Although the pitch is flat, Pointing was unable to score big during their 1st group match at Motera.

Posted by mariofan97 on (March 24, 2011, 11:40 GMT)

australia will get 280-300 and india will get 250.

Posted by harshthakor on (March 24, 2011, 7:53 GMT)

To me India hold a51-49 edge over arch-rivals Australia.Whilst India hold an edge in form and team balance Australai have the superior mental strength.The crucial factor will be whether the pitch is conducive to paceman or spinners .If the match favours spinners India are clear favourites as Australia are hardly has a match-winning spin bowler.The very crucial factor is not only the laying of a great foundation by Sehwag and Tendulkar but also how the middle order can capitalise on a great start.Australia will probably win if India collapses like against South Africa,England and West Indies.Powerplay must be taken before 35 overs when the best batsman are on song.We should play 2 specialist spinners and 2 seamers and play Raina ,who is always an asset to the team.We must also devise a bolwing strategy against the top order of Australia where we make subtle bolwing rotations to upset the Aussie onslaught.

Posted by FAB_ALI on (March 24, 2011, 7:12 GMT)

I wish India could call up VVS LAXMAN for one match against Australia!!!!!!

Posted by Vibrant_Patel on (March 24, 2011, 6:57 GMT)

Yes...!! Its time for Indian Batting to come Good all together...!!! atleast 3 of the top 5 needs to fire today... to keep Aus at bay..!!

Posted by awi_resham on (March 24, 2011, 6:56 GMT)

Well as far as history is concerned its in India's favor. In 1996 it has outplayed the champs, Pakistan in the quarters, now, it's aussies turn.

Posted by shaan_write2me on (March 24, 2011, 6:33 GMT)

Lovely article, well balanced not favouring either of the GIANT teams.... For me the best part was " To be honest, so far India's batsmen have not quite brought it as a unit. Going by numbers alone, all of the batsmen appear to be in that intangible called form".

Posted by Aussie_Mike on (March 24, 2011, 4:52 GMT)

I think for a change, the ONUS is on Indian Bowlers.

Posted by ShikharMathur on (March 24, 2011, 4:32 GMT)

Actually it's 15 years , not 19 that Aussies are playing in the finals.

Posted by KENNYY on (March 24, 2011, 4:26 GMT)

win the toss and bat, the only way we could overcome Oz

Posted by Aussie_Mike on (March 24, 2011, 4:11 GMT)

I think for a change, the ONUS is on Indian Bowlers.

Posted by sjangra on (March 24, 2011, 3:24 GMT)

come on india ......beat aussies and we will consider you the world champians....

Posted by WinTests on (March 24, 2011, 3:03 GMT)

I don't know why everyone keeps insisting that this contest has arrived two matches too early. Australia have looked extremely ordinary. They looked ordinary in the warm up matches, they looked ordinary against the associate teams. Then Pakistan, which is not half as bat heavy as India exposed them completely. This match is not premature.

Posted by dummy4fb on (March 24, 2011, 2:56 GMT)

i good post but you need to get your facts correct, in 1992 CWC final there was Pakistan vs England in Australia... so if Australia lose it would only be the 2nd time in 25 years that a CWC final is played without Australians.

Posted by Cricinfouser on (March 24, 2011, 1:34 GMT)

Common Sachin, your century winning note should answer all the questions on heavy batting side.

Posted by SanjivSanjiv on (March 23, 2011, 23:48 GMT)

India must bat sensibly with a positive attitude and play 50 overs, and take the batting powerplay between 45-50 overs considering their performance in the previous matches, so far.

Posted by dummy4fb on (March 23, 2011, 22:23 GMT)

India drop your weak fielders you can't afford to give more than one chance to any Australian fielders. Australia pick batters who could play spin better.

Posted by psh004 on (March 23, 2011, 22:22 GMT)

India must play the below team for a win against australia. Gambhir,Sehwag,Kohli,Sachin,Yuvraj,Dhoni,Raina,Harbhajan,Ashwin,Zaheer,Sreesanth. Sreesanth,Raina must be in the team as australian agression can be meet only with agressive players.Lazy players like munaf and nehra cannot do the job for india. Indian bowlers must try to take wickets rather than bowling defensively. Sachin must bat down the order at number 4 to stabilise the middle order .He is a senior player and must show the responsibility and play the role which aravinda desilva played for sri lanka in 1996 world cup. He should play that role for the country and not for his records.

Posted by dummy4fb on (March 23, 2011, 22:18 GMT)

Nice Article Sharda! Hope to hear more about Dhoniism...

Email Feedback Print
Sharda UgraClose

    Wicket with a wide, and Afghanistan's Test player

Ask Steven: Also, which player waited more than 100 Tests to get a century?

Faulkner confronted by the finish line

Daniel Brettig: His eclipse as a member of Australia's top flight parallels that of Simon O'Donnell

The fear and loathing of not getting picked

Nearly every cricketer has had to deal with rejection, even Bradman. By Nicholas Hogg

    Should a player be benched if his kit is missing?

Brad Hogg, Aakash Chopra, Cyrus Broacha and ESPNcricinfo staff talk about Aaron Finch's recent omission from the playing XI

News | Features Last 3 days

Australia are mirroring their captain's defiance

Steven Smith defied those who didn't give him a chance as a batsman. Now his team is doing the same on a tour no one thought they could compete in

How a spinner can break the rhythm of the batsman

By learning how to subtly change the pace of his deliveries

All-time IPL XI : The allrounders

Pick your two allrounders for our all-time IPL XI and help put together the team with our panel of experts

Dissecting the Daredevils batting order

Aakash Chopra analyses the Delhi Daredevils batting order, and offers insight into some of the more curious events during their game against Kolkata Knight Riders

Dismissing Tendulkar, and an U-19 triple

Also, what's the record for most matches without scoring a run?

News | Features Last 3 days

World Cup Videos