ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / Features

Rohit Sharma's work-in-progress ODI career

While the runs have come in 2013, his strike rate remains among the lowest of all current batsmen, which is surprising for a player of his ball-striking abilities

S Rajesh

October 4, 2013

Comments: 61 | Text size: A | A

Rohit Sharma strikes the ball through the covers, India v Sri Lanka, West Indies tri-series, Port-of-Spain, July 9, 2013
The experiment to use Rohit Sharma as opener in ODIs has worked reasonably well, but the hundreds still haven't come © AFP
Related Links
Players/Officials: Rohit Sharma
Teams: India

In this Indian line-up, no player divides opinions as dramatically as Rohit Sharma. Depending on which camp you belong to, he is either India's biggest batting talent since Sachin Tendulkar, or the most over-rated batsman since the beginning of cricket. As in most stories with such extremes, the truth probably lies somewhere in between.

With those who favour Rohit, one of the points made in his defence is the manner in which he has been shunted up and down the batting order, seldom batting at the same position for more than a few innings. In 2013, though, that excuse is no longer valid, as Rohit has batted at no other position but the top of the line-up in 16 consecutive ODI innings this year, easily his longest stretch in one position: his previous-best had been ten in a row at No. 5 in 2011, and five in a row at No. 4 in 2012. (Click here for Rohit's innings-by-innings list.)

In these 16 innings as opener in 2013, Rohit has gone past 50 six times, and made two others scores of more than 45, lending credence to the belief that this might perhaps be the best position for him to bat in. Yet, questions remain, because unlike Shikhar Dhawan, his opening partner who has converted three of his six 50-plus scores into hundreds in the same period, Rohit's highest as opener is 83, and his next-best 65. So while Rohit has been doing his bit in getting his team off to good starts, his lack of match-winning scores means he hasn't yet sealed the position for himself, which is a pity given that the opening slot presents the best opportunity for a batsman to make his mark in limited-overs cricket.

As the table below shows, he didn't take his opportunities at No. 3 a few years ago, scoring only 102 in eight innings. His stats as an opener are far better, yet not as convincing as they might have been.

Rohit Sharma at each batting position in ODIs
Position Innings Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Opening 19 609 35.82 67.36 0/ 6
No.3 8 102 12.75 60.71 0/ 0
No.4 26 715 31.08 78.14 2/ 3
No.5 25 862 45.36 82.64 0/ 8
No.6 12 200 28.57 73.80 0/ 1
No.7 7 70 14.00 85.36 0/ 0

The other aspect about Rohit's batting that is perplexing is his strike rate. For a batsman of his ball-striking skills, his scoring rate in ODIs is quite pedestrian - 75.61, in an age when almost all top batsmen score at around 85. Perhaps the role given to him by the team management has been that of the anchor - since there are so many strokeplayers in the side - but then his relatively poor average indicates he hasn't played too many long innings either. The combination of a relatively low average and strike rate, over a fairly extended period of time, is the reason why several critics have been questioning his position in the side for a while. As an opener he has clearly contributed more consistently in 2013, but his strike rate this year has only been 68.63.

Overall in his career, Rohit's strike rate of 75.61 is the fifth-lowest among all batsmen who've scored at least 2000 ODI runs since June 23, 2007, which is when Rohit made his ODI debut. Out of 45 batsmen who make the cut, only Mushfiqur Rahim, Shivnarine Chanderpaul, Upul Tharanga and Misbah-ul-Haq have scored their runs at a slower rate. Rohit's strike rate looks even worse when compared to the average scoring rate in the matches he has played in: against an overall strike rate of 82.54, his rate was 75.61, a percentage 91.60. That's the second-lowest among all the batsmen in the list below; the only batsman with a lower percentage is Mushfiqur Rahim - his strike rate is 91.57% of the overall match strike rate in those games, but then Rahim is a part of a weaker side, and he often comes to the crease with Bangladesh in trouble.

All the other batsmen have scored faster than Rohit, relative to the scoring rates in those matches. There have been plenty of remarks about Misbah's strike rates, but even he has scored faster when compared to the match rates. (His strike rate of 74.18 is 97.33% of the match rates, in the games that he has played in.) It's a similar story for the likes of Jonathan Trott, Mohammad Hafeez, Chanderpaul, Tharanga and Younis Khan. Rohit is clearly a more flamboyant strokeplayer than these players - and he scored an unbeaten 51 off 24 balls in the Champions League a couple of days back to further demonstrate his ball-striking skills - but in ODIs, he has generally tended to play within himself, often not backing his talent and range of strokeplay. Obviously, the rate of scoring will also go up once he gets bigger scores more consistently.

Lowest batting strike rates in ODIs since June 23, 2007 (Qual: 2000 runs)
Batsman Matches Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s Match SR* Ratio
Mushfiqur Rahim 97 2008 25.41 69.77 1/ 9 76.19 0.92
Shivnarine Chanderpaul 51 2005 60.75 72.53 5/ 13 77.53 0.94
Upul Tharanga 113 3399 34.33 74.03 7/ 20 76.94 0.96
Misbah-ul-Haq 116 3667 46.41 74.18 0/ 29 76.21 0.97
Rohit Sharma 102 2558 32.37 75.61 2/ 18 82.54 0.92
Michael Clarke 120 4252 44.75 75.65 6/ 30 79.42 0.95
Hamilton Masakadza 90 2717 30.87 76.53 3/ 15 76.15 1.00
Mohammad Hafeez 82 2659 34.98 76.65 6/ 14 74.98 1.02
Jonathan Trott 68 2819 51.25 77.06 4/ 22 83.14 0.93
Younis Khan 102 3026 32.89 77.54 4/ 22 77.48 1.00
* Overall strike rate in the matches played by that batsman

During the period since Rohit's debut, only eight Indian batsmen have scored 2500 ODI runs; no one else has even touched 1300. Among these eight batsmen, Rohit's average and strike rate are both the lowest: the next-lowest average is Raina's 38.87, while Dhoni's 84.09 is the closest strike rate to Rohit's.

The last two columns of the table below list the dot-ball and boundary percentages, and most of the batsmen below have worked on those two aspects well to achieve good strike rates. Sachin Tendulkar and Yuvraj Singh have dot-ball percentages of 54, but they both have relatively high boundary percentages to make up for that. Some of the others with lower boundary percentages have lower dot-ball percentages, while Virender Sehwag combines a relatively low dot-ball percentage with a very high boundary ratio to achieve an incredible strike rate of 118.94.

Rohit, on the other hand, has a dot-ball percentage of almost 52, which wouldn't be so bad if his boundary percentage wasn't only 37.61. The combination of the two has resulted in a strike rate of 75, which is clearly below par by today's standards.

The opening position, though, has brought stability to Rohit's place in the Indian line-up. He has made runs too, often important ones, and more consistently than he used to in the past. All but two of his innings as an opener have been outside the subcontinent, in conditions where opening the batting against two new balls haven't been the easiest. In India, conditions are likely to be easier for batting at the start of an innings, with run-scoring getting more difficult against the older ball. That could be a blessing for Rohit, both in terms of lifting his average and strike rate. It would suit the Indian team just fine too.

Indian batsmen who've scored at least 2000 ODI runs since Rohit's debut
Batsman Innings Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s Dot-ball % Boundary %
Virender Sehwag 75 3120 42.73 118.94 7/ 13 47.20 65.96
Suresh Raina 122 3693 38.87 95.79 3/ 26 45.76 46.74
Yuvraj Singh 105 3546 39.40 88.38 6/ 23 54.29 54.71
Sachin Tendulkar 78 3579 48.36 88.37 8/ 19 54.43 54.04
Virat Kohli 108 4575 49.72 86.64 15/ 24 48.67 42.40
Gautam Gambhir 122 4636 41.76 86.12 9/ 32 49.71 43.10
MS Dhoni 134 5070 53.36 84.09 5/ 35 48.91 39.61
Rohit Sharma 97 2558 32.37 75.61 2/ 18 51.91 37.61

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Comments: 61 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Dharmesh on (October 8, 2013, 19:17 GMT)

India lost 8 test ....4 in aus and 4 in england. in those matches Rohit was in squad as a visitor. IF every one says He has talent and class .give him a chance in test. after all he is the only cricketer who played 100 odi without a single test. his strok playing ability is incridible.

Posted by Daison on (October 8, 2013, 6:11 GMT)

@emceedrive - One thing Rohit has got is CHANCES. Now you are suggesting he should be given "chances" in Test level too. Why is it that only Rohit should get ALL the possible chances and all the rest of the young players just get one or two chances? If Rohit is soo special (you sound like a Mumbaikar), how come he has not utilized the chances he got in limited over games? Come on, please take a look Dhawan; he was given ONE chance and he took it with both hands and made the position in the team HIS OWN. Please dont say Dhawan was just lucky and Rohit is more talented. How come the MORE TALENTED Rohit did not get lucky in all these games? I would say Rohit is the luckiest player around for getting all these chances. He got his fair chances and started to score a few fifties (not hundreds). He should be treated no more than an average player. He shoud stand up and show respect to players like Kohli, Raina, Dhawan, Gambhir etc. They showed their worth in the field - not in lobbying.

Posted by Daison on (October 7, 2013, 10:57 GMT)

@naren1983 - Rohit, rather NOhit has always done well in IPL/T20 club level. Every year IPL he comes up with mind boggling performance in one or two games. The Mumbai Lobby Bandwagon (lurking in the background), will capitalize on those flashes in the pan calling him "the most gifted player around" and will get him selected for India duty. He then dishes out faiure after failure for around 15-20 games and when on the brink of getting dropped, will score a 50. As soon as the 50 is scored all sins are forgiven and he starts his next 15-20 games cycle. Two or three such cycle and next IPL season arrives, and the whole cycle restarts. This has been the case since he was first seen. He scored one 50 in the first T20 world cup and Mumbi lobby went "here is the next big thing". He has been the "next big thing" ever since. Now he is the MI Captain, making sure he is in playing 11. I dont think there is any other player around getting pampered as much as Rohit is.

Posted by Lakshminarayanan on (October 7, 2013, 8:20 GMT)

Rohit wants to use the opportunity and score some runs under his belt to seal the spot first, I believe you will see a different Rohit in coming seasons once he score a hundred or two. He is peaking at a right time now, if you look at his current form in CLT20, he blasted all quality bowlers and his few match winning performances with strike rate above 200. This will take Rohit to continue to ODI with better strike rate in future. It is the best time for Rohit to prove his skills and important period in his career. Awesome Rohit !!!

Posted by Daison on (October 6, 2013, 7:04 GMT)

As for me I would go with the side where it is thought Rohit Sharma is OVERRATED. He has been given chances after chances and kept delivering failure after failure. And then when one or two fifty is scored after upteenth failures, all sins are forgiven and he gets to start afresh. Whereas some other players (like Rahane), after couple of failures they are either forgotten completely or are kept on bench. Rohit has got the complete Mumbai Lobby behind him. Just so that he is in the playing eleven for Mumbai Indians, he is made the Captain of MI. Mumbai has no other names to show so they bring Rohit to the fore. Mumbai Lobby tried to pip Raina for Rohit but couldnt do becuase Dhoni prefer Raina. Talent doesnt give you place in the team, performance does for everybody else. But if you are Mumbaikar, you gets everything in silver platter.

Posted by Dummy4 on (October 6, 2013, 4:42 GMT)

In case of Rohit its always talent without temperament. That is where the Sachins,Rahuls,VVSs,Kohlis and the others score. He is not fond of working hard and demanding a place, that too a permanent one. He has had a long rope and its time he bucks up. Am tired of hearing Shastri and Manjrekar crowing how great his captaincy has been and has transformed him. Statistics may never define the entire truth but it can be a healthy indicator. His success as a captain is more due to the super stars in his team. I may be condemned that end of the day it is a team game. But then look at Shikar Dhawan, he is a better talent,,hardworking and blends well with his limited resources in the team. May be Rahane would be a better investment.

Posted by Arvind on (October 6, 2013, 1:06 GMT)

He has been a talented cricketer for 6 years, give him another 10 years to settle down. He will realise his potential, if he doesn't retire by then, lol.

Posted by Dummy4 on (October 5, 2013, 18:03 GMT)

rohit is a good no. 4 or no. 5 batsman, but unfortunately for him, we have someone like yuvraj or dhoni to bat at that position & kohli & raina sealing no. 3 & 6 respectively so he doesnt have a place in the middle order. As an opener he has been over cautious but at the moment we cant drop him as sehwag n gambhir have not done anything spectacular. So just have a look at him in next 3 odi against Aus, who knows he will become a regular odi opener.

Posted by Dummy4 on (October 5, 2013, 15:07 GMT)

The Shastri;s and co. will say Rohit has potential till he is 60 ! No one in the world has been invested upon as much as Rohit... now its payback time!

Email Feedback Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    How Bangladesh is finding and developing its talent

Mustafizur, Mosaddek, Mehidy, Nazmul - where did they all come from? By Mohammad Isam

    It's time to rediscover Test-match batting

Mark Nicholas: England's recklessness in the name of positivity is a sign that the art of batting in the longest format is no longer given due attention

Is it possible for a Pakistani to be a fan of Ian Botham?

Imran Yusuf ponders an age-old question
The Cricket Monthly

    Nottingham's the charm

On tour in the UK, Firdose Moonda witnesses a fine comeback, visits the country's oldest pub, and squeezes in some yoga lessons

News | Features Last 3 days

No stories yet

World Cup Videos