ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / Features

Williamson's drive to convert potential to performance

The break-up of his numbers indicates a preference for subcontinent conditions over those which support pace, seam and swing

S Rajesh

October 11, 2013

Comments: 13 | Text size: A | A

Kane Williamson plays a straight drive, Bangladesh v New Zealand, 1st Test, Chittagong, day 1, October 9, 2013
Kane Williamson averages 43.25 in Tests in Asia, but in Australia, England and South Africa, he averages 16.41 from 12 innings © AFP
Related Links
Players/Officials: Kane Williamson | Martin Crowe | BJ Watling
Series/Tournaments: New Zealand tour of Bangladesh
Teams: New Zealand

From the moment he made his international debut - and perhaps even before that - Kane Williamson has been regarded as the next big thing in New Zealand batting. Anyone who has seen him bat will notice the classy strokeplay and elegance which has resulted in such expectations, and while the overall numbers so far don't justify all the hype, he has also shown more than once that he possesses both the skill and the temperament to live up to those expectations.

Traditionally, New Zealand haven't had an array of batting riches at their command, and given that their current line-up looks pretty thin as well, they'll want Williamson to develop into a significant player. So far, despite this latest century in Bangladesh, he hasn't consistently given New Zealand the sort of runs they'd expect from a top-notch No. 3.

In the 47 Test innings he has played, Williamson's average is a less-than-impressive 33.31. At No. 3, the average is almost the same - 33.51 from 28 innings.

The break-up of his numbers indicates a preference for subcontinent conditions over those which support pace, seam and swing. In eight Tests in Asia, Williamson has already struck three hundreds - one each in India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh - and averages 43.07. That's better even that his home average of 41; his only home century, though, was a memorable one - 102 not out in Wellington against a potent South African attack, which helped New Zealand save the Test.

Williamson's problem so far, though, has been scoring runs in Australia, South Africa and England: he has only played two Tests in each of those countries, but he has collectively scored only 197 in those 12 innings, with only one half-century. Undoubtedly, though, he'll get plenty of opportunities to improve on those stats in the future.

Kane Williamson in Tests, in different parts of the world
  Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
In New Zealand 9 533 41.00 1/ 4
in Asia 8 603 43.07 3/ 2
in Aus, Eng, SA 6 197 16.41 0/ 1
Career 26 1499 33.31 4/ 8

The table below lists the stats for some of New Zealand's top batsmen after 26 Tests. Andrew Jones leads the way with an average of 51.70, with Glenn Turner and Mark Richardson also averaging 50 or thereabouts. All the batsmen in the list below have higher averages than Williamson's 33.31, but the key name that he'll want to look at is just above him: Martin Crowe, after 26 matches, averaged 34.68, with three centuries from 43 innings; Williamson has four from 47.

Crowe, though, had a wretched start to his Test career, averaging 24.08 after 16 Tests. Thereafter, the improvement was dramatic. For Williamson to finish with top-class numbers, he'll have to similarly raise his game, though his career is likely to be last much longer than 77 Tests, which was the length of Crowe's career.

New Zealand batsmen after 26 Tests
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Andrew Jones 48 2120 51.70 6/ 7
Glenn Turner 47 2083 50.80 5/ 10
Mark Richardson 44 2024 49.36 3/ 16
Bert Sutcliffe 47 2047 47.60 4/ 11
Ross Taylor 47 1997 43.41 5/ 10
Stephen Fleming 45 1588 36.93 1/ 12
Martin Crowe 43 1422 34.68 3/ 5
Kane Williamson 47 1499 33.31 4/ 8

Despite these numbers, Williamson is already among the top eight run-getters at the No. 3 slot for New Zealand, and isn't far from completing 1000 runs at that position. The average, though, remains lower than most of the others in the list below.

Most Test runs at No.3 for New Zealand
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Stephen Fleming 69 2977 47.25 6/ 12
Andrew Jones 70 2732 43.36 6/ 11
Bevan Congdon 62 2414 43.10 6/ 16
Geoff Howarth 33 1148 35.87 4/ 2
John Reid 24 1147 54.61 5/ 2
Mathew Sinclair 33 1113 37.10 3/ 1
Kane Williamson 28 905 33.51 2/ 5
Barry Sinclair 25 817 32.68 2/ 3

Williamson's numbers in Asia, and in Australia, South Africa and England, suggest his preference for spin over pace, and that's confirmed by the table below, which shows his stats against pace and spin. Against slow bowling he averages 43.25, but against pace it drops to less than 30.

The bowler who has dismissed him most often is a spinner, though: Pragyan Ojha has got him out five times conceding 92 (average 18.40). Against most other spinners, Williamson has come out on top, averaging 64 versus Monty Panesar, 50 against Rangana Herath and 44 against R Ashwin.

The quick bowlers have overall had more success against him, which suggests that his technique against pace might need some fine-tuning.

Williamson v pace and spin in Tests
Bowling type Runs Balls Dismissals Average
Pace 802 2084 27 29.70
Spin 692 1555 16 43.25

A keeper who can score runs
While New Zealand have high hopes from Williamson to shoulder much of their batting responsibilities, they seem to have discovered a fine wicketkeeper-batsman in BJ Watling. Watling has played 15 Tests in all and averages 33.04, which isn't far away from Williamson's Test average. However, the additional responsibility of keeping wicket seems to have helped him focus on his batting too. In the eight Tests when he has kept wicket, Watling has scored 502 runs at an average of 45.63, with two centuries and three fifties; in Tests in which he has played as a specialist batsman, Watling averages 21.50, with only one half-century from 14 innings. Watling's aggregate of 502 is already the sixth best among New Zealand's wicketkeepers. The average, so far at least, is well clear of the others in the list. While both his centuries have come against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh, he has also scored vital 60s in the home series against South Africa. If he can keep this scoring rate going a little longer, and against all opposition, New Zealand's lower-order batting will look a lot stronger.

New Zealand wicketkeepers with most runs in Tests
Player Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Brendon McCullum 52 2803 34.18 5/ 15
Adam Parore 67 2479 26.94 2/ 11
Ian Smith 63 1815 25.56 2/ 6
Ken Wadsworth 33 1010 21.48 0/ 5
Warren Lees 21 778 23.57 1/ 1
BJ Watling 8 502 45.63 2/ 3

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Comments: 13 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Ziggy on (October 17, 2013, 8:23 GMT)

williamson looks like a very good talent, and may become one of NZ's best ever, but i just don't think he will become a top tier,in the mould of a lara/ponting style batsmen.

i certainly could be wrong, infact, i really want him to prove me wrong, but at this stage, with 26 matches already, it will be tough to get that average bumped substantially. i know averages don't speak of a batsman's talent, but it is what seperates the good from the great.

he definately still has too much time on his side to judge what he will become now, but hoping KW becomes one of the best. From a BD fan.

Posted by Shane on (October 16, 2013, 11:03 GMT)

@Lermy - Need some help carrying that chip on your shoulder?

Posted by Kevin on (October 16, 2013, 7:21 GMT)

He's the best batsman in the worst team in world cricket. Wouldn't even be carrying the drinks for any other team. New Zealand only play test cricket because given the law of averages, occasionally they'll beat someone having an off day. No one goes to watch them, and no one goes to watch Kane Williamson. NZ cricket is just boring, esp right now.

Posted by Dummy4 on (October 16, 2013, 7:03 GMT)

Hey guys its still early days yet for Kane Williamson his average will improve and the runs will flow from him remember everyone is comparing him to martin Crowe if my memory recalls me Crowe started off not so well but once he played more then he became new zealands best batsman

Posted by Beau on (October 16, 2013, 6:32 GMT)

A bit late to the party here, apologies.

As others have mentioned, KW's early promotion to #3 (effectively opening most of the time) has been tough on his average, as anyone would expect. The new ball is a factor, of course, but so to is the fact that from #3, not outs become vanishingly rare. Had he been batting at 5 or 6 like most young batsmen start out, he may well have racked up half a dozen not out scores by now, which would have plumped his average up nicely.

The other factor, one that even Rajesh seems to have overlooked, is the lack (so far) of a big, big score. A 200+ in his next innings (not so unlikely, in this form, on these pitches, against this opposition) will see his average jump 6 or 7 runs to a much more impressive 40ish.

KW is pure class, and will only improve with more time in the long form.

Posted by Dummy4 on (October 13, 2013, 19:00 GMT)

Hey whoever said that Kane Williamson should bat at no 5 is so wrong im from the same city as him seen him bat at 3-4 and he is better there than any other position we have specilest batsmen for there jobs and Kane needs to be at 3

Posted by Dion on (October 13, 2013, 12:52 GMT)

He just turned 23 and plays in a team that traditionally struggles for runs. He is looking better than ever and that average will get better. He may well end up NZ's highest run scorer.

Posted by David on (October 12, 2013, 1:13 GMT)

There is cause for optimism as his numbers this year for Yorkshire were quite good and he has signed up for nest year. This should give his batting ample chance to improve in those conditions.

Posted by Dummy4 on (October 12, 2013, 0:06 GMT)

no doubt in my mind - Williamson will be the best NZ batsman since Crowe.

Posted by kevin on (October 11, 2013, 20:44 GMT)

Siddhart is correct. He has been exposed having to bat at three from a young age, which in the NZ team generally means you are virtually opening. He would have been much better left at five. If you look at his innings where he has scored poorly you will probably find he has been in within the first few overs.

Email Feedback Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    How Bangladesh is finding and developing its talent

Mustafizur, Mosaddek, Mehidy, Nazmul - where did they all come from? By Mohammad Isam

    It's time to rediscover Test-match batting

Mark Nicholas: England's recklessness in the name of positivity is a sign that the art of batting in the longest format is no longer given due attention

Is it possible for a Pakistani to be a fan of Ian Botham?

Imran Yusuf ponders an age-old question
The Cricket Monthly

    Nottingham's the charm

On tour in the UK, Firdose Moonda witnesses a fine comeback, visits the country's oldest pub, and squeezes in some yoga lessons

News | Features Last 3 days

No stories yet

News | Features Last 3 days

World Cup Videos