ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 / Features

Numbers Game

From pretty player to match-winner

The second half of Ian Bell's Test career has been a lot more fulfilling than his first, but he still needs to iron out his inconsistencies

S Rajesh

June 20, 2014

Comments: 6 | Text size: A | A

In the second half of his Test career, Ian Bell has averaged 75.66 in wins, which is among the highest in the last four and a half years © Getty Images

Right from the time Ian Bell made his Test debut, scoring 70 against West Indies at The Oval in 2004, he has been earmarked for great things. The elegance and grace with which he bats makes it seem that the art of batting comes easy to him, but the ride to 100 Tests hasn't been a smooth and blemish-free journey. There were periods when there were question marks over his stomach for a battle and a grind, but he has overcome that, and, going into his 100th Test, has firmly entrenched himself as the main man in England's middle order. The numbers stack up quite nicely too: 6787 runs, including 20 hundreds, at an average of 45.24. Many will argue that they should have been even better, but given that only 11 England players have made it to 100 Tests - and none of them averages 50 with the bat - Bell is in pretty good company. And given that he's only 32, he has time to add to his already weighty accomplishments.

Bell's start to his Test career was sensational: after his first three innings in Test cricket, he had an average of 297, as he followed his 70 on debut with unbeaten knocks of 65 and 162 at home against Bangladesh. Admittedly the opposition wasn't top class, but that start raised expectations, which wasn't necessarily a good thing given that the next series was against Australia. Ten innings in the series fetched a mere 171, and while he got runs against Pakistan home and away, another average series in Australia gave rise to suggestions that he tended to score soft runs.

That theory gained further momentum when Bell had another poor Ashes in 2009, but right after that series came his best phase in Tests, when, over a period of 20 matches in two years, he averaged 81.86, with eight hundreds. There were a few highlights during this period: in the Boxing Day Test in Durban in 2009, he scored 140 to set up a winning first-innings total, and in the next Test in Cape Town, he batted almost five hours to score 78 in the fourth innings and help England stave off defeat - it was exactly the sort of gritty innings that critics thought he was incapable of playing. Then, in the 2010-11 Ashes, he finally got the better of Australia, scoring 329 runs at an average of 65.80.

Those runs should have been the beginning of a consistent spell of success, but over the last two and a half years, Bell has again lapsed into inconsistency: in 30 Tests since the beginning of 2012, he averages 36.66, with only four centuries during this period. This includes an exceptional Ashes series in 2013, when he scored 562 runs and averaged 62.44. However, on the tour to Australia later that year, Bell was unable to stamp his authority, even though he generally looked comfortable at the crease: in ten innings he scored 235 at 26.11.

Overall, out of the 29 Test series he has played in (minimum two Tests), Bell has averaged less than 35 in 12, and 50 or more in 11, which indicates an inconsistency he hasn't yet overcome: in five out of nine series since January 2012, his average has been less than 35 (excluding the ongoing series against Sri Lanka). In contrast, during his best phase, between December 2009 and 2011, only once in six series did his average dip below 50, and even then it was 44.71, in South Africa.

Ian Bell's Test career
Period Tests Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Till April 2008 36 2546 43.15 50.33 7/ 18
May 2008 to Nov 2009 13 598 29.90 48.38 1/ 3
Dec 2009 to Dec 2011 20 1883 81.86 58.09 8/ 7
Jan 2012 onwards 30 1760 36.66 41.97 4/ 12
Career 99 6787 45.24 49.43 20/ 40
Bell in his 29 Test series*
Series averages < 35 35 to 49.99 50 to 74.99 75 and above
No. of series 12 6 5 6
* Only series in which he played at least two Tests

Bell's career in two halves

Despite the dip in numbers since 2012, the second half of Bell's career so far has still been more prolific than the first: in his last 50 Tests he averages 51.30, which is a significant improvement on his average of 39.79 in his first 49 matches.

During the second half of his career, Bell has also improved his numbers significantly along some key parameters. In the first half of his career, he averaged 25.68 against Australia from 13 Tests; in the second half, he averages almost 49 against them in 15 Tests, with four centuries compared to none in the first 13. Similarly, his numbers at home and in second innings have improved significantly too. The biggest plus, though, has been his performances in wins: he averages more than 75 in wins in his last 50 Tests, compared to 42.58 in wins in his first 49.

The only dip has been in his fourth-innings average, from 41 to 33. Also, his away average remains below par: it's 39.92, compared to a home average of 66 since December 2009.

Bell's Test career in two halves
  Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
First 49 Tests 3144 39.79 49.95 8/ 21
Last 50 Tests 3643 51.30 49.00 12/ 19
Key stats from the two halves of Bell's career
  First 49 Tests Last 50 Tests
  Tests Average 100s/ 50s Tests Average 100s/ 50s
v Aus 13 25.68 0/ 8 15 48.95 4/ 7
in Aus 5 33.10 0/ 4 10 40.28 1/ 5
Home 29 43.34 6/ 10 23 66.00 8/ 10
Away 20 35.97 2/ 11 27 39.92 4/ 9
Wins 18 42.58 4/ 4 22 75.66 10/ 5
in 2nd inngs 41 28.82 1/ 8 39 47.30 4/ 7
in 4th inngs 14 41.44 0/ 4 21 33.07 0/ 4

Bell's average of 75.66 in wins since December 2009 is among the best for all batsmen during this period. With a 1000-run cut-off, only three batsmen - Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers and Cheteshwar Pujara - have better averages in wins. Bell's average is higher than those of Pietersen and Cook, which indicates how influential he has been in victories during this period. His overall average of 51.30 is in the top ten too, and in fact he is the only England batsman in the top ten over these last four and a half years. That's despite his poor run since 2012, when his average of 36.66 is third from bottom among batsmen with at least 1000 runs during this period.

Best averages in Test wins since December 2009 (Qual: 1000 runs)
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Hashim Amla 19 1960 85.21 8/ 5
AB de Villiers 20 1850 84.09 7/ 10
Cheteshwar Pujara 11 1117 79.78 4/ 3
Ian Bell 22 2043 75.66 10/ 5
Ross Taylor 9 1004 71.71 4/ 6
Kevin Pietersen 24 2047 63.96 5/ 10
Alastair Cook 26 2489 63.82 10/ 5
Jacques Kallis 18 1280 60.95 5/ 2
Highest averages in Tests since Dec 2009 (Qual: 2000 runs)
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Kumar Sangakkara 36 3965 67.20 16/ 14
Shivnarine Chanderpaul 33 2794 66.52 8/ 11
AB de Villiers 40 3610 63.33 10/ 18
Hashim Amla 39 3754 62.56 15/ 13
Jacques Kallis 35 3012 57.92 14/ 7
Younis Khan 26 2139 54.84 7/ 7
Misbah-ul-Haq 31 2347 54.58 3/ 22
Michael Clarke 52 4547 53.49 15/ 12
Ian Bell 50 3643 51.30 12/ 19
Ross Taylor 36 2797 50.85 7/ 15

The home anomaly

While Bell has proved over the last few years that he can score tough runs - and score them reasonably consistently - some of his stats still show unusual skews, mostly as a result of the first half of his Test career.

Check out his overall stats in home Tests: his average against all teams is 53.09 from 52 Tests, but when he has played teams from the subcontinent or West Indies, he has averaged 81.24; against Australia, South Africa and New Zealand the average has dropped to 34.11. Pakistan usually have a potent pace attack, but when they toured England in 2006 - the only time Bell played them in a home series - their pace attack through most of the series consisted of Umar Gul, Mohammad Sami, Shahid Nazir and Abdul Razzaq, while Mohammad Asif played only one Test.

During the second half of his career, Bell has transformed from a batsman who liked to play second fiddle to someone who can take charge. He has done so on more than one occasion, and now with him occupying the No. 4 slot - which earlier belonged to Pietersen - he'll be expected to play the lead role in the middle order more often. Given his range of strokes and his defensive technique, he obviously has the capability to do so, but there are still streaks of inconsistency that don't sit well with a batsman whose foundations are so solid.

Ian Bell in home Tests
Versus Tests Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
B'desh, Ind, Pak, SL, WI 27 2356 81.24 63.12 10/ 11
Aus, NZ, SA 25 1467 34.11 44.49 4/ 9
All home Tests 52 3823 53.09 54.38 14/ 20

Problems against left-arm pace

Zaheer Khan has dismissed him five times at a cost of 22 runs in 44 balls (average 4.40), while Mitchell Johnson has taken his wicket six times for 124 runs (average 20.67). Against all left-arm fast bowlers Bell's average is 33, which is well below his average against other types of bowlers. The fact that neither Sri Lanka nor India have left-arm fast bowlers in their current squads should suit Bell perfectly over the summer of 2014.

Bell against each bowling style in Tests
Bowling style Dismissals Average
Right-arm pace 78 45.87
Right-arm spin 36 45.41
Left-arm pace 19 33.05
Left-arm spin 13 72.15

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Comments: 6 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Neil on (June 21, 2014, 11:07 GMT)


Yeah, this is the hallmark of a great batsman: Bells series avges in last 2 years Pak. 8.50; SL27.66; WI 111.00; SA 28.80; Ind 43.00; NZ 38.25; NZ 18.24; Aus 62.44; Aus 26.11; SL 32.50

7 series out of Last 10 Bell has averaged under 40 - most of those series his average is below 30.

Posted by Neil on (June 21, 2014, 10:46 GMT)


"Yes, Bells average is just a shade over 45" - yeah, cumulative and completely skewed by 2 excellent years.

Please explain why he's struggled to avge 40 for the other years of his career, and if he's so good why his average is 36 for the last 2 years.

Posted by Andrew on (June 20, 2014, 21:35 GMT)


"averages don't lie and do tell the story" - yes, bell's average is just a shade over 45. how many other english batsmen have his weight of runs and that high an average?

"Furthermore, truly great batsmen score heavily when all around flounder - Bell has been unable to do so when the team really needed him in the last 2 years" - apart from when he won the ashes last summer scoring 20% of England's entire runs for the series and equalling the record for the most runs in a home ashes series. As the media summed it up at the time:

"at Trent Bridge, with the hosts four down in their second innings and just 66 runs ahead; on the first morning at Lord's, with England teetering at 23-3; at Durham, when England lost their third second-innings wicket with the lead at just 17. On each occasion it was Bell who first rode the punches and then inexorably forced the tourists onto the ropes. No more can he be derided for that perceived inability to score big runs under immense pressure."

Posted by Neil on (June 20, 2014, 14:35 GMT)

Averages don't lie and do tell the story. We get 4 years of mediocre batting up to 2008, then 2 years of terrific batting (dec 2009-2011) interlaced with poor returns over 3.5 years in 2008-2009 and 2012 to current. This inconsistency makes Bell a good batsman, but not world class. Furthermore, truly great batsmen score heavily when all around flounder - Bell has been unable to do so when the team really needed him in the last 2 years.

Posted by Jackie on (June 19, 2014, 23:20 GMT)

Stats don't always tell the story. Bell didn't have a poor Ashes in 2009 because he only played in 3 Tests. In two of those Tests he had a decent score and in the final one he played a game changing innings. His average was brought down because of a catastrophic collapse by the team in the 4th Test which affected all the top order. However England went on to win the Ashes, partly due to Bell's 72 in the first innings at the Oval. Australia's reply was 160 which puts it in context. He came in at 12-1 in the must win Test and scrapped to a solid partnership with Strauss. His 2010-11 Ashes did lead to great things. In 2011 he averaged 128, scoring 4 centuries, two against Sri Lanka and two against India, including a double century to add to his Ashes century at Sydney. Omitting this purple passage and starting in 2012 skews his figures somewhat. All batsmen have ups and downs. Bell is not alone. Ponting had a purple patch that lasted 18 months then averaged 30 odd for the following year.

Posted by Delan on (June 19, 2014, 21:00 GMT)

Ian Bell is a terrific talent, and done well for England. Congrats on him reaching 100 Tests. However in modern with Trott out times shame he won't take more responsibility and bat at number 3 instead of throwing a youngster in there each time, which may work against weaker attacks on flat pitches

Email Feedback Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    How Bangladesh is finding and developing its talent

Mustafizur, Mosaddek, Mehidy, Nazmul - where did they all come from? By Mohammad Isam

    It's time to rediscover Test-match batting

Mark Nicholas: England's recklessness in the name of positivity is a sign that the art of batting in the longest format is no longer given due attention

Is it possible for a Pakistani to be a fan of Ian Botham?

Imran Yusuf ponders an age-old question
The Cricket Monthly

    Nottingham's the charm

On tour in the UK, Firdose Moonda witnesses a fine comeback, visits the country's oldest pub, and squeezes in some yoga lessons

News | Features Last 3 days

No stories yet

News | Features Last 3 days

World Cup Videos