India v Australia, 1st Test, Mohali, 1st day

India overcome early struggles, again

Not for the first time at home, India recovered from a slow start to the opening day of a series to liven up the Test

ESPNcricinfo staff

October 1, 2010

Comments: 37 | Text size: A | A

Zaheer Khan appeals successfully against Simon Katich, India v Australia, 1st Test, Mohali, 1st day, October 1, 2010
Zaheer Khan was lethal with the old ball © AFP
Enlarge

Many Indians are familiar with the benefits of the Surya Namaskar, but anyone who's watched the cricket team could tell you that they're not really morning folk, especially not on the first day of a series. Comatose starts are the norm rather than the exception and the first day in Mohali was no different.

After Zaheer Khan had struck early, Ishant Sharma's lack of control was compounded by chronic no-ball problems. By the time he went off with a jarred knee, he had conceded 41 from his last 4.4 overs and Australia were cruising. Zaheer, too, lacked zip and it was left to Pragyan Ojha to keep India afloat as Australia went past 100 runs in the session.

But on Indian pitches where the ball goes soft in no time, the home team has a reputation for clawing back from hopeless situations. Australia have been at the receiving end enough times to know that. The famous Eden Gardens Test is remembered primarily for the 376-run partnership, but on the opening afternoon, Australia went from 193 for 1 to 291 for 8 in 36.3 overs.

Three years later, in Chennai, Anil Kumble took 7 for 48 as a formidable 136 for 0 after 33 overs disintegrated into 235 all out (71.3 overs). And as recently as this February, South Africa felt the full force of the Indian afternoon riposte, losing 8 for 48 after being 218 for 1.

You'd love to be a fly on the wall in the Indian dressing room at lunch on such days, but according to Ojha, who went through 31 overs on the first day, there were no reprimands or any special instructions at the interval. "We were going to bowl according to our plans, and not give them any extra runs," he said.

From 154 for 1 in 41.3 overs, Australia managed just 70 runs in the remaining 48.3, a scoring-rate you tend to associate with the darkest days of Test cricket in the 1950's and '60s. And for once, it wasn't a remarkable spell of spin bowling or reverse-swing that got India back into the game. It was something that the side is scarcely renowned for.

It's far too early to say what kind of Test batsman Suresh Raina will be. But what his inclusion in the XI has done is inject some youthful verve and athleticism to an inner ring that isn't famed for stopping quick singles. There was a moment of hesitation from Ricky Ponting's side as Shane Watson set off for the single, but it's safe to say that Australia's captain would have made his ground if it had been any of the other nine outfielders swooping down on the ball.

In Watson's mind, that was clearly the day's turning point. "It was mainly the way the Indians bowled after the unfortunate run-out of Ricky," he said. "Their fielding lifted, and they bowled a lot better too. Early on in the first session, we were able to rotate strike fairly easily, and score fairly easily as well. As soon as Ricky got run out, they really stepped up.

"It was really difficult to score. The spinners especially bowled very well. The ball goes a bit soft as well, so it's hard to really pierce the field at times. The last couple of wickets were disappointing. It's very hard to start against the reverse-swinging ball, and Zaheer is very skilled in these conditions."

As steadily and well as Ojha bowled, it was Zaheer's spell after tea that was the difference between an average day and a good one for India. "Right now, if Ishant was there, it would have been great," said Ojha, when asked about the lack of a second pace bowler once the ball started to reverse. "We don't want to look at the negatives. The other three bowlers have done brilliantly, and we also expect Ishant to come back. Zak was amazing. He did the job."

Had Australia put many more runs on the board, India would have had far more reason to regret the dropped catches that helped Watson on his way to a second Test hundred. As it was, Ojha said the team was pretty happy with the day's work. "The way we came back the last few overs was great," he said. "Getting those three or four wickets has put them under pressure."

And while Watson suggested that going wicketless would give Ojha something to ponder before day two, the man himself reckoned that he had done what was expected of him. "My role was very clear," he said. "I was trying to attack them. I had attacking fields set and was bowling at the stumps. I was trying to make them take a chance. I'm very satisfied. They haven't taken any chances against me."

Two years ago, India scored 469 in the first innings and won by a whopping 320 runs. Watson suggested that this pitch was much slower and lower, and a score in excess of 350 could still be very competitive. "It looks like it will turn after a couple of days." said Ojha. "If we stick to our line and length, we'll extract something from it. It's going to be a bit slow."

Slowness was the name of the game on the first afternoon, but the action was anything but boring. With Watson still there, Australia can dream of a big total. As for India, the question is whether to stick to the old ball or try and engineer a twist with the new one. Unfortunately for them, they might only have Zaheer to use it.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by FIPL on (October 2, 2010, 9:44 GMT)

@ hindh88 : Pakistan has always challenged every time in the world with their bowling attack, it is just their fielding (drop catches) & batting who let them down AND watch Aussie doing ings defeat to ind

Posted by   on (October 2, 2010, 8:21 GMT)

Where is RP Singh...........

Posted by Analytical_Sathya on (October 2, 2010, 6:38 GMT)

I think Munaf Patel should have been the bowling partner of Zaheer khan. These 2 are way ahead of any other fast bowlers in the country. I would rate Munaf higher because of his skill ,ability and magnificent control which is mainly due to his athleticism. He is extremely under utilised and under rated and unjustifiably ignored over very ordinary players like Sreeshanth/Ishanth..etc

Posted by Meety on (October 2, 2010, 5:51 GMT)

Also - I think India very negative with the 2nd new ball (or lack of it!). In saying that - meybe Oz will consider that too?

Posted by Meety on (October 2, 2010, 5:49 GMT)

Its not very often Oz can't make 300 let alone 250 in a days play. I know these are India's home conditions but maybe the pitch is not easy to score on and any score over 300 will win the match?????

Posted by Hindh on (October 2, 2010, 5:42 GMT)

@sabee Pak had a good bowling attack but never challenged aus for the last 15 years.

Posted by natmastak_so-called on (October 2, 2010, 5:20 GMT)

@sabee ........'ind never had strong bowling,coz they dont eat meat which makes bones stronger.' where were u mate ? I am enlightened.THHANKKS. Had a great laugh which is must in this stressful life.thanks for ur service to mankind.keep on coming.

Posted by cric_lover143 on (October 2, 2010, 3:36 GMT)

it is very hard to understand why these selectors still persist with Ishant... Agree that he had some good old days... but that doesnt make him a First choice... Sreeshanth was a better option from the current squad.. we all know that on his day he can be as lethal as any bowler in the world ( even though we rarely see it )... We all are complaining about the fact that India is lacking good fast bowlers... we do have some good talents like Unadkat ( Wasim Akram will agree ), Kamran Khan ( Shane Warne will agree ), Mithun ( proved already ), Praveen Kumar ( should be considered ).. We have to polish these talents and atleast give them chance once in a while.

Posted by gannyboy on (October 2, 2010, 1:55 GMT)

I really hope Ishant does not come out to bowl because that's the only way we can get Sachin to bowl his seam ups. Sachin has always under utilised the bowler in him.Sachin is bowler with great variety.

Posted by sabee66 on (October 2, 2010, 1:49 GMT)

Indians never had a good bowling attack coz they dont eat meat which makes the bones stronger.... their team always looks big in the papers, big names but , very disputed number one in the world... Aussies are the real champ of this game , Undisputed champs of the world love them Wato alone is enough..and young new bowlers will destroy indian batting line easily

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Tour Results
India v Australia at Margao - Oct 24, 2010
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
India v Australia at Visakhapatnam - Oct 20, 2010
India won by 5 wickets (with 7 balls remaining)
India v Australia at Kochi - Oct 17, 2010
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
India v Australia at Bangalore - Oct 9-13, 2010
India won by 7 wickets
India v Australia at Mohali - Oct 1-5, 2010
India won by 1 wicket
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days