| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Report by Siddarth Ravindran
March 4, 2013
Australia 237 for 9 dec and 74 for 2 (Ashwin 2-42) trail India 503 (Pujara 204, Vijay 167, Maxwell 4-127) by 192 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Features : Warner c Merv Hughes b Ashwin
Players/Officials:
Cheteshwar Pujara
Series/Tournaments:
Australia tour of India
|
|||
Cheteshwar Pujara and M Vijay set about breaking a bunch of records on the third morning in Hyderabad before Australia's spinners struck regularly to curtail India's innings. Like Australia offspinner Jason Krejza's wickets on Test debut in Nagpur four years ago, the breakthroughs didn't come early enough to worry India much, as the home side's lead expanded to 266.
Australia's batsmen then had their technique against spin rigorously tested in the final session, and the abundance of deliveries that spat off the pitch or shot low meant India could entertain thoughts of an innings victory. The batsmen were so tied in knots against the turning ball that in one 12-over spell, Australia made only 10 runs despite David Warner powering a six, which was cleanly taken in the stands by former fast bowler Merv Hughes.
Australia decided the way to handle the spin was to go for the sweep, but both Warner and Phillip Hughes messed up the shot to be bowled soon after R Ashwin switched to bowling over the wicket. Hughes' position in the side is becoming increasingly untenable as he remained unsure how to score against spin, gloving the ball on to his stumps for a duck. Ed Cowan survived the testing spell to remain unbeaten at stumps, with Shane Watson keeping him company.
Batting had seemed so much easier in the morning when Vijay and Pujara stretched their stand to 370 runs, India's largest second-wicket partnership and the country's fourth biggest overall. Though Vijay missed out on a double-century, Pujara underlined his reputation as a big-innings player with his second Test 200.
As on the second day, India began cautiously despite having Australia on the mat. After a handful of watchful overs in the morning though, Vijay and Pujara unfurled their strokes. Once again Australia's spinners couldn't maintain a good length early on, producing plenty of boundary balls. Pujara repeatedly played what is becoming his signature shot - the powerful cut in front of point - and Vijay played plenty of effortless and easy-on-the-eye drives.
Smart stats |
The frustration increased for Australia as a close call for lbw against Pujara was turned down off Xavier Doherty in the 106th over and a Vijay outside edge flew through the vacant first slip in the 109th.
Finally, there was some relief for Australia when the much-criticised Glenn Maxwell got one delivery to spin and bounce forcing Vijay to edge it to backward-short leg. It had been almost 110 overs since their previous wicket.
The wickets came much quicker after that. Pujara got to his double-century with a stylish on-drive - his first boundary in the V - before he fell playing a shot that has resulted in his dismissal several times in Tests already: the hook.
For the third day in a row, a healthy crowd had turned up - around 20,000 of them were in though it was a Monday - and plenty of those wanted to watch Sachin Tendulkar bat. After more than a day padded up, Tendulkar came to the middle, greeted by a defeaning roar, but he didn't last long, playing a leg-side ball off the face of the bat to the keeper, with the third umpire stepping in to determine whether there was bat involved.
MS Dhoni then showed why he's such a dangerous batsmen when a team is pushing for a declaration, hitting a series of boundaries behind point that quickly swelled India's lead past 200. He fell for a 43-ball 44 as a drilled drive was taken on the second attempt by Xavier Doherty at mid-off. Ravindra Jadeja followed to another second-attempt catch, this time Maxwell reacting sharply off his own bowling. The terrific catching continued as Cowan made amends for an earlier drop by pouching India's last remaining specialist batsman, Virat Kohli.
India's final six wickets went down for 43 runs, though there was plenty of encouragement for the home side's spinners during that phase, as the ball ripped and spun from Doherty and Maxwell. Doherty's dismissal of Ashwin, in particular, would have caught the attention of India's slow bowlers: a fizzing delivery, it bounced and took the shoulder of Ashwin's bat through to the keeper. The late wickets flattered the Australian spinners' figures a bit, with Maxwell briefly in the hunt for a five-for.
India's tweakers made an early impact far earlier in the innings to leave Australia yet again hoping for a Michael Clarke special.
Siddarth Ravindran is a senior sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
This is not a indo-aussie series,this is a speed vs Spin series..
From last two years performance of Indian team in test cricket has been poor to say the least hence good performances in both tests is a big surprise especially against Aussies which is a high quality test side.In this test Pujara and Vijay showed extreme patience in the beginning and once they got set it became easy to score when bowlers got tired.Batsman from both sides are batting in positive state of mind and with intent , only difference is that while doing so Aus batsman are losing too many wickets.Today Indian lower order batsman played too many attacking shots unnecessarily and then Warne and Hughes did the same.This just shows that majority of batsman failed to adjust according to wicket,except Clarke and Wade for Aussies,while Pujara and Vijay for India.With big lead of 266 on a deteriorating wicket,its great chance for India to go 2-0 up.We have not won series against any top test side from two years now, so as an Indian fan hoping for the best.
@RednWhiteArmy, Why would anybody with a brain move Clarke when he's scoring so many at 5? They wouldn't, as it's plain stupidity. He's hardly hiding from the "new" ball when he's constantly in at 30-3/40-3/50-3, is he? Hughes is a real disappointment on this tour, but those saying he's done well only against ordinary outfits need to revise why he was hyped in the first place - for hammering SA in their own back yard - arguably the best attack in world cricket. Not that he shouldn't go, as he clearly can't buy a run at the moment. Maxwell and Doherty are awful with the former not suitable for any form of international cricket. The selectors have got it completely wrong here and Aus will certainly pay for it as there looks like no chance of making up the deficit, let alone posting a total for India to chase.
Well. I won't say Australians didn't plan at all. They did plan and bring in a left armer in place of a right arm offie against a right hander dominated Indian batting lineup. Though he is Doherty. Atleast it stemmed the run flow a bit though wickets were not coming when it needed to. While they showed that intent in bowling department, they should have shown it in the batting lineup too. Unless you get the right left combo going on or attacking the bowlers, you are not doing anything to upset their rhythm. They just allowed the spinners to bowl and bowl on. You need to have the concentration levels of Cook or hitting ability of KP to do it. Else, go SA way. Amla and Kallis never allowed Bhajji to bowl to his plan. They made him bowl as per their mind. Bhajji was driving but in the direction decided by Amla-Kallis..
The very debate about which team is better is stupid. Australia has one modern great- Clarke and another cricketer who might go on to become great- Pattinson! Patto's performance is at least two notches higher than someone like Steve Finn in the subcontinent- and that is saying something. India has one flamboyant captain, one probable great in Pujara. Both teams are in extreme transition- Perhaps Australia's batting is a little less secure than India's, given that without Clarke they would have had a pretty bad run in the past twelve months- all the more to celebrate Clarke as the modern great than just a wonderful player. In truth, Clarke is the true successor of Brian Lara. Finally we have someone single handedly leading his team to victory- the last was Brian Charles Lara. It would be cruel to either team to go ahead and weigh them against each other. However, I would rate Clarke as a better Captain than Dhoni, which places Aus ahead too as a team!
There is something really funny here. for 371 runs Aussies could get only one wicket and then next nine for just 133 runs. Then Aussies first two fall to sweeping, and that for starters is the last shot to play. The pitch does not sound too tricky and it is possible to stay for 8 to 9 hours without losing your wicket. Let us see how things will unfold tomorrow and whether Aussies will delete sweep from their vocabulary.
@Popcorn agree 100%. Its obvious to me that none of the current batting lineup can play the sweep with any confidence so FFS stop playing it, and stop playing across the line. Virtually all the Austalian batsmen have been dismissed Not Playing Straight. It is absolutely imperative they present a vertical bat today if they are going to bat for any length of time.The tactic of sweeping worked spectacularly well for Matthew Hayden in particular in India and obviously its peceived wisdom that you have to sweep often in India to suceed. Yet Michael Clarke has shown this isn't ncessarily true, he scores runs with few if any sweeps,and it should be patently obvious to Cowan, Warner, Henriques, Wade and Watson that they should NOT be playing this shot, or indeed many cross batted shots.Khawaja got a 80 odd against Botha and Lyon earlier in the season and combined sweeping with using his feet and that's the best way to combat the spin.Now is the time for application and concentration.
Posted by Al_Bundy1 on (March 5, 2013, 0:05 GMT)Agree with @ cricketsunami - I think Indian team playing with 9 members in the team. Look at the 1st player in the team "Sehwag" last 14 innings consistently he is failing. Look at the 11th player "Ishanth Sharma" he bowled more than 60 overs without a wicket. Why are the selectors still backing these 2 non-performers?? Everybody should be made accountable - including the selectors.
Posted by Shaggy076 on (March 4, 2013, 23:57 GMT)karthik_raja - Thats too much common sense for the ICC to implement. I like the idea od slow motion replays rather than a "predictive path", that way you would only overturn the existing umpires decision with clear proof.
Posted byCowan is doing what any opening batsman should do - stay in! Sure he is scoring a little slow but he has application. With the spinners - Doherty has bowled well in trying conditions and was rewarded with 3 wickets. And Maxwell did well too. Australia needs the solidarity of George Bailey in the middle. Drop Hughes, move Clarke up one spot, then Watson, Bailey etc. It's a bit strange that Bailey doesn't seem to appear in sides when Clake is captain. Is there an issue here?