| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
January 15, 2013
India 285 for 6 (Dhoni 72, Jadeja 61*) beat England 158 (Pietersen 42, Bhuvneshwar 3-29) by 127 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Matches:
India v England at Kochi
Series/Tournaments:
England tour of India
|
|||
Kochi, in tourist terms at least, is the gateway to the backwaters but India, 1-0 down in the ODI series with four to play, were in no mood to take that journey. MS Dhoni, impassioned not just with the bat but just as strikingly in every aspect of his captaincy, made that abundantly clear with every muscle flexed and every order barked and it was England who were sunk without trace in a 127-run defeat.
England's pursuit of 286 always looked a daunting task and it became an improbable one from the moment that Bhuvneshwar Kumar removed Kevin Pietersen and Eoin Morgan in the space of three balls in an outstanding new-ball spell. There is nothing like a humid evening in Kochi to perk up a swing bowler and Bhuvneshwar, a 22-year-old from Uttar Pradesh playing in only his fifth ODI, also summoned impressive stamina as Dhoni ran his 10-over spell through without interruption and was rewarded with his best international figures of 3 for 29.
But the match had swung India's way much earlier than that - and it was Dhoni, a captain deemed to be under pressure, and Ravindra Jadeja who were at the heart of it. England had sensed they held an element of control, at the very least, for much of India's innings but 108 runs from the last 10 overs, 68 from the last five, shook that notion to the core.
As so often, Dhoni was left to plot a route to victory, wresting control from England's attack with 72 from 66 balls. He creates his own virtuous circle, creating a febrile atmosphere and then feeding off it, in turn causing a crowd of around 70,000 to roar with even greater intensity. He fell four balls from the end of the innings when he sliced Dernbach to Joe Root at deep cover - a suitable end because Dernbach's unwavering policy of bowling wide to him outside off stump had been England's most effective counter.
India approached the last 10 overs in unconvincing shape, at 177 for 5, having been confounded in the batting Powerplay by the variations of Dernbach and Steven Finn, which conceded only 21 runs in five overs and dismissed their batting mainstay, Suresh Raina, in the process.
Dhoni had failed to manage India's run chase in Rajkot, holing out at long-off against Dernbach's slower ball. He received a near-replica in the closing overs but this time his hands were fast and his brain quicksilver and he muscled it well beyond the boundary rope. It was a statement about how things would be different this time.
What Dhoni stirred, Jadeja delivered, rounding things off by taking 14 from Dernbach's last three deliveries to finish with an unbeaten 61 from 37 balls. They were impressive statistics for a batsman who had been overshadowed until the last. As for Dernbach, for all his relative success against Dhoni, he still spilled 73 from nine overs.
Smart stats |
For Chris Woakes, who was playing his first ODI in India after his late inclusion for the injured Tim Bresnan, it was an examination far beyond anything he had ever experienced. He thought he had Dhoni caught at the wicket when he had made 6 from nine balls but it was impossible for the umpire Vineet Kulkarni to hear a nick in such a din and normal-speed TV replays, which were all that were shown, made things no clearer.
Raina had made 55 from 78 balls before he dragged on a pull at Finn and departed bashing the peak of his helmet with his bat in frustration, just as Virat Kohil had done earlier when he flayed Woakes to the cover boundary. Raina prospered primarily against the offspin of James Tredwell, two slog sweeps for six representing the highlight of his innings, and ensured that Tredwell, who took four wickets in the opening ODI in Rajkot, did not repeat the mayhem. As for England's bonus allrounder in the opening match, Joe Root, who bowled nine overs relatively unscathed, there was no encore.
India's opening pair did not survive long, Gautam Gambhir and Ajinkya Rahane both departing by the fifth over. Finn and Dernbach, also impressive with the new ball, had clamoured for several lbw appeals before they prospered by hitting the stumps.
Dernbach's nip-backer to bowl Gambhir through the gate was a delivery made to order. There are few more productive, or less convincing, shots in ODIs than Gambhir's dab through gully for four, bat hanging away from his body and he had played it the previous ball much to the bowler's frustration. The ball that cut back was the classic retort. Finn also brought a delivery back in his next over, late inswing accounting for Rahane as he shuffled across his crease.
India's frustration grew when Yuvraj Singh fell to an erroneous lbw decision by Steve Davis, who did not see - and, like Kulkarni in the case of Dhoni, certainly could not hear in such a deafening atmosphere - a deflection off the glove as he swept at Tredwell. With no DRS in use, Yuvraj had to take his punishment, although he did not do so without a stray comment or two.
So, for that matter, did Alastair Cook in England's reply, with Bhuvneshwar fortunate to win an lbw decision with a delivery that pitched outside leg stump. Cook should have been run out on 17 when Jadeja failed to pick up cleanly at midwicket to take advantage of complete confusion between Pietersen and Cook over a leg-side single. Dhoni's annoyance was clear, but Bhuvneshwar's eighth over had an impact on the course of the match and the captain's mood.
First Pietersen (42 from 44 balls) was bowled by one that jagged back as he sought to run into the off side and two balls later Bhuvneshwar found movement away from the left-handed Morgan from a good length and Dhoni dived to claim one his finest catches against England this winter, in what has been a somewhat troubled wicketkeeping sequence.
England, four down for 74 by the 17th over, had much rebuilding to do. But the ball turned for India's spinners and it was jerry-built stuff. Craig Kieswetter and Joe Root assessed a while then both got out, Kieswetter unimpressively as he pushed a short ball from R Ashwin to midwicket, Root sliced apart by Jadeja's arm ball. Woakes' managed a second-ball duck - another Jadeja arm ball to enhance his excellent match -and England's tail quickly subsided, in no doubt about the extent of the challenge ahead.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
David Hopps joined ESPNcricinfo as UK editor early in 2012. For the previous 20 years he was a senior cricket writer for the Guardian and covered England extensively during that time in all Test-playing nations. He also covered four Olympic Games and has written several cricket books, including collections of cricket quotations. He has been an avid amateur cricketer since he was 12, and so knows the pain of repeated failure only too well. The pile of untouched novels he plans to read, but rarely gets around to, is now almost touching the ceiling. He divides his time between the ESPNcricinfo office in Hammersmith and his beloved Yorkshire.
Online Money Transfer, 3 easy steps
Confirmed exchange rates. Register now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
A comfortable victory for India. Dhoni is now a relieved person, but there are still few things that are to be sorted out: 1. poor form of openers , i think its time to replace gambhir with someone like shikar dhawan 2. Indian fast bowlers have to bowl yorkers consistently in death overs . Positives from this match are : 1. Kohli has regained his touch to some extent 2. Ashwin's form has also improved 3. Atlast jadeja has proved his worth as an all rounder...
On the game, the Indian's played really well at the back end of their innings and that killed us in the end just too many runs on that pitch, probably about 40/50 too man tbh. Their was just no room for mistake by the bowlers at the end, particularly Finn who bowled a few great deliveries that ended going the distancey. Good innings from Jadeja as well, who turned up for India eventually. England was always under the pump from the start and the trouble is playing shots in those first 20 overs against the moving ball on a up and down pitch is going to massively hard, as both sides found. Trouble was for England they had to maintain the run rate and take risks all the way through the game. Losing Bell so soon, then Morgan and Cook and KP not going on finished the game off. Dernbach as to go now it's getting silly, bring Briggs in and if we should have bowled Woakes up front and all his 10 overs in one go where he was most effective.
Looks like India has got their answer to an allrounder in the form of Ravindra Jadeja atleast for the limited overs format. Way to go SIR R Jadeja...lol.. Seriously good innings. Hope you become consistent. Dhoni is in the form of his life in ODi's n still he is persisting to come lower down the order. I am sure he wants to steady the ship when things go terribly wrong, but I would like to see him come up the oder when situation demands or just once every 3-4 games simply to take the game away from the opposition. Would like to see the Dhoni of old back but that would just remain a dream as he has additional responsibility of being a captain. Good show Team India. Keep up the good work.
I like Ajinkya Rahane but to those who were so vociferous in asking for a place for Pujara should see how Rahane has done so far, even though he's played a few ODIs. Some ppl wanted Pujara to open in place of Gambhir leaving us with 2 inexp openers. I hope you all can now see how tough it would be for a debutant and even tougher if he was asked to bat at an unusual position.
I am sure Rahane will go along way cos he is very talented and should succeed. But one should not ask for experiments for the sake of experiments. Pujara will get a chance soon, but not just cos he is there. Even though Indian batsmen are not in form as of now, I don't think it would be wise to drop anyone of them to play Pujara.
The only 1 who may be dropped is Gambhir but we'd need an opener to replace him. If someone can open there for eg Kohli then Pujara should play, not otherwise.
I think you guys need to easy down on Dhoni
1. Swap Gambhir with Pujara whom is in excellent form atm. Gambhir is experienced but he's had his run. 2. It's good Rohit Sharma has been removed. 3. Ishant Sharma has been too expensive recently, the magic he produced in Australia years ago has long gone and Dhoni needs to forget about it. 4. I think Dhoni should look at Australias method whereby if a person is out of a form they should be forced to sit out till their form improves. No point having someone out of form in the team. You should always bring in your best XI from the country of 1 billion people.
Hey mates Shan and Harmony, Chillax! Both of you are good enough in debates. Just chillax no?
Posted by Shan156 on (January 18, 2013, 17:23 GMT)"Posted by Harmony111 on (January 15 2013, 21:57 PM GMT)"
Now, what was that Botham said that was offensive to Indian fans? He simply says he expects England's reign to last 5-8 years. How is that offensive to Indian fans? He was simply being positive about his team's chances in the next few years, correct?
Then, read this one
Posted by Harmony111 on (January 17 2013, 16:07 PM GMT)
Here you claim that Kohli was being positive about his team's chances. So, if Botham is positive that England will be on top for the next 5-8 years, then it is offensive. But, if Kohli says that India will beat England 4-0 at home, then it is not. They are both talking big about your team which is not such a bad thing although a little over-ambitious. Although, for the record, I think neither are offensive. You think one of them is. I leave it to others here to decide who got exposed here.
Posted by Shan156 on (January 18, 2013, 15:49 GMT)@Harmony111, What about the first issue Mister? I have explained it before. I have no intention of explaining it again. You just want to argue for argument sake. It does not make any sense. I initially thought of having a genuine conversation but it looks like you are just an attention seeker who is interested in exposing others double standards. The fact is all you have exposed here is your childish behavior.
Just for the record, I didn't change my opinion. I never said in the first place that I considered comments from any cricketer as offensive. I don't have any need to prove anything to you or anyone. Yes, let anyone who reads these comments figure out for themselves.
I should have stuck with my original decision not to reply to you. I just wasted a lot of time here. Anyway, lesson learnt.
Posted by Harmony111 on (January 18, 2013, 14:16 GMT)@Shan156:
Having the last word is hardly the objective here.
I don't mind ppl who change their opinions. In fact I believe we should be flexible. But changing your opinion just to suit your current argument is merely being opportunistic. If you change your opinion cos u changed in a fundamental way then its good but its not good if you jump from O1 to O2 to O8 as per the arguments of the other side.
Let's leave it to those who may read these comments to decide who was exposed and who had double standards and who made more sense.
Posted by Harmony111 on (January 18, 2013, 13:38 GMT)@Shan156: You wanted me to show your double standards to you. I did just that @16:07 regarding your selective criticism/taking offense of typical comments of Kohli/Raina/GG while you said nothing about Hussain/Vaughan/Bresnan's comments and in fact used the former to justify/nullify the latter.
Now when I've done that you again shifted your ground and now want me to prove something else. Instead of admitting that yes you were selective you now want me to move on to the next one. What about the 1st issue Mister?
That Eng'd beaten Ind at Home was said in 2011 too after 0-5. Even here, right after the 2nd ODI, the same line was used - by others and by you too. What else can I say now...
As for the E1-E2 thing, If I talk of Cute Lab Pups then u talking about Cute Kittens would be understandable but u suddenly talking about Barbers would be weird. Are you weird? The context would be obvious - Cuteness & Offense.
Thus, u did say E2 was offensive just like E1 but then @02:33 u reverted.