Virender Sehwag's 100th Test

A match-winner in the subcontinent

Although Virender Sehwag's overall batting stats are extremely impressive, the downside is that a vast majority of his runs came on batting-friendly tracks in the subcontinent

Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan

November 21, 2012

Comments: 16 | Text size: A | A

Virender Sehwag lofts one down the ground, Australia v India, 1st Test, Melbourne, 2nd day, December 27, 2011
Virender Sehwag averages 60.57 in the subcontinent but only 35.84 in matches outside Asia © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links

For a batsman who scored a century at No.6 on debut and prefers to bat in the middle order, Virender Sehwag has had an incredibly successful career as a Test opener. Sehwag's aggressive style of batting and potential to rack up massive scores place him in an elite list of match-winning Test batsmen. Sehwag, who is poised to become the ninth Indian players to feature in 100 Tests, is the joint-quickest to the 7000-run mark in terms of matches (79). He is also one of only four batsmen (Don Bradman, Brian Lara and Chris Gayle being the others) to register two 300-plus scores in Tests. Despite his form outside the subcontinent dropping off alarmingly in the last few years, he still remains one of the most feared batsmen in the Indian line-up considering his ability to score at a fast clip off both pace and spin.

In 99 Tests so far, Sehwag has scored 8448 runs at an average of 50.89. Among Indian batsmen who have played 100 Tests and scored 7000-plus runs, only Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid and Sunil Gavaskar have a higher average and century tally than Sehwag. However, Sehwag's ratio of centuries to fifties (0.71) is the third-highest in the group behind those of Tendulkar (0.78) and Gavaskar (0.75). Sehwag's batting stats are sharply skewed towards the first innings, which shows he has been superb at setting up matches for India. In the team first innings, Sehwag's average of 64.95 is by far the highest among Indian batsmen who have scored at least 4000 runs in the first innings. In the team's second innings (third and fourth innings of the match), his average of 30.80 is the lowest among batsmen with 2000-plus second-innings runs. A further indicator of the first-innings bias is the fact that only one of Sehwag's 23 centuries has come in the team's second innings.

Indian batsmen who've played 100 Tests and scored 7000+ runs
Batsman Matches Runs Average 100s/50s
Sachin Tendulkar 191 15546 54.93 51/65
Rahul Dravid 164 13288 52.31 36/63
VVS Laxman 134 8781 45.97 17/56
Sunil Gavaskar 125 10122 51.12 34/45
Sourav Ganguly 113 7212 42.17 16/35
Virender Sehwag 99 8448 50.89 23/32

Throughout his career, Sehwag has established himself as one of the most destructive opening batsmen. He has showcased his ability to score rapidly on more than one occasion in home and away Tests. One of his finest knocks outside the subcontinent was the 195 he made on the opening day of the Boxing Day Test in 2003 at the MCG. He twice scored over 300 (Multan and Chennai) and fell short by seven runs on a third occasion (Mumbai 2009). Among opening batsmen with 6000-plus runs, Sehwag's average of 51.72 is second only to Len Hutton's 56.47. All but one of Sehwag's centuries have come when he has opened the innings. Sehwag's ratio of centuries to fifties (0.73) is, however, fourth on the list ahead of Hutton and Alastair Cook.

Opening batsmen with the best average (min 6000 runs)
Batsman Matches Runs Average 100s/50s
Len Hutton 76 6721 56.47 19/31
Virender Sehwag 94 8069 51.72 22/30
Matthew Hayden 103 8625 50.73 30/29
Graeme Smith 100 8112 50.38 25/32
Sunil Gavaskar 119 9607 50.29 33/42
Alastair Cook 77 6194 48.39 19/27

In the first five years of his career (2001-2006), Sehwag was a highly consistent performer in overseas Tests too. Although his style of batting was far more successful in subcontinent conditions, he averaged 41.02 outside the subcontinent during that phase. In the subcontinent, he averaged 57.26 with eight centuries. His strike rates in the subcontinent (74.93) and outside (77.04) were well below his career mark of 82.45. In the second phase of his career (2007-2012), Sehwag struggled to score outside the subcontinent and managed just one century (Adelaide in 2008). His average outside the subcontinent plummeted to 29.41. However, he encountered no such problems in matches played in the subcontinent. In the last five years, Sehwag has scored ten centuries in 33 Tests at an average of 63.34 and an incredible strike rate of 95.34. His overall numbers also point to a dominant run in the subcontinent (average 60.57 with 18 centuries) as opposed to outside Asia (average 35.84 with five centuries).

Two phases of Sehwag's career
Period Venue Matches Runs Average 100/50 SR
Phase 1 (debut-2006) In subcontinent 30 2634 57.26 8/8 74.93
Phase 1 (debut-2006) Outside subcontinent 21 1477 41.02 4/4 77.04
Phase 2 (2007-2012) In subcontinent 33 3484 63.34 10/16 95.34
Phase 2 (2007-2012) Outside subcontinent 15 853 29.41 1/4 73.53
Overall In subcontinent 63 6118 60.57 18/24 85.33
Overall Outside subcontinent 36 2330 35.84 5/8 75.72

Sehwag started his career with a bang scoring a century on debut against South Africa. His record against them through his career has also been excellent although most of the significant performances have come in India. While he averages 84 in India (four centuries), he has managed an average of 25.46 in South Africa with one century. Against Australia, Sehwag has had a much more even run home and away (average 40.15 and 46.86 respectively). Sehwag's worst record is against England: he averages 33.23 in home Tests and 27.80 in Tests in England. Against New Zealand too, he has a top-class record at home (average 63.90) but has been ordinary in away games (average 20.00).

His record against the two major subcontinent teams (Pakistan and Sri Lanka) is superb both home and away. Against Pakistan, Sehwag has scored four centuries overall and averages 91.14. Five of his 23 centuries have come in matches against Sri Lanka. While he averages 78.14 in five home Tests against Sri Lanka, his record in Sri Lanka is also equally good (average 69.20 with three centuries). Overall, against top teams (excluding Bangladesh and Zimbabwe), Sehwag averages 57.71 at home (13 centuries) and 45.08 in away Tests (ten centuries).

Sehwag's record against top teams home and away
Opposition Matches/Runs (h) Avg, 100/50 (h) Matches/Runs (a)
Avg, 100/50 (a) Matches/Runs (overall) Avg, 100/50 (overall)
Australia 10/763 40.15, 1/5 11/1031 46.86, 2/5 21/1794 43.75, 3/10
England 8/432 33.23, 1/3 6/278 27.80, 1/1 14/710 30.86, 2/4
New Zealand 7/703 63.90, 2/3 5/180 20.00, 0/0 12/883 44.15, 2/3
Pakistan 3/544 90.66, 2/1 6/732 91.50, 2/1 9/1276 91.14, 4/2
South Africa 7/924 84.00, 4/1 8/382 25.46, 1/1 15/1306 50.23, 5/2
Sri Lanka 5/547 78.14, 2/1 6/692 69.20, 3/2 11/1239 72.88, 5/3
West Indies 6/531 53.10, 1/4 4/357 51.00, 1/1 10/888 52.23, 2/5
Overall 46/4444 57.71, 13/18 46/3652 45.08, 10/11 92/8096 51.24, 23/29

A stand-out aspect of Sehwag's career has been his ability to score big centuries. Of his 23 centuries, 14 have been scores of 150 or more. He has also scored two triple-centuries and four double-centuries. Among batsmen who have scored at least 8000 runs, Sehwag's 150-plus scores as a percentage of his hundreds (60.86) is the highest. Lara (55.88%) and Kumar Sangakkara (53.33%) are second and third respectively. Among batsmen with ten or more 150-plus scores, only Bradman has a higher 150-plus score percentage (62.09) than that of Sehwag. Owing to his attacking style, Sehwag's average in 150-plus knocks only) is the lowest on the list (225.61). In contrast, a high percentage of not-outs has ensured a much higher average for David Gower (343.50) and Steve Waugh (328.71).

Highest % of 150-plus scores
Batsman Inns 100s 150-plus % of 150-plus Avg (in 150-plus knocks)
Don Bradman 80 29 18 62.06 254.12
Virender Sehwag 172 23 14 60.86 225.61
Brian Lara 232 34 19 55.88 239.17
Kumar Sangakkara 190 30 16 53.33 295.81
Mahela Jayawardene 224 31 14 45.16 226.53
David Gower 204 18 8 44.44 343.50
Steve Waugh 260 32 14 43.75 328.71

Sehwag's strike rate of 82.45 is easily the best among batsmen who have scored 2000-plus runs (Tests since 1995). Adam Gilchrist, who is second on the overall list, has a much higher strike rate for 100-plus knocks (96.64) than Sehwag (83.49). Sehwag has also scored six centuries at a strike rate greater than 100. Only Gilchrist (seven scores) has done so more often than Sehwag. The boundary-run percentage (in 100-plus knocks) for Sehwag (62.36) is below Gilchrist's (64.38) but well ahead of Lara's corresponding figure of 55.70.

Batsmen with best strike rates since 1995 (100-plus scores only)
Batsman Centuries Strike rate Inns with SR of 100 or more % boundary runs
Adam Gilchrist 17 96.64 7 64.38
Virender Sehwag 23 83.49 6 62.36
Kevin Pietersen 21 73.53 1 54.78
Tillakaratne Dilshan 13 72.69 0 49.44
Sanath Jayasuriya 14 71.85 0 55.43
Brian Lara 30 68.35 2 55.70

With Gautam Gambhir, Sehwag formed one of the most prolific opening combinations in Tests. In 82 innings, the pair averaged 53.72 with 11 century stands. Sehwag also had a very fruitful association with Rahul Dravid. They are one of only three batting pairs to share a 400-run opening stand (410 in Lahore 2006). In his partnerships with Dravid, however, Sehwag was the more dominant batsman scoring nearly 63% of the runs. The Tendulkar-Sehwag partnership began with a century stand on Sehwag's debut in 2001 and continued to thrive. In 23 innings, the partnership aggregate was 1560 runs at an average of 67.82. Sehwag, who also forged successful partnerships with Aakash Chopra and M Vijay, never quite managed the same with VVS Laxman. In 18 innings, the pair managed an aggregate of just 529 runs at an average of 29.38 with a solitary century stand.

Partnership stats for Sehwag (min 500 runs)
Partner Innings Runs Avg 100/50 stands
Gautam Gambhir 82 4244 53.72 11/24
Rahul Dravid 60 3405 58.70 10/11
Sachin Tendulkar 23 1560 67.82 4/5
Wasim Jaffer 28 1031 36.82 3/4
Aakash Chopra 19 897 47.21 4/2
M Vijay 13 839 64.53 3/1
VVS Laxman 18 529 29.38 1/2

When Sehwag's stats against pace and spin are compared, quite a few interesting numbers emerge. In the subcontinent, Sehwag was exceptionally good against spinners. Not only is his average against the slow bowlers very high (86.58), the balls-per-dismissal figure is also good (93.70). His scoring rate (5.54) and boundary-run percentage (61.69) against spinners are also excellent. Against pace bowlers in the subcontinent, he has been dismissed far more often (68 times) and averages 56.42. He has a lower value of balls-per-dismissal (69.01) and scoring rate (4.90) but a higher boundary-run percentage (66.25) as compared to his corresponding numbers against spin.

Sehwag has been vulnerable in conditions which offer lateral movement and as a result, his numbers outside the subcontinent are poorer. He has been dismissed 48 times by fast bowlers and averages 39.41. Both the balls-per-dismissal (54.67) and scoring rate (4.32) are much lower than the stats in subcontinent Tests. Surprisingly, his numbers against spinners outside the subcontinent are ordinary. While his scoring rate of 6.21 is superb, the aggressive approach has meant that he has been dismissed far more often (balls-per-dismissal value of 22.75) and averages just 23.58. Overall, Sehwag's average and scoring rate against pace bowlers (49.38 and 4.69) are well below his corresponding numbers against spinners (65.58 and 5.61). The bowlers who have had the most success against Sehwag are Dale Steyn (seven dismissals), Ben Hilfenhaus and Matthew Hoggard (six dismissals each).

Sehwag v pace and spin (excluding matches against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe)
Bowler type Venue Dismissals Avg Balls per dismissal Scoring rate Boundary %
Pace subcontinent 68 56.42 69.01 4.90 66.25
Spin subcontinent 24 86.58 93.70 5.54 61.69
Pace outside subcontinent 48 39.41 54.67 4.32 63.53
Spin outside subcontinent 12 23.58 22.75 6.21 57.24
Pace Overall 116 49.38 63.08 4.69 65.35
Spin Overall 36 65.58 70.06 5.61 61.16

Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan is a sub-editor (stats) at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (November 22, 2012, 22:54 GMT)

22 centuries and 30 fifties... All 52 Innings have been game changers and are a treat to remember... Some of the Golden Greats don't even have 25 magical innings that changed the course of the match under their belt. Sehwag in this aspect is an all time great in my view...

Posted by Jose on (November 22, 2012, 20:09 GMT)

The most important table in the article is "Two Phases of Sehwag's Career". Sehwag's average dipped during the the 1st phase of outside the subcontinent in comparison to 1st phase (from 41.02 to 29.41). First of all, It indicates that he has the potential to bat well outside the sub-continent also. I think that his poor fitness in England and spat with Dhoni in Aus played on his mind to some extent.

In addition, IPL has spoiled Indian batsmen and not giving chance to participate in foreign counties. Viru used to play for Leicestershire, but later BCCI denied him to play for an English county.

I am sure if he is back to form, he can push his outside subcontinent average back to 40+ or even more. All he needs is bit more patience and good support especially from his skipper.

Posted by   on (November 22, 2012, 17:28 GMT)

@vaidy if sehwag is not great , then noone is great.. jus look at the entertainment factor he brings to the game.. will u glue yourself to ur TV sets if yur so-called technically efficient batsman play a long innings..??? eg.rahul dravid, mahela jayawardena etc.. no offense meant for them though.. if playing a high risk game with a strike rate of over 82 and average of 50 in 100 testmatches is not great, then i wonder what would be one?

Posted by shreemanta on (November 22, 2012, 17:20 GMT)

Forget what the stats says, Viru is the only batsman to chance the face of "Test Cricket". He has shown that cricket at the highest level is a mental sport. Scoring 23 Test Hundreds is not a joke or a fluke and that too as a opening batsmen and every sportsman is a lion in there on den, so what's wrong in Viru being so..... There is, was and will only ONE Viru in any format of Cricket.... and just don't forget his 219 in a ODI against the Windies.. In 2002 ~03 when we were searching for openers he was the only one to accept the challenge and that requires a lot of courage with a capital "C" and mental toughness. It's very easy to bat in a 1 day format and in t20 format. Test Cricket is the toughest and the most real format of Cricket and he has set a benchmark...... All the best Viru..... Go for at least 35 "Test Hundreds" ........

Posted by GRVJPR on (November 22, 2012, 13:20 GMT)

The writer has missed his most striking aspect , and that is strike rate of over 85. At that strike rate to muster these sort of averages is mighty difficult no matter where the runs are scored. Also about his away average - the averages of Opposition openers is below him in those matches which shows the state of pitches offered to Indian Team, even home openers struggled

Posted by dharme999 on (November 22, 2012, 13:18 GMT)

Stop critising him,if u think ponting,kallis,hayden,gavaskar,richards are greater than this master,than compare their contribution in entertainment with viru..Richard took 120 tests for his 8500..and Sehwag has done it in 100..than who is more consistent...How many centuries ponting had hit on flat indian tracks?If sunny was greater than him than why he played 174 for his 36 in 1975 WC..That are some reasons so why he is arguably the greatest entertainer of our time...He ownly explained his true batsmanship with his skills..

Posted by Fast_Track_Bully on (November 22, 2012, 12:04 GMT)

He may not be greatest, but you cannot ignore him. He wicket is most wanted for the bowlers.

Posted by tntn on (November 22, 2012, 11:32 GMT)

@vaidy: You may agree good ,great are all adjectives which will change from one individual to another. we need some match winners and he is one. scores fast, sets up a game for big innings total and genuinely gives our bowlers the runs to back their skill.

Posted by harishk19812007 on (November 22, 2012, 11:20 GMT)

If subcontinent conditions is batting friendly how many of these so called batting greats from Australia, England & south Africa has prospered in same conditions & if they are so great in so called "tough conditions" & so much "technically sound"...shouldn't they be scoring at a strike rate of 300+ ???????? this question goes to Bradman & Gilchrist & so slef acclaimed greats by ther respective country men....soooo stop making comments like flat track bullies.... its absolutely ridiculous & utter non sense.....I am a sehwag fan & he is extraordinary & if these so proclaimed people are great i think sehwag is the greatest coz he opened the innings against the new ball (most of his career)& always in test cricket the best bowlers in the team ALWAYS open bowling when athey are fresh & the other so called greats hide behind the openers & score when the bowlers are either tired or over confident after getting couple of wickets..overall Sehwag is a great player, everyone has lean patches.

Posted by harishk19812007 on (November 22, 2012, 11:20 GMT)

If subcontinent conditions is batting friendly how many of these so called batting greats from Australia, England & south Africa has prospered in same conditions & if they are so great in so called "tough conditions" & so much "technically sound"...shouldn't they be scoring at a strike rate of 300+ ???????? this question goes to Bradman & Gilchrist & so slef acclaimed greats by ther respective country men....soooo stop making comments like flat track bullies.... its absolutely ridiculous & utter non sense.....I am a sehwag fan & he is extraordinary & if these so proclaimed people are great i think sehwag is the greatest coz he opened the innings against the new ball (most of his career)& always in test cricket the best bowlers in the team ALWAYS open bowling when athey are fresh & the other so called greats hide behind the openers & score when the bowlers are either tired or over confident after getting couple of wickets..overall Sehwag is a great player, everyone has lean patches.

Posted by bingorighton on (November 22, 2012, 11:13 GMT)

batting friendly conditions ? if india scores big on a pitch , the pitch is bad, if australia smash 482 in a day, their batting was superior, if visiting team collapses for 91 in india, pitch is doctored, if indian team collapses for 100 on foreign pitches, indian team is poor.....clarke scores 2 double centuries, but these are sporting wickets, and he is genuine class batsman, sehwag scores 100 in home country and he is a flat track bully ? FAIR ENOUGH!!!!!!!!

Posted by trueanalyst on (November 22, 2012, 9:23 GMT)

Stop all these nonsense of batting friendly conditions of Subcontinent,Just tell how many matches in subcontinent that he has played have resulted in draws.Batting friendly conditions must be friendly to the opposing team also.His double century in Galle against Srilanka was a masterpiece.How many runs did Brian lara & Ricky ponting score in these batting friendly conditions.

Posted by vaidy on (November 22, 2012, 9:18 GMT)

@tntn - nothing wrong. It is the difference between good and great....

Posted by ooper_cut on (November 22, 2012, 8:52 GMT)

57.71 and 45.08 is not bad at all for home and away. Now people want to distinguish further by saying Asia & away, wonder how low can we get to criticize our sportsmen who have entertained us a lot. I am dead sure he gives a damn about these stats or the critics saying he is a flat track bully. Everyone is welcome to try the same.

Posted by zan_69 on (November 22, 2012, 8:38 GMT)

Still cant compare with Great Kumar Sangakara

Posted by tntn on (November 22, 2012, 8:29 GMT)

Why is there so much crib about a 35 + average outside of India? How many english /aus and SA batsman have an average which is bordering on these nos in their own country ?

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Madhusudhan RamakrishnanClose
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days