India news June 20, 2013

Srinivasan part of BCCI delegation at ICC conference

The BCCI will be represented by three senior officials at the ICC's annual conference in London from June 25 to 29 because of the recent change in structure at the top-most level of the board. N Srinivasan, who has temporarily stepped aside as BCCI president, Jagmohan Dalmiya, who is in charge of the board's day-to-day functioning and the secretary Sanjay Patel will be in attendance.

Two officials from each of the ten Full Members of the ICC usually attend the conference. However, since Srinivasan stopped participating in the BCCI's administration until the probe into the betting charges against his son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan, a top Chennai Super Kings official, is completed, Dalmiya could represent the BCCI.

The ICC board consists of the president or chairman from each of the ten Full Members plus three Associate representatives. Also present at the meetings is the ICC president, who chairs proceedings and the ICC chief executive. The ICC board ratifies all major decisions taken during the conference.

Srinivasan is set to attend the meetings of three sub-committees of which he is a member: the ICC's finance and commercial affairs committee, the nominations committee and the HR and remuneration committee. Despite the wariness of BCCI members, led by IS Bindra who explained his opposition to Srinivasan attending the meeting on his website and Twitter page, Srinivasan will take part in these meetings.

"We are hearing that Srinivasan will leave for London immediately after attending the TNCA [Tamil Nadu Cricket Association] AGM on June 23. It will end up further damaging his own image and that of the BCCI if he actually ends up attending the annual conference," a chief of a BCCI affiliated unit told ESPNcricinfo.

The Chief Executives meeting, however, will be attended by the secretary Patel. "Traditionally, the BCCI secretary attends the CEC meeting and there will be no change in this tradition," a board official said.

The CEC comprises the Chief Executives of the ten Full Member nations as well as three Associate representatives. Also present is the ICC chief executive, who chairs the meeting and, by invitation, the ICC president and chairman of the ICC Cricket Committee.

Despite the BCCI's opposition to DRS, there is likely to be a move for it to be implemented in every Test. The issue will first be discussed in the Chief Executives' meeting, so Patel, who along with BCCI treasurer Ravi Savant was in Chennai - Srinivasan's hometown - on Wednesday, will have to reiterate board's stand.

Amol Karhadkar is a correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on June 21, 2013, 10:26 GMT

    Mr. Srinivasan attending the ICC meeting is a bad precedent. He was forced to step down from presidency of BCCI in view of conflict of interest and other issues raised recently. So till the correct picture does not emerge pending the enquiry, he should not have been allowed to attend the meeting .

  • ladycricfan on June 21, 2013, 8:39 GMT

    To oppose drs is a collective decision taken by the bcci. Srinivasan or anybody from bcci who attend the icc meet will oppose drs. Drs is not perfect yet. Imagine if one review is wasted by an opening batsman in the odi, the rest 10 players will have to play without drs. What's the point in having an expensive technology if the umpires decisions are accepted 10/11 th of the match. Number of reviews should be increased. Why can't they use the drs everytime when a batsman is given out and 2 or 3 reviews allowed for the fielding side?

  • simpleguy2008 on June 21, 2013, 7:02 GMT

    Bad decision taken by BCCI for srinivasan to attend the meeting because the same problem DRS issue will come he will again say no to DRS which is not good for the game of cricket because other teams will be suffering without DRS so i think ICC shouldn't go with Srinivasan and they should implement the DRS in all test and one day cricket with 2 or 3 reviews and if BCCI threaten to do any stupid think let them do.

  • srinideva on June 21, 2013, 6:15 GMT

    Fair decision, I don`t know why media is too much interested in this type of issue...Do you think he is going to interfere CSK termination in ICC meeting... Get a life and move on...#Politics #India

  • on June 20, 2013, 20:25 GMT

    It is the correct decision taken by BCCI members. Mr. Srinivasan has done no wrong and why the media is still trying to be against him is a question. He is the only bold face who has made the media a dummy horse. Media should understand that they cannot take all issues like politics and play with good people. Their noise works with Indian politics but not with cricket, that is what Mr. Srinivasan is proving now and again.

  • on June 21, 2013, 10:26 GMT

    Mr. Srinivasan attending the ICC meeting is a bad precedent. He was forced to step down from presidency of BCCI in view of conflict of interest and other issues raised recently. So till the correct picture does not emerge pending the enquiry, he should not have been allowed to attend the meeting .

  • ladycricfan on June 21, 2013, 8:39 GMT

    To oppose drs is a collective decision taken by the bcci. Srinivasan or anybody from bcci who attend the icc meet will oppose drs. Drs is not perfect yet. Imagine if one review is wasted by an opening batsman in the odi, the rest 10 players will have to play without drs. What's the point in having an expensive technology if the umpires decisions are accepted 10/11 th of the match. Number of reviews should be increased. Why can't they use the drs everytime when a batsman is given out and 2 or 3 reviews allowed for the fielding side?

  • simpleguy2008 on June 21, 2013, 7:02 GMT

    Bad decision taken by BCCI for srinivasan to attend the meeting because the same problem DRS issue will come he will again say no to DRS which is not good for the game of cricket because other teams will be suffering without DRS so i think ICC shouldn't go with Srinivasan and they should implement the DRS in all test and one day cricket with 2 or 3 reviews and if BCCI threaten to do any stupid think let them do.

  • srinideva on June 21, 2013, 6:15 GMT

    Fair decision, I don`t know why media is too much interested in this type of issue...Do you think he is going to interfere CSK termination in ICC meeting... Get a life and move on...#Politics #India

  • on June 20, 2013, 20:25 GMT

    It is the correct decision taken by BCCI members. Mr. Srinivasan has done no wrong and why the media is still trying to be against him is a question. He is the only bold face who has made the media a dummy horse. Media should understand that they cannot take all issues like politics and play with good people. Their noise works with Indian politics but not with cricket, that is what Mr. Srinivasan is proving now and again.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on June 20, 2013, 20:25 GMT

    It is the correct decision taken by BCCI members. Mr. Srinivasan has done no wrong and why the media is still trying to be against him is a question. He is the only bold face who has made the media a dummy horse. Media should understand that they cannot take all issues like politics and play with good people. Their noise works with Indian politics but not with cricket, that is what Mr. Srinivasan is proving now and again.

  • srinideva on June 21, 2013, 6:15 GMT

    Fair decision, I don`t know why media is too much interested in this type of issue...Do you think he is going to interfere CSK termination in ICC meeting... Get a life and move on...#Politics #India

  • simpleguy2008 on June 21, 2013, 7:02 GMT

    Bad decision taken by BCCI for srinivasan to attend the meeting because the same problem DRS issue will come he will again say no to DRS which is not good for the game of cricket because other teams will be suffering without DRS so i think ICC shouldn't go with Srinivasan and they should implement the DRS in all test and one day cricket with 2 or 3 reviews and if BCCI threaten to do any stupid think let them do.

  • ladycricfan on June 21, 2013, 8:39 GMT

    To oppose drs is a collective decision taken by the bcci. Srinivasan or anybody from bcci who attend the icc meet will oppose drs. Drs is not perfect yet. Imagine if one review is wasted by an opening batsman in the odi, the rest 10 players will have to play without drs. What's the point in having an expensive technology if the umpires decisions are accepted 10/11 th of the match. Number of reviews should be increased. Why can't they use the drs everytime when a batsman is given out and 2 or 3 reviews allowed for the fielding side?

  • on June 21, 2013, 10:26 GMT

    Mr. Srinivasan attending the ICC meeting is a bad precedent. He was forced to step down from presidency of BCCI in view of conflict of interest and other issues raised recently. So till the correct picture does not emerge pending the enquiry, he should not have been allowed to attend the meeting .