|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
July 30, 2013
Letters written by two senior former BCCI officials to the petitioner in the Bombay High Court case have revealed how the appointment of the two-man inquiry commission, which cleared the owners of the Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals IPL franchises, followed a flawed process.
Replies from Sanjay Jagdale, former BCCI secretary, and Ajay Shirke, former treasurer, to Aditya Verma, the secretary of the Cricket Association of Bihar, on specific questions about the appointment of the panel reveal that the board had not followed the correct procedure under its constitution. The court, delivering its judgment on Verma's petition, ruled on Tuesday that the panel was constituted illegally.
Concerns about the committee were raised soon after its constitution on May 28. On May 26, Srinivasan had said that the probe panel would comprise an independent member and two out of a group of five people: Jagdale, Shirke, the then-IPL chairman Rajiv Shukla, BCCI vice-president and IPL governing council member Arun Jaitley, and governing council member Ravi Shastri.
On May 28, the BCCI issued a press release stating that the governing council had appointed a panel consisting of two retired judges from Tamil Nadu, T Jayaram Chouta and R Balasubramanian, and Jagdale.
However, in his reply to Verma, Jagdale said he had no knowledge of any governing council meeting on May 28. "I'm not aware of any such IPL GC meeting on May 28 2013 to appoint a three-member probe panel," Jagdale wrote. He added that in the evening of the same day, Ratnakar Shetty, the BCCI's game development general manager, had informed him over the telephone about the institution of the panel. Jagdale also stated he had received a letter, signed by Shetty, on May 30 about the panel's appointment.
Shirke, too, stated he was not aware of a governing council meeting having taken place in New Delhi on May 28. Like Jagdale, Shirke also said he did not know "who suggested the names of the two retired judges to be appointed on the three-member probe panel."
In June, ESPNcricinfo had learned that at least two members of the governing council were unaware of where and when the panel, originally comprising three members, had been set up. It was also learned that two other governing council members were called over the telephone to take their consent before the decision was announced.
Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfoFeeds: Nagraj Gollapudi
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
|Comments have now been closed for this article
Ishant Sharma has often been the butt of jokes, and sometimes deservedly so. Today, however, the joke was on England
The leave outside off stump has been critical to M Vijay's success since his India comeback last year. Contrary to popular opinion, such patience and self-denial comes naturally to him
They have to see a glass that is half-full, and play the game as if it is just that, a game; and an opportunity
Only 15 times in Test history has a player achieved the double of 300 runs and 20 wickets in a Test series. Going on current form, Bhuvneshwar could well be the 16th
In India's win at Lord's, Ishant Sharma took the best bowling figures by an Indian in the fourth innings of a Test outside Asia. Here are five other best bowling efforts by Indians in the fourth innings of Tests outside Asia
India's wretched run away from home began at Lord's in 2011. A young team full of self-belief may have brought it to an end with their victory at the same venue three years later
What's wrong with their cricket? Well, what isn't?
Why not you? Read and learn how!