India news May 30, 2014

BCCI keeps Afghanistan, Nepal waiting

18

The BCCI has kept the Afghanistan Cricket Board and Cricket Association of Nepal waiting for at least six months since receiving requests from both teams to use the training facilities and technical expertise in India.

While the BCCI has not tabled the proposals in any of its meetings, the two neighbours- whose teams have caught the imagination of the cricket world in the recent past- remain positive about a favourable reply from the BCCI. Both the ACB and CAN have been requesting the BCCI to help raise the profile of cricket in their respective countries, but despite their assurance of helping associate nations, the BCCI is yet to pay any heed to the requests.

"When I was in Mumbai for Sachin Tendulkar's 200th Test (in November 2013), I had a meeting with select BCCI officials and we expressed our desire to use the infrastructure and technical expertise in India that would help our players immensely," Dr Noor Murad, ACB chief executive, told ESPNcricinfo from UK. "So far, there has been no response. But we are optimistic that the BCCI will help our endeavour of raising the profile of the game in Afghanistan as well as help the international image of the country, which had been engulfed in war for so many years."

Ashok Nath Pyarkuryal, the CAN secretary, was also hopeful for a positive response from the BCCI. "Ever since the Asian Cricket Council in Malaysia last year, we have been requesting the BCCI to let us use the modern facilities and possibly allow some of our teams to participate in a few tournaments in India," Pyakuryal said. "We are waiting to hear from them. The CAN representative also reminded the BCCI officials about the same on the sidelines of the ACC finance committee meeting in Chennai earlier this week, and they have promised to look into it."

The BCCI has preferred to maintain a silence on the issue. Secretary Sanjay Patel said he did not "wish to comment" on the issue since it was an internal matter of the BCCI. However, ESPNcricinfo understands that never in the last six months have these requests been put before the working committee to allow the decision-making body of the BCCI to decide on whether or not they should lend a helping hand. It is believed that a few high-ranking BCCI officials are averse to the idea of letting the game grow beyond the Full Members.

Murad, though, is still hopeful that the BCCI will help out Afghanistan. "Had it not been for the BCCI's initiative, Afghanistan would not have been included in the Asia Cup," he said. "Ours is a unique case in the world of cricket, and with the situation that we are dealing with back home, we hope that BCCI helps us out like a big brother. In fact, we have also been pursuing this matter with the Indian Embassy in Afghanistan and the ambassador has promised us help."

Till last year, many touring teams used to travel to various state associations and private academies to hone their skills. However, ever since the England Lions trained at the Dr DY Patil Sport Academy in Mumbai during India's home series against England in 2012, paving a way for some of the injured England players to regain fitness, the BCCI has disallowed any of its members to host overseas teams without prior permission from the parent body.

Focusing their attention towards developing nations has been one of the biggest talking points in the proposed ICC financial restructuring - planned by the board of India, England and Australia - that would come into effect in June. However, many of the Associate members have expressed concerns on whether the remodeling would be in their favour.

After the ACC finance committee earlier this week, ACC chief exectuvie Ashraful Haque had emphasized on the scope for development in countries like Afghanistan and Nepal.

"There is so much talent in Afghanistan," Haque told the Hindu . "Nepal is another country with tremendous potential for growth. If you see, four of the six non-Test playing teams in the 2014 World T20 came from Asia. They were Afghanistan, Nepal, UAE and Hong Kong. In the 2015 ODI World Cup, two of the four non-Test playing teams, Afghanistan and UAE, will be from Asia.

"The scope for development of cricket in Afghanistan, Nepal and China is tremendous since the ethnic population plays and supports the game there. In countries such as the UAE and Hong Kong, the expatriates play the game."

Amol Karhadkar is a correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • pradeep_dealwis on June 1, 2014, 16:56 GMT

    Both teams have used SL facilities and expertise before and are most welcome to continue to do so.

  • agupta429 on June 1, 2014, 13:31 GMT

    Iam Indian, our facilities arent great. Indian players themselves go to Australia for pace training etc. maybe a season or 2 in the Ranji might help.

  • himmat on June 1, 2014, 9:59 GMT

    CAN should rather go to Australia or England because they have better facilities than what india can really provide , TBH !!! If BCCI really cares about CAN and ACB they would have said so earlier......I really hope Australian Cricket or England Cricket help instead of india !!!!

  • mjrvasu on June 1, 2014, 9:31 GMT

    What is the problem in letting the upcoming countries to use the facilities available in India?

  • on June 1, 2014, 6:45 GMT

    India has always given a cold shoulder to the ACB,s request for help.India has been very generous in helping Afghanistan in other fields but I don,t know why they refuse to help in developing cricket in Afghanistan. Are they jealous of the talent of Afghan cricketers or they fear that if they help Afghanistan, they will become their tough opponent like Pakistan in future? come on ICB!!! If cricket is developed in Afghanistan with your help ,the credit will go to you too...................

  • rustyryan on May 31, 2014, 18:26 GMT

    One of the main reasons for monopolizing Cricket might be due to the revenue from advertisement and sponsors.. By having fewer high quality teams, the big three can be remunerated for most of the financial profits. Look at Football.. La Liga makes almost as much revenue as of BPL.. If this goes, after certain extent, only five elite teams would be playing with each other and soon the sport will become extinct.. For God Sake, appoint players lik Dravid as the chief of ICC who's more concerned about the game than the revenue.. Had he been at the top of BCCI, the associates will have one less reason to worry about..

  • getsetgopk on May 31, 2014, 18:19 GMT

    A quote from the article rightly sums it all up. "It is believed that a few high-ranking BCCI officials are averse to the idea of letting the game grow beyond the Full Members." But I guess BCCI is wrong in assuming that they actually can restrict cricket to a select few countries. It is a sport, it will grow, whether you like it or not or whether you lend a helping hand or not but for the time being it is nice to know the intentions of India.

  • on May 31, 2014, 14:40 GMT

    India must support Afghanistan because they have historical good relation. As ICC full member India must support raising associate nations specially Afghanistan to become full members in the next years and they must support Nepal as well to qualify for next world cup in 2018.

  • challagalla on May 31, 2014, 12:07 GMT

    Every one wants to see cricket become bigger and better. We all want more countries playing cricket and the onus is on BCCI to encourage our neighboring countries . I would also recommend ACB and CAN to be allowed to participate in the Ranji trophy . I think ages ago Sri Lanka used to play in the Ranji trophy until they developed their game.

  • sradip on May 31, 2014, 5:37 GMT

    i hope BCCI will support its neighboring country Nepal and afghanistan as they supported bangladesh and sri lanka during their early days............

  • pradeep_dealwis on June 1, 2014, 16:56 GMT

    Both teams have used SL facilities and expertise before and are most welcome to continue to do so.

  • agupta429 on June 1, 2014, 13:31 GMT

    Iam Indian, our facilities arent great. Indian players themselves go to Australia for pace training etc. maybe a season or 2 in the Ranji might help.

  • himmat on June 1, 2014, 9:59 GMT

    CAN should rather go to Australia or England because they have better facilities than what india can really provide , TBH !!! If BCCI really cares about CAN and ACB they would have said so earlier......I really hope Australian Cricket or England Cricket help instead of india !!!!

  • mjrvasu on June 1, 2014, 9:31 GMT

    What is the problem in letting the upcoming countries to use the facilities available in India?

  • on June 1, 2014, 6:45 GMT

    India has always given a cold shoulder to the ACB,s request for help.India has been very generous in helping Afghanistan in other fields but I don,t know why they refuse to help in developing cricket in Afghanistan. Are they jealous of the talent of Afghan cricketers or they fear that if they help Afghanistan, they will become their tough opponent like Pakistan in future? come on ICB!!! If cricket is developed in Afghanistan with your help ,the credit will go to you too...................

  • rustyryan on May 31, 2014, 18:26 GMT

    One of the main reasons for monopolizing Cricket might be due to the revenue from advertisement and sponsors.. By having fewer high quality teams, the big three can be remunerated for most of the financial profits. Look at Football.. La Liga makes almost as much revenue as of BPL.. If this goes, after certain extent, only five elite teams would be playing with each other and soon the sport will become extinct.. For God Sake, appoint players lik Dravid as the chief of ICC who's more concerned about the game than the revenue.. Had he been at the top of BCCI, the associates will have one less reason to worry about..

  • getsetgopk on May 31, 2014, 18:19 GMT

    A quote from the article rightly sums it all up. "It is believed that a few high-ranking BCCI officials are averse to the idea of letting the game grow beyond the Full Members." But I guess BCCI is wrong in assuming that they actually can restrict cricket to a select few countries. It is a sport, it will grow, whether you like it or not or whether you lend a helping hand or not but for the time being it is nice to know the intentions of India.

  • on May 31, 2014, 14:40 GMT

    India must support Afghanistan because they have historical good relation. As ICC full member India must support raising associate nations specially Afghanistan to become full members in the next years and they must support Nepal as well to qualify for next world cup in 2018.

  • challagalla on May 31, 2014, 12:07 GMT

    Every one wants to see cricket become bigger and better. We all want more countries playing cricket and the onus is on BCCI to encourage our neighboring countries . I would also recommend ACB and CAN to be allowed to participate in the Ranji trophy . I think ages ago Sri Lanka used to play in the Ranji trophy until they developed their game.

  • sradip on May 31, 2014, 5:37 GMT

    i hope BCCI will support its neighboring country Nepal and afghanistan as they supported bangladesh and sri lanka during their early days............

  • on May 31, 2014, 5:17 GMT

    I appreciate bcci initiative. Their main focus is for world cup 2015 which is held on australia and new zealnd.

  • Arif_Khan_Bangladeshi on May 31, 2014, 3:54 GMT

    Wow, this is a shocker, NOT. Even in the past, the Afghan board stated that India was unwilling to assist them. Their repeated requests were met with silence or delay. Instead of wasting time, they should go towards Pakistan and Bangladesh, countries who have always allowed Afghans to lean on them.

  • Desihungama on May 31, 2014, 3:28 GMT

    Sending A team to Bangladesh, Keeping upcoming teams Afghanistan and Nepal away. So this is how Big 3 were supposed to lead.

  • nursery_ender on May 30, 2014, 20:15 GMT

    Posted by Dinesh Basnet on (May 30, 2014, 17:09 GMT) " Why wouldn't India want cricket to be developed in Nepal and Afghanistan? What are the possible negative consequences for India? I can't think of any.

    Embarrassing defeats?

  • Cpt.Meanster on May 30, 2014, 19:04 GMT

    I hope the BCCI does the right thing and encourages players from both countries to make use of facilities in India. I would go one step further and allow players from both nations to even play in the Ranji Trophy. India should be what England is by allowing players from neighbouring countries to play in its first class system. That would only make Indian domestic cricket even more powerful and interesting to watch. Please make it happen as the world most powerful cricket board.

  • on May 30, 2014, 17:09 GMT

    "Focusing their attention towards developing nations has been one of the biggest talking points in the proposed ICC financial restructuring - planned by the board of India, England and Australia - that would come into effect in June."

    Why are only 3 teams involved in the finances of ICC? Why wouldn't India want cricket to be developed in Nepal and Afghanistan? What are the possible negative consequences for India? I can't think of any.

  • on May 30, 2014, 16:27 GMT

    " It is believed that a few high-ranking BCCI officials are averse to the idea of letting the game grow beyond the Full Members." This very line irks me. It is really disappointing to know that one of cricket's premier nations is unwilling to expand the game. The ICC revamp has given the BCCI much more power. If they continue to exploit it for their own benefit, and do not try to further build the game, I fear the future. Yet, there is hope. Just like Afghanistan and Nepal and many associates, we cricket fans can only hope that the BCCI together with ECB and CA will make cricket into much bigger, better and entertaining sport, more than it can ever be.

  • chucking_thug800_wickets on May 30, 2014, 15:05 GMT

    BCCI should not hesitate for even a second. it will help the game grow. and Nepal and Afghanistan team to gain competitive exposure. plus, the goodwill it will create in both the countries will be very positive thing.. Act swift. and let our afghan and nepali brothers get the much required facilities.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • chucking_thug800_wickets on May 30, 2014, 15:05 GMT

    BCCI should not hesitate for even a second. it will help the game grow. and Nepal and Afghanistan team to gain competitive exposure. plus, the goodwill it will create in both the countries will be very positive thing.. Act swift. and let our afghan and nepali brothers get the much required facilities.

  • on May 30, 2014, 16:27 GMT

    " It is believed that a few high-ranking BCCI officials are averse to the idea of letting the game grow beyond the Full Members." This very line irks me. It is really disappointing to know that one of cricket's premier nations is unwilling to expand the game. The ICC revamp has given the BCCI much more power. If they continue to exploit it for their own benefit, and do not try to further build the game, I fear the future. Yet, there is hope. Just like Afghanistan and Nepal and many associates, we cricket fans can only hope that the BCCI together with ECB and CA will make cricket into much bigger, better and entertaining sport, more than it can ever be.

  • on May 30, 2014, 17:09 GMT

    "Focusing their attention towards developing nations has been one of the biggest talking points in the proposed ICC financial restructuring - planned by the board of India, England and Australia - that would come into effect in June."

    Why are only 3 teams involved in the finances of ICC? Why wouldn't India want cricket to be developed in Nepal and Afghanistan? What are the possible negative consequences for India? I can't think of any.

  • Cpt.Meanster on May 30, 2014, 19:04 GMT

    I hope the BCCI does the right thing and encourages players from both countries to make use of facilities in India. I would go one step further and allow players from both nations to even play in the Ranji Trophy. India should be what England is by allowing players from neighbouring countries to play in its first class system. That would only make Indian domestic cricket even more powerful and interesting to watch. Please make it happen as the world most powerful cricket board.

  • nursery_ender on May 30, 2014, 20:15 GMT

    Posted by Dinesh Basnet on (May 30, 2014, 17:09 GMT) " Why wouldn't India want cricket to be developed in Nepal and Afghanistan? What are the possible negative consequences for India? I can't think of any.

    Embarrassing defeats?

  • Desihungama on May 31, 2014, 3:28 GMT

    Sending A team to Bangladesh, Keeping upcoming teams Afghanistan and Nepal away. So this is how Big 3 were supposed to lead.

  • Arif_Khan_Bangladeshi on May 31, 2014, 3:54 GMT

    Wow, this is a shocker, NOT. Even in the past, the Afghan board stated that India was unwilling to assist them. Their repeated requests were met with silence or delay. Instead of wasting time, they should go towards Pakistan and Bangladesh, countries who have always allowed Afghans to lean on them.

  • on May 31, 2014, 5:17 GMT

    I appreciate bcci initiative. Their main focus is for world cup 2015 which is held on australia and new zealnd.

  • sradip on May 31, 2014, 5:37 GMT

    i hope BCCI will support its neighboring country Nepal and afghanistan as they supported bangladesh and sri lanka during their early days............

  • challagalla on May 31, 2014, 12:07 GMT

    Every one wants to see cricket become bigger and better. We all want more countries playing cricket and the onus is on BCCI to encourage our neighboring countries . I would also recommend ACB and CAN to be allowed to participate in the Ranji trophy . I think ages ago Sri Lanka used to play in the Ranji trophy until they developed their game.