IPL 2012 performance analysis May 8, 2012

Foreign players leave huge impact

An analysis of team-wise batting and bowling performances in IPL 2012
23

The ESPNcricinfo performance analysis, which was primarily used to analyse individual batting and bowling performances in the IPL, can be extended to measure similar parameters for each team. As the tournament nears its business end, a team-wise performance analysis throws up some interesting results. Some teams have been relying heavily on the form of Indian players while some others have tasted success due to the exploits of overseas players. A detailed study of batting performances is an accurate indicator of the form of the top and middle-order batsmen in each team, and together with a similar analysis of bowling performances, it helps provide a better understanding of team composition.

The performance of the teams has been analysed in two different periods. The first phase involves all matches played between the start of the tournament and April 19. The second phase analyses all matches played from April 20 to May 6. At first glance, one can observe that nearly all teams have done much better on the batting front in the second period. In the first period, Rajasthan Royals were the only team who managed to start well with the bat. Ajinkya Rahane and Owais Shah were terrific at the start of the tournament and this is clearly reflected in the table. Royals' average points (11.77) in the first period, is well above the average for the tournament (8.12) and comfortably ahead of second-placed Delhi Daredevils (9.38). Batsmen in the Kolkata Knight Riders and Mumbai Indians teams struggled to compile high scores on slow pitches and hence have a much lower average score. Kings XI Punjab had mixed success in the beginning of the IPL and failed to post big scores. Their average in the period (5.90) is the lowest among all teams.

In the second phase of the IPL, when bat has almost always dominated the ball, four teams have an average score above ten with Royal Challengers Bangalore on top with 11.85 points. Royal Challengers boast an outstanding batting line-up with Chris Gayle and AB de Villiers in prime form and it is not surprising that they have the maximum number of innings in the list of top-50 performances. Mumbai Indians and Chennai Super Kings have not quite been able to repeat their run in previous years this time round and have an average score lower than the corresponding number for the tournament. While every top knock (top-50 performance) for Royal Challengers has been scored by a foreign player, the case is quite the opposite for Daredevils and Knight Riders for whom Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir have been the most prolific.

All stats updated till the end of the matches on May 6, 2012

Team batting analysis in IPL 2012
Team Avg points (Apr 4 - Apr 19) Avg points (Apr 20 - May 6)  Overall avg points Inns in top 50 (Indian player/foreign player)
Deccan Chargers 8.10 9.79 9.03 1/5
Delhi Daredevils 9.38 11.61 10.58 5/2
Kings XI Punjab 5.90 8.94 7.45 0/3
Kolkata Knight Riders 7.05 10.48 8.21 5/0
Mumbai Indians 7.71 7.57 7.63 3/3
Royal Challengers Bangalore 7.20 11.85 9.18 0/9
Rajasthan Royals 11.77 10.72 11.31 3/3
Chennai Super Kings 9.06 8.57 8.84 0/3
Pune Warriors 7.70 9.88 8.70 2/3
Overall 8.12 9.73 8.88 19/31

On the bowling front, the points difference between the top-ranked team (Mumbai Indians) and the lowest-ranked team (Super Kings) in the first phase is nearly as much as the corresponding difference in the batting. All three teams with more than 20 points in the first phase have experienced a fall in the score in the second phase. While the average points (overall) in the second phase is lower than the corresponding number in the first, Kings XI and Super Kings have managed to improve on their score in the first phase. The contrast in performances (top-50 performances) of Indian and foreign players is not as vast as in the case of batting. Dale Steyn has been outstanding for Chargers while his South African fast-bowling partner Morne Morkel has had a similar influence for Daredevils. Lasith Malinga, the leading wicket-taker across the five seasons of the IPL, has been regularly ranked on top of the list of best bowlers in the ESPNcricinfo analysis. He, along with Kieron Pollard, has five performances in the top 50. Kings XI are the only team to have a significant number of top-50 performances by Indian players (6) including two each by Parvinder Awana and Piyush Chawla.

Team bowling analysis in IPL 2012
Team Avg points (Apr 4 - Apr 19) Avg points (Apr 20 - May 6)
Overall avg points Avg points per match Spells in top 50 (Indian bowlers/foreign bowlers)
Deccan Chargers 17.88 16.38 16.94 103.37 1/3
Delhi Daredevils 20.69 17.42 19.08 108.79 3/2
Kings XI Punjab 18.57 18.75 18.67 105.25 6/4
Kolkata Knight Riders 17.17 18.53 17.73 108.16 2/4
Mumbai Indians 20.76 17.20 18.71 112.30 4/7
Royal Challengers Bangalore 17.31 16.98 17.14 101.17 2/2
Rajasthan Royals 20.20 17.24 18.87 106.37 2/1
Chennai Super Kings 14.82 15.56 15.16 99.25 1/2
Pune Warriors 18.61 16.09 17.35 104.11 2/2
Overall 18.32 17.07 17.69 105.40 23/27

The highlight of the batting analysis by position is the difference in performance of the two opening batsmen. While the strike batsman (No.1) has an average score of 10.26, the non-strike batsman (No.2) has a much higher average score (17.21). Given the form of Gayle and Sehwag, who both have five performances in the top-50, it is no surprise that the difference between the No.2 and No.1 batsmen is the highest for Royal Challengers and Daredevils. Kings XI and Pune Warriors have both struggled for consistency at the top of the order while Faf du Plessis has proved to be the saving grace for Super Kings. The overall average for the No.3 position is second only to that of the No.2 position. Cameron White, who has made three seventy-plus scores so far in the tournament, has been chiefly responsible for the high average at No.3 for Chargers. Kevin Pietersen's departure is likely to bring down Daredevils' average score for the No.3 position, In sharp contrast, Royal Challengers have the lowest average at the position because of Virat Kohli's run of poor scores. With Sehwag and Pietersen doing the bulk of the scoring, Daredevils' middle-order has hardly been tested and their average scores at No.4 and No.5 are among the lowest. Although Royals and Super Kings have strong middle-order performances, de Villiers' stunning knocks have ensured that Royal Challengers have the highest average score at No.5. Steven Smith's superb form has ensured that Warriors have a far higher average than all teams at the crucial No.6 position. Overall, the No.2 and No.3 positions have contributed the most scores to the list of top-50 performances (24 and 10 respectively).

Batting analysis based on batting position (average points)
Team 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Deccan Chargers 7.19 19.58 22.15 12.32 5.91 4.33 0.13
Delhi Daredevils 6.70 26.70 21.37 3.14 3.82 2.35 8.27
Kings XI Punjab 11.49 6.70 14.82 12.17 5.00 4.77 4.77
Kolkata Knight Riders 12.78 19.31 10.60 8.04 1.99 4.04 6.19
Mumbai Indians 10.69 8.86 14.89 8.88 11.16 5.57 3.66
Royal Challengers Bangalore 10.05 25.97 6.96 5.29 17.25 4.74 1.14
Rajasthan Royals 16.51 20.63 12.74 10.92 13.15 4.06 1.86
Chennai Super Kings 11.57 14.48 12.22 10.52 11.85 2.88 8.54
Pune Warriors 5.41 14.92 8.75 14.73 6.50 16.38 6.33
Overall avg 10.26 17.21 13.86 9.71 8.76 5.60 4.60
No of inns in top 50 5 24 10 5 5 0 1

Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan is a sub-editor (stats) at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • BellCurve on May 11, 2012, 8:20 GMT

    If you combine batting and bowling the ratio is 42/58. If you then consider the player ratio is 7/4 and that there are 9 teams in the competition - if follows that the ratio of top 50 performances per playe is 0.67/1.61. In other words, a foreign player is 2.41x more likely to produce a top 50 performence than a local player. Now why is that? Afterall, the locals do benefit from local condition.

  • on May 10, 2012, 22:51 GMT

    Shocking to see Deccan chargers at the top of each analysis !!

  • on May 10, 2012, 21:26 GMT

    One fallacy the analysis overlooks is that most international players bat in the top order (they are certain to get to bat), while international bowlers get their full quota of 4 overs, even for B-grade internationals like James Franklin or Daniel Harris. The domestic players on the other hand get to bat when the top order fails which means the team is under pressure, and the bowlers have to share overs between them which means lesser opportunity of getting wickets. So the analysis is a bit biased in my opinion.

  • RajCSK on May 10, 2012, 9:48 GMT

    Yes , IPL is like a bollywood movie. Mostly about batsman and the maximums. In other word the bowlers are the real back bone of the IPL. But if you watch IPL daily ....then it is a over dose, you tend to have a feeling that 'why every shot is a great shot and why the commentator is screaming on his lungs'. Too much is never a good idea. But if you watch only one team's matches alone then its a fantastic entertainer. Just a 15 games in two months. SO.. IPL is great achievement of BCCI. No doubt about that.

  • SnowSnake on May 10, 2012, 1:07 GMT

    I find this whole analysis useless. What do you really expect, foreign players not performing well? All foreign players are active international cricket players that are selected in limited 4 player slot for a team. Naturally there is higher competition for foreign player slot than Indian player slot (7 indian players). Further, Indian players that play international cricket are divided among 8 teams. Also, foreign players are better rested due to limited slots and are more frequently rotated than indian players. The results are to be expected.

  • fr600 on May 10, 2012, 0:29 GMT

    Compare performances of foreign players against the locals and see the difference.

  • Aussasinator on May 9, 2012, 18:49 GMT

    well said. its all about foreigners.

  • Hayat22 on May 9, 2012, 17:55 GMT

    @ Noball Specialist, There was that Stanford event, in UK but it wasn't successful. the truth is, the glamour quotient has worked to take IPL to the non cricketing viewers atleast initially,and may have created new fans.Since IPL India has had substantial success in the limited overs version, atleast it won the ODI WC, so aside from the commercial success atleast it has created an attacking mind set and made the team more adept at handling high pressure situations in limited overs cricket.Now there is an argument often made that the test matches recently have been a disaster,and IPL has to be blamed!But then even without the IPL a stage would have come when the big guns of Indian Test cricket would have retired and the transition begun,and we would have seen this play out.That d players were not groomed when the seniors were reasonably successful,has come to bite.That's not IPl's fault.It only showcases talent, that needs grooming.The contest has often been good b/n bat&ball this time.

  • luks on May 9, 2012, 16:32 GMT

    KingOwl: ok, I'm willing to compromise. T20 is not "just" glorified radomness, it is "mostly" glorified randomness. Agree?

  • montys_muse on May 9, 2012, 15:48 GMT

    I dont know how many times the IPL Organising Committee need to make it clear that its an Indian league basically, and the reason to have a four-foreign players cap is to give exposure to local Indian talent on a stage equivalent to international cricket. There have for sure been a few good finds for Team India through this.

  • BellCurve on May 11, 2012, 8:20 GMT

    If you combine batting and bowling the ratio is 42/58. If you then consider the player ratio is 7/4 and that there are 9 teams in the competition - if follows that the ratio of top 50 performances per playe is 0.67/1.61. In other words, a foreign player is 2.41x more likely to produce a top 50 performence than a local player. Now why is that? Afterall, the locals do benefit from local condition.

  • on May 10, 2012, 22:51 GMT

    Shocking to see Deccan chargers at the top of each analysis !!

  • on May 10, 2012, 21:26 GMT

    One fallacy the analysis overlooks is that most international players bat in the top order (they are certain to get to bat), while international bowlers get their full quota of 4 overs, even for B-grade internationals like James Franklin or Daniel Harris. The domestic players on the other hand get to bat when the top order fails which means the team is under pressure, and the bowlers have to share overs between them which means lesser opportunity of getting wickets. So the analysis is a bit biased in my opinion.

  • RajCSK on May 10, 2012, 9:48 GMT

    Yes , IPL is like a bollywood movie. Mostly about batsman and the maximums. In other word the bowlers are the real back bone of the IPL. But if you watch IPL daily ....then it is a over dose, you tend to have a feeling that 'why every shot is a great shot and why the commentator is screaming on his lungs'. Too much is never a good idea. But if you watch only one team's matches alone then its a fantastic entertainer. Just a 15 games in two months. SO.. IPL is great achievement of BCCI. No doubt about that.

  • SnowSnake on May 10, 2012, 1:07 GMT

    I find this whole analysis useless. What do you really expect, foreign players not performing well? All foreign players are active international cricket players that are selected in limited 4 player slot for a team. Naturally there is higher competition for foreign player slot than Indian player slot (7 indian players). Further, Indian players that play international cricket are divided among 8 teams. Also, foreign players are better rested due to limited slots and are more frequently rotated than indian players. The results are to be expected.

  • fr600 on May 10, 2012, 0:29 GMT

    Compare performances of foreign players against the locals and see the difference.

  • Aussasinator on May 9, 2012, 18:49 GMT

    well said. its all about foreigners.

  • Hayat22 on May 9, 2012, 17:55 GMT

    @ Noball Specialist, There was that Stanford event, in UK but it wasn't successful. the truth is, the glamour quotient has worked to take IPL to the non cricketing viewers atleast initially,and may have created new fans.Since IPL India has had substantial success in the limited overs version, atleast it won the ODI WC, so aside from the commercial success atleast it has created an attacking mind set and made the team more adept at handling high pressure situations in limited overs cricket.Now there is an argument often made that the test matches recently have been a disaster,and IPL has to be blamed!But then even without the IPL a stage would have come when the big guns of Indian Test cricket would have retired and the transition begun,and we would have seen this play out.That d players were not groomed when the seniors were reasonably successful,has come to bite.That's not IPl's fault.It only showcases talent, that needs grooming.The contest has often been good b/n bat&ball this time.

  • luks on May 9, 2012, 16:32 GMT

    KingOwl: ok, I'm willing to compromise. T20 is not "just" glorified radomness, it is "mostly" glorified randomness. Agree?

  • montys_muse on May 9, 2012, 15:48 GMT

    I dont know how many times the IPL Organising Committee need to make it clear that its an Indian league basically, and the reason to have a four-foreign players cap is to give exposure to local Indian talent on a stage equivalent to international cricket. There have for sure been a few good finds for Team India through this.

  • on May 9, 2012, 13:24 GMT

    @ KingOwl , malinga didnt played the 1st edition of ipl, he missed it due to inquiry

  • StatisticsRocks on May 9, 2012, 12:55 GMT

    I agree with some of you posting like @Niick, @Farce-Follower, and @Noball_Specialist. Some of the local talents are so bad that even I won't take them in my club cricket. Why the limit on the international players (I don't like the word foriegn or alien). If India truly wants to identify talents that can compete at the international level then remove this limit and let each young aspiring cricketer compete for the playing 11 agnst quality competition. Let them know it is no joke to play at the intl. level and improve their skill level and their fitness. Indn cricketers barring a very few are not fit to play at the intl. level. Just coz of the star culture that prevails in our country some players know no matter how bad they perform their position in the team is guaranteed.

  • Pablo123 on May 9, 2012, 10:58 GMT

    Well it all makes sense, that is why they are bought in the first place. They simply have to perform !

  • KingOwl on May 9, 2012, 10:57 GMT

    Luks: T20 is not just glorified radomness. Malinga has been consistently #1 throughout 5 series. That is because he is the greatest T20 bowler around.

  • SanjivAwesome on May 9, 2012, 10:52 GMT

    I don't get this analysis.

  • Jaipal13 on May 9, 2012, 10:46 GMT

    U should have included how many overseas batsmen playing at the top of the order......most of the teams choosing 2 batsmen+1 all rounder+1 bowler formula (some teams going with 1+2+1 and some with 3+1)....This is also one of the reason why Indian player foreign player ratios is 19/31. And the other reason is young guns like virat,raina,Vijay,Manoj, Sourabh, pathan, uttappa, Manish are not firing like they expected.

  • Noball_Specialist on May 9, 2012, 9:45 GMT

    As soon as someone makes a league where each team can have an unlimited amount of foreign players per team. That will become the ultimate league. IPL in my own opinion suffers from the foreign player cap - limiting its appeal to indian audiences. The UK and the ECB stand the best chance of making a league like that a success, but are managed by incompetancy who seem to be unwilling to let anything in the way of their precious Ashes series (after series after series). Viewing the IPL is similar to viewing a Bollywood movie. A lot of glam, flash, bang and superstar worship, but lacking in true substance. Not to mention Shastri and Gavaskar eclaiming every shot is the best that they've ever seen. 20.20 devalues the game by making Bowlers nothing but a means to get a batsmen to hit a six. Pressure is always short lived and fizzles out over the course of a couple of overs.

  • on May 9, 2012, 9:22 GMT

    what does he mean by average points. i didnt understand any by these numbers referring to averages

  • luks on May 9, 2012, 8:16 GMT

    Why did my comment not get posted? Let me sanitize it, even though my post wasn't out of the bounds. This article is like trying to find patterns amid randomness. T20 itself is nothing more than glorified randomness.

  • Farce-Follower on May 9, 2012, 7:45 GMT

    Evident in the continuing useless performances from Virat Kohli, Tiwary, Mayank Aggarwal and Vinay Kumar. They know very well that the cupboard is bare and they cannot get sacked. Kohli has been the biggest flop in this year's IPL. He is not fit to represent even a Namibia B team. He is fortunate to be playing for RCB, where he tries his best to lose matches.

  • addicted_to_chaos on May 9, 2012, 6:08 GMT

    What a waste of time n efforts........ who cares!!!...... from a quick glance at last chart, it look Deccan Chargers must be doing good, and Pune had solid middle order performance......... also KKR & Delhi look very vulnerable.....

    What is the point???

  • Niick on May 8, 2012, 18:43 GMT

    "Foreign players leave huge impact" either that or there is a huge chasm in the quality of domestic players that's turning out for each of these teams.

  • Alexk400 on May 8, 2012, 18:20 GMT

    it shows delhi has weakest middle order in the league. 4,5,6 scores nothing.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Alexk400 on May 8, 2012, 18:20 GMT

    it shows delhi has weakest middle order in the league. 4,5,6 scores nothing.

  • Niick on May 8, 2012, 18:43 GMT

    "Foreign players leave huge impact" either that or there is a huge chasm in the quality of domestic players that's turning out for each of these teams.

  • addicted_to_chaos on May 9, 2012, 6:08 GMT

    What a waste of time n efforts........ who cares!!!...... from a quick glance at last chart, it look Deccan Chargers must be doing good, and Pune had solid middle order performance......... also KKR & Delhi look very vulnerable.....

    What is the point???

  • Farce-Follower on May 9, 2012, 7:45 GMT

    Evident in the continuing useless performances from Virat Kohli, Tiwary, Mayank Aggarwal and Vinay Kumar. They know very well that the cupboard is bare and they cannot get sacked. Kohli has been the biggest flop in this year's IPL. He is not fit to represent even a Namibia B team. He is fortunate to be playing for RCB, where he tries his best to lose matches.

  • luks on May 9, 2012, 8:16 GMT

    Why did my comment not get posted? Let me sanitize it, even though my post wasn't out of the bounds. This article is like trying to find patterns amid randomness. T20 itself is nothing more than glorified randomness.

  • on May 9, 2012, 9:22 GMT

    what does he mean by average points. i didnt understand any by these numbers referring to averages

  • Noball_Specialist on May 9, 2012, 9:45 GMT

    As soon as someone makes a league where each team can have an unlimited amount of foreign players per team. That will become the ultimate league. IPL in my own opinion suffers from the foreign player cap - limiting its appeal to indian audiences. The UK and the ECB stand the best chance of making a league like that a success, but are managed by incompetancy who seem to be unwilling to let anything in the way of their precious Ashes series (after series after series). Viewing the IPL is similar to viewing a Bollywood movie. A lot of glam, flash, bang and superstar worship, but lacking in true substance. Not to mention Shastri and Gavaskar eclaiming every shot is the best that they've ever seen. 20.20 devalues the game by making Bowlers nothing but a means to get a batsmen to hit a six. Pressure is always short lived and fizzles out over the course of a couple of overs.

  • Jaipal13 on May 9, 2012, 10:46 GMT

    U should have included how many overseas batsmen playing at the top of the order......most of the teams choosing 2 batsmen+1 all rounder+1 bowler formula (some teams going with 1+2+1 and some with 3+1)....This is also one of the reason why Indian player foreign player ratios is 19/31. And the other reason is young guns like virat,raina,Vijay,Manoj, Sourabh, pathan, uttappa, Manish are not firing like they expected.

  • SanjivAwesome on May 9, 2012, 10:52 GMT

    I don't get this analysis.

  • KingOwl on May 9, 2012, 10:57 GMT

    Luks: T20 is not just glorified radomness. Malinga has been consistently #1 throughout 5 series. That is because he is the greatest T20 bowler around.